惯性聚合 高效追踪和阅读你感兴趣的博客、新闻、科技资讯
阅读原文 在惯性聚合中打开

推荐订阅源

Hacker News: Ask HN
Hacker News: Ask HN
D
DataBreaches.Net
Microsoft Security Blog
Microsoft Security Blog
U
Unit 42
V
Visual Studio Blog
GbyAI
GbyAI
云风的 BLOG
云风的 BLOG
博客园 - Franky
C
CXSECURITY Database RSS Feed - CXSecurity.com
大猫的无限游戏
大猫的无限游戏
P
Privacy & Cybersecurity Law Blog
T
The Exploit Database - CXSecurity.com
Simon Willison's Weblog
Simon Willison's Weblog
L
LangChain Blog
I
Intezer
V2EX - 技术
V2EX - 技术
Google DeepMind News
Google DeepMind News
T
Threat Research - Cisco Blogs
Apple Machine Learning Research
Apple Machine Learning Research
V
V2EX
腾讯CDC
博客园 - 【当耐特】
Know Your Adversary
Know Your Adversary
TaoSecurity Blog
TaoSecurity Blog
cs.AI updates on arXiv.org
cs.AI updates on arXiv.org
F
Fortinet All Blogs
Project Zero
Project Zero
Blog — PlanetScale
Blog — PlanetScale
S
Security @ Cisco Blogs
量子位
M
MIT News - Artificial intelligence
美团技术团队
C
Cisco Blogs
S
Schneier on Security
Recent Commits to openclaw:main
Recent Commits to openclaw:main
G
Google Developers Blog
N
News and Events Feed by Topic
MongoDB | Blog
MongoDB | Blog
The Hacker News
The Hacker News
H
Help Net Security
S
Secure Thoughts
Scott Helme
Scott Helme
SecWiki News
SecWiki News
T
Troy Hunt's Blog
cs.CV updates on arXiv.org
cs.CV updates on arXiv.org
博客园 - 叶小钗
O
OpenAI News
Application and Cybersecurity Blog
Application and Cybersecurity Blog
博客园 - 司徒正美
T
Tenable Blog

