惯性聚合 高效追踪和阅读你感兴趣的博客、新闻、科技资讯
阅读原文 在惯性聚合中打开

推荐订阅源

C
CXSECURITY Database RSS Feed - CXSecurity.com
S
Schneier on Security
N
News and Events Feed by Topic
量子位
S
Secure Thoughts
V2EX - 技术
V2EX - 技术
Hugging Face - Blog
Hugging Face - Blog
S
Security Affairs
J
Java Code Geeks
Schneier on Security
Schneier on Security
Google Online Security Blog
Google Online Security Blog
TaoSecurity Blog
TaoSecurity Blog
小众软件
小众软件
S
SegmentFault 最新的问题
www.infosecurity-magazine.com
www.infosecurity-magazine.com
K
KPMG report finds enterprise disconnect between AI and its ROI | CIO
Security Archives - TechRepublic
Security Archives - TechRepublic
P
Privacy International News Feed
酷 壳 – CoolShell
酷 壳 – CoolShell
美团技术团队
博客园 - 聂微东
T
Tor Project blog
博客园 - Franky
C
CERT Recently Published Vulnerability Notes
Cyberwarzone
Cyberwarzone
罗磊的独立博客
博客园_首页
The Cloudflare Blog
钛媒体:引领未来商业与生活新知
钛媒体:引领未来商业与生活新知
博客园 - 三生石上(FineUI控件)
大猫的无限游戏
大猫的无限游戏
Forbes - Security
Forbes - Security
V
Vulnerabilities – Threatpost
Security Latest
Security Latest
腾讯CDC
Simon Willison's Weblog
Simon Willison's Weblog
S
Securelist
博客园 - 【当耐特】
Threat Intelligence Blog | Flashpoint
Threat Intelligence Blog | Flashpoint
T
Threat Research - Cisco Blogs
博客园 - 司徒正美
AWS News Blog
AWS News Blog
WordPress大学
WordPress大学
Jina AI
Jina AI
G
GRAHAM CLULEY
V
V2EX
L
LINUX DO - 最新话题
H
Heimdal Security Blog
让小产品的独立变现更简单 - ezindie.com
让小产品的独立变现更简单 - ezindie.com
IT之家
IT之家

