惯性聚合 高效追踪和阅读你感兴趣的博客、新闻、科技资讯
阅读原文 在惯性聚合中打开

推荐订阅源

Microsoft Security Blog
Microsoft Security Blog
Apple Machine Learning Research
Apple Machine Learning Research
美团技术团队
WordPress大学
WordPress大学
酷 壳 – CoolShell
酷 壳 – CoolShell
G
Google Developers Blog
阮一峰的网络日志
阮一峰的网络日志
The Cloudflare Blog
J
Java Code Geeks
Martin Fowler
Martin Fowler
M
MIT News - Artificial intelligence
IT之家
IT之家
博客园 - 三生石上(FineUI控件)
月光博客
月光博客
Google DeepMind News
Google DeepMind News
小众软件
小众软件
V
V2EX
Hugging Face - Blog
Hugging Face - Blog
爱范儿
爱范儿
OSCHINA 社区最新新闻
OSCHINA 社区最新新闻
Jina AI
Jina AI
freeCodeCamp Programming Tutorials: Python, JavaScript, Git & More
腾讯CDC
B
Blog

DEV Community

Authentication Security Deep Dive: From Brute Force to Salted Hashing (With Java Examples) Why AI Systems Don’t Fail — They Drift Spilling beans for how i learn for exam😁"Reinforcement Learning Cheat Sheet" I Replaced Chrome with Safari for AI Browser Automation. Here's What Broke (and What Finally Worked) How Python Borrows Other People's Work The $40 Architecture: Processing 1 Billion API Requests with 99.99% Uptime Vibe Coding: A Workflow Guide (From Zero to SaaS) Most webhook security guides protect the wrong side. The scary part is delivery. Headless CMS for TanStack Start: Build a Blog with Cosmic EU Age Verification App "Hacked in 2 Minutes" — What Actually Happened Comfy Cloud’s delete function does not actually remove files Running AI Models on GPU Cloud Servers: A Beginner Guide Event-driven media intelligence with AWS Step Functions and Bedrock I scored 500 AI prompts across 8 quality dimensions — here's what broke How to Call Google Gemini API from Next.js (Free Tier, No Backend Needed) The Portal Protocol: Reclaiming Human Connection in the Age of AI How to Fix Your Team's Scattered Knowledge Problem With a Self-Hosted Forum Intro to tc Cloud Functors: A Graph-First Mental Model for the Modern Cloud Designing Multi-Tenant Backends With Both Ownership and Team Access I Built a Neumorphic CSS Library with 77+ Components — Here's What I Learned PostgreSQL Performance Optimization: Why Connection Pooling Is Critical at Scale Cómo construí un SaaS multi-rubro para gestionar expensas en Argentina con FastAPI + Vue 3 🚀 I Built an Ethical Hacking Scanner Tool – Open Source Project I Replaced /usage and /context in Claude Code With a Single Statusline A Pythonic Way to Handle Emails (IMAP/SMTP) with Auto-Discovery and AI-Ready Design I Collected 8.9 Million Polymarket Price Points — Here's What I Found About How Markets Really Move EcoTrack AI — Carbon Footprint Tracker & Dashboard Everyone's Using AI. No One Agrees How. 5 self-hosted ebook managers worth trying in 2026 Building Your First AI Agent with LangChain: From Chatbot to Autonomous Assistant
Building My First Real API in Go — with Gin
mihir mohapatra · 2026-06-22 · via DEV Community

Building My First Real API in Go — with Gin

In part 4 I worked through Go's error handling model and came around on if err != nil. This is the post where everything from the last four parts — structs, interfaces, goroutines, error wrapping — stops being theoretical and actually gets wired into something that runs, accepts requests, and talks to a database.

I'm building a small Orders API: create an order, fetch one by ID, list all of them. Simple enough that the routing and middleware patterns are clear, complex enough that the error handling and concurrency patterns from earlier posts actually matter.

