惯性聚合 高效追踪和阅读你感兴趣的博客、新闻、科技资讯
阅读原文 在惯性聚合中打开

推荐订阅源

Recent Announcements
Recent Announcements
奇客Solidot–传递最新科技情报
奇客Solidot–传递最新科技情报
MongoDB | Blog
MongoDB | Blog
H
Help Net Security
钛媒体:引领未来商业与生活新知
钛媒体:引领未来商业与生活新知
人人都是产品经理
人人都是产品经理
freeCodeCamp Programming Tutorials: Python, JavaScript, Git & More
The GitHub Blog
The GitHub Blog
V
V2EX
Microsoft Security Blog
Microsoft Security Blog
V
Visual Studio Blog
A
About on SuperTechFans
博客园_首页
L
LangChain Blog
量子位
雷峰网
雷峰网
Cyber Security Advisories - MS-ISAC
Cyber Security Advisories - MS-ISAC
Jina AI
Jina AI
月光博客
月光博客
阮一峰的网络日志
阮一峰的网络日志
博客园 - 聂微东
Microsoft Azure Blog
Microsoft Azure Blog
M
MIT News - Artificial intelligence
N
Netflix TechBlog - Medium

DEV Community

Authentication Security Deep Dive: From Brute Force to Salted Hashing (With Java Examples) Why AI Systems Don’t Fail — They Drift Spilling beans for how i learn for exam😁"Reinforcement Learning Cheat Sheet" I Replaced Chrome with Safari for AI Browser Automation. Here's What Broke (and What Finally Worked) How Python Borrows Other People's Work The $40 Architecture: Processing 1 Billion API Requests with 99.99% Uptime Vibe Coding: A Workflow Guide (From Zero to SaaS) Most webhook security guides protect the wrong side. The scary part is delivery. Headless CMS for TanStack Start: Build a Blog with Cosmic EU Age Verification App "Hacked in 2 Minutes" — What Actually Happened Comfy Cloud’s delete function does not actually remove files Running AI Models on GPU Cloud Servers: A Beginner Guide Event-driven media intelligence with AWS Step Functions and Bedrock I scored 500 AI prompts across 8 quality dimensions — here's what broke How to Call Google Gemini API from Next.js (Free Tier, No Backend Needed) The Portal Protocol: Reclaiming Human Connection in the Age of AI How to Fix Your Team's Scattered Knowledge Problem With a Self-Hosted Forum Intro to tc Cloud Functors: A Graph-First Mental Model for the Modern Cloud Designing Multi-Tenant Backends With Both Ownership and Team Access I Built a Neumorphic CSS Library with 77+ Components — Here's What I Learned PostgreSQL Performance Optimization: Why Connection Pooling Is Critical at Scale Cómo construí un SaaS multi-rubro para gestionar expensas en Argentina con FastAPI + Vue 3 🚀 I Built an Ethical Hacking Scanner Tool – Open Source Project I Replaced /usage and /context in Claude Code With a Single Statusline A Pythonic Way to Handle Emails (IMAP/SMTP) with Auto-Discovery and AI-Ready Design I Collected 8.9 Million Polymarket Price Points — Here's What I Found About How Markets Really Move EcoTrack AI — Carbon Footprint Tracker & Dashboard Everyone's Using AI. No One Agrees How. 5 self-hosted ebook managers worth trying in 2026 Building Your First AI Agent with LangChain: From Chatbot to Autonomous Assistant
Why teachers need explainable AI, not just accurate AI — ...
Oscar Rieken · 2026-05-21 · via DEV Community

What We Built

NumPath's teacher dashboard previously showed one number per student: 7-day accuracy. A teacher looking at "Emma — 43%" has no idea whether Emma is struggling with borrowing, place value, number sense, or all three. The number is technically correct and completely unactionable.

In this post I'll walk through how we added a Knowledge Component (KC) mastery panel to the dashboard — colour-coded progress bars per skill that expand to show p_mastery %, mastery level label, and opportunity count. The backend piece is a single endpoint backed by a left-join use case. The research reason it matters is more interesting than the code.

