惯性聚合 高效追踪和阅读你感兴趣的博客、新闻、科技资讯
阅读原文 在惯性聚合中打开

推荐订阅源

博客园_首页
博客园 - 【当耐特】
博客园 - 叶小钗
阮一峰的网络日志
阮一峰的网络日志
WordPress大学
WordPress大学
D
Docker
T
The Blog of Author Tim Ferriss
Cyber Security Advisories - MS-ISAC
Cyber Security Advisories - MS-ISAC
Microsoft Azure Blog
Microsoft Azure Blog
钛媒体:引领未来商业与生活新知
钛媒体:引领未来商业与生活新知
月光博客
月光博客
M
MIT News - Artificial intelligence
H
Hackread – Cybersecurity News, Data Breaches, AI and More
freeCodeCamp Programming Tutorials: Python, JavaScript, Git & More
云风的 BLOG
云风的 BLOG
F
Fortinet All Blogs
罗磊的独立博客
小众软件
小众软件
A
About on SuperTechFans
MyScale Blog
MyScale Blog
D
DataBreaches.Net
The GitHub Blog
The GitHub Blog
C
Check Point Blog
L
LangChain Blog

DEV Community

Authentication Security Deep Dive: From Brute Force to Salted Hashing (With Java Examples) Why AI Systems Don’t Fail — They Drift Spilling beans for how i learn for exam😁"Reinforcement Learning Cheat Sheet" I Replaced Chrome with Safari for AI Browser Automation. Here's What Broke (and What Finally Worked) How Python Borrows Other People's Work The $40 Architecture: Processing 1 Billion API Requests with 99.99% Uptime Vibe Coding: A Workflow Guide (From Zero to SaaS) Most webhook security guides protect the wrong side. The scary part is delivery. Headless CMS for TanStack Start: Build a Blog with Cosmic EU Age Verification App "Hacked in 2 Minutes" — What Actually Happened Comfy Cloud’s delete function does not actually remove files Running AI Models on GPU Cloud Servers: A Beginner Guide Event-driven media intelligence with AWS Step Functions and Bedrock I scored 500 AI prompts across 8 quality dimensions — here's what broke How to Call Google Gemini API from Next.js (Free Tier, No Backend Needed) The Portal Protocol: Reclaiming Human Connection in the Age of AI How to Fix Your Team's Scattered Knowledge Problem With a Self-Hosted Forum Intro to tc Cloud Functors: A Graph-First Mental Model for the Modern Cloud Designing Multi-Tenant Backends With Both Ownership and Team Access I Built a Neumorphic CSS Library with 77+ Components — Here's What I Learned PostgreSQL Performance Optimization: Why Connection Pooling Is Critical at Scale Cómo construí un SaaS multi-rubro para gestionar expensas en Argentina con FastAPI + Vue 3 🚀 I Built an Ethical Hacking Scanner Tool – Open Source Project I Replaced /usage and /context in Claude Code With a Single Statusline A Pythonic Way to Handle Emails (IMAP/SMTP) with Auto-Discovery and AI-Ready Design I Collected 8.9 Million Polymarket Price Points — Here's What I Found About How Markets Really Move EcoTrack AI — Carbon Footprint Tracker & Dashboard Everyone's Using AI. No One Agrees How. 5 self-hosted ebook managers worth trying in 2026 Building Your First AI Agent with LangChain: From Chatbot to Autonomous Assistant
GitOps on K3s: Managing a Complete Homelab with ArgoCD
david · 2026-06-14 · via DEV Community

david

Originally published at woitzik.dev

Most Kubernetes tutorials end with kubectl apply -f. You deploy something, it works, and you move on. Three weeks later you have no idea what's running in your cluster, why it's configured that way, or how to recreate it if something breaks.

GitOps solves this. With ArgoCD, your Git repository is the single source of truth for everything in the cluster. No manual kubectl apply, no Helm commands in your shell history, no configuration drift. If it's not in Git, it doesn't exist.

This article documents how a complete homelab stack — MetalLB, Traefik, Longhorn, cert-manager, Authelia, and Vaultwarden — is managed as a single Git repository using ArgoCD's App-of-Apps pattern.

View the complete homelab infrastructure source on GitHub 🐙

The Repository Structure

Everything lives in one repository under a kubernetes/ directory:

homelab-infrastructure/
└── kubernetes/
    ├── apps/                    # User-facing applications
    │   ├── authelia/
    │   │   ├── authelia.yml     # Deployment + Service
    │   │   ├── configuration.yml # ConfigMap
    │   │   ├── ingress.yml
    │   │   └── users_database.yml
    │   └── vaultwarden/
    │       ├── ingress.yml
    │       └── pvc.yml
    └── system/                  # Cluster infrastructure
        ├── argocd-config/       # ArgoCD Application definitions
        ├── cert-manager/        # Helm chart Application
        ├── cert-manager-config/ # ClusterIssuer + Certificate CRDs
        ├── longhorn/            # Helm chart Application
        ├── metallb/             # Helm chart Application
        ├── metallb-config/      # IPAddressPool + L2Advertisement
        ├── traefik/             # Helm chart Application
        └── test-app/            # nginx for smoke testing

The separation between apps/ and system/ is intentional. System components are cluster infrastructure — they need to exist before applications can run. Applications are workloads that depend on system components. ArgoCD sync waves enforce this ordering.

