惯性聚合 高效追踪和阅读你感兴趣的博客、新闻、科技资讯
阅读原文 在惯性聚合中打开

推荐订阅源

钛媒体:引领未来商业与生活新知
钛媒体:引领未来商业与生活新知
云风的 BLOG
云风的 BLOG
IT之家
IT之家
C
Check Point Blog
T
The Blog of Author Tim Ferriss
S
SegmentFault 最新的问题
人人都是产品经理
人人都是产品经理
H
Hackread – Cybersecurity News, Data Breaches, AI and More
美团技术团队
M
MIT News - Artificial intelligence
Jina AI
Jina AI
Blog — PlanetScale
Blog — PlanetScale
freeCodeCamp Programming Tutorials: Python, JavaScript, Git & More
Microsoft Security Blog
Microsoft Security Blog
G
Google Developers Blog
F
Fortinet All Blogs
V
Visual Studio Blog
奇客Solidot–传递最新科技情报
奇客Solidot–传递最新科技情报
T
Tailwind CSS Blog
Hugging Face - Blog
Hugging Face - Blog
MyScale Blog
MyScale Blog
爱范儿
爱范儿
The Cloudflare Blog
博客园 - 三生石上(FineUI控件)

DEV Community

Authentication Security Deep Dive: From Brute Force to Salted Hashing (With Java Examples) Why AI Systems Don’t Fail — They Drift Spilling beans for how i learn for exam😁"Reinforcement Learning Cheat Sheet" I Replaced Chrome with Safari for AI Browser Automation. Here's What Broke (and What Finally Worked) How Python Borrows Other People's Work The $40 Architecture: Processing 1 Billion API Requests with 99.99% Uptime Vibe Coding: A Workflow Guide (From Zero to SaaS) Most webhook security guides protect the wrong side. The scary part is delivery. Headless CMS for TanStack Start: Build a Blog with Cosmic EU Age Verification App "Hacked in 2 Minutes" — What Actually Happened Comfy Cloud’s delete function does not actually remove files Running AI Models on GPU Cloud Servers: A Beginner Guide Event-driven media intelligence with AWS Step Functions and Bedrock I scored 500 AI prompts across 8 quality dimensions — here's what broke How to Call Google Gemini API from Next.js (Free Tier, No Backend Needed) The Portal Protocol: Reclaiming Human Connection in the Age of AI How to Fix Your Team's Scattered Knowledge Problem With a Self-Hosted Forum Intro to tc Cloud Functors: A Graph-First Mental Model for the Modern Cloud Designing Multi-Tenant Backends With Both Ownership and Team Access I Built a Neumorphic CSS Library with 77+ Components — Here's What I Learned PostgreSQL Performance Optimization: Why Connection Pooling Is Critical at Scale Cómo construí un SaaS multi-rubro para gestionar expensas en Argentina con FastAPI + Vue 3 🚀 I Built an Ethical Hacking Scanner Tool – Open Source Project I Replaced /usage and /context in Claude Code With a Single Statusline A Pythonic Way to Handle Emails (IMAP/SMTP) with Auto-Discovery and AI-Ready Design I Collected 8.9 Million Polymarket Price Points — Here's What I Found About How Markets Really Move EcoTrack AI — Carbon Footprint Tracker & Dashboard Everyone's Using AI. No One Agrees How. 5 self-hosted ebook managers worth trying in 2026 Building Your First AI Agent with LangChain: From Chatbot to Autonomous Assistant
I Migrated 23 Make.com Scenarios to n8n and Cut My Bill b...
Alex Kane · 2026-05-22 · via DEV Community

I was paying $49/month on Make.com and hitting operation limits every few weeks.

My 23 scenarios handled lead captures, Slack notifications, email sequences, and weekly reports. But Make.com counts every module execution as an "operation" — a 6-module scenario running 200 times/month consumes 1,200 operations. With 23 scenarios, I was always near the limit and upgrading every quarter.

Two weeks after switching to n8n, I cut my automation bill to $0 (self-hosted). Here's the complete guide — with 3 import-ready workflow JSONs.

Make.com vs n8n: The Pricing Reality

Make.com charges per operation. n8n charges per workflow execution (not per node).

