惯性聚合 高效追踪和阅读你感兴趣的博客、新闻、科技资讯
阅读原文 在惯性聚合中打开

推荐订阅源

博客园 - 聂微东
罗磊的独立博客
S
SegmentFault 最新的问题
The GitHub Blog
The GitHub Blog
cs.CV updates on arXiv.org
cs.CV updates on arXiv.org
L
LINUX DO - 最新话题
Webroot Blog
Webroot Blog
cs.AI updates on arXiv.org
cs.AI updates on arXiv.org
Microsoft Azure Blog
Microsoft Azure Blog
GbyAI
GbyAI
T
Tenable Blog
Help Net Security
Help Net Security
WordPress大学
WordPress大学
H
Heimdal Security Blog
SecWiki News
SecWiki News
V2EX - 技术
V2EX - 技术
C
CERT Recently Published Vulnerability Notes
P
Privacy International News Feed
T
Tailwind CSS Blog
L
LINUX DO - 热门话题
Scott Helme
Scott Helme
K
KPMG report finds enterprise disconnect between AI and its ROI | CIO
Threat Intelligence Blog | Flashpoint
Threat Intelligence Blog | Flashpoint
O
OpenAI News
Latest news
Latest news
月光博客
月光博客
L
LangChain Blog
Google DeepMind News
Google DeepMind News
爱范儿
爱范儿
I
InfoQ
T
Threat Research - Cisco Blogs
人人都是产品经理
人人都是产品经理
Forbes - Security
Forbes - Security
Recent Commits to openclaw:main
Recent Commits to openclaw:main
博客园_首页
雷峰网
雷峰网
T
Tor Project blog
Security Archives - TechRepublic
Security Archives - TechRepublic
G
GRAHAM CLULEY
Project Zero
Project Zero
MyScale Blog
MyScale Blog
V
V2EX
Vercel News
Vercel News
F
Fortinet All Blogs
The Register - Security
The Register - Security
N
News and Events Feed by Topic
P
Palo Alto Networks Blog
H
Hacker News: Front Page
Application and Cybersecurity Blog
Application and Cybersecurity Blog
博客园 - 司徒正美

