Los Angeles Mayor Karen Bass came under heavy attack Wednesday night as challenger Spencer Pratt and Councilmember Nithya Raman turned a mayoral debate into a full-blown showdown over wildfires, crime and homelessness.

The debate centered on whether Bass deserves another term running Los Angeles, with the January 2025 Palisades fires quickly becoming the defining flashpoint of the night.

Bass defended her record, arguing the city was already in crisis when she took office and pointed to a reported 17.5% drop in street homelessness along with expanded housing efforts.

She also said her administration deployed enough fire trucks during the wildfire response but blamed staffing shortfalls on former Fire Chief Kristin Crowley, who she said was removed in February 2025.

Pratt went straight for the city’s wildfire preparedness, accusing officials of failing basic safety planning.

He said Crowley had requested $17 million in funding that was denied and blasted how reservoirs were managed during the fires.

He focused heavily on the Santa Ynez Reservoir being empty during the blaze and promised sweeping changes if elected.

“As mayor, I will never drain the reservoirs that we need for wildfire protection,” Pratt said, adding he would create 20 additional dip sites across Los Angeles.

Bass pushed back on claims about fire conditions and rejected Pratt’s criticism of how the crisis unfolded.

Bass highlighted a drug enforcement operation tied to MacArthur Park, Calabasas and San Gabriel, saying authorities made 18 arrests and seized 40 pounds of fentanyl in raids carried out Wednesday.

---

Download The California Post App, follow us on social, and subscribe to our newsletters

She also said she is pushing to hire more police officers but blamed the county council for delays.

Raman’s past vote against police funding resurfaced during the exchange, while Pratt leaned into a tough-on-crime message, saying many residents feel unsafe and want stronger enforcement.

A controversial needle distribution program also came under fire, including opposition from Langer’s Delicatessen.

Bass said she would end the program. Pratt agreed it should be shut down permanently. Raman opposed that approach, arguing for more investment in housing and services.

“We need to invest in shelter, we need to invest in services,” Raman said.

With the 2028 Olympics approaching, the candidates also clashed over policing levels. 

Pratt promised increased hiring of officers.

Bass also said the city needs more police presence.

Raman took a different approach, saying she would maintain current staffing while reducing strain on officers and limiting armed responses to situations that truly require them, stressing that the right responders must show up when residents call 911.

Homelessness remained one of the night’s central issues.

All three candidates agreed that when shelter beds are available, unhoused people should be required to move indoors.

On encampments near schools and daycares, Pratt said they should not be allowed. Raman did not directly answer the question, but pointed to progress in her district, saying encampments had fallen 54% over the past three years.

Federal prosecutors in recent months have brought a string of cases against LA-area individuals, alleging fraud tied to homeless spending programs, raising fresh questions about oversight of massive public funding streams.

Asked how the public can trust that the money is being properly spent, Bass didn’t shy away from the issue.

“I don’t think it’s shocking that you do find corruption in big programs like this and I think it is extremely important to hold them completely accountable,” she said.

About half an hour into the debate, Raman shifted her remarks to the audience and offered a prediction about how the night would unfold, saying Bass and Pratt would likely focus their attacks on her because, as she put it, “they want to run against each other.”

She argued that both opponents see their path to victory as going through one another rather than her, adding: “Each of them thinks that running against each other is what’s going to help them win, and they don’t want to run against me because my ideas are based on real results in my district,” she said. “I want to take this citywide. This is why this is happening today.”

“If I wanted to run against anybody, it would be the councilmember who is terrible,” Pratt replied.

Pratt positioned himself as the “adult in the room” compared to Bass and Raman, asserting that he would be more careful to prevent the squandering of Los Angeles city tax dollars.

Bass, meanwhile, kept her composure and came right back at both challengers, zeroing in especially on Raman.

“She doesn’t understand,” the mayor said of the councilmember regarding the financing of the police department.

The debate over voting rights and election integrity took a sharp turn when candidates were grilled on whether non-citizens should have the right to vote in city and school board elections