Make.com n8n (self-hosted)
Free tier 1,000 ops/month Unlimited
Starter $9/month (10k ops) Free
Pro $29/month (40k ops) $24/month cloud / free self-hosted
6-node workflow, 500 runs/month 3,000 ops used 500 executions
Custom code Basic formula functions Full Node.js/Python runtime
AI/LLM nodes Limited Native Claude, GPT-4o, Gemini
Self-hosting No Yes (Docker, npm, Railway)

With n8n self-hosted: zero cost, unlimited workflows, unlimited executions.

The Concept Translation Dictionary

Make.com n8n Notes
Scenario Workflow Same concept
Module Node Same concept
Operation Execution (per workflow run) n8n counts once per run, not per node
Bundle Item n8n calls data records "items"
Router Switch node Branch logic
Iterator SplitInBatches Loop over arrays
Aggregator Merge + Code node Combine results
Filter IF node Conditional branching
Instant Webhook trigger Webhook node Identical
Scheduler Schedule Trigger node Identical
Functions/Formulas Code node (JavaScript) Full Node.js runtime
Data Store PostgreSQL / Airtable / Redis More flexible
HTTP module HTTP Request node Same

Migration 1: Lead Capture Form → Sheets + Confirmation Email

Make.com version: Webhooks → Google Sheets (Add Row) → Gmail = 3 ops per run.

At 200 leads/month = 600 operations/month just for this one scenario.

n8n equivalent:

{
  "name": "Lead Capture - Webhook to Sheets",
  "nodes": [
    {
      "parameters": {
        "httpMethod": "POST",
        "path": "lead-capture",
        "responseMode": "responseNode"
      },
      "name": "Webhook",
      "type": "n8n-nodes-base.webhook",
      "position": [240, 300]
    },
    {
      "parameters": {
        "operation": "appendOrUpdate",
        "documentId": "YOUR_SHEET_ID",
        "sheetName": "Leads",
        "dataMode": "autoMapInputData"
      },
      "name": "Google Sheets",
      "type": "n8n-nodes-base.googleSheets",
      "position": [480, 300]
    },
    {
      "parameters": {
        "toEmail": "={{ $('Webhook').item.json.body.email }}",
        "subject": "Thanks for reaching out!",
        "message": "Hi {{ $('Webhook').item.json.body.name }},\n\nWe received your message and will reply within 24 hours."
      },
      "name": "Gmail",
      "type": "n8n-nodes-base.gmail",
      "position": [720, 300]
    }
  ],
  "connections": {
    "Webhook": {"main": [[{"node": "Google Sheets", "type": "main", "index": 0}]]},
    "Google Sheets": {"main": [[{"node": "Gmail", "type": "main", "index": 0}]]}
  }
}

Enter fullscreen mode Exit fullscreen mode

Key difference: Make.com uses {{1.name}} (bundle notation). n8n uses {{ $('Webhook').item.json.body.name }} or just {{ $json.body.name }} when referring to the previous node's output.

Migration 2: Stripe Payment → Slack + Log to Sheets

Make.com version: Webhooks → Slack (Send Message) → Google Sheets = 3 ops/run.

At 150 payments/month = 450 ops/month.

{
  "name": "Stripe Payment Notifier",
  "nodes": [
    {
      "parameters": {
        "httpMethod": "POST",
        "path": "stripe-payment",
        "responseMode": "lastNode"
      },
      "name": "Stripe Webhook",
      "type": "n8n-nodes-base.webhook",
      "position": [240, 300]
    },
    {
      "parameters": {
        "channel": "#payments",
        "text": "=💰 New payment: ${{ ($('Stripe Webhook').item.json.body.data.object.amount / 100).toFixed(2) }} from {{ $('Stripe Webhook').item.json.body.data.object.billing_details?.name || 'Customer' }}"
      },
      "name": "Slack",
      "type": "n8n-nodes-base.slack",
      "position": [480, 200]
    },
    {
      "parameters": {
        "operation": "appendOrUpdate",
        "documentId": "YOUR_SHEET_ID",
        "sheetName": "Payments",
        "columns": {
          "mappingMode": "defineBelow",
          "value": {
            "Timestamp": "={{ new Date().toISOString() }}",
            "Amount": "={{ $('Stripe Webhook').item.json.body.data.object.amount / 100 }}",
            "Customer": "={{ $('Stripe Webhook').item.json.body.data.object.billing_details?.name }}",
            "Status": "={{ $('Stripe Webhook').item.json.body.data.object.status }}"
          }
        }
      },
      "name": "Google Sheets",
      "type": "n8n-nodes-base.googleSheets",
      "position": [480, 400]
    }
  ],
  "connections": {
    "Stripe Webhook": {
      "main": [
        [
          {"node": "Slack", "type": "main", "index": 0},
          {"node": "Google Sheets", "type": "main", "index": 0}
        ]
      ]
    }
  }
}

Enter fullscreen mode Exit fullscreen mode

Migration tip: Make.com runs Slack then Sheets sequentially (2 separate operations). The n8n fan-out pattern (one node → two connections) runs both in parallel — faster, still 1 execution.