Electronic Frontier Foundation

Onward, Friends EFFecting Change: LGBTQ+ Solidarity Against the Tide of Surveillance EFFecting Change Site Banner 6.17.26 Victory! 702 has Expired! Yes to California's Bill to Ban Surveillance Pricing ‘News’ Site Keeps Hallucinating EFF Staffers LGBT Q&A: We’re Back With Season 2! Congress Just Rushed Through a Disastrous Copyright Office Overhaul The 702 Ultimatum: Warrant Requirement or Bust Enshittification Merch That Actually Fights Enshittification 🔊 Mass Surveillance for… Loud Music? | EFFector 38.11 How and Why to Fight Back Against Social Media Bans Tell Congress: Just Say No to NO FAKES VICTORY: Meta Strips Facial Recognition Code From Smart Glasses App After Public Outcry Cheers to the Winners of EFF’s 18th Annual Cyberlaw Trivia Night! EFFecting Change: If You Own It, Why Can't You Fix It? Internet Age-Gates Are a Growing Global Threat LGBT Q&A Season 1 Recap: Staying Safer Online EFF at TechCrunch Disrupt California’s AB 412 Still Demands Developers Do The Impossible Pulte Appointment Underscores Need to Reform Section 702 Spying EFF Testifies to Congress on Protecting Americans’ Rights from Government AI Move Fast, Surveil Things EFF at DEF CON 34 We're Fighting Mass Surveillance Tech—and Winning Welcome New EFF Executive Director Nicole Ozer One Step Forward, Two Steps Back: CA's AB 1856 Exempts Open Source But Expands Age-Gating Barcelona Cybersecurity Congress Age Verification is a Privacy Nightmare More License Plate Reader Mission Creep: School Residency Verification, Background Checks, and Noise Complaints 🔒 A Win for Encrypted Messaging | EFFector 38.10 Microsoft Took a Step Toward Human Rights Accountability. Google and Amazon (and Others) Should Pay Attention! Your Privacy Shouldn't Be A Corporate Decision EFFecting Change: LGBTQ+ Solidarity Against the Tide of Surveillance We Updated Our Privacy Policy. Here's What Changed and Why. We Must Not Normalize Digital Surveillance Abuses. EFF’s New Guide Underlines Concrete Steps to Fight Back. EFF at Black Hat USA Help EFF Solve an Issue That's Bigger than Creepy Ads The Science is Not Settled: How Weak Evidence is Fueling a National Push to Ban Social Media for Youth Broken Promises: RIP Instagram’s End-to-End Encrypted DMs Victory! End-to-End Encrypted RCS Comes to Apple and Android Chats EFF Launches New Offline Campaign for Saudi Wikipedian Osama Khalid A Hackers Guide to Circumventing Internet Shutdowns Canada’s Bill C-22 Is a Repackaged Version of Last Year’s Surveillance Nightmare EFF to Fourth Circuit: Electronic Device Searches at the Border Require a Warrant EFFecting Change Site Banner 5.14.26 EFF Stands in Solidarity With RightsCon and the Global Digital Rights Community Congress Narrowed the GUARD Act, But Serious Problems Remain Free Signal Guide Milestone 1.0.0 Release of APK Downloader `apkeep` Powers Research on Android Apps 👎 California's Terrible, No Good, Very Bad Social Media Ban | EFFector 38.9 The SECURE Data Act is Not a Serious Piece of Privacy Legislation Offline: Osama Khalid EFF and 18 Organizations Urge UK Policymakers to Prioritize Addressing the Roots of Online Harm Shut Down Turnkey Totalitarianism EFF Submission to UK Consultation on Digital ID Getting Digital Fairness Right: EFF's Recommendations for the EU's Digital Fairness Act A Bridge to Somewhere: How to Link Your Mastodon, Bluesky, or Other Federated Accounts Utah’s New Law Targeting VPNs Goes Into Effect Next Week Open Records Laws Reveal ALPRs’ Sprawling Surveillance. Now States Want to Block What the Public Sees. Digital Hopes, Real Power: From Connection to Collective Action Aaron v. Bondi EFF Submission to UN Report on the Role of Media in the Context of Israel’s Policies Toward Palestinians Former EFF Activism Director's New Book, Transaction Denied, Explores What Happens When Financial Companies Act like Censors The Open Social Web Needs Section 230 to Survive The GUARD Act Isn’t Targeting Dangerous AI—It’s Blocking Everyday Internet Use Congress Must Reject New Insufficient 702 Reauthorization Bill The Internet Still Works: SmugMug Powers Online Photography Act Now to Stop California’s Paternalistic and Privacy-Destroying Social Media Ban EFF Challenges Secrecy In Eastern District of Texas Patent Case California Coastal Community Must Reject CBP's AI-Powered Surveillance Tower EFF to 9th Circuit (Again): App Stores Shouldn’t Be Liable for Processing Payments for User Content 📁 How ICE Got My Data | EFFector 38.8 EFF Sues DHS and ICE For Records on Subpoenas Seeking to Unmask Online Critics Bay Area Members' Speakeasy with WISP Copyright and DMCA Best Practices for Fediverse Operators Palantir Has a Human Rights Policy. Its ICE Work Tells a Different Story Keep Pushing: We Get 10 More Days to Reform Section 702 EFF at RightsCon Stop New York's Attack on 3D Printing How Push Notifications Can Betray Your Privacy (and What to Do About It) Google Broke Its Promise to Me. Now ICE Has My Data. EFF Calls on Kuwait to Release Journalist Ahmed Shihab-Eldin Digital Hopes, Real Power: The Rise of Network Shutdowns The Dangers of California’s Legislation to Censor 3D Printing The Bay Agenda: Security for Journalists EFF 🤝 HOPE: Join Us This August! Hot Off the Press: EFF's Updated Guide to Tech at the US-Mexico Border War as a Pretext: Gulf States Are Tightening the Screws on Speech—Again Speaking Freely: Dr. Jean Linis-Dinco We Need You: Our Privacy Cannot Afford a Clean Extension of Section 702 Yikes, Encryption’s Y2K Moment is Coming Years Early Comparison Shopping Is Not a (Computer) Crime EFF is Leaving X Banning New Foreign Routers Mistargets Products to Fix Real Problem Another Court Rules Copyright Can’t Stop People From Reading and Speaking the Law 👁 Selling Mass Surveillance | EFFector 38.7 Digital Hopes, Real Power: How the Arab Spring Fueled a Global Surveillance Boom Privacy Index Workshop EU Parliament Blocks Mass-Scanning of Our Chats—What's Next?
EFF to State AGs: Investigate Google's Broken Promise to Users Targeted by the Government
Deeplinks Blog by Paige Collings | June 5, 2026 · 2026-04-15 · via Electronic Frontier Foundation

