惯性聚合 高效追踪和阅读你感兴趣的博客、新闻、科技资讯
阅读原文 在惯性聚合中打开

推荐订阅源

The GitHub Blog
The GitHub Blog
奇客Solidot–传递最新科技情报
奇客Solidot–传递最新科技情报
Microsoft Security Blog
Microsoft Security Blog
J
Java Code Geeks
S
SegmentFault 最新的问题
Apple Machine Learning Research
Apple Machine Learning Research
N
Netflix TechBlog - Medium
OSCHINA 社区最新新闻
OSCHINA 社区最新新闻
博客园_首页
宝玉的分享
宝玉的分享
Google DeepMind News
Google DeepMind News
B
Blog RSS Feed
Hugging Face - Blog
Hugging Face - Blog
量子位
Blog — PlanetScale
Blog — PlanetScale
freeCodeCamp Programming Tutorials: Python, JavaScript, Git & More
阮一峰的网络日志
阮一峰的网络日志
D
Docker
罗磊的独立博客
Cyber Security Advisories - MS-ISAC
Cyber Security Advisories - MS-ISAC
云风的 BLOG
云风的 BLOG
IT之家
IT之家
MyScale Blog
MyScale Blog
Microsoft Azure Blog
Microsoft Azure Blog

DEV Community

Authentication Security Deep Dive: From Brute Force to Salted Hashing (With Java Examples) Why AI Systems Don’t Fail — They Drift Spilling beans for how i learn for exam😁"Reinforcement Learning Cheat Sheet" I Replaced Chrome with Safari for AI Browser Automation. Here's What Broke (and What Finally Worked) How Python Borrows Other People's Work The $40 Architecture: Processing 1 Billion API Requests with 99.99% Uptime Vibe Coding: A Workflow Guide (From Zero to SaaS) Most webhook security guides protect the wrong side. The scary part is delivery. Headless CMS for TanStack Start: Build a Blog with Cosmic EU Age Verification App "Hacked in 2 Minutes" — What Actually Happened Comfy Cloud’s delete function does not actually remove files Running AI Models on GPU Cloud Servers: A Beginner Guide Event-driven media intelligence with AWS Step Functions and Bedrock I scored 500 AI prompts across 8 quality dimensions — here's what broke How to Call Google Gemini API from Next.js (Free Tier, No Backend Needed) The Portal Protocol: Reclaiming Human Connection in the Age of AI How to Fix Your Team's Scattered Knowledge Problem With a Self-Hosted Forum Intro to tc Cloud Functors: A Graph-First Mental Model for the Modern Cloud Designing Multi-Tenant Backends With Both Ownership and Team Access I Built a Neumorphic CSS Library with 77+ Components — Here's What I Learned PostgreSQL Performance Optimization: Why Connection Pooling Is Critical at Scale Cómo construí un SaaS multi-rubro para gestionar expensas en Argentina con FastAPI + Vue 3 🚀 I Built an Ethical Hacking Scanner Tool – Open Source Project I Replaced /usage and /context in Claude Code With a Single Statusline A Pythonic Way to Handle Emails (IMAP/SMTP) with Auto-Discovery and AI-Ready Design I Collected 8.9 Million Polymarket Price Points — Here's What I Found About How Markets Really Move EcoTrack AI — Carbon Footprint Tracker & Dashboard Everyone's Using AI. No One Agrees How. 5 self-hosted ebook managers worth trying in 2026 Building Your First AI Agent with LangChain: From Chatbot to Autonomous Assistant
bcrypt and Laravel: 72 Bytes, Not 72 Characters
Ivan Mykhavko · 2026-06-22 · via DEV Community

I expected bcrypt to silently drop characters past 72. I did not expect it to bake in half an emoji.

That's what happens with a specific password combination I tested. The original password still works. But strip the emoji (a password manager, a different keyboard, a Unicode normalizer) and you're locked out. Your Laravel validator passed it as valid the whole time.

The 72-Byte Rule

bcrypt has a hard input limit of 72 bytes. Not characters - bytes.

When you call password_hash($password, PASSWORD_BCRYPT), PHP silently truncates anything past byte 72. Most developers know this in theory. But for ASCII-only apps, it never bites. 72 ASCII characters is already a very long password, and the silent clip is harmless in practice.

The trouble starts with multi-byte scripts.

How Many Characters Fit?

Character set Bytes per char Effective bcrypt limit
ASCII 1 72 chars
Cyrillic 2 36 chars
CJK (Chinese, Japanese, Korean, common block) 3 24 chars
Emoji 4 18 chars

Past the byte limit, a longer password adds no security at all. A 200-character Cyrillic password hashes identically to its own first 36 characters. Byte 73 and beyond simply do not exist from bcrypt's point of view. So "longer always produces a stronger bcrypt hash" is not true.

A Cyrillic user with a 37-character password gets silently truncated at char 36. The hash is still consistent. The user logs in fine, but any variation past character 36 doesn't matter to bcrypt. Annoying from a security standpoint, but it does not break login.

The Split-Byte Trap

The 72-byte limit cuts at a byte boundary, not a character boundary. If a multi-byte character falls on that cut, bcrypt bakes in an incomplete UTF-8 sequence.

// 35 Cyrillic chars = 70 bytes, emoji = 4 bytes, total = 74 bytes
$password = str_repeat('А', 35) . '🔑';
$hash = password_hash($password, PASSWORD_BCRYPT);

password_verify($password, $hash);           // ?
password_verify(str_repeat('А', 35), $hash); // ?
password_verify(str_repeat('А', 36), $hash); // ?