Electronic Frontier Foundation

Onward, Friends EFFecting Change: LGBTQ+ Solidarity Against the Tide of Surveillance EFFecting Change Site Banner 6.17.26 Victory! 702 has Expired! Yes to California's Bill to Ban Surveillance Pricing ‘News’ Site Keeps Hallucinating EFF Staffers LGBT Q&A: We’re Back With Season 2! Congress Just Rushed Through a Disastrous Copyright Office Overhaul The 702 Ultimatum: Warrant Requirement or Bust Enshittification Merch That Actually Fights Enshittification 🔊 Mass Surveillance for… Loud Music? | EFFector 38.11 How and Why to Fight Back Against Social Media Bans Tell Congress: Just Say No to NO FAKES VICTORY: Meta Strips Facial Recognition Code From Smart Glasses App After Public Outcry Cheers to the Winners of EFF’s 18th Annual Cyberlaw Trivia Night! EFFecting Change: If You Own It, Why Can't You Fix It? Internet Age-Gates Are a Growing Global Threat LGBT Q&A Season 1 Recap: Staying Safer Online EFF at TechCrunch Disrupt California’s AB 412 Still Demands Developers Do The Impossible Pulte Appointment Underscores Need to Reform Section 702 Spying EFF Testifies to Congress on Protecting Americans’ Rights from Government AI Move Fast, Surveil Things EFF at DEF CON 34 We're Fighting Mass Surveillance Tech—and Winning Welcome New EFF Executive Director Nicole Ozer One Step Forward, Two Steps Back: CA's AB 1856 Exempts Open Source But Expands Age-Gating Barcelona Cybersecurity Congress Age Verification is a Privacy Nightmare More License Plate Reader Mission Creep: School Residency Verification, Background Checks, and Noise Complaints 🔒 A Win for Encrypted Messaging | EFFector 38.10 Microsoft Took a Step Toward Human Rights Accountability. Google and Amazon (and Others) Should Pay Attention! Your Privacy Shouldn't Be A Corporate Decision EFFecting Change: LGBTQ+ Solidarity Against the Tide of Surveillance We Updated Our Privacy Policy. Here's What Changed and Why. We Must Not Normalize Digital Surveillance Abuses. EFF’s New Guide Underlines Concrete Steps to Fight Back. EFF at Black Hat USA Help EFF Solve an Issue That's Bigger than Creepy Ads The Science is Not Settled: How Weak Evidence is Fueling a National Push to Ban Social Media for Youth Broken Promises: RIP Instagram’s End-to-End Encrypted DMs Victory! End-to-End Encrypted RCS Comes to Apple and Android Chats EFF Launches New Offline Campaign for Saudi Wikipedian Osama Khalid A Hackers Guide to Circumventing Internet Shutdowns Canada’s Bill C-22 Is a Repackaged Version of Last Year’s Surveillance Nightmare EFF to Fourth Circuit: Electronic Device Searches at the Border Require a Warrant EFFecting Change Site Banner 5.14.26 EFF Stands in Solidarity With RightsCon and the Global Digital Rights Community Congress Narrowed the GUARD Act, But Serious Problems Remain Free Signal Guide Milestone 1.0.0 Release of APK Downloader `apkeep` Powers Research on Android Apps 👎 California's Terrible, No Good, Very Bad Social Media Ban | EFFector 38.9 The SECURE Data Act is Not a Serious Piece of Privacy Legislation Offline: Osama Khalid EFF and 18 Organizations Urge UK Policymakers to Prioritize Addressing the Roots of Online Harm Shut Down Turnkey Totalitarianism EFF Submission to UK Consultation on Digital ID Getting Digital Fairness Right: EFF's Recommendations for the EU's Digital Fairness Act A Bridge to Somewhere: How to Link Your Mastodon, Bluesky, or Other Federated Accounts Utah’s New Law Targeting VPNs Goes Into Effect Next Week Open Records Laws Reveal ALPRs’ Sprawling Surveillance. Now States Want to Block What the Public Sees. Digital Hopes, Real Power: From Connection to Collective Action Aaron v. Bondi EFF Submission to UN Report on the Role of Media in the Context of Israel’s Policies Toward Palestinians Former EFF Activism Director's New Book, Transaction Denied, Explores What Happens When Financial Companies Act like Censors The Open Social Web Needs Section 230 to Survive The GUARD Act Isn’t Targeting Dangerous AI—It’s Blocking Everyday Internet Use Congress Must Reject New Insufficient 702 Reauthorization Bill The Internet Still Works: SmugMug Powers Online Photography Act Now to Stop California’s Paternalistic and Privacy-Destroying Social Media Ban EFF Challenges Secrecy In Eastern District of Texas Patent Case California Coastal Community Must Reject CBP's AI-Powered Surveillance Tower EFF to 9th Circuit (Again): App Stores Shouldn’t Be Liable for Processing Payments for User Content 📁 How ICE Got My Data | EFFector 38.8 EFF Sues DHS and ICE For Records on Subpoenas Seeking to Unmask Online Critics Bay Area Members' Speakeasy with WISP Palantir Has a Human Rights Policy. Its ICE Work Tells a Different Story Keep Pushing: We Get 10 More Days to Reform Section 702 EFF at RightsCon Stop New York's Attack on 3D Printing How Push Notifications Can Betray Your Privacy (and What to Do About It) Google Broke Its Promise to Me. Now ICE Has My Data. EFF Calls on Kuwait to Release Journalist Ahmed Shihab-Eldin Digital Hopes, Real Power: The Rise of Network Shutdowns EFF to State AGs: Investigate Google's Broken Promise to Users Targeted by the Government The Dangers of California’s Legislation to Censor 3D Printing The Bay Agenda: Security for Journalists EFF 🤝 HOPE: Join Us This August! Hot Off the Press: EFF's Updated Guide to Tech at the US-Mexico Border War as a Pretext: Gulf States Are Tightening the Screws on Speech—Again Speaking Freely: Dr. Jean Linis-Dinco We Need You: Our Privacy Cannot Afford a Clean Extension of Section 702 Yikes, Encryption’s Y2K Moment is Coming Years Early Comparison Shopping Is Not a (Computer) Crime EFF is Leaving X Banning New Foreign Routers Mistargets Products to Fix Real Problem Another Court Rules Copyright Can’t Stop People From Reading and Speaking the Law 👁 Selling Mass Surveillance | EFFector 38.7 Digital Hopes, Real Power: How the Arab Spring Fueled a Global Surveillance Boom Privacy Index Workshop EU Parliament Blocks Mass-Scanning of Our Chats—What's Next?
Copyright and DMCA Best Practices for Fediverse Operators
Mitch Stoltz · 2026-04-22 · via Electronic Frontier Foundation

People building the future of the social web — interoperable and decentralized — need to protect themselves against copyright liability. Like anyone who creates and operates platforms for user-uploaded content, the hosts of the decentralized social web can take preventive measures to reduce their legal exposure when a user posts material that violates someone’s copyright.