freeCodeCamp Programming Tutorials: Python, JavaScript, Git & More

Learn Command Line Interface (CLI) Development with Dart: From Zero to a Fully Published Developer Tool How to Bypass Cloud SMTP Restrictions Using Brevo and HTTP APIs How to Build a Live Options Database in Python – A Complete Guide How to Migrate to S3 Native State Locking in Terraform How to Use SCons to Build Software Projects [Full Handbook] How to Run Open Source LLMs Locally and in the Cloud QuRT: The Real-Time OS Inside Your Phone's Processor [Full Handbook] The Real Infrastructure Behind Remote Work (It’s Not Just Wi-Fi) The Lithography Handbook: Machines, Markets, and the Next Wave of Semiconductor Startups ITCM vs DTCM vs DDR: Embedded Memory Types Explained [Full Handbook] AI Paper Review: Improving Language Understanding by Generative Pre-Training (GPT-1) How to Build a Market Research Copilot with MCP and Python [Full Handbook] How to Build a Scoped Note-Taking API with Django Rest Framework and SimpleJWT The Complete SOC 2 Type II Implementation Handbook for Engineers: A Month-by-Month Roadmap with Real Commands Mastering the JavaScript Event Loop Data Science Insights: Why the Mean Lies When Handling Messy Retail Data How to Build High-Ranking SEO Landing Page How to Query Data in DynamoDB Using .Net How to Unblock Your AI PR Review Bottleneck: A Tech Lead’s Guide to Building a Codebase-Aware Reviewer How to Navigate Microservices as a Frontend Engineer How to Compress PDF Files in the Browser Using JavaScript (Step-by-Step) Stanford's youngest instructor talks InfoSec, AI, and catching cheaters - Rachel Fernandez interview [Podcast #217] Product Experimentation with Propensity Scores: Causal Inference for LLM-Based Features in Python How to Build a Multi-Agent AI System with LangGraph, MCP, and A2A [Full Book] How to Land Your First Cloud or DevOps Role: What Hiring Managers Actually Look For How to Deploy a Serverless Spam Classifier Using Scikit-Learn, AWS Lambda, & API Gateway How to Dockerize a Go Application – Full Step-by-Step Walkthrough Learn Hardware, Cloud, DevOps, Networking, Security, Databases, DNS, Git, and Linux Inside TreeHacks 2026, Stanford’s Elite Student Hakc Inside Stanford’s Elite Student Hackathon [Full Documentary] How to Measure Your AI Citation Rate Across ChatGPT, Perplexity, and Claude How to Deploy a Full-Stack Next.js App on Cloudflare Workers with GitHub Actions CI/CD How to Build a Multi-Tenant SaaS Platform with Next.js, Express, and Prisma How I Completed 15 freeCodeCamp Certifications in 4 Months: A Structured Learning Journey How to Build an Agentic Terminal Workflow with GitHub Copilot CLI and MCP Servers How AI Changed the Economics of Writing Clean Code How to Apply STRIDE Threat Modeling and SonarQube Analysis for Secure Software Development How to Set Up OpenID Connect (OIDC) in GitHub Actions for AWS How to Split PDF Files in the Browser Using JavaScript (Step-by-Step) How to Build Your Own Language-Specific LLM [Full Handbook] How to Build a Self-Learning RAG System with Knowledge Reflection How to Trace Multi-Agent AI Swarms with Jaeger v2 How I Tested Malaysia's Open Data Portals with Plain English How I Built a Production-Ready CI/CD Pipeline for a Monorepo-Based Microservices System with Jenkins, Docker Compose, and Traefik The Hidden Tax of Infrastructure: Why Your Team Shouldn’t Be Running It Anymore From Metrics to Meaning: How PaaS Helps Developers Understand Production From Symptoms to Root Cause: How to Use the 5 Whys Technique Product Experimentation for AI Rollouts: Why A/B Testing Breaks and How Difference-in-Differences in Python Fixes It How to Create a GPU-Optimized Machine Image with HashiCorp Packer on GCP 3D Web Development with Blender and Three.js How to Fix a Failing GitHub PR: Debugging CI, Lint Errors, and Build Errors Step by Step How to Merge PDF Files in the Browser Using JavaScript (Step-by-Step) How to Handle Stripe Webhooks Reliably with Background Jobs How to Build an Automatic Knowledge Graph for Your Blog with PHP and JSON-LD Understanding Proxies and Reverse Proxies: Your Gateway to Secure Networking The Evolution of Nvidia Blackwell GPU Memory Architecture How to Use PostgreSQL as a Cache, Queue, and Search Engine The New Definition of Software Engineering in the Age of AI Reclaim Your Time – Master Automation with Zapier How to Create Dynamic Emails in Go with React Email Why Many Beginner Self-Taught Developers Struggle (And What to Do About It) How to Build a Headless WordPress Frontend with Astro SSR on Cloudflare Pages How to Make Your GitHub Profile Stand Out How to Use Context Hub (chub) to Build a Companion Relevance Engine Why Chrome OS Is the Operating System the AI Era Was Built For How to Build Microservices-Based REST APIs for Healthcare Portals How to friction-max your learning with software engineer Jessica Rose [Podcast #216] Shadow AI Explained: Why Employees Are Using AI Behind Your Back Traditional Scraping vs AI Scraping: A Practical Guide for Developers and Data Teams How Database Indexes Work – A Practical Guide with PostgreSQL Examples How to Streamline Search in Web Applications with Elasticsearch How to Build an Open Source Data Lake for Batch Ingestion OpenAI Codex Essentials – AI Assisted Agentic Development Course Learn Software System Design How to Generate PDF Files in the Browser Using JavaScript (With a Real Invoice Example) How to Get Started with Terraform Service-to-Service Communication: When to Use REST, gRPC, and Event-Driven Messaging A Developer’s Guide to Lazy Loading in React and Next.js The Data Quality Handbook: Data Errors, the Developer's Role, and Validation Layers Explained. United States Residential Proxy: Why Local IP Accuracy Matters for SERP, Ads, and Pricing How to Build a Fashion App That Helps You Organize Your Wardrobe How to Build an Admin Dashboard Sidebar with shadcn/ui and Base UI The AI Governance Handbook: How to Build Responsible AI Systems That Actually Ship How to Build a Local DevOps HomeLab with Docker, Kubernetes, and Ansible How to Use Mixins in Flutter [Full Handbook] How to Prep for Technical Interviews – A Guide for Web Developers GPT-5.4 vs GLM-5: Is Open Source Finally Matching Proprietary AI? Data Visualization Tools for Svelte Developers How to Keep Human Experts Visible in Your AI-Assisted Codebase Efficient Data Processing in Python: Batch vs Streaming Pipelines Explained How to Build and Deploy Multi-Architecture Docker Apps on Google Cloud Using ARM Nodes (Without QEMU) How to Build a Secure AI PR Reviewer with Claude, GitHub Actions, and JavaScript How to Build a Positioning-Based Crude Oil Strategy in Python [Full Handbook] How to learn programming and CS in the AI hype era – interview with dev and prof Mark Mahoney [Podcast #215] CUDA Programming for NVIDIA H100s How to Build Reliable AI Systems. How to Build an Online Marketplace with Next.js, Express, and Stripe Connect The WebCodecs Handbook: Native Video Processing in the Browser The Bluetooth LE Audio Handbook: From "Why Does My Call Sound Like a Tin Can?" to AOSP Implementation How to Set Up OpenClaw and Design an A2A Plugin Bridge
How to Build a Cost-Efficient AI Agent with Tiered Model Routing
2026-04-08 · via freeCodeCamp Programming Tutorials: Python, JavaScript, Git & More
How to Build a Cost-Efficient AI Agent with Tiered Model Routing

