惯性聚合 高效追踪和阅读你感兴趣的博客、新闻、科技资讯
阅读原文 在惯性聚合中打开

推荐订阅源

S
SegmentFault 最新的问题
G
Google Developers Blog
H
Help Net Security
月光博客
月光博客
阮一峰的网络日志
阮一峰的网络日志
钛媒体:引领未来商业与生活新知
钛媒体:引领未来商业与生活新知
P
Proofpoint News Feed
Cyber Security Advisories - MS-ISAC
Cyber Security Advisories - MS-ISAC
B
Blog RSS Feed
爱范儿
爱范儿
酷 壳 – CoolShell
酷 壳 – CoolShell
博客园 - 三生石上(FineUI控件)
大猫的无限游戏
大猫的无限游戏
人人都是产品经理
人人都是产品经理
GbyAI
GbyAI
D
Docker
Hugging Face - Blog
Hugging Face - Blog
I
InfoQ
博客园 - 司徒正美
Last Week in AI
Last Week in AI
Microsoft Security Blog
Microsoft Security Blog
美团技术团队
Stack Overflow Blog
Stack Overflow Blog
M
MIT News - Artificial intelligence

DEV Community

Authentication Security Deep Dive: From Brute Force to Salted Hashing (With Java Examples) Why AI Systems Don’t Fail — They Drift Spilling beans for how i learn for exam😁"Reinforcement Learning Cheat Sheet" I Replaced Chrome with Safari for AI Browser Automation. Here's What Broke (and What Finally Worked) How Python Borrows Other People's Work The $40 Architecture: Processing 1 Billion API Requests with 99.99% Uptime Vibe Coding: A Workflow Guide (From Zero to SaaS) Most webhook security guides protect the wrong side. The scary part is delivery. Headless CMS for TanStack Start: Build a Blog with Cosmic EU Age Verification App "Hacked in 2 Minutes" — What Actually Happened Comfy Cloud’s delete function does not actually remove files Running AI Models on GPU Cloud Servers: A Beginner Guide Event-driven media intelligence with AWS Step Functions and Bedrock I scored 500 AI prompts across 8 quality dimensions — here's what broke How to Call Google Gemini API from Next.js (Free Tier, No Backend Needed) The Portal Protocol: Reclaiming Human Connection in the Age of AI How to Fix Your Team's Scattered Knowledge Problem With a Self-Hosted Forum Intro to tc Cloud Functors: A Graph-First Mental Model for the Modern Cloud Designing Multi-Tenant Backends With Both Ownership and Team Access I Built a Neumorphic CSS Library with 77+ Components — Here's What I Learned PostgreSQL Performance Optimization: Why Connection Pooling Is Critical at Scale Cómo construí un SaaS multi-rubro para gestionar expensas en Argentina con FastAPI + Vue 3 🚀 I Built an Ethical Hacking Scanner Tool – Open Source Project I Replaced /usage and /context in Claude Code With a Single Statusline A Pythonic Way to Handle Emails (IMAP/SMTP) with Auto-Discovery and AI-Ready Design I Collected 8.9 Million Polymarket Price Points — Here's What I Found About How Markets Really Move EcoTrack AI — Carbon Footprint Tracker & Dashboard Everyone's Using AI. No One Agrees How. 5 self-hosted ebook managers worth trying in 2026 Building Your First AI Agent with LangChain: From Chatbot to Autonomous Assistant
Why your .NET 8 API needs a cache layer — and how to buil...
fenixkit · 2026-05-18 · via DEV Community

Caching is one of those things that sounds optional until your database starts getting hammered at scale, your response times creep up, and you realise you've been querying the same data hundreds of times per minute. This article covers why a cache layer matters, how to implement cache-aside properly with tag-based invalidation in .NET 8, how to handle Redis outages gracefully, and why Valkey is worth knowing about.


Why bother with cache at all?

The short answer: your database doesn't need to answer the same question twice.

A typical read-heavy API hits the database for the same product list, the same user profile, the same category results — on every request. Each one is a network round trip, a query execution, and serialisation overhead. At low traffic it's fine. At scale it isn't.

A cache layer puts the answer in Redis the first time, and returns it directly on every subsequent request — milliseconds, no database involved.

The reasons people avoid it:

  • "It adds complexity" — only if you build it badly
  • "Cache invalidation is hard" — it is, but it doesn't have to be unpredictable
  • "Redis going down takes my API down" — only if you don't handle it properly

All three are solvable.


