惯性聚合 高效追踪和阅读你感兴趣的博客、新闻、科技资讯
阅读原文 在惯性聚合中打开

推荐订阅源

大猫的无限游戏
大猫的无限游戏
云风的 BLOG
云风的 BLOG
小众软件
小众软件
V
V2EX
博客园 - Franky
博客园 - 司徒正美
Apple Machine Learning Research
Apple Machine Learning Research
量子位
博客园 - 【当耐特】
雷峰网
雷峰网
WordPress大学
WordPress大学
Jina AI
Jina AI
Google DeepMind News
Google DeepMind News
N
Netflix TechBlog - Medium
爱范儿
爱范儿
OSCHINA 社区最新新闻
OSCHINA 社区最新新闻
奇客Solidot–传递最新科技情报
奇客Solidot–传递最新科技情报
阮一峰的网络日志
阮一峰的网络日志
IT之家
IT之家
Blog — PlanetScale
Blog — PlanetScale
Hugging Face - Blog
Hugging Face - Blog
H
Hackread – Cybersecurity News, Data Breaches, AI and More
V
Visual Studio Blog
Microsoft Security Blog
Microsoft Security Blog

DEV Community

Authentication Security Deep Dive: From Brute Force to Salted Hashing (With Java Examples) Why AI Systems Don’t Fail — They Drift Spilling beans for how i learn for exam😁"Reinforcement Learning Cheat Sheet" I Replaced Chrome with Safari for AI Browser Automation. Here's What Broke (and What Finally Worked) How Python Borrows Other People's Work The $40 Architecture: Processing 1 Billion API Requests with 99.99% Uptime Vibe Coding: A Workflow Guide (From Zero to SaaS) Most webhook security guides protect the wrong side. The scary part is delivery. Headless CMS for TanStack Start: Build a Blog with Cosmic EU Age Verification App "Hacked in 2 Minutes" — What Actually Happened Comfy Cloud’s delete function does not actually remove files Running AI Models on GPU Cloud Servers: A Beginner Guide Event-driven media intelligence with AWS Step Functions and Bedrock I scored 500 AI prompts across 8 quality dimensions — here's what broke How to Call Google Gemini API from Next.js (Free Tier, No Backend Needed) The Portal Protocol: Reclaiming Human Connection in the Age of AI How to Fix Your Team's Scattered Knowledge Problem With a Self-Hosted Forum Intro to tc Cloud Functors: A Graph-First Mental Model for the Modern Cloud Designing Multi-Tenant Backends With Both Ownership and Team Access I Built a Neumorphic CSS Library with 77+ Components — Here's What I Learned PostgreSQL Performance Optimization: Why Connection Pooling Is Critical at Scale Cómo construí un SaaS multi-rubro para gestionar expensas en Argentina con FastAPI + Vue 3 🚀 I Built an Ethical Hacking Scanner Tool – Open Source Project I Replaced /usage and /context in Claude Code With a Single Statusline A Pythonic Way to Handle Emails (IMAP/SMTP) with Auto-Discovery and AI-Ready Design I Collected 8.9 Million Polymarket Price Points — Here's What I Found About How Markets Really Move EcoTrack AI — Carbon Footprint Tracker & Dashboard Everyone's Using AI. No One Agrees How. 5 self-hosted ebook managers worth trying in 2026 Building Your First AI Agent with LangChain: From Chatbot to Autonomous Assistant
🧩 Runtime Snapshots #17 — BaSS: Browser-as-Shared-Space
Alechko · 2026-06-15 · via DEV Community

The #16 was about how a single agent perceives a page — vision, accessibility tree, or runtime structural perception — and why the third one wins when the user is the user. This post is about the axis underneath that one, the part nobody names: not how the agent sees the page, but how many things are looking at it at once.

Today the answer is one. One driver per browser. That assumption is so baked in it's invisible — and it's the next thing to break.

One driver is a design decision, not a law

Look at the three perception architectures from #16 and notice what they share. Vision spins up a headless browser the agent owns. Accessibility-tree agents drive a Chromium instance over DevTools Protocol — again, theirs. In both, the browser is a single-occupancy vehicle: the agent gets in, drives, gets out. The human isn't in the car. Neither is any other agent.

Runtime structural perception is the odd one out, and that difference is the whole point of this post. It runs as a peripheral to the user's own browser — the real session, already logged in. Which means the surface it reads is, by construction, a surface someone else is already on. The human is right there. The agent isn't operating a browser; it's operating the same browser.

Once that's true, "one driver" stops being a constraint and starts being a choice.

BaSS: Browser-as-Shared-Space

Call it BaSS — Browser-as-Shared-Space.

The claim is small to state and large in consequence: a browser tab is not one driver's cockpit. It's a surface several participants can occupy at once — you, an agent, a second agent from a different vendor — each addressing not just "the page" but individual elements by stable ID, on the same live DOM, at the same time.

surface: checkout (live, authenticated session)
el#a17  "Place order"   [button]
  · human         — hovering, hasn't committed
  · agent:claude  — reading line items
  · agent:codex   — flagged a price mismatch on el#a09

That is a different primitive from "an agent that browses." An agent that browses is alone. BaSS is co-presence: humans and multiple agents sharing one live state, the way a shared document is one file several cursors edit — except the document is the live web app you're actually working in, with your real credentials, mid-task.

Why only one of the three can host it

This is the part that matters architecturally. Of the three perception models, only runtime structural perception can host BaSS at all — and not by cleverness, by construction.

Vision and accessibility-tree agents each instantiate their own browser. There is no shared surface, because each participant brought their own. To put two agents and a human "in the same place," that place has to already exist and already be occupied — which is exactly what an in-session peripheral is, and exactly what a headless instance isn't. You can bolt coordination onto isolated browsers, but then you're rebuilding the shared surface in software that the in-session model gets for free.

So BaSS isn't a feature you sprinkle on any browser agent. It's only available to the architecture that was already sitting inside the user's real session. #16 argued runtime structural perception wins on cost, authentication, and real-app coverage. This is the fourth reason, and it has the longest tail: it's the only one that can be shared.

The hard part isn't permission — it's coexistence

The instinct is to model this as access control: who's allowed to act, in what order. That's the wrong frame. In BaSS there's no hierarchy and no gate; participants are equals. The actual hard problem is coexistence: most of what's in a real DOM — you, foreign scripts, whatever automation the site itself runs — has no idea any protocol exists. The question isn't "who's allowed in." It's "how do independent actors share a space none of them coordinated in advance, without stepping on each other."

That's a concurrency problem on a surface no one owns. It's the interesting part, and it's most of the engineering.

What's shipped, and what's days out

Straight about status, because this series is read by people who build:

The substrate is in production. Runtime structural perception (the #16 approach), the relay that exposes it over MCP, single-agent perceive-and-act inside your real authenticated browser — shipped and running. We've already had two agents from different vendors act on one shared cart through the relay, which is the smallest honest proof that the shared part isn't a slide.

The full BaSS layer — multiple participants on one surface, element-level addressing across all of them, the coexistence logic that keeps them out of each other's way — is in active development and days from release. This post is the concept landing just ahead of the thing. The next snapshot will be the thing itself.


e2llm.com

This is part 17 of the Runtime Snapshots series — exploring how structured browser data changes the way we build, test, and ship software. #16 mapped the three ways an agent can see a page; this one is about what happens when more than one of them is looking at the same page at once.

If you've run two agents against the same live page — what was the first thing that collided?