惯性聚合 高效追踪和阅读你感兴趣的博客、新闻、科技资讯
阅读原文 在惯性聚合中打开

推荐订阅源

WordPress大学
WordPress大学
Vercel News
Vercel News
博客园_首页
Y
Y Combinator Blog
美团技术团队
Cyber Security Advisories - MS-ISAC
Cyber Security Advisories - MS-ISAC
阮一峰的网络日志
阮一峰的网络日志
aimingoo的专栏
aimingoo的专栏
H
Hackread – Cybersecurity News, Data Breaches, AI and More
MyScale Blog
MyScale Blog
GbyAI
GbyAI
人人都是产品经理
人人都是产品经理
T
Tailwind CSS Blog
MongoDB | Blog
MongoDB | Blog
D
DataBreaches.Net
博客园 - Franky
Engineering at Meta
Engineering at Meta
量子位
The GitHub Blog
The GitHub Blog
F
Fortinet All Blogs
freeCodeCamp Programming Tutorials: Python, JavaScript, Git & More
钛媒体:引领未来商业与生活新知
钛媒体:引领未来商业与生活新知
酷 壳 – CoolShell
酷 壳 – CoolShell
N
Netflix TechBlog - Medium

cs.CR updates on arXiv.org

Agentic Vulnerability Reasoning on Windows COM Binaries From Beats to Breaches:How Offensive AI Infers Sensitive User Information from Playlists Undetectable Backdoors in Model Parameters: Hiding Sparse Secrets in High Dimensions When Embedding-Based Defenses Fail: Rethinking Safety in LLM-Based Multi-Agent Systems Token-Efficient Change Detection in LLM APIs Selfie-Capture Dynamics as an Auxiliary Signal Against Deepfakes and Injection Attacks for Mobile Identity Verification Trident: Improving Malware Detection with LLMs and Behavioral Features When Alignment Isn't Enough: Response-Path Attacks on LLM Agents RefusalGuard: Geometry-Preserving Fine-Tuning for Safety in LLMs Checkerboard: A Simple, Effective, Efficient and Learning-free Clean Label Backdoor Attack with Low Poisoning Budget Block-wise Codeword Embedding for Reliable Multi-bit Text Watermarking Secret Stealing Attacks on Local LLM Fine-Tuning through Supply-Chain Model Code Backdoors Enhancing Linux Privilege Escalation Attack Capabilities of Local LLM Agents Defusing the Trigger: Plug-and-Play Defense for Backdoored LLMs via Tail-Risk Intrinsic Geometric Smoothing Evaluating Jailbreaking Vulnerabilities in LLMs Deployed as Assistants for Smart Grid Operations: A Benchmark Against NERC Standards Behavioral Canaries: Auditing Private Retrieved Context Usage in RL Fine-Tuning FlexServe: A Fast and Secure LLM Serving System for Mobile Devices with Flexible Resource Isolation Breaking MCP with Function Hijacking Attacks: Novel Threats for Function Calling and Agentic Models Text Steganography with Dynamic Codebook and Multimodal Large Language Model An AI Agent Execution Environment to Safeguard User Data TwoHamsters: Benchmarking Multi-Concept Compositional Unsafety in Text-to-Image Models Fundamental Limitations of Favorable Privacy-Utility Guarantees for DP-SGD Symbolic Guardrails for Domain-Specific Agents: Stronger Safety and Security Guarantees Without Sacrificing Utility Hardening x402: PII-Safe Agentic Payments via Pre-Execution Metadata Filtering QShield: Securing Neural Networks Against Adversarial Attacks using Quantum Circuits Hijacking Text Heritage: Hiding the Human Signature through Homoglyphic Substitution Like a Hammer, It Can Build, It Can Break: Large Language Model Uses, Perceptions, and Adoption in Cybersecurity Operations on Reddit Private Seeds, Public LLMs: Realistic and Privacy-Preserving Synthetic Data Generation One Word at a Time: Incremental Completion Decomposition Breaks LLM Safety Measuring and Exploiting Contextual Bias in LLM-Assisted Security Code Review
Reinforcement Learning for Linear Quadratic Control is Vu...
Yunhan Huang, Quanyan Zhu · 2022-03-11 · via cs.CR updates on arXiv.org

In this work, we study the deception of a Linear-Quadratic-Gaussian (LQG) agent by manipulating the cost signals. We show that a small falsification of the cost parameters will only lead to a bounded change in the optimal policy. The bound is linear on the amount of falsification the attacker can apply to the cost parameters. We propose an attack model where the attacker aims to mislead the agent into learning a `nefarious' policy by intentionally falsifying the cost parameters. We formulate the attack's problem as a convex optimization problem and develop necessary and sufficient conditions to check the achievability of the attacker's goal. We showcase the adversarial manipulation on two types of LQG learners: the batch RL learner and the other is the adaptive dynamic programming (ADP) learner. Our results demonstrate that with only 2.296% of falsification on the cost data, the attacker misleads the batch RL into learning the 'nefarious' policy that leads the vehicle to a dangerous position. The attacker can also gradually trick the ADP learner into learning the same `nefarious' policy by consistently feeding the learner a falsified cost signal that stays close to the actual cost signal. The paper aims to raise people's awareness of the security threats faced by RL-enabled control systems.