惯性聚合 高效追踪和阅读你感兴趣的博客、新闻、科技资讯
阅读原文 在惯性聚合中打开

推荐订阅源

G
Google Developers Blog
S
SegmentFault 最新的问题
Jina AI
Jina AI
D
DataBreaches.Net
人人都是产品经理
人人都是产品经理
罗磊的独立博客
OSCHINA 社区最新新闻
OSCHINA 社区最新新闻
爱范儿
爱范儿
大猫的无限游戏
大猫的无限游戏
C
Check Point Blog
酷 壳 – CoolShell
酷 壳 – CoolShell
WordPress大学
WordPress大学
博客园 - 三生石上(FineUI控件)
B
Blog
博客园 - 【当耐特】
博客园 - Franky
M
MIT News - Artificial intelligence
让小产品的独立变现更简单 - ezindie.com
让小产品的独立变现更简单 - ezindie.com
L
LangChain Blog
MyScale Blog
MyScale Blog
Cyber Security Advisories - MS-ISAC
Cyber Security Advisories - MS-ISAC
博客园 - 叶小钗
Last Week in AI
Last Week in AI
Engineering at Meta
Engineering at Meta

DEV Community

Authentication Security Deep Dive: From Brute Force to Salted Hashing (With Java Examples) Why AI Systems Don’t Fail — They Drift Spilling beans for how i learn for exam😁"Reinforcement Learning Cheat Sheet" I Replaced Chrome with Safari for AI Browser Automation. Here's What Broke (and What Finally Worked) How Python Borrows Other People's Work The $40 Architecture: Processing 1 Billion API Requests with 99.99% Uptime Vibe Coding: A Workflow Guide (From Zero to SaaS) Most webhook security guides protect the wrong side. The scary part is delivery. Headless CMS for TanStack Start: Build a Blog with Cosmic EU Age Verification App "Hacked in 2 Minutes" — What Actually Happened Comfy Cloud’s delete function does not actually remove files Running AI Models on GPU Cloud Servers: A Beginner Guide Event-driven media intelligence with AWS Step Functions and Bedrock I scored 500 AI prompts across 8 quality dimensions — here's what broke How to Call Google Gemini API from Next.js (Free Tier, No Backend Needed) The Portal Protocol: Reclaiming Human Connection in the Age of AI How to Fix Your Team's Scattered Knowledge Problem With a Self-Hosted Forum Intro to tc Cloud Functors: A Graph-First Mental Model for the Modern Cloud Designing Multi-Tenant Backends With Both Ownership and Team Access I Built a Neumorphic CSS Library with 77+ Components — Here's What I Learned PostgreSQL Performance Optimization: Why Connection Pooling Is Critical at Scale Cómo construí un SaaS multi-rubro para gestionar expensas en Argentina con FastAPI + Vue 3 🚀 I Built an Ethical Hacking Scanner Tool – Open Source Project I Replaced /usage and /context in Claude Code With a Single Statusline A Pythonic Way to Handle Emails (IMAP/SMTP) with Auto-Discovery and AI-Ready Design I Collected 8.9 Million Polymarket Price Points — Here's What I Found About How Markets Really Move EcoTrack AI — Carbon Footprint Tracker & Dashboard Everyone's Using AI. No One Agrees How. 5 self-hosted ebook managers worth trying in 2026 Building Your First AI Agent with LangChain: From Chatbot to Autonomous Assistant
Generate TanStack Query Hooks from OpenAPI: Own the Last ...
D.S. · 2026-05-11 · via DEV Community

When you go API-First, your OpenAPI contract should be the single source of truth across your entire stack.

Unfortunately, most community-managed generators TanStack Query generators force you into an uncomfortable tradeoff: either live with rigid, inflexible hooks, or write everything by hand and lose the benefits of type safety.

This article shows a more flexible approach.

