惯性聚合 高效追踪和阅读你感兴趣的博客、新闻、科技资讯
阅读原文 在惯性聚合中打开

推荐订阅源

IT之家
IT之家
Y
Y Combinator Blog
月光博客
月光博客
Blog — PlanetScale
Blog — PlanetScale
GbyAI
GbyAI
Cyber Security Advisories - MS-ISAC
Cyber Security Advisories - MS-ISAC
博客园 - 三生石上(FineUI控件)
S
SegmentFault 最新的问题
让小产品的独立变现更简单 - ezindie.com
让小产品的独立变现更简单 - ezindie.com
美团技术团队
雷峰网
雷峰网
酷 壳 – CoolShell
酷 壳 – CoolShell
Last Week in AI
Last Week in AI
钛媒体:引领未来商业与生活新知
钛媒体:引领未来商业与生活新知
有赞技术团队
有赞技术团队
博客园 - 司徒正美
V
Visual Studio Blog
小众软件
小众软件
OSCHINA 社区最新新闻
OSCHINA 社区最新新闻
T
Tailwind CSS Blog
Apple Machine Learning Research
Apple Machine Learning Research
奇客Solidot–传递最新科技情报
奇客Solidot–传递最新科技情报
A
About on SuperTechFans
The Cloudflare Blog

DEV Community

Authentication Security Deep Dive: From Brute Force to Salted Hashing (With Java Examples) Why AI Systems Don’t Fail — They Drift Spilling beans for how i learn for exam😁"Reinforcement Learning Cheat Sheet" I Replaced Chrome with Safari for AI Browser Automation. Here's What Broke (and What Finally Worked) How Python Borrows Other People's Work The $40 Architecture: Processing 1 Billion API Requests with 99.99% Uptime Vibe Coding: A Workflow Guide (From Zero to SaaS) Most webhook security guides protect the wrong side. The scary part is delivery. Headless CMS for TanStack Start: Build a Blog with Cosmic EU Age Verification App "Hacked in 2 Minutes" — What Actually Happened Comfy Cloud’s delete function does not actually remove files Running AI Models on GPU Cloud Servers: A Beginner Guide Event-driven media intelligence with AWS Step Functions and Bedrock I scored 500 AI prompts across 8 quality dimensions — here's what broke How to Call Google Gemini API from Next.js (Free Tier, No Backend Needed) The Portal Protocol: Reclaiming Human Connection in the Age of AI How to Fix Your Team's Scattered Knowledge Problem With a Self-Hosted Forum Intro to tc Cloud Functors: A Graph-First Mental Model for the Modern Cloud Designing Multi-Tenant Backends With Both Ownership and Team Access I Built a Neumorphic CSS Library with 77+ Components — Here's What I Learned PostgreSQL Performance Optimization: Why Connection Pooling Is Critical at Scale Cómo construí un SaaS multi-rubro para gestionar expensas en Argentina con FastAPI + Vue 3 🚀 I Built an Ethical Hacking Scanner Tool – Open Source Project I Replaced /usage and /context in Claude Code With a Single Statusline A Pythonic Way to Handle Emails (IMAP/SMTP) with Auto-Discovery and AI-Ready Design I Collected 8.9 Million Polymarket Price Points — Here's What I Found About How Markets Really Move EcoTrack AI — Carbon Footprint Tracker & Dashboard Everyone's Using AI. No One Agrees How. 5 self-hosted ebook managers worth trying in 2026 Building Your First AI Agent with LangChain: From Chatbot to Autonomous Assistant
How Search Algorithms Work — From DFS and BFS to A*
shangkyu shi · 2026-05-06 · via DEV Community

shangkyu shin

Search algorithms look simple until the state space gets huge.

Then the real question becomes:

Do you explore everything, or do you choose smarter paths first?

That is the core idea behind search in AI.

Core Idea

Search is about moving from a start state to a goal state.

You have:

  • a current state
  • possible actions
  • next states
  • a goal condition

The algorithm decides which state to explore next.

That one decision changes everything.

The Basic Structure

Most search algorithms follow this pattern:

start from the initial state

while there are states to explore:
    choose the next state

    if it is the goal:
        return solution

    expand possible next states

return failure

Enter fullscreen mode Exit fullscreen mode

The difference between DFS, BFS, Greedy Search, and A* is mostly this:

How do we choose the next state?

DFS vs BFS

The first important comparison is DFS vs BFS.

DFS goes deep first.

BFS expands level by level.

DFS:

  • follows one path as far as possible
  • uses less memory in many cases
  • can get stuck exploring a bad deep branch

BFS:

  • explores nearby states first
  • finds the shortest path in unweighted graphs
  • can use a lot of memory

So the trade-off is simple:

DFS is memory-friendly.

BFS is distance-friendly.

Concrete Example

Imagine a maze.

DFS may run down one corridor until it hits a dead end.

Then it backtracks.

BFS explores all nearby positions first.

Then it expands outward step by step.

If the shortest path matters, BFS is safer.

If memory matters more, DFS may be more practical.

Where IDS Fits

Iterative Deepening Search tries to combine both ideas.

It runs DFS with a depth limit.

Then it increases the limit gradually.

In simple form:

for depth_limit from 0 to max_depth:
    run DFS only up to depth_limit

Enter fullscreen mode Exit fullscreen mode

This gives you:

  • DFS-style memory usage
  • BFS-style level-by-level discovery

IDS is useful because it shows that search strategies are not always separate boxes.

Sometimes they are trade-offs.

Uninformed vs Informed Search

Basic search does not know where the goal is.

It only follows structure.

That is called uninformed search.

Examples:

  • DFS
  • BFS
  • IDS

Informed search uses extra information.

It asks:

“Which direction looks more promising?”

That extra information is usually a heuristic.

Greedy Search vs A*

This is the key comparison for heuristic search.

Greedy Search uses only the heuristic.

It chooses the node that looks closest to the goal.

A* uses both cost and heuristic.

It chooses the node with the best total estimated path.

The structure is:

Greedy:

h(n)

A*:

f(n) = g(n) + h(n)

Where:

  • g(n) = cost from start to current node
  • h(n) = estimated cost from current node to goal
  • f(n) = total estimated cost

Greedy is fast and intuitive.

But it can be fooled.

A* is more careful because it also remembers the cost already paid.

Why This Matters in Practice

In real problems, the state space can explode.

A small grid, puzzle, route map, or game tree can quickly produce thousands or millions of possible states.

So implementation is not just about “finding a path.”

It is about choosing what not to explore.

That is why the search strategy matters.

A bad strategy wastes time.

A good strategy turns a massive problem into a manageable one.

Recommended Learning Order

If you are learning search algorithms, this order works well:

  1. State Space Search
  2. DFS
  3. BFS
  4. IDS
  5. Informed Search
  6. Heuristic Function
  7. Greedy Search
  8. A* Algorithm

This order helps because you first learn the basic search structure.

Then you learn the trade-offs.

Then you learn how heuristics make search more efficient.

Takeaway

Search algorithms are not just different ways to traverse graphs.

They are different strategies for deciding what to explore next.

DFS goes deep.

BFS expands nearby states.

IDS balances depth and memory.

Greedy follows what looks best.

A* balances actual cost and estimated future cost.

If you remember one idea, remember this:

Search performance depends on the rule used to choose the next state.

Discussion

When solving search problems, do you usually start with BFS or DFS first, or do you jump directly to heuristic search like Greedy Search or A*?

Originally published at zeromathai.com.
Original article: https://zeromathai.com/en/search-algorithms-hub-en/