惯性聚合 高效追踪和阅读你感兴趣的博客、新闻、科技资讯
阅读原文 在惯性聚合中打开

推荐订阅源

The GitHub Blog
The GitHub Blog
奇客Solidot–传递最新科技情报
奇客Solidot–传递最新科技情报
Microsoft Security Blog
Microsoft Security Blog
J
Java Code Geeks
S
SegmentFault 最新的问题
Apple Machine Learning Research
Apple Machine Learning Research
N
Netflix TechBlog - Medium
OSCHINA 社区最新新闻
OSCHINA 社区最新新闻
博客园_首页
宝玉的分享
宝玉的分享
Google DeepMind News
Google DeepMind News
B
Blog RSS Feed
Hugging Face - Blog
Hugging Face - Blog
量子位
Blog — PlanetScale
Blog — PlanetScale
freeCodeCamp Programming Tutorials: Python, JavaScript, Git & More
阮一峰的网络日志
阮一峰的网络日志
D
Docker
罗磊的独立博客
Cyber Security Advisories - MS-ISAC
Cyber Security Advisories - MS-ISAC
云风的 BLOG
云风的 BLOG
IT之家
IT之家
MyScale Blog
MyScale Blog
Microsoft Azure Blog
Microsoft Azure Blog

DEV Community

Authentication Security Deep Dive: From Brute Force to Salted Hashing (With Java Examples) Why AI Systems Don’t Fail — They Drift Spilling beans for how i learn for exam😁"Reinforcement Learning Cheat Sheet" I Replaced Chrome with Safari for AI Browser Automation. Here's What Broke (and What Finally Worked) How Python Borrows Other People's Work The $40 Architecture: Processing 1 Billion API Requests with 99.99% Uptime Vibe Coding: A Workflow Guide (From Zero to SaaS) Most webhook security guides protect the wrong side. The scary part is delivery. Headless CMS for TanStack Start: Build a Blog with Cosmic EU Age Verification App "Hacked in 2 Minutes" — What Actually Happened Comfy Cloud’s delete function does not actually remove files Running AI Models on GPU Cloud Servers: A Beginner Guide Event-driven media intelligence with AWS Step Functions and Bedrock I scored 500 AI prompts across 8 quality dimensions — here's what broke How to Call Google Gemini API from Next.js (Free Tier, No Backend Needed) The Portal Protocol: Reclaiming Human Connection in the Age of AI How to Fix Your Team's Scattered Knowledge Problem With a Self-Hosted Forum Intro to tc Cloud Functors: A Graph-First Mental Model for the Modern Cloud Designing Multi-Tenant Backends With Both Ownership and Team Access I Built a Neumorphic CSS Library with 77+ Components — Here's What I Learned PostgreSQL Performance Optimization: Why Connection Pooling Is Critical at Scale Cómo construí un SaaS multi-rubro para gestionar expensas en Argentina con FastAPI + Vue 3 🚀 I Built an Ethical Hacking Scanner Tool – Open Source Project I Replaced /usage and /context in Claude Code With a Single Statusline A Pythonic Way to Handle Emails (IMAP/SMTP) with Auto-Discovery and AI-Ready Design I Collected 8.9 Million Polymarket Price Points — Here's What I Found About How Markets Really Move EcoTrack AI — Carbon Footprint Tracker & Dashboard Everyone's Using AI. No One Agrees How. 5 self-hosted ebook managers worth trying in 2026 Building Your First AI Agent with LangChain: From Chatbot to Autonomous Assistant
Building an Alien Language from Scratch with LangChain
Harish Kotra (he/him) · 2026-05-30 · via DEV Community

How 100 AI agents evolved a shared symbolic vocabulary through trade — with no pre-programmed definitions, no mock data, and no shortcuts.

The Core Idea

Most emergent communication demos cheat. They hardcode symbol meanings, or use mock LLM responses, or simulate the entire thing with random number generators. The result is a demo that looks impressive but teaches you nothing about how actual language models behave when they need to coordinate.

I wanted to build something real: two civilizations of AI agents, each with 50 unique personalities, negotiating trades using abstract symbols — where every single message and decision flows through a real LLM via LangChain SDK pipelines.

No mock data. No hardcoded symbol mappings. Just pure reinforcement: successful trades reinforce a symbol's meaning, failed trades weaken it. Over hundreds of rounds, a shared vocabulary emerges.


Why LangChain

LangChain.js (v1.4) is the backbone of this project. I deliberately used three different LangChain patterns to show how the SDK can handle different levels of agent complexity:

Pattern 1: The Message Chain

const chain = ChatPromptTemplate
  .fromMessages([["system", prompt], ["human", "{input}"]])
  .pipe(model)
  .pipe(parser);

Every symbol an agent sends is generated through this pipeline. The ChatPromptTemplate injects the agent's personality, observations, recent successes/failures, and conversation history. The model returns structured JSON ({"message": "🟢⚡🔺"}), which the JsonOutputParser validates.