Why Gin

The Go standard library's net/http package is genuinely capable — you can write a production API with nothing else. But Gin adds three things that make it worth reaching for immediately: a clean router with path parameters and route groups, a middleware chain that composes nicely, and response helpers (c.JSON, c.AbortWithStatusJSON) that remove a lot of boilerplate. It's the closest thing Go has to a lightweight Express or Axum — fast, minimal, and doesn't try to own your entire architecture.

go mod init orders-api
go get github.com/gin-gonic/gin

Project Structure

Before a single line of code, here's the layout I settled on:

orders-api/
├── main.go
├── handler/
│   └── order.go
├── model/
│   └── order.go
├── store/
│   └── order.go
└── middleware/
    └── logger.go

This is the standard Go flat-package layout — no src/, no deep nesting, no framework-imposed folders. handler owns HTTP concerns, model owns data shapes, store owns persistence logic. The separation means each layer depends on the one below it, and none of them import each other in circles.

The Model

// model/order.go
package model

import "time"

type Order struct {
    ID        string    `json:"id"`
    Customer  string    `json:"customer"`
    Amount    float64   `json:"amount"`
    Status    string    `json:"status"`
    CreatedAt time.Time `json:"created_at"`
}

type CreateOrderRequest struct {
    Customer string  `json:"customer" binding:"required"`
    Amount   float64 `json:"amount"   binding:"required,gt=0"`
}

Two things worth noting here. The struct tags (json:"id") control serialisation — without them Gin would use the field name as-is, so CreatedAt would become CreatedAt in JSON rather than created_at. The binding tags on CreateOrderRequest are Gin's built-in validation: binding:"required" rejects blank fields, gt=0 rejects zero or negative amounts. This is the closest Go gets to Java Bean Validation annotations, except it's enforced at the handler layer rather than the model layer — I'll show how in a moment.

The Store

For now the store is in-memory — a map behind a sync.RWMutex. Part 7 will swap this for pgx. The interface is the important part:

// store/order.go
package store

import (
    "errors"
    "sync"
    "time"

    "orders-api/model"

    "github.com/google/uuid"
)

var ErrNotFound = errors.New("order not found")

type OrderStore interface {
    Create(req model.CreateOrderRequest) (model.Order, error)
    GetByID(id string) (model.Order, error)
    List() ([]model.Order, error)
}

type inMemoryStore struct {
    mu     sync.RWMutex
    orders map[string]model.Order
}

func NewInMemoryStore() OrderStore {
    return &inMemoryStore{orders: make(map[string]model.Order)}
}

func (s *inMemoryStore) Create(req model.CreateOrderRequest) (model.Order, error) {
    order := model.Order{
        ID:        uuid.New().String(),
        Customer:  req.Customer,
        Amount:    req.Amount,
        Status:    "pending",
        CreatedAt: time.Now(),
    }
    s.mu.Lock()
    s.orders[order.ID] = order
    s.mu.Unlock()
    return order, nil
}

func (s *inMemoryStore) GetByID(id string) (model.Order, error) {
    s.mu.RLock()
    defer s.mu.RUnlock()
    order, ok := s.orders[id]
    if !ok {
        return model.Order{}, ErrNotFound
    }
    return order, nil
}

func (s *inMemoryStore) List() ([]model.Order, error) {
    s.mu.RLock()
    defer s.mu.RUnlock()
    orders := make([]model.Order, 0, len(s.orders))
    for _, o := range s.orders {
        orders = append(orders, o)
    }
    return orders, nil
}

sync.RWMutex lets multiple concurrent reads proceed at the same time but serialises writes — the right primitive for a read-heavy in-memory store. The OrderStore interface is defined here, in the store package, but that's just for organisation — the handler depends on the interface, not the concrete type, which means swapping in a real database later is a one-line change in main.go.

