惯性聚合 高效追踪和阅读你感兴趣的博客、新闻、科技资讯
阅读原文 在惯性聚合中打开

推荐订阅源

雷峰网
雷峰网
博客园 - 聂微东
酷 壳 – CoolShell
酷 壳 – CoolShell
宝玉的分享
宝玉的分享
奇客Solidot–传递最新科技情报
奇客Solidot–传递最新科技情报
罗磊的独立博客
Hugging Face - Blog
Hugging Face - Blog
T
Tailwind CSS Blog
OSCHINA 社区最新新闻
OSCHINA 社区最新新闻
IT之家
IT之家
博客园_首页
博客园 - 三生石上(FineUI控件)
博客园 - 叶小钗
Apple Machine Learning Research
Apple Machine Learning Research
freeCodeCamp Programming Tutorials: Python, JavaScript, Git & More
量子位
钛媒体:引领未来商业与生活新知
钛媒体:引领未来商业与生活新知
人人都是产品经理
人人都是产品经理
美团技术团队
小众软件
小众软件
Jina AI
Jina AI
S
SegmentFault 最新的问题
博客园 - Franky
让小产品的独立变现更简单 - ezindie.com
让小产品的独立变现更简单 - ezindie.com

DEV Community

Authentication Security Deep Dive: From Brute Force to Salted Hashing (With Java Examples) Why AI Systems Don’t Fail — They Drift Spilling beans for how i learn for exam😁"Reinforcement Learning Cheat Sheet" I Replaced Chrome with Safari for AI Browser Automation. Here's What Broke (and What Finally Worked) How Python Borrows Other People's Work The $40 Architecture: Processing 1 Billion API Requests with 99.99% Uptime Vibe Coding: A Workflow Guide (From Zero to SaaS) Most webhook security guides protect the wrong side. The scary part is delivery. Headless CMS for TanStack Start: Build a Blog with Cosmic EU Age Verification App "Hacked in 2 Minutes" — What Actually Happened Comfy Cloud’s delete function does not actually remove files Running AI Models on GPU Cloud Servers: A Beginner Guide Event-driven media intelligence with AWS Step Functions and Bedrock I scored 500 AI prompts across 8 quality dimensions — here's what broke How to Call Google Gemini API from Next.js (Free Tier, No Backend Needed) The Portal Protocol: Reclaiming Human Connection in the Age of AI How to Fix Your Team's Scattered Knowledge Problem With a Self-Hosted Forum Intro to tc Cloud Functors: A Graph-First Mental Model for the Modern Cloud Designing Multi-Tenant Backends With Both Ownership and Team Access I Built a Neumorphic CSS Library with 77+ Components — Here's What I Learned PostgreSQL Performance Optimization: Why Connection Pooling Is Critical at Scale Cómo construí un SaaS multi-rubro para gestionar expensas en Argentina con FastAPI + Vue 3 🚀 I Built an Ethical Hacking Scanner Tool – Open Source Project I Replaced /usage and /context in Claude Code With a Single Statusline A Pythonic Way to Handle Emails (IMAP/SMTP) with Auto-Discovery and AI-Ready Design I Collected 8.9 Million Polymarket Price Points — Here's What I Found About How Markets Really Move EcoTrack AI — Carbon Footprint Tracker & Dashboard Everyone's Using AI. No One Agrees How. 5 self-hosted ebook managers worth trying in 2026 Building Your First AI Agent with LangChain: From Chatbot to Autonomous Assistant
Why I Built a Job Queue With SQLite Instead of Redis (And...
D_SECURITY · 2026-05-04 · via DEV Community

I needed to coordinate background scripts running across different machines.

The obvious answer was Redis. Everyone uses Redis for this. The tutorials all use Redis. The Stack Overflow answers all say "just use Redis."

So I looked at what deploying Redis would actually cost me:

  • A running Redis server I had to maintain
  • A broker to connect workers to it
  • Celery or RQ on top of that
  • Memory-based storage with no persistence by default
  • A whole new failure mode: what happens when Redis goes down?

I'm running scripts on PythonAnywhere and a phone running Termux. I don't want to maintain infrastructure. I just want my cloud script to say "hey, do this" and have a worker somewhere execute it.

So I built Intent Bus — a pure HTTP job queue backed by SQLite. No Redis. No broker. No open ports required.

