惯性聚合 高效追踪和阅读你感兴趣的博客、新闻、科技资讯
阅读原文 在惯性聚合中打开

推荐订阅源

Martin Fowler
Martin Fowler
大猫的无限游戏
大猫的无限游戏
J
Java Code Geeks
罗磊的独立博客
雷峰网
雷峰网
G
Google Developers Blog
Cyber Security Advisories - MS-ISAC
Cyber Security Advisories - MS-ISAC
爱范儿
爱范儿
B
Blog RSS Feed
腾讯CDC
Apple Machine Learning Research
Apple Machine Learning Research
D
Docker
Recent Announcements
Recent Announcements
T
Tailwind CSS Blog
博客园 - 聂微东
让小产品的独立变现更简单 - ezindie.com
让小产品的独立变现更简单 - ezindie.com
Vercel News
Vercel News
小众软件
小众软件
人人都是产品经理
人人都是产品经理
云风的 BLOG
云风的 BLOG
IT之家
IT之家
Blog — PlanetScale
Blog — PlanetScale
I
InfoQ
S
SegmentFault 最新的问题

DEV Community

Authentication Security Deep Dive: From Brute Force to Salted Hashing (With Java Examples) Why AI Systems Don’t Fail — They Drift Spilling beans for how i learn for exam😁"Reinforcement Learning Cheat Sheet" I Replaced Chrome with Safari for AI Browser Automation. Here's What Broke (and What Finally Worked) How Python Borrows Other People's Work The $40 Architecture: Processing 1 Billion API Requests with 99.99% Uptime Vibe Coding: A Workflow Guide (From Zero to SaaS) Most webhook security guides protect the wrong side. The scary part is delivery. Headless CMS for TanStack Start: Build a Blog with Cosmic EU Age Verification App "Hacked in 2 Minutes" — What Actually Happened Comfy Cloud’s delete function does not actually remove files Running AI Models on GPU Cloud Servers: A Beginner Guide Event-driven media intelligence with AWS Step Functions and Bedrock I scored 500 AI prompts across 8 quality dimensions — here's what broke How to Call Google Gemini API from Next.js (Free Tier, No Backend Needed) The Portal Protocol: Reclaiming Human Connection in the Age of AI How to Fix Your Team's Scattered Knowledge Problem With a Self-Hosted Forum Intro to tc Cloud Functors: A Graph-First Mental Model for the Modern Cloud Designing Multi-Tenant Backends With Both Ownership and Team Access I Built a Neumorphic CSS Library with 77+ Components — Here's What I Learned PostgreSQL Performance Optimization: Why Connection Pooling Is Critical at Scale Cómo construí un SaaS multi-rubro para gestionar expensas en Argentina con FastAPI + Vue 3 🚀 I Built an Ethical Hacking Scanner Tool – Open Source Project I Replaced /usage and /context in Claude Code With a Single Statusline A Pythonic Way to Handle Emails (IMAP/SMTP) with Auto-Discovery and AI-Ready Design I Collected 8.9 Million Polymarket Price Points — Here's What I Found About How Markets Really Move EcoTrack AI — Carbon Footprint Tracker & Dashboard Everyone's Using AI. No One Agrees How. 5 self-hosted ebook managers worth trying in 2026 Building Your First AI Agent with LangChain: From Chatbot to Autonomous Assistant
Your AI Agent Has Push Access to Every Repo
PolicyLayer · 2026-06-16 · via DEV Community

PolicyLayer

Your coding agent just merged a pull request to main, deleted three files it thought were unused, and created a new repository called temp-debug-workspace. You didn't ask it to do any of that. But you gave it access to the GitHub MCP server, and the GitHub MCP server said yes to everything.

What the GitHub MCP server exposes

The official GitHub MCP server registers 83 tools. Most people set it up for reading code and managing issues. What they don't realise is they've also handed their agent the keys to:

  • delete_file — permanently remove files from a repository
  • merge_pull_request — merge PRs without human review
  • push_files — commit directly to any branch, including main
  • create_repository — spin up new repos under your organisation
  • fork_repository — fork repositories on your behalf
  • create_or_update_file — overwrite any file in any repo
  • actions_run_trigger — trigger CI/CD workflows

There's no permission model inside MCP. The protocol forwards every tools/call from agent to server without restriction. If the GitHub token has write access, the agent has write access. And if the agent hallucinates a plan that involves tidying up old files or "fixing" a broken workflow, nothing stands in its way.

This is the same class of problem we covered in what happens when an AI agent goes rogue — except here the blast radius is your entire GitHub organisation.

Block the dangerous tools, rate limit the rest

Intercept sits between your agent and the GitHub MCP server as a proxy. Every tool call passes through a YAML policy before reaching GitHub. The policy is deterministic — no LLM judgment, no prompt-based guardrails, just hard rules evaluated at the transport layer.

Here's the destructive tool policy from our GitHub starter config. File deletion is blocked outright:

version: "1"
description: "Policy for github/github-mcp-server"
default: "allow"

tools:
  # Block file deletion entirely
  delete_file:
    rules:
      - name: "block-delete"
        action: deny
        on_deny: "File deletion blocked by policy"

When the agent tries to call delete_file, it receives the on_deny message instead. The request never reaches GitHub.

For write operations you want to permit but not leave unchecked, rate limits keep things sane:

tools:
  # Cap write operations
  create_or_update_file:
    rules:
      - name: "rate-limit-writes"
        rate_limit: "30/hour"
        on_deny: "Rate limit: max 30 write operations per hour"

  push_files:
    rules:
      - name: "rate-limit-writes"
        rate_limit: "30/hour"
        on_deny: "Rate limit: max 30 write operations per hour"

  # Tighter limit on repo creation
  create_repository:
    rules:
      - name: "rate-limit-repo-creation"
        rate_limit: "5/hour"
        on_deny: "Rate limit: max 5 repository creations per hour"

  # Comments can loop fast — cap them
  add_issue_comment:
    rules:
      - name: "rate-limit-comments"
        rate_limit: "20/hour"
        on_deny: "Rate limit: max 20 comments per hour"

  # Workflow triggers are expensive
  actions_run_trigger:
    rules:
      - name: "rate-limit-workflows"
        rate_limit: "10/hour"
        on_deny: "Rate limit: max 10 workflow triggers per hour"

Rate limits use stateful counters that reset at the top of each window (hour, minute, or day). If the agent burns through 30 file writes in a loop, it's cut off until the next hour — and it knows why, because the denial message tells it.

Finally, a global backstop catches anything you haven't explicitly configured:

tools:
  "*":
    rules:
      - name: "global-rate-limit"
        rate_limit: "120/minute"
        on_deny: "Global rate limit: max 120 calls per minute"

This caps the agent at 120 total tool calls per minute across all 83 tools. Even if you forget to add a rule for a specific tool, the wildcard catches runaway loops before they cause real damage.

Getting started

Install Intercept and point it at the GitHub MCP server:

# Install
npm install -g @policylayer/intercept

# Run with the GitHub policy
intercept -c github.yaml -- npx -y @modelcontextprotocol/server-github

Every tool call now passes through the policy. Denied calls return the on_deny message to the agent. Allowed calls forward to GitHub as normal. The agent doesn't know Intercept is there — it just sees an MCP server that sometimes says no.

You can start with our pre-built GitHub policy and adjust from there. Block what's dangerous, rate limit what's useful, and leave read-only tools open.

Full GitHub policy →