Most AI agent tutorials make the same mistake: they route every task to the most expensive model available.

A character count doesn't need GPT-4. A presence check doesn't need Sonnet. A regex doesn't need anything except Python.

The mistake isn't using AI — it's not knowing when to stop using it.

This tutorial shows you how to build a tiered routing system that sends tasks to the cheapest model that can solve them. The pattern is called the cost curve. It comes from a comment thread on a DEV.to article, implemented by three developers over a weekend, and it cut the per-URL cost of a real SEO audit agent from \(0.006 to effectively \)0 for most pages.

By the end, you'll have a working cost_curve.py module you can drop into any agent project.

What You'll Build

A three-tier routing function that:

  • Runs deterministic Python checks first — zero API cost

  • Escalates to Claude Haiku only for genuinely ambiguous cases — ~$0.0001 per call

  • Escalates to Claude Sonnet only when semantic judgment is required — ~$0.006 per call

  • Falls back gracefully when any tier fails

  • Returns a consistent result schema regardless of which tier handled the request

The full implementation is part of dannwaneri/seo-agent, an open-core SEO audit agent. The cost curve module is the premium routing layer, and the principle applies to any agent with mixed-complexity tasks.

Prerequisites

  • Python 3.11 or higher

  • An Anthropic API key

  • Basic familiarity with Python and the Claude API

Table of Contents

  1. The Problem with Calling Claude on Everything

  2. The Cost Curve Explained

  3. Project Setup

  4. Tier 1: Deterministic Python

  5. Tier 2: Claude Haiku for Ambiguous Cases

  6. Tier 3: Claude Sonnet for Semantic Judgment

  7. The Router: audit_url()

  8. Graceful Fallback

  9. Testing the Cost Curve

  10. Applying This Pattern to Your Agent

The Problem with Calling Claude on Everything

Here's what most agent code looks like:

def audit_url(snapshot: dict) -> dict:
    response = client.messages.create(
        model="claude-sonnet-4-20250514",
        messages=[{"role": "user", "content": build_prompt(snapshot)}]
    )
    return parse_response(response)

This works. It also calls Sonnet for every URL in the list — including the ones where the title is 142 characters long and the answer is obviously FAIL without any model involvement.

