惯性聚合 高效追踪和阅读你感兴趣的博客、新闻、科技资讯
阅读原文 在惯性聚合中打开

推荐订阅源

Y
Y Combinator Blog
The GitHub Blog
The GitHub Blog
云风的 BLOG
云风的 BLOG
Engineering at Meta
Engineering at Meta
Google DeepMind News
Google DeepMind News
aimingoo的专栏
aimingoo的专栏
Recent Announcements
Recent Announcements
A
About on SuperTechFans
U
Unit 42
MyScale Blog
MyScale Blog
J
Java Code Geeks
博客园_首页
Blog — PlanetScale
Blog — PlanetScale
D
Docker
Microsoft Azure Blog
Microsoft Azure Blog
博客园 - 司徒正美
量子位
月光博客
月光博客
G
Google Developers Blog
V
V2EX
博客园 - 聂微东
宝玉的分享
宝玉的分享
IT之家
IT之家
Vercel News
Vercel News

DEV Community

Authentication Security Deep Dive: From Brute Force to Salted Hashing (With Java Examples) Why AI Systems Don’t Fail — They Drift Spilling beans for how i learn for exam😁"Reinforcement Learning Cheat Sheet" I Replaced Chrome with Safari for AI Browser Automation. Here's What Broke (and What Finally Worked) How Python Borrows Other People's Work The $40 Architecture: Processing 1 Billion API Requests with 99.99% Uptime Vibe Coding: A Workflow Guide (From Zero to SaaS) Most webhook security guides protect the wrong side. The scary part is delivery. Headless CMS for TanStack Start: Build a Blog with Cosmic EU Age Verification App "Hacked in 2 Minutes" — What Actually Happened Comfy Cloud’s delete function does not actually remove files Running AI Models on GPU Cloud Servers: A Beginner Guide Event-driven media intelligence with AWS Step Functions and Bedrock I scored 500 AI prompts across 8 quality dimensions — here's what broke How to Call Google Gemini API from Next.js (Free Tier, No Backend Needed) The Portal Protocol: Reclaiming Human Connection in the Age of AI How to Fix Your Team's Scattered Knowledge Problem With a Self-Hosted Forum Intro to tc Cloud Functors: A Graph-First Mental Model for the Modern Cloud Designing Multi-Tenant Backends With Both Ownership and Team Access I Built a Neumorphic CSS Library with 77+ Components — Here's What I Learned PostgreSQL Performance Optimization: Why Connection Pooling Is Critical at Scale Cómo construí un SaaS multi-rubro para gestionar expensas en Argentina con FastAPI + Vue 3 🚀 I Built an Ethical Hacking Scanner Tool – Open Source Project I Replaced /usage and /context in Claude Code With a Single Statusline A Pythonic Way to Handle Emails (IMAP/SMTP) with Auto-Discovery and AI-Ready Design I Collected 8.9 Million Polymarket Price Points — Here's What I Found About How Markets Really Move EcoTrack AI — Carbon Footprint Tracker & Dashboard Everyone's Using AI. No One Agrees How. 5 self-hosted ebook managers worth trying in 2026 Building Your First AI Agent with LangChain: From Chatbot to Autonomous Assistant
Verify That Your GitHub Actions Deployment Actually Lande...
hello world_leo · 2026-05-28 · via DEV Community

How to Verify?

GitHub Actions said ✅ Success. The server disagreed.

We kept running into a subtle CI/CD problem: after pushing to main, GitHub marked the deployment as successful, but checking the server revealed the old code was still there. No error. No alert. Just stale code running in production.

This article walks through the root cause, and the two-part fix we implemented: lock detection and commit SHA verification.


The Setup

Our deployment architecture uses a webhook-based approach (no SSH):

GitHub Actions → HTTP POST → deploy.php on server → runs deploy.sh

Why webhooks instead of SSH? Our hosting provider (Hypernode) IP-whitelists SSH access. GitHub Actions runs on dynamic Azure IPs that get blocked. Port 443 (HTTPS) has no such restriction.

The workflow looks like this:

- name: Trigger deploy on server
run: |
    response=$(curl -s -w "\n%{http_code}" \
    -X POST https://www.yoursite.nl/deploy.php \
    -H "X-Deploy-Token: ${{ secrets.DEPLOY_WEBHOOK_TOKEN }}" \
    --max-time 300)

    code=$(echo "$response" | tail -n 1)
    if [ "$code" != "200" ]; then
    echo "❌ Deployment failed (HTTP $code)"
    exit 1
    fi
    echo "✅ Deployment successful"

And deploy.php runs deploy.sh synchronously:

exec("bash {$script} 2>&1", $output, $exit);
echo implode("\n", $output) . "\n";
http_response_code($exit === 0 ? 200 : 500);

Looks solid, right? The exec() call is blocking — PHP waits for deploy.sh to finish before responding. So GitHub should always get an accurate result.

