惯性聚合 高效追踪和阅读你感兴趣的博客、新闻、科技资讯
阅读原文 在惯性聚合中打开

推荐订阅源

Engineering at Meta
Engineering at Meta
雷峰网
雷峰网
freeCodeCamp Programming Tutorials: Python, JavaScript, Git & More
B
Blog
Y
Y Combinator Blog
WordPress大学
WordPress大学
Microsoft Azure Blog
Microsoft Azure Blog
小众软件
小众软件
G
Google Developers Blog
云风的 BLOG
云风的 BLOG
罗磊的独立博客
博客园 - 三生石上(FineUI控件)
博客园 - 叶小钗
钛媒体:引领未来商业与生活新知
钛媒体:引领未来商业与生活新知
量子位
The Cloudflare Blog
T
The Blog of Author Tim Ferriss
博客园_首页
B
Blog RSS Feed
Hugging Face - Blog
Hugging Face - Blog
IT之家
IT之家
阮一峰的网络日志
阮一峰的网络日志
L
LangChain Blog
宝玉的分享
宝玉的分享

Electronic Frontier Foundation

EFFecting Change: LGBTQ+ Solidarity Against the Tide of Surveillance EFFecting Change Site Banner 6.17.26 Victory! 702 has Expired! Yes to California's Bill to Ban Surveillance Pricing ‘News’ Site Keeps Hallucinating EFF Staffers LGBT Q&A: We’re Back With Season 2! Congress Just Rushed Through a Disastrous Copyright Office Overhaul The 702 Ultimatum: Warrant Requirement or Bust Enshittification Merch That Actually Fights Enshittification 🔊 Mass Surveillance for… Loud Music? | EFFector 38.11 How and Why to Fight Back Against Social Media Bans Tell Congress: Just Say No to NO FAKES VICTORY: Meta Strips Facial Recognition Code From Smart Glasses App After Public Outcry Cheers to the Winners of EFF’s 18th Annual Cyberlaw Trivia Night! EFFecting Change: If You Own It, Why Can't You Fix It? Internet Age-Gates Are a Growing Global Threat LGBT Q&A Season 1 Recap: Staying Safer Online EFF at TechCrunch Disrupt California’s AB 412 Still Demands Developers Do The Impossible Pulte Appointment Underscores Need to Reform Section 702 Spying EFF Testifies to Congress on Protecting Americans’ Rights from Government AI Move Fast, Surveil Things EFF at DEF CON 34 We're Fighting Mass Surveillance Tech—and Winning Welcome New EFF Executive Director Nicole Ozer One Step Forward, Two Steps Back: CA's AB 1856 Exempts Open Source But Expands Age-Gating Barcelona Cybersecurity Congress Age Verification is a Privacy Nightmare More License Plate Reader Mission Creep: School Residency Verification, Background Checks, and Noise Complaints 🔒 A Win for Encrypted Messaging | EFFector 38.10
EFF Joins 60+ Groups Urging the UK to Halt Face Estimatio...
Paige Collings · 2026-06-19 · via Electronic Frontier Foundation

This week, EFF joined Foxglove, Human Rights Watch, and 60 other organizations in writing to the UK’s Minister of State for Border Security and Asylum, Alex Norris, raising serious concern about the Home Office’s decision to deploy Facial Age Estimation (FAE) to assess asylum-seeking children from 2027. 

The letter points to four key concerns:

Discrimination 

As with most face estimation and recognition tools, there is ongoing bias in the deployment of these technologies. With FAE, many have highlighted its baked-in failures and discrimination, particularly in relation to women and people of color. Evidence shows that FAE is most accurate for estimating the ages of Eastern European men, but even then it consistently produces errors. The Home Office itself noted “that FAE performance can vary depending on ethnicity” and skin tone. 

Inaccuracy

The Home Office has admitted that FAE systems are imprecise for analyzing 16-to 18-year-olds, with even the “top systems” having an “error margin of around 2.5 years here.” This is exactly the age range for which the Home Office has chosen to deploy this technology. And this error margin will be widened yet further because children seeking asylum often suffer from trauma-induced aging. 

Lawfulness of Use of Children’s Data

Major concerns exist around the lawful basis on which the Home Office, or its chosen third-party FAE vendors, could have sought consent to collect and process photographs or data from asylum-seeking children to train this system. Further, there is no clarity on the images and/or data that this technology has been trained on. 

Lack of Necessary Disclosure 

The Home Office claims “extensive testing has already been carried out across diverse groups, including different ethnicities, genders and age ranges, indicating promising performance and accuracy.” But these purported “promising” results have not been published, nor have any Equality or Data Protection Impact Assessments. 

The letter continues by requesting clarification on several key questions regarding these concerns. EFF and partners have provided the UK government 21 days for a response, and we urge the Home Office to take on this uphill task in good faith and release the information.

You can read the letter in full here