The Design Decision

The core choice was: what data does a teacher actually need?

We had three options:

  1. Accuracy-only (what we had): fast to compute, no additional queries, but unactionable
  2. Raw BKT parameters: show p_mastery, p_learn, p_guess, p_slip — complete but overwhelming for a classroom teacher
  3. KC mastery levels: translate p_mastery into a three-tier label (Novice / Developing / Mastered) with colour coding, keeping the raw number available on expand

We chose option 3. The mastery level thresholds are defined as named constants in get_kc_states.py:

_MASTERY_DEVELOPING = 0.40
_MASTERY_MASTERED   = 0.80

def _mastery_level(p_mastery: float) -> str:
    if p_mastery >= _MASTERY_MASTERED:
        return "Mastered"
    if p_mastery >= _MASTERY_DEVELOPING:
        return "Developing"
    return "Novice"

Enter fullscreen mode Exit fullscreen mode

One deliberate UX choice: a student with no attempts at all still sees all 5 skills at 0% / Novice. There's no "no data yet" placeholder. The teacher sees the full KC grid from day one — an empty bar is information ("this student hasn't encountered this skill yet"), not an error.

The access control pattern is worth noting too. We added a require_authenticated dependency — any valid JWT — and enforced role logic in the route handler:

@router.get("/{student_id}/kc-states", response_model=KCStatesResponse)
async def get_kc_states(
    student_id: uuid.UUID,
    db: AsyncSession = Depends(get_db),
    auth: dict = Depends(require_authenticated),
) -> KCStatesResponse:
    role = auth.get("role")
    if role == "student" and auth.get("sub") != str(student_id):
        raise HTTPException(status_code=status.HTTP_403_FORBIDDEN, detail="Access denied")
    ...

Enter fullscreen mode Exit fullscreen mode

Students see their own KC states. Teachers see any student's. The rule lives in one place — the route — rather than being split across two separate dependency functions.

Why It Matters for the Research

The MacLellan ITS framework's "Teacher-in-the-Loop" principle isn't just about giving teachers a screen. It's about giving them information they can act on. A 43% accuracy number tells a teacher "this student is struggling." A KC panel that shows SUB_BORROW at 12% (Novice, 8 attempts) while PLACE_VALUE is at 67% (Developing, 14 attempts) tells a teacher "this student needs targeted borrowing practice — and they've already tried eight times, so hints aren't landing."

That's the difference between a reporting tool and a teaching tool. The RCT we're designing in Phase 4 will measure whether teachers who have KC-level visibility actually intervene differently than those who see accuracy alone. This dashboard is the instrument we're studying, not just a convenience feature.

What We Learned

The left-join strategy — two separate queries plus a dict lookup — turned out to be cleaner than an ORM outerjoin(). SQLAlchemy async outerjoin() with nullable columns requires explicit handling of None values in ways that are easy to get wrong. Two queries and a dict.get() with a default is more readable and easier to test with mocks:

kc_by_skill_id = {record.skill_id: record for record in kc_records}

summaries = [
    KCStateSummary(
        skill_code=skill.code,
        p_mastery=round(kc_by_skill_id[skill.id].p_mastery, 3)
        if skill.id in kc_by_skill_id else 0.0,
        ...
    )
    for skill in all_skills
]

Enter fullscreen mode Exit fullscreen mode

Nine unit tests covering the use case ran in 0.03s with no live database. That's the payoff for keeping the domain logic in a use case rather than inline in the route.

What's Next

Phase 2 of the KC dashboard adds recent attempt history to the student detail panel — the specific problems a student got wrong, with their classified mistake codes, so a teacher can see patterns as they form.

Key Takeaways

  • Accuracy is output, KC mastery is signal — a single accuracy number is not enough for a teacher to act; per-KC mastery state is the minimum viable explainability for an ITS
  • Empty is informative, not broken — showing all KCs at 0% for a new student tells a teacher "this skill hasn't been practised yet"; hiding it implies the data is missing
  • Two queries + dict > one complex join — for small, static reference data (5 skills), two simple queries and a dict lookup are more readable, testable, and maintainable than an ORM outer join with nullable column handling