The cache-aside pattern

Cache-aside is the simplest correct approach:

  1. On read — check Redis first. Hit → return. Miss → query the database, populate Redis, return.
  2. On write — invalidate the relevant cache entries, then write to the database.
GET /api/products/abc123

  1. Check Redis  ──▶  HIT  ──▶  return cached JSON ✓
               └──▶  MISS ──▶  query database
                              └──▶  populate Redis ──▶  return ✓

PUT /api/products/abc123

  → invalidate cache entries for this product
  → write to database

Enter fullscreen mode Exit fullscreen mode

Simple in theory. The problem is step 2 — which cache entries do you invalidate?


The invalidation problem

If you cache by key only (product:abc123), that's easy — delete that key on update. But most APIs cache more than that:

  • Paged lists — product:paged:p1:s20
  • Cursor pages — product:cursor:start:20:fwd
  • Filtered results — product:category:Gaming

When you update a product, all of those might be stale. You can't just delete one key.

The naive solution is to expire everything with a short TTL. It works, but it means serving stale data for up to N minutes after every write, and it doesn't scale — at high write rates your cache is constantly cold.


Tag-based invalidation

A better approach: every cached entry is registered under one or more tags. When you write, you invalidate by tag — wiping all entries associated with that tag at once.

In Redis, a tag is a Set that holds the keys registered under it:

product:abc123              STRING   cached product JSON          TTL 5 min
product:paged:p1:s20        STRING   cached page JSON             TTL 5 min
product:category:Gaming     STRING   cached category list         TTL 5 min

tag:product                 SET      { paged keys, cursor keys }    no TTL
tag:product:abc123          SET      { "product:abc123" }            no TTL
tag:product:category:Gaming SET      { "product:category:..." }      no TTL

Enter fullscreen mode Exit fullscreen mode

Tag sets have no TTL — they are deleted when InvalidateByTagAsync runs, leaving no orphaned entries.

On every write, the repository wipes all matching tags.

The update case is worth calling out: when a product moves from Electronics to Gaming, you need to invalidate both the old and new category cache. The solution is to union the tags from the original and the updated entity before invalidating — both category caches get wiped, no extra logic needed in your handler.


Three levels of control

Not everything needs automatic invalidation. A well-designed cache layer gives you three levels:

Level Mechanism Use for
Automatic Base repository calls GetInvalidationTags on every write Standard CRUD — always on
Tag-based _cache.InvalidateByTagAsync("product:category:Gaming") Custom domain queries
Manual _cache.InvalidateAsync("product:abc123") Surgical single-key removal

You pick the right level per operation. Most of the time the automatic level handles everything.


Handling Redis outages — FailOpen vs FailClosed

This is where most cache implementations go wrong. If Redis throws an exception and you let it propagate, your API returns 500s whenever the cache is unavailable — even though your data is perfectly fine in the database.

FailOpen (recommended default): treat any Redis error as a cache miss. The request falls through to the database, succeeds, and returns normally. Redis being down is a performance degradation, not an outage.

FailClosed: return an error when Redis is unavailable. Use this only when cache correctness is a hard requirement.

For most APIs, FailOpen is the right default. Redis is a performance layer, not a source of truth.


Making cache optional

There are scenarios where you want to run without Redis entirely — local development or environments where you haven't provisioned a cache server yet.

The clean solution is a no-op implementation of your cache interface that can be swapped in via config:

// appsettings.json / .env
Cache__Enabled=false

Enter fullscreen mode Exit fullscreen mode

When disabled: the cache interface resolves to a no-op, IConnectionMultiplexer is never registered, and the Redis health check is omitted automatically. No code changes required anywhere else.


Valkey — the Redis fork worth knowing about

In 2024, Redis changed its licence from BSD, no longer open-source. In response, the Linux Foundation forked Redis at version 7.2 and created Valkey — an open-source, community-maintained drop-in replacement.

Valkey is wire-protocol compatible with Redis. StackExchange.Redis connects to it transparently — no client changes, no code changes needed.

# docker-compose.valkey.yml
valkey:
  image: valkey/valkey:7.2-alpine
  command: valkey-server --requirepass ${CACHE_PASSWORD}
  ports:
    - "6379:6379"

Enter fullscreen mode Exit fullscreen mode

valkey:6379,password=yourpassword,protocol=2

Enter fullscreen mode Exit fullscreen mode

If you're happy with Redis 8, nothing changes. If you prefer a fully open-source stack, Valkey 7.2 is a transparent swap.


Putting it together

The full pattern in a .NET 8 Minimal API:

  1. Read — check Redis, miss falls through to the database, result populates Redis on return
  2. Write — union tags from old + new entity, invalidate, write to database
  3. FailOpen by default — Redis errors never surface as 500s
  4. Optional — disable via config, no-op swaps in automatically

If you'd rather not wire all of this from scratch, I've packaged the full implementation into FenixKit — .NET 8 Minimal API starter kits with the cache layer, tag invalidation, FailOpen, Valkey support, and health checks all included and pre-configured.