惯性聚合 高效追踪和阅读你感兴趣的博客、新闻、科技资讯
阅读原文 在惯性聚合中打开

推荐订阅源

博客园 - Franky
U
Unit 42
MyScale Blog
MyScale Blog
B
Blog
阮一峰的网络日志
阮一峰的网络日志
量子位
IT之家
IT之家
The GitHub Blog
The GitHub Blog
F
Fortinet All Blogs
Recent Announcements
Recent Announcements
V
Visual Studio Blog
G
Google Developers Blog
Last Week in AI
Last Week in AI
雷峰网
雷峰网
博客园 - 聂微东
博客园 - 叶小钗
OSCHINA 社区最新新闻
OSCHINA 社区最新新闻
让小产品的独立变现更简单 - ezindie.com
让小产品的独立变现更简单 - ezindie.com
J
Java Code Geeks
博客园 - 司徒正美
Y
Y Combinator Blog
T
The Blog of Author Tim Ferriss
月光博客
月光博客
aimingoo的专栏
aimingoo的专栏

DEV Community

Authentication Security Deep Dive: From Brute Force to Salted Hashing (With Java Examples) Why AI Systems Don’t Fail — They Drift Spilling beans for how i learn for exam😁"Reinforcement Learning Cheat Sheet" I Replaced Chrome with Safari for AI Browser Automation. Here's What Broke (and What Finally Worked) How Python Borrows Other People's Work The $40 Architecture: Processing 1 Billion API Requests with 99.99% Uptime Vibe Coding: A Workflow Guide (From Zero to SaaS) Most webhook security guides protect the wrong side. The scary part is delivery. Headless CMS for TanStack Start: Build a Blog with Cosmic EU Age Verification App "Hacked in 2 Minutes" — What Actually Happened Comfy Cloud’s delete function does not actually remove files Running AI Models on GPU Cloud Servers: A Beginner Guide Event-driven media intelligence with AWS Step Functions and Bedrock I scored 500 AI prompts across 8 quality dimensions — here's what broke How to Call Google Gemini API from Next.js (Free Tier, No Backend Needed) The Portal Protocol: Reclaiming Human Connection in the Age of AI How to Fix Your Team's Scattered Knowledge Problem With a Self-Hosted Forum Intro to tc Cloud Functors: A Graph-First Mental Model for the Modern Cloud Designing Multi-Tenant Backends With Both Ownership and Team Access I Built a Neumorphic CSS Library with 77+ Components — Here's What I Learned PostgreSQL Performance Optimization: Why Connection Pooling Is Critical at Scale Cómo construí un SaaS multi-rubro para gestionar expensas en Argentina con FastAPI + Vue 3 🚀 I Built an Ethical Hacking Scanner Tool – Open Source Project I Replaced /usage and /context in Claude Code With a Single Statusline A Pythonic Way to Handle Emails (IMAP/SMTP) with Auto-Discovery and AI-Ready Design I Collected 8.9 Million Polymarket Price Points — Here's What I Found About How Markets Really Move EcoTrack AI — Carbon Footprint Tracker & Dashboard Everyone's Using AI. No One Agrees How. 5 self-hosted ebook managers worth trying in 2026 Building Your First AI Agent with LangChain: From Chatbot to Autonomous Assistant
PostCSS Adopted Staged Publishing. 685M Weekly Downloads ...
Pico · 2026-06-27 · via DEV Community

Pico

On June 18, 2026, I filed postcss/postcss#2096 about OIDC provenance for PostCSS. The ai npm account — one person, Andrey Sitnik — publishes PostCSS, nanoid, Autoprefixer, browserslist, and caniuse-lite. Combined: over 900 million weekly downloads through a single publish credential.

Andrey's first reply was not agreement. It was a correction.

"CI-as-publisher increased the attack risks"

From his comment:

Provenance wouldn't save from all of that supply chain attack. The old CI-only based provenance was also a reason of TanStack Shai-Hulud attack.

CI-as-publisher increased the attack risks compared to 2FA manual publishing. TanStack was attacked only because they publish by CI and it was a token on CI.

He is right. TanStack's May 2026 compromise came through GitHub Actions cache poisoning. The attacker got an OIDC token from the CI runner and used it to publish. The provenance attestation was valid — the package was built by TanStack's CI pipeline. The CI pipeline was just also running the attacker's code.

Red Hat's June 1 compromise proved the same pattern. Thirty-two packages published through a compromised GitHub account's CI pipeline. All 32 had valid SLSA provenance attestations.

Andrey's argument: if you publish manually with hardware-bound 2FA (passkey, YubiKey), the attacker needs physical access to your device. If you publish through CI, the attacker needs a GitHub token — a much larger attack surface.

The resolution: Staged Publishing

npm's Staged Publishing splits the problem: CI builds and stages. A human approves before latest moves. A stolen CI token stages a malicious version but never promotes it.

From Andrey's follow-up:

I already moved nanoid and nanospy to the new process, we can test them.

PostCSS will be done in a week or two (too many other open source projects) 😅

The diff

nanoid's release.yml, updated June 18:

- name: Publish npm package
  run: npm stage publish

PostCSS followed through

Andrey said "a week or two." It took nine days. As of June 27, four of the seven packages under the ai npm account have Staged Publishing enabled:

Package Weekly downloads Staged Publishing Score
postcss 251M 85
nanoid 207M 92
browserslist 166M 89
autoprefixer 61M 89
caniuse-lite 171M 81
postcss-nested 54M 72
postcss-js 53M 70

That's 685 million weekly downloads now behind a human approval gate. One GitHub issue, nine days, no drama.

Three more packages remain. When caniuse-lite, postcss-nested, and postcss-js adopt, the entire PostCSS ecosystem — 963 million weekly downloads — will be gated.

Check your dependencies

npx proof-of-commitment

Scans your lockfile. Flags single-publisher packages at scale. Shows provenance, Staged Publishing, and dormant access status. When nanoid's score went from 90 to 92 after adopting Staged Publishing, the CLI picked it up automatically.

The full PostCSS ecosystem audit data comes from Commit, which scores packages on behavioral signals rather than declared metadata.