惯性聚合 高效追踪和阅读你感兴趣的博客、新闻、科技资讯
阅读原文 在惯性聚合中打开

推荐订阅源

V
Visual Studio Blog
量子位
大猫的无限游戏
大猫的无限游戏
Hugging Face - Blog
Hugging Face - Blog
S
SegmentFault 最新的问题
Blog — PlanetScale
Blog — PlanetScale
月光博客
月光博客
Google DeepMind News
Google DeepMind News
小众软件
小众软件
WordPress大学
WordPress大学
宝玉的分享
宝玉的分享
MongoDB | Blog
MongoDB | Blog
B
Blog RSS Feed
博客园 - Franky
奇客Solidot–传递最新科技情报
奇客Solidot–传递最新科技情报
B
Blog
博客园 - 聂微东
The GitHub Blog
The GitHub Blog
Recent Announcements
Recent Announcements
Y
Y Combinator Blog
Microsoft Security Blog
Microsoft Security Blog
雷峰网
雷峰网
Jina AI
Jina AI
酷 壳 – CoolShell
酷 壳 – CoolShell

DEV Community

Authentication Security Deep Dive: From Brute Force to Salted Hashing (With Java Examples) Why AI Systems Don’t Fail — They Drift Spilling beans for how i learn for exam😁"Reinforcement Learning Cheat Sheet" I Replaced Chrome with Safari for AI Browser Automation. Here's What Broke (and What Finally Worked) How Python Borrows Other People's Work The $40 Architecture: Processing 1 Billion API Requests with 99.99% Uptime Vibe Coding: A Workflow Guide (From Zero to SaaS) Most webhook security guides protect the wrong side. The scary part is delivery. Headless CMS for TanStack Start: Build a Blog with Cosmic EU Age Verification App "Hacked in 2 Minutes" — What Actually Happened Comfy Cloud’s delete function does not actually remove files Running AI Models on GPU Cloud Servers: A Beginner Guide Event-driven media intelligence with AWS Step Functions and Bedrock I scored 500 AI prompts across 8 quality dimensions — here's what broke How to Call Google Gemini API from Next.js (Free Tier, No Backend Needed) The Portal Protocol: Reclaiming Human Connection in the Age of AI How to Fix Your Team's Scattered Knowledge Problem With a Self-Hosted Forum Intro to tc Cloud Functors: A Graph-First Mental Model for the Modern Cloud Designing Multi-Tenant Backends With Both Ownership and Team Access I Built a Neumorphic CSS Library with 77+ Components — Here's What I Learned PostgreSQL Performance Optimization: Why Connection Pooling Is Critical at Scale Cómo construí un SaaS multi-rubro para gestionar expensas en Argentina con FastAPI + Vue 3 🚀 I Built an Ethical Hacking Scanner Tool – Open Source Project I Replaced /usage and /context in Claude Code With a Single Statusline A Pythonic Way to Handle Emails (IMAP/SMTP) with Auto-Discovery and AI-Ready Design I Collected 8.9 Million Polymarket Price Points — Here's What I Found About How Markets Really Move EcoTrack AI — Carbon Footprint Tracker & Dashboard Everyone's Using AI. No One Agrees How. 5 self-hosted ebook managers worth trying in 2026 Building Your First AI Agent with LangChain: From Chatbot to Autonomous Assistant
Why Your Shipping Speed Hasn't Changed Since You Started ...
David · 2026-04-27 · via DEV Community

I'm going to be honest with you.

Most engineers using AI assistants today are shipping at the same speed as before.

They have Cursor. They have Claude Code. They watched the demos, saw the vibe coding videos, and said, "This is going to change everything." And nothing changed.

Here's the thing nobody wants to say out loud: LLMs are amplifiers. Not magic.

That's it. That's the whole thesis. An amplifier takes whatever signal you give it and makes it louder. If you plug in a clean signal, you get a clean sound. If you plug in noise, you get louder noise.

Most engineers are plugging in noise.

They open a chat window with zero context. No specs. No planning. No clear definition of what they're building. They ask the model to write a feature; it generates something; they copy it; it breaks; they debug for two hours; they paste the error back in; it generates a fix that breaks something else. And they call that AI-assisted development.

