This is a submission for the June Solstice Game Jam
A game about untangling distinctions, and a story about how the same process created the game itself.
Where Am I Right Now?
This is my submission for the Summer Solstice Game Jam.
I'm not a professional game developer, and before this challenge I had never completed a real game project. I only had some basic programming knowledge and a curiosity about building things.
What surprised me most was not the game itself.
It was the realization that the process of creating the game became the same game I was trying to build.
The game is about untangling knots.
Looking back, the journey that created the game followed exactly the same structure.
Quick Jump
- What Was Really Built
- About the Game
- Video Demo
- Source Code
- How I Built a Game While Playing the Same Game
- Best Ode to Alan Turing
- Conclusion
What Was Really Built
In short:
A conversation.
The most interesting thing I built was not the code.
It was the journey of ideas that unfolded through a conversation with AI while designing the game.
The Summer Solstice theme immediately suggested several distinctions:
- Longest day vs. shortest day
- Light vs. darkness
- Balance vs. imbalance
I became interested in the idea that these distinctions themselves might be knots.
Instead of directly explaining my idea, I started a conversation with AI and gradually explored it through questions.
The game evolved from that exploration.
At first, I thought I was creating a game about untangling knots.
Eventually, I realized that the conversation itself was untangling knots.
About the Game
Genre
A philosophical puzzle-adventure with narrative exploration elements.
Description
The Final Knot is an atmospheric philosophical puzzle-adventure game where the player explores a world trapped on an eternal Summer Solstice.
Frozen shadows have accumulated into vast cosmic knots, and each knot represents a distinction such as light and darkness, action and silence, or balance and imbalance.
Through observation, experimentation, and reflection, players gradually realize that the game is less about fixing a broken world and more about understanding the assumptions used to perceive it.
As the journey progresses, puzzles become questions, answers become patterns, and every untangled knot reveals another waiting beneath it.
The game concludes with a final knot that cannot be solved within the game itself.
A game where every puzzle untangles a concept, and every answer reveals another knot.
README
Video Demo
Source Code
How I Built a Game While Playing the Same Game
The first version was simply a puzzle game generated through AI-assisted development.
Then I suggested a small change:
Add a player action called Silence.
That single idea changed everything.
The discussion shifted from game mechanics to the meaning behind those mechanics.
We began questioning assumptions that were originally built into the game itself.
The conversation gradually moved from:
- Commanding → Questioning
- Fixing the world → Understanding the world
- Achievements → Reflection
- Action → Attention
The game became less about solving problems and more about examining how we define problems in the first place.
Some of the most interesting discussions emerged around concepts such as:
- Balance and imbalance
- Equality and difference
- Distinction and comparison
- Human and AI
- Fear and reluctance
The game grew directly from these conversations.
Every new question revealed another conceptual knot to untangle.
Looking back, the development process followed the same structure as the game itself.
The game was about untangling.
The design process was untangling.
Best Ode to Alan Turing
I submitted this project for the Best Ode to Alan Turing category.
Many of the conversations eventually arrived at questions closely connected to ideas explored by Alan Turing:
- What distinguishes humans from machines?
- What role does comparison play in intelligence?
- Can understanding exist without creating distinctions?
- How do we recognize patterns?
The game does not attempt to answer these questions.
Instead, it invites players to explore them.
One of the final narrative elements in the game is a fictional conversation between Alan Turing and an advanced AI discussing patterns, distinctions, identity, and understanding.
Just before the player reaches the Final Knot, the conversation ends with a simple realization:
"The next knot."
Conclusion
During this project, I noticed something interesting.
Distinction and comparison appear everywhere.
Humans rely on them.
AI relies on them.
Science relies on them.
Games rely on them.
We understand things by separating them from what they are not.
Yet every distinction creates another knot.
Every answer creates another question.
Every solution reveals another possibility.
The game eventually suggests that the Final Knot should be taken with you rather than solved.
Perhaps that is true beyond the game as well.
This project also changed how I think about prompt engineering. I expected prompt engineering to be about writing better instructions. Instead, it became a process of asking better questions.
The final line of the game says:
Untangling never ends.
At first I thought that line described the player.
Now I think it also describes creativity itself.
Perhaps creativity is not the act of finding answers.
Perhaps it is the act of finding better knots.
And perhaps that is simply the way of everything.