Here's what I learned.


The Core Idea

Any script POSTs a job to a Flask server. Workers anywhere poll for jobs matching their goal, claim them atomically, execute them, and mark them fulfilled.

Cloud Script
    │
    │ POST /intent  {"goal": "send_notification", "payload": {...}}
    ▼
Intent Bus (Flask + SQLite)
    │
    │ POST /claim?goal=send_notification
    ▼
Worker (Termux / Linux / anywhere)
    │
    │ executes job → POST /fulfill/<id>
    ▼
Done

Enter fullscreen mode Exit fullscreen mode

Workers poll outbound. They don't need an open port. They work behind any firewall.


The SQLite Locking Question

The part everyone pushes back on: can SQLite actually handle concurrent workers without race conditions?

Yes — with the right setup. Here's the exact claim query:

BEGIN IMMEDIATE;

SELECT * FROM intents
WHERE expires_at > :now
AND (status='open' OR (status='claimed' AND claimed_at < :stale))
AND goal = :goal
ORDER BY rowid ASC
LIMIT 1;

UPDATE intents
SET status='claimed', claimed_at=:now, claimed_by=:worker
WHERE id = (SELECT id FROM candidate)
AND (status='open' OR (status='claimed' AND claimed_at < :stale));

RETURNING id, goal, payload, claim_attempts;

Enter fullscreen mode Exit fullscreen mode

BEGIN IMMEDIATE acquires a write lock before the SELECT. No other writer can start a transaction until this one commits. The RETURNING clause means the SELECT and UPDATE are atomic — one worker gets the job, every other concurrent claim gets a 204 back and sleeps.

With PRAGMA journal_mode=WAL and PRAGMA busy_timeout=30000, readers never block writers and the system handles short bursts cleanly.

In practice on PythonAnywhere's free tier: I've tested with 3 concurrent workers, zero double-claims.


What SQLite Gets You That Redis Doesn't

Aspect SQLite (Intent Bus) Redis + Celery
Infrastructure Zero — just a file Redis server + broker
Persistence ACID by default Requires AOF/RDB config
Inspect queue Any SQL tool Redis CLI or dashboard
Self-hostable Yes, free tier works Needs paid hosting or VPS
Mobile workers Yes, just HTTP Complex from Termux
Failure recovery 60s visibility timeout, auto-requeue Ack-based, more complex
Throughput ceiling ~50-100 writes/sec Tens of thousands/sec

The throughput ceiling is the honest limitation. SQLite WAL mode serializes writes. At high concurrency (>10 req/sec sustained) you'll see queue buildup. For that use case, use Redis — it's the right tool.

For low-to-medium frequency workloads (scripts, bots, scrapers, phone notifications), SQLite is not just adequate — it's better, because you get persistence, inspectability, and zero infrastructure.


Delivery Guarantees

Intent Bus provides at-least-once delivery. If a worker crashes after claiming but before fulfilling, the 60-second visibility timeout auto-requeues the job. The next available worker picks it up.

This means workers should be idempotent where possible. For most script automation use cases (send a notification, write a log, trigger a webhook), this is fine.


The Scale Ceiling

I get asked: "what happens when this gets popular?"

The upgrade path is straightforward:

  1. Swap SQLite for PostgreSQL — minimal code changes, the query logic is identical
  2. Move to a paid VPS for higher CPU allocation
  3. Split read/write paths if needed

But the honest answer is: if you need to worry about that upgrade path, Intent Bus isn't the right tool for you today. It's designed for the tier below that problem.


Try It

pip install intent-bus

Enter fullscreen mode Exit fullscreen mode

from intent_bus import IntentClient

bus = IntentClient(api_key="your_key")

# Publish a job
bus.publish(goal="send_notification", payload={"message": "Scrape complete"})

# Listen for jobs
def handle(payload):
    print(payload["message"])

bus.listen(goal="send_notification", handler=handle)

Enter fullscreen mode Exit fullscreen mode

Full server code, spec, and worker examples: https://github.com/dsecurity49/Intent-Bus

The server runs free on PythonAnywhere. Workers run anywhere that can make HTTP requests — including a phone.


Have you used SQLite as a message broker in production? I'd genuinely like to know where it held up and where it broke down — drop a comment.