惯性聚合 高效追踪和阅读你感兴趣的博客、新闻、科技资讯
阅读原文 在惯性聚合中打开

推荐订阅源

Google DeepMind News
Google DeepMind News
I
InfoQ
Engineering at Meta
Engineering at Meta
D
DataBreaches.Net
L
LangChain Blog
Cyber Security Advisories - MS-ISAC
Cyber Security Advisories - MS-ISAC
奇客Solidot–传递最新科技情报
奇客Solidot–传递最新科技情报
Recent Announcements
Recent Announcements
GbyAI
GbyAI
爱范儿
爱范儿
Microsoft Security Blog
Microsoft Security Blog
腾讯CDC
美团技术团队
罗磊的独立博客
Microsoft Azure Blog
Microsoft Azure Blog
WordPress大学
WordPress大学
T
The Blog of Author Tim Ferriss
freeCodeCamp Programming Tutorials: Python, JavaScript, Git & More
雷峰网
雷峰网
M
MIT News - Artificial intelligence
D
Docker
MongoDB | Blog
MongoDB | Blog
F
Fortinet All Blogs
博客园 - 叶小钗

cs.CR updates on arXiv.org

On the Security of Research Artifacts SafeHarbor: Hierarchical Memory-Augmented Guardrail for LLM Agent Safety Agentic Vulnerability Reasoning on Windows COM Binaries From Beats to Breaches:How Offensive AI Infers Sensitive User Information from Playlists Undetectable Backdoors in Model Parameters: Hiding Sparse Secrets in High Dimensions When Embedding-Based Defenses Fail: Rethinking Safety in LLM-Based Multi-Agent Systems Token-Efficient Change Detection in LLM APIs Selfie-Capture Dynamics as an Auxiliary Signal Against Deepfakes and Injection Attacks for Mobile Identity Verification Trident: Improving Malware Detection with LLMs and Behavioral Features When Alignment Isn't Enough: Response-Path Attacks on LLM Agents RefusalGuard: Geometry-Preserving Fine-Tuning for Safety in LLMs Checkerboard: A Simple, Effective, Efficient and Learning-free Clean Label Backdoor Attack with Low Poisoning Budget Block-wise Codeword Embedding for Reliable Multi-bit Text Watermarking Secret Stealing Attacks on Local LLM Fine-Tuning through Supply-Chain Model Code Backdoors Enhancing Linux Privilege Escalation Attack Capabilities of Local LLM Agents Defusing the Trigger: Plug-and-Play Defense for Backdoored LLMs via Tail-Risk Intrinsic Geometric Smoothing Evaluating Jailbreaking Vulnerabilities in LLMs Deployed as Assistants for Smart Grid Operations: A Benchmark Against NERC Standards Behavioral Canaries: Auditing Private Retrieved Context Usage in RL Fine-Tuning FlexServe: A Fast and Secure LLM Serving System for Mobile Devices with Flexible Resource Isolation Breaking MCP with Function Hijacking Attacks: Novel Threats for Function Calling and Agentic Models Text Steganography with Dynamic Codebook and Multimodal Large Language Model TwoHamsters: Benchmarking Multi-Concept Compositional Unsafety in Text-to-Image Models Fundamental Limitations of Favorable Privacy-Utility Guarantees for DP-SGD Symbolic Guardrails for Domain-Specific Agents: Stronger Safety and Security Guarantees Without Sacrificing Utility Hardening x402: PII-Safe Agentic Payments via Pre-Execution Metadata Filtering QShield: Securing Neural Networks Against Adversarial Attacks using Quantum Circuits Hijacking Text Heritage: Hiding the Human Signature through Homoglyphic Substitution Like a Hammer, It Can Build, It Can Break: Large Language Model Uses, Perceptions, and Adoption in Cybersecurity Operations on Reddit Private Seeds, Public LLMs: Realistic and Privacy-Preserving Synthetic Data Generation One Word at a Time: Incremental Completion Decomposition Breaks LLM Safety
Detecting Malignant TLS Servers Using Machine Learning Te...
Sankalp Bagaria, R. Balaji, B. S. Bindhumadhava · 2017-05-25 · via cs.CR updates on arXiv.org

TLS uses X.509 certificates for server authentication. A X.509 certificate is a complex document and various innocent errors may occur while creating/ using it. Also, many certificates belong to malicious websites and should be rejected by the client and those web servers should not be visited. Usually, when a client finds a certificate that is doubtful using the traditional tests, it asks for human intervention. But, looking at certificates, most people can't differentiate between malicious and non-malicious websites. Thus, once traditional certificate validation has failed, instead of asking for human intervention, we use machine learning techniques to enable a web browser to decide whether the server to which the certificate belongs to is malignant or not ie, whether the website should be visited or not. Once a certificate has been accepted in the above phase, we observe that the website may still turn out to be malicious. So, in the second phase, we download a part of the website in a sandbox without decrypting it and observe the TLS encrypted traffic (encrypted malicious data captured in a sandbox cannot harm the system). As the traffic is encrypted after Handshake is completed, traditional pattern-matching techniques cannot be employed. Thus we use flow features of the traffic along with the features used in the above first phase. We couple these features with the unencrypted TLS header information obtained during TLS Handshake and use these in a machine learning classifier to identify whether the traffic is malicious or not.