Use @apical-ts/craft to handle all the heavy, error-prone OpenAPI work: parsing, schema generation, response unions, parameter serialization, and type inference. Then keep a thin, custom generator in your own repository for the TanStack Query layer.

The result: fully typed, clean, and highly ergonomic hooks that you fully own and can evolve as your application needs — without upstream dependencies or duplicated contract logic.

When working with TanStack Query and you want to generate hooks from an OpenAPI contract, you have a few options:

  • implement hooks by hand trying to match the contract types
  • use a community-managed open source generator for the hooks layer
  • or keep a small custom generator in your own repository

This article shows the last option, using @apical-ts/craft to generate the contract-sensitive pieces and a lightweight local generator to emit TanStack Query hooks, as in examples/tanstack-query-hooks/.

The Real Tradeoff Is Ownership

Both the second and third approaches are still code generation. Both start from OpenAPI. What changes is who owns the last mile of the frontend integration.

Approach Shared input Who owns hook ergonomics
Community-managed generator OpenAPI spec upstream open source project
Custom local generator OpenAPI spec your repository

That difference matters because TanStack Query is intentionally flexible. Query keys, invalidation, mutation side effects, pagination, SSR conventions, and wrapper APIs often end up being application-specific.

The Sweet Spot: Delegate the Hard Part, Own the Hook Layer

With @apical-ts/craft you can generate:

  • shared Zod schemas in generated/schemas/*
  • route metadata in generated/routes/*
  • typed operation functions in generated/client/*

That means your custom hook generator does not need to solve the hardest OpenAPI problems itself. @apical-ts/craft already handles the complex, correctness-sensitive work.

At that point, the TanStack Query layer becomes a much thinner problem: read the generated client and route metadata, then wrap them in useQuery and useMutation the way your application wants.

This is also exactly the kind of layer that can be implemented or evolved very quickly with an AI coding agent.

How It Works

1. Generate the typed client, route metadata, and schemas

npx @apical-ts/craft generate \
  --client \
  -i ./swagger.json \
  -o ./generated

Enter fullscreen mode Exit fullscreen mode

In the example package, this is exposed as:

pnpm run generate:client

Enter fullscreen mode Exit fullscreen mode

2. Run a local generator for the TanStack Query layer

The local generator in scripts/generate-hooks.ts reads the generated client and routes, then emits hook modules under generated/tanstack-query-hooks/*.

Run it in the example template:

pnpm run generate:hooks

Enter fullscreen mode Exit fullscreen mode

or by yourself:

tsx ./scripts/generate-hooks.ts

Enter fullscreen mode Exit fullscreen mode

Example Usage

const { data, error, isLoading } = useFindPetsByStatus({
  query: { status: ["available"] },
});

const addPet = useAddPetMutation();

await addPet.mutateAsync({
  body: { name: "Rex", photoUrls: [] },
});

Enter fullscreen mode Exit fullscreen mode

The generated hooks stay simple and fully typed:

export function useFindPetsByStatus(
  args: Parameters<typeof ops.findPetsByStatus>[0],
) {
  type Result = Awaited<ReturnType<typeof ops.findPetsByStatus>>;

  return useQuery<Result, unknown>({
    queryKey: ["findPetsByStatus", args],
    queryFn: () => ops.findPetsByStatus(args),
  });
}

Enter fullscreen mode Exit fullscreen mode

Why Owning the Hook Layer Matters

Most feature requests for community generators are not about OpenAPI parsing: they’re about customization. Custom query key factories, selective invalidation, pagination helpers, optimistic updates, SSR patterns, etc.

These are exactly the kinds of changes you can implement quickly when you own the layer instead of opening an issue upstream and hoping the customization gets accepted.

Final Take

@apical-ts/craft lets you delegate the hard OpenAPI work while keeping full control over your TanStack Query experience. It’s the best of both worlds: strong types and maximum flexibility.

Ready-to-use example:

You may want to try it yourself:

https://github.com/gunzip/apical-ts/tree/main/examples/tanstack-query-hooks