The App-of-Apps Pattern

Instead of manually creating each ArgoCD Application, we use the App-of-Apps pattern: a single root Application that points at the argocd-config/ directory, which contains Application manifests for everything else.

The root Application:

apiVersion: argoproj.io/v1alpha1
kind: Application
metadata:
  name: root-app
  namespace: argocd
spec:
  project: default
  source:
    repoURL: https://github.com/dwoitzik/homelab-infrastructure.git
    targetRevision: HEAD
    path: kubernetes/system/argocd-config
  destination:
    server: https://kubernetes.default.svc
    namespace: argocd
  syncPolicy:
    automated:
      prune: true
      selfHeal: true

This single Application bootstraps everything else. Once ArgoCD is installed and this root Application is created, the cluster self-assembles from Git.

How Applications Are Structured

Each component follows one of two patterns depending on whether it's a Helm chart or raw manifests.

Pattern 1: Helm Chart from External Registry

For upstream charts (MetalLB, Traefik, Longhorn, cert-manager), the Application points directly at the Helm repository:

apiVersion: argoproj.io/v1alpha1
kind: Application
metadata:
  name: cert-manager
  namespace: argocd
spec:
  project: default
  source:
    repoURL: https://charts.jetstack.io
    targetRevision: v1.14.4
    chart: cert-manager
    helm:
      values: |
        installCRDs: true
        extraArgs:
          - --dns01-recursive-nameservers=1.1.1.1:53,8.8.8.8:53
          - --dns01-recursive-nameservers-only
  destination:
    server: https://kubernetes.default.svc
    namespace: cert-manager
  syncPolicy:
    automated:
      prune: true
      selfHeal: true
    syncOptions:
      - CreateNamespace=true

The chart version is pinned (v1.14.4) — never use latest for system components. You want to control when upgrades happen, not have ArgoCD surprise you on a random sync.

Pattern 2: Raw Manifests from Git

For CRD configurations and custom resources that extend Helm charts, a separate Application points at a path in the Git repository:

apiVersion: argoproj.io/v1alpha1
kind: Application
metadata:
  name: cert-manager-config
  namespace: argocd
spec:
  project: default
  source:
    repoURL: https://github.com/dwoitzik/homelab-infrastructure.git
    targetRevision: main
    path: kubernetes/system/cert-manager-config
  destination:
    server: https://kubernetes.default.svc
    namespace: cert-manager
  syncPolicy:
    automated:
      prune: true
      selfHeal: true

This pattern — Helm chart Application + separate config Application — appears for MetalLB, cert-manager, and Longhorn. The split is necessary because CRDs installed by the Helm chart must exist before the configuration resources can be applied. Two Applications with an implicit ordering is cleaner than trying to manage this inside a single Application.

The Deployment Workflow

Once the cluster is running, the entire deployment workflow is:

1. Edit a file in the repository
2. git commit -m "describe the change"
3. git push

ArgoCD polls the repository every 3 minutes by default. Within 3 minutes of a push, ArgoCD detects the drift between the desired state (Git) and the actual state (cluster), and reconciles automatically.

No kubectl apply. No helm upgrade. No SSH into nodes. The Git history is the deployment log.

Handling the Bootstrap Problem

There is one chicken-and-egg problem: ArgoCD itself must exist before it can manage anything. The bootstrap sequence is:

# 1. Install ArgoCD itself (one-time manual step)
kubectl create namespace argocd
kubectl apply -n argocd -f https://raw.githubusercontent.com/argoproj/argo-cd/stable/manifests/install.yaml

# 2. Create the root Application (one-time manual step)
kubectl apply -f kubernetes/system/argocd-config/root-app.yaml

# 3. Everything else is automatic

After step 2, ArgoCD reads the argocd-config/ directory, creates all the child Applications, and the cluster self-assembles. This two-step bootstrap is the only manual intervention required for a full cluster rebuild.

Automated vs Manual Sync

All Applications in this setup use automated sync with selfHeal: true. This means:

  • ArgoCD automatically applies changes when it detects drift from Git
  • If someone manually changes something in the cluster (kubectl edit, Portal click, etc.), ArgoCD reverts it within minutes
  • prune: true means resources deleted from Git are deleted from the cluster

This is intentionally strict. The cluster enforces Git as the source of truth — manual changes don't survive a sync cycle.

For production workloads where you want to review changes before they apply, switch to manual sync and use ArgoCD's UI or CLI to approve deployments.

The Result

With ArgoCD managing the full stack:

  • Reproducibility — a fresh cluster rebuilds itself from git push in under 10 minutes
  • Auditability — every change is a Git commit with author, timestamp, and diff
  • Drift preventionselfHeal: true reverts any manual changes automatically
  • Dependency management — the App-of-Apps pattern enforces ordering between system and application components

The entire homelab — from bare metal to running Authelia and Vaultwarden — is a Git repository. If the cluster burns down, kubectl apply -f root-app.yaml and wait.


The same GitOps principles apply in enterprise Azure environments — with Terraform as the infrastructure layer and ArgoCD or Flux managing the application layer on top of AKS. If you are building the Azure network foundation for a regulated environment, the Enterprise Terraform Blueprints cover the Zero-Trust networking layer that sits underneath.