// PHP 8.4, Laravel sandbox:
verify(original 74 bytes):          bool(true)
verify(trimmed 35 Cyrillic, 70 bytes): bool(false)
verify(36 Cyrillic, 72 bytes):      bool(false)

The original full string still verifies. bcrypt truncates it to the same 72 bytes on both sides. But every other attempt fails.

What happened: bcrypt stored 70 Cyrillic bytes plus the first 2 bytes of the 4-byte emoji (F0 9F from the sequence F0 9F 94 91). That's the effective password now. The trailing emoji looks like decoration, but it's load-bearing.

I tested this in my Laravel sandbox across several character sets:

Input Total bytes Original verifies? Cyrillic-only verifies?
36x Cyrillic + extra chars 72+2 yes yes
24x CJK + extra chars 72+3 yes yes
18x emoji + extra chars 72+4 yes yes
35x Cyrillic + 1 emoji 74 yes no

For most overflow cases both the original and any Cyrillic-only variant work - the clip is harmless. With the split-byte case, only the exact original string works. A user who enters "35 Cyrillic chars" thinking the emoji was decoration is locked out. That happens when a password manager strips the emoji, a keyboard can't type it, or the app normalizes Unicode on input.

What Laravel Does About It

Laravel's Password::max() uses mb_strlen() under the hood. That counts characters, not bytes.

// Looks safe. Is not.
'password' => Password::min(8)->max(72),

A 37-char Cyrillic password: mb_strlen = 37, passes your validator. strlen = 74. bcrypt gets 74 bytes and clips at 72. Depending on where the boundary lands, the user either gets silent truncation or the split-byte lockout.

Laravel 12 added a BCRYPT_LIMIT config option in config/hashing.php:

// config/hashing.php
'bcrypt' => [
    'rounds' => env('BCRYPT_ROUNDS', 12),
    'limit'  => env('BCRYPT_LIMIT', 72),
],

Heads up: BCRYPT_LIMIT was introduced in Laravel 12. On Laravel 11 and below, you need to handle this yourself.

When set, Laravel's bcrypt driver throws an InvalidArgumentException if the password exceeds 72 bytes. That prevents silent truncation. But it does not close the validation gap: Password::max(72) still accepts passwords that exceed 72 bytes, and BCRYPT_LIMIT then throws at hash time. Without explicit exception handling, that bubbles as a 500. Your user submitted a valid form and hits an error.

Fix Options

Validate at the form layer, before hashing. bcrypt is intentionally slow: one unauthenticated request triggers a full key schedule regardless of input length. Without an upper bound, that cost is fixed per request whether the input is 10 bytes or 10 000. Rate limiting is still essential; the byte cap just removes wasted work on input bcrypt would ignore anyway.

Option 1: Validate byte length directly

'password' => [
    'required',
    'string',
    'min:8',
    function ($attribute, $value, $fail) {
        if (strlen($value) > 72) {
            $fail('The password is too long.');
        }
    },
],

strlen() in PHP counts bytes, not characters. This catches both the silent truncation and the split-byte case before hashing happens.

Option 2: Switch to Argon2id

// config/hashing.php
'driver' => 'argon2id',

No 72-byte limit. For existing users registered with bcrypt, rehash on first successful login:

if (Hash::needsRehash($user->password)) {
    $user->update(['password' => Hash::make($plaintext)]);
}

PHP's password_verify() reads the algorithm from the hash directly, so existing bcrypt users can still log in after you change the default driver. Users log in fine throughout.

Option 3: Pre-hash with SHA-256 before bcrypt

OWASP's Password Storage Cheat Sheet covers this pattern. Their recommended form uses HMAC with a server-side pepper:

// Always produces 64 ASCII bytes - fits bcrypt comfortably
$prehashed = hash_hmac('sha256', $password, $pepper);
$stored    = password_hash($prehashed, PASSWORD_BCRYPT);

// Verify:
password_verify(hash_hmac('sha256', $input, $pepper), $stored);

Plain hash('sha256', $password) without a pepper has a known weakness: if bcrypt is cracked, the attacker gets the raw SHA-256 hash and can crack it without bcrypt's cost (password shucking). The HMAC form closes that gap. Either way, this is non-standard and adds complexity to your auth layer.

If you're starting a new app, use Argon2id and skip this entire problem (check defined('PASSWORD_ARGON2ID') first - some shared hosts and older builds lack it). If you're maintaining an existing bcrypt app, add the byte-length validator today and plan a migration to Argon2id when you have the runway.

That user from the intro (the one locked out with a valid password) hit the split-byte case. The fix is one validator rule.

TL;DR

  • bcrypt truncates at 72 bytes, not characters. Cyrillic caps at 36 chars, CJK at 24, emoji at 18
  • If the cut falls inside a multi-byte char, the trailing emoji becomes load-bearing: original verifies, anything that strips the emoji does not
  • Password::max(72) uses mb_strlen (characters, not bytes), so it does not catch this
  • Laravel 12 BCRYPT_LIMIT=72 throws at hash time but does not block invalid input at the form level
  • Fix: validate with strlen($password) > 72, switch to Argon2id, or pre-hash with hash_hmac('sha256', ...)

💡 Use strlen() to validate password byte length. mb_strlen() won't catch the dangerous cases.

References

Author's Note

Thanks for sticking around!
Find me on dev.to, linkedin, or check out my work on github.

Laravel, after the happy path.