惯性聚合 高效追踪和阅读你感兴趣的博客、新闻、科技资讯
阅读原文 在惯性聚合中打开

推荐订阅源

WordPress大学
WordPress大学
J
Java Code Geeks
Cyber Security Advisories - MS-ISAC
Cyber Security Advisories - MS-ISAC
钛媒体:引领未来商业与生活新知
钛媒体:引领未来商业与生活新知
腾讯CDC
IT之家
IT之家
罗磊的独立博客
酷 壳 – CoolShell
酷 壳 – CoolShell
U
Unit 42
爱范儿
爱范儿
博客园 - 聂微东
F
Fortinet All Blogs
V
Visual Studio Blog
Blog — PlanetScale
Blog — PlanetScale
G
Google Developers Blog
aimingoo的专栏
aimingoo的专栏
L
LangChain Blog
雷峰网
雷峰网
B
Blog RSS Feed
宝玉的分享
宝玉的分享
T
Tailwind CSS Blog
奇客Solidot–传递最新科技情报
奇客Solidot–传递最新科技情报
Engineering at Meta
Engineering at Meta
H
Hackread – Cybersecurity News, Data Breaches, AI and More

cs.CR updates on arXiv.org

Agentic Vulnerability Reasoning on Windows COM Binaries From Beats to Breaches:How Offensive AI Infers Sensitive User Information from Playlists Undetectable Backdoors in Model Parameters: Hiding Sparse Secrets in High Dimensions When Embedding-Based Defenses Fail: Rethinking Safety in LLM-Based Multi-Agent Systems Token-Efficient Change Detection in LLM APIs Selfie-Capture Dynamics as an Auxiliary Signal Against Deepfakes and Injection Attacks for Mobile Identity Verification Trident: Improving Malware Detection with LLMs and Behavioral Features When Alignment Isn't Enough: Response-Path Attacks on LLM Agents RefusalGuard: Geometry-Preserving Fine-Tuning for Safety in LLMs Checkerboard: A Simple, Effective, Efficient and Learning-free Clean Label Backdoor Attack with Low Poisoning Budget Block-wise Codeword Embedding for Reliable Multi-bit Text Watermarking Secret Stealing Attacks on Local LLM Fine-Tuning through Supply-Chain Model Code Backdoors Enhancing Linux Privilege Escalation Attack Capabilities of Local LLM Agents Defusing the Trigger: Plug-and-Play Defense for Backdoored LLMs via Tail-Risk Intrinsic Geometric Smoothing Evaluating Jailbreaking Vulnerabilities in LLMs Deployed as Assistants for Smart Grid Operations: A Benchmark Against NERC Standards Behavioral Canaries: Auditing Private Retrieved Context Usage in RL Fine-Tuning FlexServe: A Fast and Secure LLM Serving System for Mobile Devices with Flexible Resource Isolation Breaking MCP with Function Hijacking Attacks: Novel Threats for Function Calling and Agentic Models Text Steganography with Dynamic Codebook and Multimodal Large Language Model An AI Agent Execution Environment to Safeguard User Data TwoHamsters: Benchmarking Multi-Concept Compositional Unsafety in Text-to-Image Models Fundamental Limitations of Favorable Privacy-Utility Guarantees for DP-SGD Symbolic Guardrails for Domain-Specific Agents: Stronger Safety and Security Guarantees Without Sacrificing Utility Hardening x402: PII-Safe Agentic Payments via Pre-Execution Metadata Filtering QShield: Securing Neural Networks Against Adversarial Attacks using Quantum Circuits Hijacking Text Heritage: Hiding the Human Signature through Homoglyphic Substitution Like a Hammer, It Can Build, It Can Break: Large Language Model Uses, Perceptions, and Adoption in Cybersecurity Operations on Reddit Private Seeds, Public LLMs: Realistic and Privacy-Preserving Synthetic Data Generation One Word at a Time: Incremental Completion Decomposition Breaks LLM Safety Measuring and Exploiting Contextual Bias in LLM-Assisted Security Code Review
Gradual Release of Sensitive Data under Differential Privacy
Fragkiskos Koufogiannis, Shuo Han, George J. Pappas · 2015-04-02 · via cs.CR updates on arXiv.org

We introduce the problem of releasing sensitive data under differential privacy when the privacy level is subject to change over time. Existing work assumes that privacy level is determined by the system designer as a fixed value before sensitive data is released. For certain applications, however, users may wish to relax the privacy level for subsequent releases of the same data after either a re-evaluation of the privacy concerns or the need for better accuracy. Specifically, given a database containing sensitive data, we assume that a response $y_1$ that preserves $ε_{1}$-differential privacy has already been published. Then, the privacy level is relaxed to $ε_2$, with $ε_2 > ε_1$, and we wish to publish a more accurate response $y_2$ while the joint response $(y_1, y_2)$ preserves $ε_2$-differential privacy. How much accuracy is lost in the scenario of gradually releasing two responses $y_1$ and $y_2$ compared to the scenario of releasing a single response that is $ε_{2}$-differentially private? Our results show that there exists a composite mechanism that achieves \textit{no loss} in accuracy. We consider the case in which the private data lies within $\mathbb{R}^{n}$ with an adjacency relation induced by the $\ell_{1}$-norm, and we focus on mechanisms that approximate identity queries. We show that the same accuracy can be achieved in the case of gradual release through a mechanism whose outputs can be described by a \textit{lazy Markov stochastic process}. This stochastic process has a closed form expression and can be efficiently sampled. Our results are applicable beyond identity queries. To this end, we demonstrate that our results can be applied in several cases, including Google's RAPPOR project, trading of sensitive data, and controlled transmission of private data in a social network.