That's not development. That's chaos at 10x speed.

Here's what's really happening in this AI era. You're no longer a developer. You're the product manager, the architect, the QA engineer, AND the developer, all at once.

But if you don't know the principles of software projects, you're just equipped with a tool that mirrors your disorganization back at you confidently and at scale.

You didn't get slower because AI is bad. You got slower because you skipped the step that makes AI powerful: the spec.

Now, let me be clear — you're not alone in this. I'm not saying you're incompetent.

Some of the best engineers I've seen fall into this trap. And there are workflows out there built specifically to solve it.

BMAD. Agent Skills. Multiple frameworks built by engineers with real experience, engineers who lead real projects

They're not geniuses

Just people who mastered the principles of project management before they touched a model.

These workflows exist because the people who built them understood one thing: you don't pick up tools before you have a plan.

I want to share my version. Four phases that are similar to the well-known Spec-Driven Development with LLMs.

Every artifact across all four phases is stored in a Markdown file. That's not an accident — markdown keeps your workflow portable, readable, and model-agnostic. Whatever model is trending next month, your specs still work.


Phase 1 — Context

This is where you feed the model everything before it writes a single line of code.

Epics. User stories. Story descriptions. Technical requirements. Stack decisions. Non-negotiables.

Think of it as onboarding a new engineer to your team. You would never hand someone a laptop on day one and say, "Build the app." You walk them through the product. You explain the architecture. You tell them what they cannot touch. You set the context.

Do the same thing with your LLM.

No context = the model is going to hallucinate. And I've seen this happen. Engineers waste hours debugging code that was never wrong — it just solved a different problem than the one they had in their head.


Phase 2 — Planning

Now the model has context. Time to make a plan.

You instruct the model to break each user story into small, achievable milestones. Not one big chunk. Not a wall of code. A sequenced plan with clear checkpoints. And you save that plan to a markdown file.

This step alone separates engineers who are faster with AI from engineers who aren't.

Why? Because planning forces clarity. It forces you to think five steps ahead instead of just reacting to whatever the model generates.

You know what the difference between an engineer who stagnates and one who evolves is? One of them attacks their work with intention. The other just reacts.

The planning phase is where you build intention into your workflow.


Phase 3 — Building

This is where the actual development happens. And there is one rule. One non-negotiable.

The model does not move to the next step without your approval.

Every milestone. You review it before the model continues.

I know what you're thinking — that sounds slow. It's not. It's the opposite. Because the engineers who skip this step are the ones ending up with 3,000 lines of AI-generated code they don't understand and cannot debug. Then they spend three days trying to reverse engineer what the model was built for. That's not fast. That's a disaster.

Approval gates keep you in the loop. And in this phase, you can also bring in a second model as a code reviewer. You can use a skill to generate PRs. You can run automated checks.

The workflow becomes a system, and a system is what separates someone who scales from someone who grinds.


Phase 4 — Learning

This is the phase almost nobody talks about. And it's the most powerful one.

When you encounter a bug, for example, and you fix it, the model should update its memory — its instructions, its specs — so that pattern never happens again. If you find a fix, the model documents it. If you discover a constraint specific to your stack, it gets added to the context for the next session.

Phase 4 turns your AI assistant from a stateless code generator into something that actually learns how you work. Your conventions. Your edge cases, etc.

Most engineers use AI like a calculator. They pick it up, punch in a problem, get an answer, and put it down. They don't build on it. They don't make their codebase smarter over time.

That's why their shipping speed hasn't changed. The tool never learned them.

There are many AI workflows available right now — BMAD, Agent Skills, and others — built by engineers who've shipped real products. They're worth studying. Use them.

But before you pick one, understand the four principles underneath all of them:

Context → Planning → Building with approval gates → Learning.

Master those, and it won't matter which model is trending, which tool drops next week, or what the next big demo on X looks like.

LLMs are amplifiers. Feed them a solid spec — they'll amplify your output. Feed them chaos — and they'll amplify that too.

The choice is yours.


I break down engineering workflows, career strategy, and how to level up in tech on the TecPatri podcast. If you want to go deeper, the link is here: https://www.youtube.com/@TecPatri