惯性聚合 高效追踪和阅读你感兴趣的博客、新闻、科技资讯
阅读原文 在惯性聚合中打开

推荐订阅源

freeCodeCamp Programming Tutorials: Python, JavaScript, Git & More
H
Help Net Security
云风的 BLOG
云风的 BLOG
Apple Machine Learning Research
Apple Machine Learning Research
H
Hackread – Cybersecurity News, Data Breaches, AI and More
Hugging Face - Blog
Hugging Face - Blog
博客园_首页
D
Docker
让小产品的独立变现更简单 - ezindie.com
让小产品的独立变现更简单 - ezindie.com
Blog — PlanetScale
Blog — PlanetScale
Cyber Security Advisories - MS-ISAC
Cyber Security Advisories - MS-ISAC
GbyAI
GbyAI
博客园 - Franky
B
Blog RSS Feed
Stack Overflow Blog
Stack Overflow Blog
L
LangChain Blog
量子位
V
Visual Studio Blog
Y
Y Combinator Blog
小众软件
小众软件
N
Netflix TechBlog - Medium
博客园 - 三生石上(FineUI控件)
Microsoft Security Blog
Microsoft Security Blog
雷峰网
雷峰网

Electronic Frontier Foundation

Onward, Friends EFFecting Change: LGBTQ+ Solidarity Against the Tide of Surveillance EFFecting Change Site Banner 6.17.26 Victory! 702 has Expired! Yes to California's Bill to Ban Surveillance Pricing ‘News’ Site Keeps Hallucinating EFF Staffers LGBT Q&A: We’re Back With Season 2! Congress Just Rushed Through a Disastrous Copyright Office Overhaul The 702 Ultimatum: Warrant Requirement or Bust Enshittification Merch That Actually Fights Enshittification 🔊 Mass Surveillance for… Loud Music? | EFFector 38.11 How and Why to Fight Back Against Social Media Bans Tell Congress: Just Say No to NO FAKES VICTORY: Meta Strips Facial Recognition Code From Smart Glasses App After Public Outcry Cheers to the Winners of EFF’s 18th Annual Cyberlaw Trivia Night! EFFecting Change: If You Own It, Why Can't You Fix It? Internet Age-Gates Are a Growing Global Threat LGBT Q&A Season 1 Recap: Staying Safer Online EFF at TechCrunch Disrupt California’s AB 412 Still Demands Developers Do The Impossible Pulte Appointment Underscores Need to Reform Section 702 Spying EFF Testifies to Congress on Protecting Americans’ Rights from Government AI Move Fast, Surveil Things EFF at DEF CON 34 We're Fighting Mass Surveillance Tech—and Winning Welcome New EFF Executive Director Nicole Ozer One Step Forward, Two Steps Back: CA's AB 1856 Exempts Open Source But Expands Age-Gating Barcelona Cybersecurity Congress Age Verification is a Privacy Nightmare More License Plate Reader Mission Creep: School Residency Verification, Background Checks, and Noise Complaints
EFF Submission to UK Consultation on Digital ID
Paige Collin · 2026-05-05 · via Electronic Frontier Foundation

Last September, the United Kingdom’s Prime Minister Keir Starmer announced plans to introduce a new digital ID scheme in the country. The scheme aims to make it easier for people to prove their identities by creating a virtual ID on personal devices with information like names, date of birth, nationality or residency status, and a photo to verify their right to live and work in the country. 

Since then, EFF has joined UK-based civil society organizations in urging the government to reconsider this proposal. In one joint letter from December, ahead of Parliament’s debate around a petition signed by 2.9 million people calling for an end to the government’s plans to roll out a national digital ID, EFF and 12 other civil society organizations wrote to politicians in the country urging MPs to reject the Labour government’s proposal.

Nevertheless, politicians have continued to explore ways to build out a digital ID system in the country, often fluctuating between different ideas and conceptualisations for such a scheme. In their search for clarity, the government launched a consultation, Making public services work for you with your digital identity,’ seeking views on a proposed national digital ID system in the UK. 

EFF submitted comments to this consultation, focusing on six interconnected issues:

  1. Mission creep
  2. Infringements on privacy rights 
  3. Serious security risks
  4. Reliance on inaccurate and unproven technologies
  5. Discrimination and exclusion
  6. The deepening of entrenched power imbalances between the state and the public.

Even the strongest recommended safeguards cannot resolve these issues, and the fundamental core problem that a mandatory digital ID scheme that shifts power dramatically away from individuals and toward the state. They are pursued as a technological solution to offline problems but instead allow the state to determine what you can access, not just verify who you are, by functioning as a key to opening—or closing—doors to essential services and experiences. 

No one should be coerced—technically or socially—into a digital system in order to participate fully in public life. It is essential that the UK government listen to people in the country and say no to digital ID. 

Read our submission in full here.