Claude Sonnet 4 is priced at \(3 per million input tokens and \)15 per million output tokens. A typical page snapshot is around 500 input tokens. That's \(0.0015 per URL just for input — before output tokens. Across a 20-URL weekly audit, the total is around \)0.12. Not expensive. But most of those pages have mechanical SEO issues: missing descriptions, titles over 60 characters, no canonical tag. A character count catches all of that. You don't need a model.

The cost curve fixes this by routing based on what the task actually requires, not on what the model is capable of.

The Cost Curve Explained

In the cost curve, we have three tiers, three tools, and three price points:

Tier 1 — Deterministic Python. Cost: $0. Check title length, description length, H1 count, canonical presence. These are not judgment calls. They're string operations. If title length > 60, FAIL. No model needed.

Tier 2 — Claude Haiku. Cost: ~$0.0001 per call. Title present but only 4 characters long. Description present but only 30 characters. Status code is a redirect. These pass the mechanical audit but something is off. Haiku is fast and cheap enough that escalating ambiguous cases costs less than the debugging time you'd spend on false positives.

Tier 3 — Claude Sonnet. Cost: ~$0.006 per call. Pages Haiku flags as needing semantic judgment. "This title passes length but reads like a navigation label." "This description duplicates the title verbatim." Sonnet earns its cost on genuinely hard cases — not on every URL in the list.

The routing decision happens before any API call. The result schema is identical regardless of which tier handled the request.

Project Setup

mkdir cost-curve-demo && cd cost-curve-demo
pip install anthropic

Set your API key:

# macOS/Linux
export ANTHROPIC_API_KEY="sk-ant-..."

# Windows PowerShell
$env:ANTHROPIC_API_KEY = "sk-ant-..."

Create cost_curve.py — you'll build this module step by step.

Tier 1: Deterministic Python

Tier 1 runs first on every URL. It checks four fields using only Python string operations. There's no API call, no latency, and no cost.

import json
import logging
import os
import re
from datetime import datetime, timezone

import anthropic

logger = logging.getLogger(__name__)

REDIRECT_CODES = {301, 302, 307, 308}

# Fields that trigger Tier 2 escalation
# Title or description present but suspiciously short
AMBIGUOUS_TITLE_MAX = 10   # chars — present but too short to be real
AMBIGUOUS_DESC_MAX = 50    # chars — present but too short to be useful


def _now_iso() -> str:
    return datetime.now(timezone.utc).isoformat()


def _build_result(snapshot: dict, method: str) -> dict:
    """Base result skeleton — same schema regardless of tier."""
    return {
        "url": snapshot.get("final_url", ""),
        "final_url": snapshot.get("final_url", ""),
        "status_code": snapshot.get("status_code"),
        "title": {"value": None, "length": 0, "status": "PASS"},
        "description": {"value": None, "length": 0, "status": "PASS"},
        "h1": {"count": 0, "value": None, "status": "PASS"},
        "canonical": {"value": None, "status": "PASS"},
        "flags": [],
        "human_review": False,
        "audited_at": _now_iso(),
        "method": method,
        "needs_tier3": False,
    }


def tier1_check(snapshot: dict) -> dict:
    """
    Pure Python SEO checks. Zero API calls.