Migration 3: Scheduled Weekly Report

Make.com version: Scheduler → Google Sheets (Get Rows) → Tools (Array Aggregator) → Gmail = 4 ops/run. Weekly = 208 ops/year.

{
  "name": "Weekly Sales Report",
  "nodes": [
    {
      "parameters": {
        "rule": {
          "interval": [{"field": "weeks", "weeksInterval": 1, "triggerAtDay": [1], "triggerAtHour": 8}]
        }
      },
      "name": "Schedule Trigger",
      "type": "n8n-nodes-base.scheduleTrigger",
      "position": [240, 300]
    },
    {
      "parameters": {
        "operation": "getAll",
        "documentId": "YOUR_SHEET_ID",
        "sheetName": "Orders",
        "options": {"returnAll": true}
      },
      "name": "Get Orders",
      "type": "n8n-nodes-base.googleSheets",
      "position": [480, 300]
    },
    {
      "parameters": {
        "jsCode": "const items = $input.all();
const total = items.reduce((sum, i) => sum + Number(i.json.Amount || 0), 0);
const count = items.length;
const avg = count > 0 ? (total / count).toFixed(2) : 0;
return [{ json: { total: total.toFixed(2), count, avg } }];"
      },
      "name": "Calculate Stats",
      "type": "n8n-nodes-base.code",
      "position": [720, 300]
    },
    {
      "parameters": {
        "toEmail": "you@yourdomain.com",
        "subject": "=Weekly Sales Report — {{ $now.toFormat('yyyy-WW') }}",
        "message": "=<h2>Weekly Sales Report</h2><p><b>Revenue:</b> ${{ $json.total }}</p><p><b>Orders:</b> {{ $json.count }}</p><p><b>Avg Order:</b> ${{ $json.avg }}</p>"
      },
      "name": "Send Report",
      "type": "n8n-nodes-base.gmail",
      "position": [960, 300]
    }
  ],
  "connections": {
    "Schedule Trigger": {"main": [[{"node": "Get Orders", "type": "main", "index": 0}]]},
    "Get Orders": {"main": [[{"node": "Calculate Stats", "type": "main", "index": 0}]]},
    "Calculate Stats": {"main": [[{"node": "Send Report", "type": "main", "index": 0}]]}
  }
}

Enter fullscreen mode Exit fullscreen mode

Migration tip: Make.com's Array Aggregator + Formula syntax → n8n's Code node. Full JavaScript gives you far more flexibility: conditional logic, external API calls, complex calculations.

What's Harder in n8n (Honest)

  • UI polish: Make.com's module search and drag-and-drop is more beginner-friendly.
  • App coverage: Some niche SaaS tools have Make integrations but no n8n community nodes yet.
  • Error messages: Make.com gives clearer errors for non-technical users.
  • Initial setup: Self-hosting requires Docker or a VPS. Make.com is SaaS — just sign up.

If you run under 10 simple scenarios and hate command lines: Make.com is fine. If you're technical, building complex AI workflows, or hitting operation limits: n8n wins.

Migration Checklist

  • [ ] List all Make.com scenarios + module count + monthly run frequency
  • [ ] Calculate operations per scenario (modules × runs)
  • [ ] Install n8n (npx n8n for local, Docker for production)
  • [ ] Start with your highest-operation scenario first (biggest immediate saving)
  • [ ] Use the concept table above to translate each module
  • [ ] Test with n8n's test webhook URL before switching live traffic
  • [ ] Update webhook URLs in your forms/services to n8n production URLs
  • [ ] Disable Make.com scenario after confirming n8n works
  • [ ] Repeat for remaining scenarios over 2-3 weeks
  • [ ] Cancel Make.com subscription after 30 days

Ready-Made Templates (Skip the Migration Work)

Already running n8n? These pre-built templates save hours of setup:

Browse all 15 templates at stripeai.gumroad.com.


Alex Kane builds automation tools at FlowKit. Ready-to-use n8n workflow templates for businesses, developers, and teams.