This post gives an overview of the steps to take. It’s meant for operators of Mastodon and other ActivityPub servers, Bluesky hosts, RSS mirrors, and other decentralized social media protocols, and developers of apps for those protocols — but it will apply to other hosts as well. This isn’t legal advice, and can’t substitute for a consultation with a lawyer about your specific circumstances. It focuses on U.S. law — the law may impose different requirements elsewhere. Still, we hope it helps you get started with confidence.

Why should I care? Copyright’s Sword of Damocles

In some circumstances, the operator of a platform that handles user content can be legally responsible for content that infringes copyright. That can happen when the platform operator is directly involved in copying or distributing the copyrighted material, when they promote or knowingly assist the infringement, or when they benefit financially from infringement while being in a position to supervise it. But these judge-made rules are often difficult and uncertain to apply in practice — and the penalties for being found on the wrong side of the law can be severe. Copyright’s “statutory damages” regime allows for massive, unpredictable financial liability. That’s why it’s important to limit your risk.

For Server Operators: Limiting Risk with the DMCA Safe Harbors

If you run a social network server, the safe harbor provisions of the Digital Millennium Copyright Act (DMCA) are an important way to limit your liability risk. The DMCA shields server operators from nearly all forms of copyright liability that can result from “storage at the direction of a user” — in other words, hosting user-uploaded content. But to qualify for this protection, there are steps a server operator has to take.

1. Designate A Contact To Receive Copyright Infringement Notices

First, you’ll need to provide contact information for someone who can receive infringement notices (a “designated agent”). That information needs to be posted in at least two places: on your server in a place visible to users (such as a “DMCA” page or post, or as part of your Terms of Service), and in the U.S. Copyright Office’s “Designated Agent Directory.” To post that information to the directory, you have to create an account at https://www.copyright.gov/dmca-directory/ and pay a small fee. The directory listings expire after three years, and once expired, your safe harbor protection goes away, so it’s important to keep that listing current.

2. Respond Promptly to Notices and Counter-notices

When you receive infringement notices, it’s important to respond to them promptly. Notices are supposed to identify the copyright holder, the copyrighted work they claim was infringed, and the post they claim is infringing. By deleting or disabling access to the posted material, you protect yourself from liability with respect to that material.

The theory behind Section 512 is that hosts don’t have to be in a position of deciding whether a post infringes someone’s copyright — it’s up to the poster, the rights holder, and potentially a court to decide that. A host who takes down posts whenever they receive an infringement notice is well-protected. But it’s equally important to recognize that hosts aren’t required to take down content in response to every notice. Infringement notices are frequently wrong, misguided, or abusive, or simply incomplete. Hosts who want to stand up for their users’ speech can choose to disregard infringement notices that seem suspect. While this risks losing the automatic protection of the safe harbor in each instance, it can still be done safely with careful preparation, ideally using a plan crafted with help from a lawyer. Bear in mind that people sending false notices, including by failing to consider whether a post is a fair use before asking a host to take it down, can be liable for damages under the DMCA.

The DMCA also allows the person who posted the material to send a “counter-notification” asserting that they really did have the right to post and that there’s no copyright infringement. Responding to counter-notifications is a good way for a host to demonstrate that they look out for their users. When a host receives a counter-notification, they should forward it on to the person who sent the original takedown notice and let them know that the post will be restored in 10 business days. Then, after that waiting period has elapsed, the host can restore the posted material. Just like with infringement notices, a host isn’t required to honor a counter-notification that appears to be fraudulent, but there’s no penalty for honoring it anyway.

3. Have A Repeat Infringer Policy

The next requirement is to have a policy of terminating the accounts of “subscribers and account holders” who are “repeat infringers” in “appropriate circumstances,” and to carry out that policy. Yes, that’s a vague requirement. It doesn’t require a “three strikes” policy or any other sports analogy. It just needs to be reasonable. Be sure your policy is spelled out in your website terms or “DMCA” page.

4. Don’t Ignore Known Infringement

Hosts need to take down user posts whenever the host actually knows that the post is infringing. In other words, a host isn’t protected if they ignore takedown notices based on technicalities in the notices, or if they learn about the infringement some other way. But hosts don’t need to actively look for infringement on their servers — only to act when someone notifies them.

5. Don’t Encourage Infringement

Finally, make sure that nothing you post or advertise actively encourages copyright infringement. For example, don’t post examples of users uploading copyrighted music or video without permission, or insinuate that your server is a good place for infringing content.

There are some other technicalities in the DMCA that can affect the safe harbor, which is why it’s always a good idea to consult with a lawyer. But following these steps will help protect you when you run a social media server — or any other kind of user-uploaded content platform.