    Returns a result dict with method="deterministic".
    Sets needs_tier3=False always — Tier 1 never escalates to Tier 3 directly.
    Escalation to Tier 2 is decided by the router, not here.
    """
    result = _build_result(snapshot, "deterministic")

    title = snapshot.get("title") or ""
    description = snapshot.get("meta_description") or ""
    h1s = snapshot.get("h1s") or []
    canonical = snapshot.get("canonical") or ""

    # Title check
    result["title"]["value"] = title or None
    result["title"]["length"] = len(title)
    if not title or len(title) > 60:
        result["title"]["status"] = "FAIL"
        msg = "Title is missing" if not title else f"Title is {len(title)} characters (max 60)"
        result["flags"].append(msg)

    # Description check
    result["description"]["value"] = description or None
    result["description"]["length"] = len(description)
    if not description or len(description) > 160:
        result["description"]["status"] = "FAIL"
        msg = "Meta description is missing" if not description else f"Meta description is {len(description)} characters (max 160)"
        result["flags"].append(msg)

    # H1 check
    result["h1"]["count"] = len(h1s)
    result["h1"]["value"] = h1s[0] if h1s else None
    if len(h1s) == 0:
        result["h1"]["status"] = "FAIL"
        result["flags"].append("H1 tag is missing")
    elif len(h1s) > 1:
        result["h1"]["status"] = "FAIL"
        result["flags"].append(f"Multiple H1 tags found ({len(h1s)})")

    # Canonical check
    result["canonical"]["value"] = canonical or None
    if not canonical:
        result["canonical"]["status"] = "FAIL"
        result["flags"].append("Canonical tag is missing")

    return result

The key design decision: tier1_check() never decides whether to escalate. It just runs the checks and returns. The router decides escalation based on the result.

Tier 2: Claude Haiku for Ambiguous Cases

Tier 2 runs when Tier 1 detects something mechanical but the result might need a second look. A 4-character title present but clearly wrong. A 30-character description that's technically there but useless. A redirect status that needs a human-readable explanation.

Haiku is the right model here. It's fast, cheap (\(1 input / \)5 output per million tokens), and sufficient for triage-level judgment. The prompt asks a narrow question: is this ambiguous enough to need Sonnet?

def tier2_check(snapshot: dict) -> dict:
    """
    Claude Haiku call for ambiguous cases.

    Returns result with method="haiku".
    Sets needs_tier3=True if Haiku determines the case needs semantic judgment.
    Falls back to Tier 1 result on API error.
    """
    api_key = os.environ.get("ANTHROPIC_API_KEY")
    if not api_key:
        raise OSError("ANTHROPIC_API_KEY is not set.")

    client = anthropic.Anthropic(api_key=api_key)

    title = snapshot.get("title") or ""
    description = snapshot.get("meta_description") or ""
    status_code = snapshot.get("status_code")

    prompt = f"""You are an SEO auditor doing a quick triage check.

Page data:
- Title: {repr(title)} ({len(title)} chars)
- Meta description: {repr(description)} ({len(description)} chars)
- Status code: {status_code}

Answer these two questions with only "yes" or "no":
1. Does this page need semantic judgment beyond simple length/presence checks? 
   (e.g. title is present but clearly wrong, description is present but meaningless)
2. Is the status code a redirect that needs investigation?

Respond in this exact JSON format and nothing else:
{{"needs_tier3": true_or_false, "reason": "one sentence explanation"}}"""

    try:
        response = client.messages.create(
            model="claude-haiku-4-5-20251001",
            max_tokens=150,
            messages=[{"role": "user", "content": prompt}],
        )
        raw = response.content[0].text.strip()
        # Strip markdown fences if present
        if raw.startswith("```"):
            lines = raw.splitlines()
            raw = "\n".join(lines[1:-1] if lines[-1].strip() == "```" else lines[1:])
        parsed = json.loads(raw)

        result = _build_result(snapshot, "haiku")
        # Copy Tier 1 field checks — Haiku doesn't redo those
        t1 = tier1_check(snapshot)
        result["title"] = t1["title"]
        result["description"] = t1["description"]
        result["h1"] = t1["h1"]
        result["canonical"] = t1["canonical"]
        result["flags"] = t1["flags"]
        result["needs_tier3"] = parsed.get("needs_tier3", False)
        if result["needs_tier3"]:
            result["flags"].append(f"Escalated to Tier 3: {parsed.get('reason', '')}")

        return result

    except Exception as exc:
        logger.warning("[tier2] Haiku API error: %s — falling back to Tier 1 result", exc)
        fallback = tier1_check(snapshot)
        fallback["method"] = "haiku-fallback"
        return fallback

The fallback is the critical piece. If Haiku fails — rate limit, network error, malformed response — the function returns the Tier 1 result rather than crashing. The audit continues. The URL gets flagged with method="haiku-fallback" so you can identify it later.