The Handler

// handler/order.go
package handler

import (
    "errors"
    "net/http"

    "orders-api/model"
    "orders-api/store"

    "github.com/gin-gonic/gin"
)

type OrderHandler struct {
    store store.OrderStore
}

func NewOrderHandler(s store.OrderStore) *OrderHandler {
    return &OrderHandler{store: s}
}

func (h *OrderHandler) Create(c *gin.Context) {
    var req model.CreateOrderRequest
    if err := c.ShouldBindJSON(&req); err != nil {
        c.AbortWithStatusJSON(http.StatusBadRequest, gin.H{"error": err.Error()})
        return
    }

    order, err := h.store.Create(req)
    if err != nil {
        c.AbortWithStatusJSON(http.StatusInternalServerError, gin.H{"error": "could not create order"})
        return
    }

    c.JSON(http.StatusCreated, order)
}

func (h *OrderHandler) GetByID(c *gin.Context) {
    id := c.Param("id")

    order, err := h.store.GetByID(id)
    if err != nil {
        if errors.Is(err, store.ErrNotFound) {
            c.AbortWithStatusJSON(http.StatusNotFound, gin.H{"error": "order not found"})
            return
        }
        c.AbortWithStatusJSON(http.StatusInternalServerError, gin.H{"error": "could not fetch order"})
        return
    }

    c.JSON(http.StatusOK, order)
}

func (h *OrderHandler) List(c *gin.Context) {
    orders, err := h.store.List()
    if err != nil {
        c.AbortWithStatusJSON(http.StatusInternalServerError, gin.H{"error": "could not list orders"})
        return
    }
    c.JSON(http.StatusOK, orders)
}

ShouldBindJSON is where the binding tags from the model earn their keep — it validates and decodes the request body in one call, returning a descriptive error if anything fails. errors.Is(err, store.ErrNotFound) is the same pattern from part 4: unwrap through layers and match the sentinel. The handler doesn't know or care whether the store is in-memory or PostgreSQL — it just speaks to the interface.

Middleware: Request Logging

// middleware/logger.go
package middleware

import (
    "fmt"
    "time"

    "github.com/gin-gonic/gin"
)

func Logger() gin.HandlerFunc {
    return func(c *gin.Context) {
        start := time.Now()
        c.Next()
        fmt.Printf("[%s] %s %s %d (%s)\n",
            start.Format("15:04:05"),
            c.Request.Method,
            c.Request.URL.Path,
            c.Writer.Status(),
            time.Since(start),
        )
    }
}

c.Next() hands control to the next handler in the chain, then execution returns here after the response is written — which is why time.Since(start) gives you the actual request duration. This is the middleware pattern in every Gin-based service: wrap, call Next(), do something with what happened after.

Wiring It Together

// main.go
package main

import (
    "orders-api/handler"
    "orders-api/middleware"
    "orders-api/store"

    "github.com/gin-gonic/gin"
)

func main() {
    s := store.NewInMemoryStore()
    h := handler.NewOrderHandler(s)

    r := gin.New()
    r.Use(middleware.Logger())

    api := r.Group("/api/v1")
    {
        orders := api.Group("/orders")
        orders.POST("", h.Create)
        orders.GET("", h.List)
        orders.GET("/:id", h.GetByID)
    }

    r.Run(":8080")
}

gin.New() instead of gin.Default() gives a blank engine — no Gin's built-in logger or recovery middleware added automatically, since we're providing our own. The r.Group nesting gives every orders route the /api/v1/orders prefix without repeating it on each registration. Running this and hitting POST /api/v1/orders with a JSON body gets you a real response, with validation, error handling, and request logging, in about 120 lines across all files.

What This Draws On From Earlier Posts

Part 2's interfaces: OrderStore is exactly the kind of single-responsibility interface Go favours — three methods, defined by the consumer (the handler), satisfied implicitly by the concrete store.

Part 3's concurrency: sync.RWMutex in the store is the in-memory safe concurrency answer. In part 7 when this becomes a real database, the connection pool handles this instead.

Part 4's error handling: errors.Is(err, store.ErrNotFound) translating a store-layer sentinel into an HTTP 404 is the wrapping pattern paying off at the HTTP boundary.

Up Next

Part 6 is testing — table-driven tests, the httptest package for handler tests without spinning up a real server, and the benchmarking habits that will matter once we push toward production in part 7.

What's your preferred approach to structuring Go API projects — flat packages like this, or a domain-driven layout with more nesting? Genuinely curious how people land on this one.