The trickiest part was the {{ escaping — LangChain uses {} for template variables, but I needed literal {} in the JSON example. The double-brace escape ({{"message": "..."}}) resolves this cleanly.

Pattern 2: Trade Evaluation Chain

Same structure, different prompt — but this one returns a boolean decision. {"accept": true} or {"accept": false}. The agent evaluates whether the proposed resource exchange is beneficial based on its observations and personality.

Pattern 3: The ReAct Agent

This is where LangChain really shines. Using createAgent() from the LangGraph-based SDK, I built a full ReAct agent that can:

  1. Inspect its civilization's current resource levels via a DynamicTool
  2. Calculate the net impact of a proposed trade via another DynamicTool
  3. Decide whether to accept based on that information

The agent literally thinks, uses tools, and then decides — all within LangChain's agent loop.


Handling Real-World LLM Quirks

The moment you switch from mock to real LLMs, everything gets interesting. Models wrap JSON in markdown code fences. They include chain-of-thought reasoning. They run out of tokens mid-response. They return empty content and put their thoughts in vendor-specific fields like reasoning_content.

I built a LenientJsonParser that extends LangChain's JsonOutputParser to handle all of these cases:

class LenientJsonParser extends JsonOutputParser {
  async parse(text: string): Promise<object> {
    try { return await super.parse(text); } catch {
      // Strip ```
{% endraw %}
json ...
{% raw %}
 ``` fences
      // Match balanced braces for nested objects
      // Fall back gracefully
    }
  }
}

This was essential. Without it, models like Gemma 4 (a reasoning model) would output all their thinking in reasoning_content and leave content empty, causing the parser to fail on every message.


The Multi-Provider Architecture

All three provider types — OpenAI, Featherless.ai, and LM Studio — use the same ChatOpenAI class from @langchain/openai. This means:

  • Zero code duplication between providers
  • LM Studio works through its OpenAI-compatible endpoint with just a baseURL config change
  • Switching providers is a dropdown selection in the UI — no code changes needed

The model factory in orchestrator.ts creates the right ChatOpenAI instance based on the config:

function createChatModel(config: SimulationConfig) {
  switch (config.provider) {
    case "openai":    return new ChatOpenAI({ model: "gpt-4o-mini", ... });
    case "featherless": return new ChatOpenAI({ model: "...", configuration: { baseURL: "..." } });
    case "lmstudio":  return new ChatOpenAI({ model: "...", configuration: { baseURL: ".../v1" } });
  }
}

Every provider swap is instant — no restart, no rebuild.


The UI: Premium Light Product

I went through two complete redesigns. The first was dark cyberpunk — glowing elements, neon accents, dramatic. It looked great in screenshots but was exhausting to work with.

The second is a premium light product aesthetic inspired by Civilization VI, Notion, and Stripe:

  • White cards, subtle shadows (box-shadow: 0 1px 2px rgba(0,0,0,0.04))
  • 12–16px rounded corners
  • Inter font family
  • Segregated control panels with clear visual hierarchy

Dark/light mode uses CSS custom properties mapped through @theme, with localStorage persistence and prefers-color-scheme detection. No Tailwind dark: variants cluttering the component code.


What I Learned

  1. Real LLMs are messyJsonOutputParser fails the moment a model wraps output in markdown. Build lenient parsers from day one.

  2. Reasoning models need special handling — Gemma 4, DeepSeek R1, and similar models put everything in reasoning_content and leave content empty. You need higher maxTokens and explicit "do not reason" instructions in the system prompt.

  3. {{ escaping is essential — LangChain's ChatPromptTemplate uses {} for template variables. JSON examples need {{ and }} to produce literal braces in the output.

  4. createAgent() is powerful but expensive — the ReAct loop makes multiple LLM calls per decision. For simple trade evaluation, Pattern 2 (a single chain call) is more efficient. Use Pattern 3 when you need tool-use and multi-step reasoning.

  5. Template variable collision is real — LangChain's {} syntax conflicts with JSON's {}. The switch to {{ escaping was a "wait, that's it?" moment after hours of debugging.

  6. CSS custom properties + Tailwind = clean themes — mapping all colors through @theme variables instead of using dark: variants keeps component code readable and theming centralized.


Run It Yourself

git clone https://github.com/harishkotra/alien-translator.git
cd alien-translator
npm install
npm run dev

Open the settings, configure an LLM provider, and click Start. Watch the language emerge.

Screenshots

Alien Translator 1

Alien Translator 2

Alien Translator 3

Alien Translator 4

Code and more: https://www.dailybuild.xyz/project/147-alient-translator