Tier 3: Claude Sonnet for Semantic Judgment

Tier 3 is where the full extraction prompt runs. This is the same call you'd make in a naïve implementation — the difference is that only a small fraction of URLs reach this tier.

def tier3_check(snapshot: dict) -> dict:
    """
    Claude Sonnet call for semantic judgment.

    Returns result with method="sonnet".
    This is the full extraction prompt — same as calling the model directly.
    """
    api_key = os.environ.get("ANTHROPIC_API_KEY")
    if not api_key:
        raise OSError("ANTHROPIC_API_KEY is not set.")

    client = anthropic.Anthropic(api_key=api_key)

    prompt = f"""You are an SEO auditor. Analyze this page snapshot and return ONLY a JSON object.
No prose. No explanation. No markdown fences. Raw JSON only.

Page data:
- URL: {snapshot.get('final_url')}
- Status code: {snapshot.get('status_code')}
- Title: {snapshot.get('title')}
- Meta description: {snapshot.get('meta_description')}
- H1 tags: {snapshot.get('h1s')}
- Canonical: {snapshot.get('canonical')}

Return this exact schema:
{{
  "url": "string",
  "final_url": "string",
  "status_code": number,
  "title": {{"value": "string or null", "length": number, "status": "PASS or FAIL"}},
  "description": {{"value": "string or null", "length": number, "status": "PASS or FAIL"}},
  "h1": {{"count": number, "value": "string or null", "status": "PASS or FAIL"}},
  "canonical": {{"value": "string or null", "status": "PASS or FAIL"}},
  "flags": ["array of strings describing specific issues"],
  "human_review": false,
  "audited_at": "ISO timestamp"
}}

PASS/FAIL rules:
- title: FAIL if null or length > 60 characters, or if present but clearly not a real title
- description: FAIL if null or length > 160 characters, or if present but meaningless
- h1: FAIL if count is 0 or count > 1
- canonical: FAIL if null
- audited_at: use current UTC time"""

    try:
        response = client.messages.create(
            model="claude-sonnet-4-20250514",
            max_tokens=1000,
            messages=[{"role": "user", "content": prompt}],
        )
        raw = response.content[0].text.strip()
        if raw.startswith("```"):
            lines = raw.splitlines()
            raw = "\n".join(lines[1:-1] if lines[-1].strip() == "```" else lines[1:])

        result = json.loads(raw)
        result["method"] = "sonnet"
        result["needs_tier3"] = False
        return result

    except Exception as exc:
        logger.warning("[tier3] Sonnet API error: %s — falling back to Tier 1 result", exc)
        fallback = tier1_check(snapshot)
        fallback["method"] = "sonnet-fallback"
        return fallback

Note the prompt addition in Tier 3 that isn't in Tier 1: "or if present but clearly not a real title" and "or if present but meaningless". That's the semantic judgment Haiku identified as needed. Tier 3 acts on it.

The Router: audit_url()

The router is the public interface. Everything else is an implementation detail.

def audit_url(snapshot: dict, tiered: bool = False) -> dict:
    """
    Route a page snapshot through the appropriate audit tier.

    Args:
        snapshot: Page data from browser.py — must contain final_url,
                  status_code, title, meta_description, h1s, canonical.
        tiered: If False, delegates directly to Tier 3 (Sonnet).
                If True, routes through the cost curve.

