惯性聚合 高效追踪和阅读你感兴趣的博客、新闻、科技资讯
阅读原文 在惯性聚合中打开

推荐订阅源

S
SegmentFault 最新的问题
Jina AI
Jina AI
罗磊的独立博客
V
Visual Studio Blog
freeCodeCamp Programming Tutorials: Python, JavaScript, Git & More
J
Java Code Geeks
U
Unit 42
Microsoft Azure Blog
Microsoft Azure Blog
B
Blog RSS Feed
爱范儿
爱范儿
酷 壳 – CoolShell
酷 壳 – CoolShell
Last Week in AI
Last Week in AI
T
The Blog of Author Tim Ferriss
腾讯CDC
Hugging Face - Blog
Hugging Face - Blog
T
Tailwind CSS Blog
让小产品的独立变现更简单 - ezindie.com
让小产品的独立变现更简单 - ezindie.com
I
InfoQ
月光博客
月光博客
博客园_首页
Vercel News
Vercel News
P
Proofpoint News Feed
GbyAI
GbyAI
Y
Y Combinator Blog

DEV Community

Authentication Security Deep Dive: From Brute Force to Salted Hashing (With Java Examples) Why AI Systems Don’t Fail — They Drift Spilling beans for how i learn for exam😁"Reinforcement Learning Cheat Sheet" I Replaced Chrome with Safari for AI Browser Automation. Here's What Broke (and What Finally Worked) How Python Borrows Other People's Work The $40 Architecture: Processing 1 Billion API Requests with 99.99% Uptime Vibe Coding: A Workflow Guide (From Zero to SaaS) Most webhook security guides protect the wrong side. The scary part is delivery. Headless CMS for TanStack Start: Build a Blog with Cosmic EU Age Verification App "Hacked in 2 Minutes" — What Actually Happened Comfy Cloud’s delete function does not actually remove files Running AI Models on GPU Cloud Servers: A Beginner Guide Event-driven media intelligence with AWS Step Functions and Bedrock I scored 500 AI prompts across 8 quality dimensions — here's what broke How to Call Google Gemini API from Next.js (Free Tier, No Backend Needed) The Portal Protocol: Reclaiming Human Connection in the Age of AI How to Fix Your Team's Scattered Knowledge Problem With a Self-Hosted Forum Intro to tc Cloud Functors: A Graph-First Mental Model for the Modern Cloud Designing Multi-Tenant Backends With Both Ownership and Team Access I Built a Neumorphic CSS Library with 77+ Components — Here's What I Learned PostgreSQL Performance Optimization: Why Connection Pooling Is Critical at Scale Cómo construí un SaaS multi-rubro para gestionar expensas en Argentina con FastAPI + Vue 3 🚀 I Built an Ethical Hacking Scanner Tool – Open Source Project I Replaced /usage and /context in Claude Code With a Single Statusline A Pythonic Way to Handle Emails (IMAP/SMTP) with Auto-Discovery and AI-Ready Design I Collected 8.9 Million Polymarket Price Points — Here's What I Found About How Markets Really Move EcoTrack AI — Carbon Footprint Tracker & Dashboard Everyone's Using AI. No One Agrees How. 5 self-hosted ebook managers worth trying in 2026 Building Your First AI Agent with LangChain: From Chatbot to Autonomous Assistant
How to Redact PII before sending prompts to OpenAI, Claud...
Trevor · 2026-06-18 · via DEV Community

If you send user text to an LLM, you are probably sending personal data with it without meaning to. A support message, a chat transcript, a pasted form. They carry names, emails, phone numbers, and sometimes card numbers, and all of it ends up in your prompt. Once that prompt leaves your server, the personal data is sitting in someone else's logs, which is a real problem under GDPR and HIPAA.

The fix is simpler than most people expect, and it does not mean giving up the model. You redact the personal data before the prompt goes out, send the safe version to the model, then put the real values back into the answer. This post walks through that pattern with working code.

The pattern in three steps

  1. Redact. Take your raw text and swap each piece of personal data for a placeholder like [EMAIL_1]. Keep a small map on your side that records which placeholder stands for which real value.
  2. Call the model with the redacted text. The model only ever sees placeholders, so the real data never lands in logs you do not control.
  3. Restore. Take the model's reply and your map, and put the real values back so the final output is useful to your user.

That is the whole idea. The personal data takes a round trip through placeholders and never leaves your stack.