SAN FRANCISCO – The Electronic Frontier Foundation sent complaints today to the attorneys general of California and New York urging them to investigate Google for deceptive trade practices, related to the company's broken promise to give users prior notice before disclosing their information to law enforcement. 

The letters were sent on behalf of Amandla Thomas-Johnson, whose information was disclosed to U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) without prior notice from Google. 

For nearly a decade, Google has promised billions of users that it will notify them before disclosing their personal data to law enforcement. Many times, the company has done just that. But through a hidden and systematic practice, Google has likely violated that promise numerous times over the years. This was the case for Thomas-Johnson, a Ph.D. candidate who was targeted by ICE after briefly attending a protest, effectively preventing him from contesting an invalid subpoena for his data. 

"Google should answer the question: How many other times has it broken its promise to users?” said EFF Senior Staff Attorney F. Mario Trujillo. "Advance notice is especially important now, when agencies like ICE are unconstitutionally targeting users for First Amendment-protected activity. State attorneys general should investigate Google for this deception." 

On Google’s Privacy & Terms page, it promises its users that “When we receive a request from a government agency, we send an email to the user account before disclosing information.” This promise ensures that users can protect their own privacy and decide to challenge overbroad or illegal demands on their own behalf. The company lists a handful of exceptions to this policy (such as if Google receives a gag order from a court) that do not apply to Thomas-Johnson's case. While ICE “requested” that Google not notify Thomas-Johnson, the request was not enforceable or mandated by a court. 

But on May 8, 2025, Google complied with an administrative subpoena from ICE seeking Thomas-Johnson’s subscriber information, including his name, address, IP address, and other personal identifiers. Later that same day, the company sent Thomas-Johnson a message telling him it had already complied with the subpoena, which he would have successfully challenged had he been given advance notice. Google received the subpoena in April and had more than a month to alert Thomas-Johnson. 

Communication between EFF and Google later revealed that this is a systematic issue, not an isolated one. When Google does not fulfill a subpoena within a government-provided artificial deadline, the company's outside counsel explained, Google will sometimes comply with the request and provide notice to a user on the same day. The company calls this practice “simultaneous notice.” 

"What this experience has made clear is that anyone can be targeted by law enforcement," said Thomas-Johnson. "And with their massive stores of data, technology companies can facilitate those arbitrary investigations. Who, exactly, can I hold accountable?" 

Google must commit to ending this deception and pay for its past mistakes. The attorneys general of California and New York are empowered to stop deceptive business practices and seek financial restitution stemming from those practices. As EFF writes in its complaints, they should investigate, hold Google to its public promise to give users advanced notice of law enforcement demands, and take appropriate action if necessary.

Update: This press release has been updated to include more information about Google's exceptions to their notification policy, none of which applied to the subpoena targeting Thomas-Johnson. 
 
For the complaints:
https://www.eff.org/document/eff-letter-re-google-notice-california 
https://www.eff.org/document/eff-letter-re-google-notice-new-york 
https://www.eff.org/document/eff-letter-re-google-notice-exhibits
 
For Thomas-Johnson's account of his ordeal: https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2026/04/google-broke-its-promise-me-now-ice-has-my-data 

For more information on lawless DHS subpoenas: https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2026/02/open-letter-tech-companies-protect-your-users-lawless-dhs-subpoenas 

Contact: press@eff.org