    Returns:
        Audit result dict with method field indicating which tier ran.
    """
    if not tiered:
        # Non-tiered mode: call Sonnet directly, same as v1 behavior
        return tier3_check(snapshot)

    # Tier 1: always runs first
    t1_result = tier1_check(snapshot)

    # Check if escalation to Tier 2 is warranted
    title = snapshot.get("title") or ""
    description = snapshot.get("meta_description") or ""
    status_code = snapshot.get("status_code")

    needs_tier2 = (
        # Title present but suspiciously short
        (title and len(title) < AMBIGUOUS_TITLE_MAX) or
        # Description present but suspiciously short
        (description and len(description) < AMBIGUOUS_DESC_MAX) or
        # Redirect status — may need explanation
        (status_code in REDIRECT_CODES)
    )

    if not needs_tier2:
        # Tier 1 result is definitive — return without any API call
        return t1_result

    # Tier 2: Haiku triage
    t2_result = tier2_check(snapshot)

    if not t2_result.get("needs_tier3", False):
        # Haiku determined no semantic judgment needed
        return t2_result

    # Tier 3: Sonnet for semantic judgment
    return tier3_check(snapshot)

The router logic is explicit and readable. Each decision point is a named condition. When tiered=False, behavior is identical to the v1 naive implementation — this is the backward compatibility guarantee that lets you add the cost curve incrementally without breaking existing audits.

Graceful Fallback

The fallback pattern appears in both Tier 2 and Tier 3. It's worth making explicit:

# Pattern used in both tier2_check() and tier3_check()
except Exception as exc:
    logger.warning("[tierN] API error: %s — falling back to Tier 1 result", exc)
    fallback = tier1_check(snapshot)
    fallback["method"] = "tierN-fallback"
    return fallback

Three things this does:

  1. Logs the error with enough context to debug later

  2. Returns a valid result — the Tier 1 deterministic check always runs regardless

  3. Tags the result with the fallback method so you can filter these in your report

An agent that crashes on API errors is not production-ready. An agent that degrades gracefully and continues is.

Testing the Cost Curve

Create test_cost_curve.py to verify routing behavior without live API calls:

import json
from unittest import mock

from cost_curve import audit_url, tier1_check


def make_snapshot(title="Normal Title Under 60 Chars",
                  description="A normal meta description that is under 160 characters and describes the page content well.",
                  h1s=["Single H1"],
                  canonical="https://example.com/page",
                  status_code=200,
                  final_url="https://example.com/page"):
    return {
        "title": title,
        "meta_description": description,
        "h1s": h1s,
        "canonical": canonical,
        "status_code": status_code,
        "final_url": final_url,
    }


def test_clean_page_returns_tier1_no_api_calls():
    """Clean page: all checks pass deterministically — no API call."""
    snapshot = make_snapshot()
    with mock.patch("anthropic.Anthropic") as mock_client:
        result = audit_url(snapshot, tiered=True)
        assert result["method"] == "deterministic"
        mock_client.assert_not_called()
    print("PASS: clean page → Tier 1, zero API calls")


def test_long_title_returns_tier1_fail_no_api_call():
    """Title >60 chars: FAIL from Tier 1, no API call."""
    snapshot = make_snapshot(title="A" * 70)
    with mock.patch("anthropic.Anthropic") as mock_client:
        result = audit_url(snapshot, tiered=True)
        assert result["method"] == "deterministic"
        assert result["title"]["status"] == "FAIL"
        mock_client.assert_not_called()
    print("PASS: title >60 → Tier 1 FAIL, zero API calls")


def test_suspiciously_short_title_escalates_to_tier2():
    """Title present but 4 chars: escalates to Tier 2."""
    snapshot = make_snapshot(title="SEO")  # 3 chars — under AMBIGUOUS_TITLE_MAX
    mock_response = mock.MagicMock()
    mock_response.content = [mock.MagicMock(
        text='{"needs_tier3": false, "reason": "title is short but not ambiguous"}'
    )]
    with mock.patch("anthropic.Anthropic") as mock_client:
        mock_client.return_value.messages.create.return_value = mock_response
        result = audit_url(snapshot, tiered=True)
        assert result["method"] == "haiku"
        assert mock_client.return_value.messages.create.call_count == 1
    print("PASS: short title → Tier 2 (Haiku called once)")


