Abstract:Generative AI models lower the bar for content creation, making it easy for any user to create professional-looking images, text and music with minimal effort. This has enabled a new cottage industry around creation of "AI slop" mass quantities of mediocre content produced to generate revenue, often through misrepresentation as human-authored content, or scams involving automated scripts and fake consumption.
While there are obvious parallels between the AI-slop industry and "traditional" email spam networks, it might be too early to determine if AI slop generation can grow into a similar self-sustaining industry. In this paper, we look specifically at the music industry, and explore the question: Can we prevent AI music slop from growing into a self-sustaining shadow industry?
To answer this question, we characterize the current state of AI slop in music, and its pipeline from generation, distribution, and consumption by users on streaming platforms. By examining growth and engagement on Spotify, we confirm that AI music exhibits AI slop characteristics: the overwhelming majority (93%) of AI music receive few, if any listener plays, and are rarely recommended. AI musicians "spray and pray," releasing large volumes of music across multiple genres in hopes of generating a hit. We also explore the AI slop pipeline by generating and publishing our own AI tracks onto streaming through 11 indie music distributors. We find distributors have inconsistent and largely unenforced policies on AI music, making it surprisingly easy to publish mass produced AI songs. Finally, we consider AI music detection, and find that current methods lack accuracy or robustness. As generation costs decrease, we believe slop generation in music will become self-sustainable, unless concrete steps are taken by the music industry. We consider and discuss potential mitigation methods based on our findings.
From: Stanley Wu [view email]
[v1]
Tue, 16 Jun 2026 15:29:25 UTC (1,916 KB)
此内容由惯性聚合(RSS阅读器)自动聚合整理，仅供阅读参考。 原文来自 — 版权归原作者所有。