A real example

Say you run a support tool that uses GPT to summarize customer emails. A customer writes in with their email and phone number. You want the summary, but you do not want to ship their contact details to OpenAI.

Here is the flow end to end. I am using a small API I built for the redact and restore steps, but the shape is the same no matter how you handle those two calls.

// Real example: summarize a customer support email with GPT,
// without sending any personal data to OpenAI.
const SHIELD = "https://llm-privacy-shield.p.rapidapi.com";
const shieldHeaders = {
  "content-type": "application/json",
  "x-rapidapi-host": "llm-privacy-shield.p.rapidapi.com",
  "x-rapidapi-key": "YOUR-RAPIDAPI-KEY"
};

async function summarizeSafely(customerEmail) {
  // 1. Redact PII before the text leaves your server.
  const { redacted, token_map } = await fetch(SHIELD + "/api/redact", {
    method: "POST",
    headers: shieldHeaders,
    body: JSON.stringify({ text: customerEmail })
  }).then(res => res.json());

  // customerEmail:
  //   "Hi, my confirmation went to john@acme.com but nothing arrived.
  //    Please call me back on 415-555-0132."
  // redacted:
  //   "Hi, my confirmation went to [EMAIL_1] but nothing arrived.
  //    Please call me back on [PHONE_1]."

  // 2. Send only the safe version to your model. OpenAI is shown here.
  //    Anthropic and Gemini work the same way, just swap this call.
  const completion = await openai.chat.completions.create({
    model: "gpt-4o-mini",
    messages: [
      { role: "system", content: "Summarize this support email in one sentence." },
      { role: "user", content: redacted }
    ]
  });
  const summary = completion.choices[0].message.content;

  // 3. Put the real contact details back for your support agent.
  const { restored } = await fetch(SHIELD + "/api/restore", {
    method: "POST",
    headers: shieldHeaders,
    body: JSON.stringify({ text: summary, token_map })
  }).then(res => res.json());

  return restored;
}

The customer's email and phone number never reach OpenAI. The model summarizes placeholder text, and you swap the real values back in at the end for your support agent to read.

The two calls, side by side

If you just want to see the redact and restore calls on their own:

// The two calls, at a glance
const HOST = "https://llm-privacy-shield.p.rapidapi.com";
const headers = {
  "content-type": "application/json",
  "x-rapidapi-host": "llm-privacy-shield.p.rapidapi.com",
  "x-rapidapi-key": "YOUR-RAPIDAPI-KEY"   // from your RapidAPI dashboard
};

const r = await fetch(HOST + "/api/redact", {
  method: "POST",
  headers,
  body: JSON.stringify({ text: "Email john@acme.com about invoice 4521" })
}).then(x => x.json());

// r.redacted   => "Email [EMAIL_1] about invoice 4521"
// r.token_map  => { "[EMAIL_1]": "john@acme.com" }

const back = await fetch(HOST + "/api/restore", {
  method: "POST",
  headers,
  body: JSON.stringify({ text: modelReply, token_map: r.token_map })
}).then(x => x.json());
// back.restored => the model reply with the real values put back

The redact call hands you back the safe text and the token_map. You hold the map. The restore call takes that map and the model's reply and rebuilds the real answer.

The three modes

Redaction is not one size fits all. There are three modes worth knowing:

  • Tokenize (reversible). Replaces each value with a placeholder you can reverse later. Use this when you need the real values back in the answer.
  • Mask. Replaces a value with a generic label like <EMAIL>. Good when you never need it back.
  • Remove. Deletes the value entirely.

Tokenize is the default in the examples above, because the restore step depends on it.

Do you have to use a hosted API?

No. If you would rather self-host, Microsoft Presidio is a solid open source option for detecting and anonymizing PII. The redact then restore pattern is the part that matters, and it works the same whether you run it yourself or call a service.

I built a hosted version because I wanted the redact and the restore in one place, running in-process so the protected data never goes to a third party, with a response time under a millisecond. It detects emails, phone numbers, SSNs, credit cards, IP addresses, and API keys, and there is a free tier if you want to try it without committing to anything paid:

LLM Privacy Shield on RapidAPI

Wrapping up

If your app sends user text to an LLM, run it through a redact step first. Keep the map, send placeholders to the model, restore at the end. Your users get the same useful output, and the personal data stays where it belongs.

What new app or existing pipeline can you heighten privacy using this API?