def test_tiered_false_calls_sonnet_directly():
    """tiered=False: Sonnet called regardless of snapshot content."""
    snapshot = make_snapshot()  # clean page, would be Tier 1 in tiered mode
    mock_response = mock.MagicMock()
    mock_response.content = [mock.MagicMock(text=json.dumps({
        "url": "https://example.com/page",
        "final_url": "https://example.com/page",
        "status_code": 200,
        "title": {"value": "Normal Title Under 60 Chars", "length": 27, "status": "PASS"},
        "description": {"value": "desc", "length": 4, "status": "PASS"},
        "h1": {"count": 1, "value": "Single H1", "status": "PASS"},
        "canonical": {"value": "https://example.com/page", "status": "PASS"},
        "flags": [],
        "human_review": False,
        "audited_at": "2026-04-01T00:00:00+00:00",
    }))]
    with mock.patch("anthropic.Anthropic") as mock_client:
        mock_client.return_value.messages.create.return_value = mock_response
        result = audit_url(snapshot, tiered=False)
        assert result["method"] == "sonnet"
        assert mock_client.return_value.messages.create.call_count == 1
    print("PASS: tiered=False → Sonnet called directly")


def test_haiku_api_failure_falls_back_to_tier1():
    """Haiku failure: falls back to Tier 1 result, no crash."""
    snapshot = make_snapshot(title="SEO")  # triggers Tier 2
    with mock.patch("anthropic.Anthropic") as mock_client:
        mock_client.return_value.messages.create.side_effect = Exception("rate limit")
        result = audit_url(snapshot, tiered=True)
        assert result["method"] == "haiku-fallback"
    print("PASS: Haiku failure → fallback to Tier 1, no crash")


if __name__ == "__main__":
    test_clean_page_returns_tier1_no_api_calls()
    test_long_title_returns_tier1_fail_no_api_call()
    test_suspiciously_short_title_escalates_to_tier2()
    test_tiered_false_calls_sonnet_directly()
    test_haiku_api_failure_falls_back_to_tier1()
    print("\nAll tests passed.")

Run it:

python test_cost_curve.py

Expected output:

PASS: clean page → Tier 1, zero API calls
PASS: title >60 → Tier 1 FAIL, zero API calls
PASS: short title → Tier 2 (Haiku called once)
PASS: tiered=False → Sonnet called directly
PASS: Haiku failure → fallback to Tier 1, no crash

Applying This Pattern to Your Agent

The cost curve is not SEO-specific. Any agent with mixed-complexity tasks can use it.

The principle: classify tasks by what they actually require before deciding which model to invoke.

Customer support agent:

  • Tier 1: keyword matching for known FAQ topics — no model

  • Tier 2: Haiku for intent classification on ambiguous queries

  • Tier 3: Sonnet for complex complaints requiring judgment

Code review agent:

  • Tier 1: lint rules, syntax checks — no model

  • Tier 2: Haiku for common pattern detection

  • Tier 3: Sonnet for architectural review

Content moderation agent:

  • Tier 1: blocklist matching — no model

  • Tier 2: Haiku for borderline cases

  • Tier 3: Sonnet for context-dependent judgment

The implementation pattern is the same in all three cases. The audit_url() router becomes route_task(). The tier functions change their prompts and escalation conditions. The fallback logic stays identical.

The key question to ask before writing any agent code: what fraction of my inputs are mechanically solvable? That fraction goes to Tier 1. The rest escalate. The cost curve routes everything else.

Wrapping Up

The full implementation — including the SEO audit agent that uses this module in production — is at dannwaneri/seo-agent. The core/ directory is MIT licensed. The tiered routing lives in premium/cost_curve.py.

This tutorial is the companion piece to I Was Paying \(0.006 Per URL for SEO Audits Until I Realized Most Needed \)0 on DEV.to, which covers the architecture decisions behind the cost curve.



Learn to code for free. freeCodeCamp's open source curriculum has helped more than 40,000 people get jobs as developers. Get started