Mostly, yes. But there's one case where it silently lies.


The Root Cause: Silent Lock Skips

deploy.sh uses a lock file to prevent concurrent deployments:

LOCK_FILE="/tmp/mysite-deploy.lock"

if [ -f "$LOCK_FILE" ]; then
    log "ERROR: Deployment already in progress. Aborting."
    exit 1
fi

touch "$LOCK_FILE"
trap "rm -f $LOCK_FILE" EXIT

When a second push happens while a deploy is already running:

  1. Second deploy hits deploy.php
  2. deploy.sh finds lock file → exit 1
  3. deploy.php returns HTTP 500
  4. GitHub Actions sees 500 → ❌ marks as failed

That part is actually fine. But here's the subtle problem: the first deploy might fail mid-way (network hiccup on git fetch, OOM kill, timeout), leaving the lock file behind. Now every subsequent deploy silently skips, deploy.sh exits 1, deploy.php returns 500 and depending on how your workflow handles the response, you might see a misleading result.

Worse: even when deploys succeed, there was no proof of what commit actually landed. We had to manually SSH in and check file timestamps or grep for a known string. That's not sustainable.


The Fix: Two Parts

Part 1 — Return 423 When Locked

Instead of letting deploy.sh handle the lock silently, detect it in deploy.php first and return a meaningful HTTP status:

$lockFile = '/tmp/mysite-deploy.lock';
if (file_exists($lockFile)) {
    http_response_code(423);
    echo "LOCKED: Deployment already in progress. Try again shortly.\n";
    exit;
}

exec("bash {$script} 2>&1", $output, $exit);
echo implode("\n", $output) . "\n";
http_response_code($exit === 0 ? 200 : 500);

HTTP 423 Locked is semantically correct here — it's a standard status code meaning "the resource is currently locked."

Update the workflow to treat 423 as a distinct failure:

if [ "$code" = "423" ]; then
echo "⚠️  Deploy locked — previous deploy still running"
exit 1
fi
if [ "$code" != "200" ]; then
echo "❌ Deployment failed (HTTP $code)"
exit 1
fi

Now you get a clear signal in CI instead of a generic failure or false success.


Part 2 — Write a Version File, Verify the SHA

At the end of deploy.sh, after all steps complete successfully, write the deployed commit SHA to a public file:

# After git reset --hard, capture the SHA DEPLOYED_COMMIT=$(git rev-parse HEAD)
log "✓ Code updated (commit: $DEPLOYED_COMMIT)"

# ... composer install, yarn build, artisan commands ...

# At the very end, write version file
echo "$DEPLOYED_COMMIT $(date -u +%Y-%m-%dT%H:%M:%SZ)" > public/version.txt
log "✓ Version file written: $DEPLOYED_COMMIT"

This file is written after git clean (which would delete it) and before deploy.sh exits, so by the time deploy.php returns 200, version.txt is already on disk with the correct SHA.

Add it to .gitignore so it never gets accidentally committed: public/version.txt


Part 3 — Verify in GitHub Actions

Add a verification step after the webhook trigger:

- name: Trigger deploy on server
run: |
    # ... existing webhook call ...

- name: Verify deployment landed
run: |
    EXPECTED="${{ github.sha }}"
    echo "Expected SHA: $EXPECTED"

    for i in $(seq 1 20); do
    sleep 15
    DEPLOYED=$(curl -sf "https://www.yoursite.nl/version.txt" 2>/dev/null | awk '{print $1}')
    echo "Attempt $i/20: server=${DEPLOYED:-none}"
    if [ "$DEPLOYED" = "$EXPECTED" ]; then
        echo "✅ Deploy confirmed on server: $DEPLOYED"
        exit 0
    fi
    done

    echo "❌ Deploy verification FAILED after 5 minutes"
    echo "Expected: $EXPECTED"
    echo "Got:      ${DEPLOYED:-no response from server}"
    exit 1

This polls version.txt every 15 seconds for up to 5 minutes. Since our deploy.php uses synchronous exec(), the deploy is already finished by the time this step runs, so the first poll (15 seconds in) almost always matches immediately.


Results

Here's what the GitHub Actions log looks like after the fix:

Run EXPECTED="6f250fe1a2b9bb11ea826325a8a486b25279dfb1"
Waiting for deploy to complete on server...
Expected SHA: 6f250fe1a2b9bb11ea826325a8a486b25279dfb1
Attempt 1/20: server=6f250fe1a2b9bb11ea826325a8a486b25279dfb1
✅ Deploy confirmed on server: 6f250fe1a2b9bb11ea826325a8a486b25279dfb1

Confirmed on attempt 1 no waiting needed.

You can also verify manually any time:

curl -s https://www.yoursite.nl/version.txt
# 6f250fe1a2b9bb11ea826325a8a486b25279dfb1 2026-05-28T03:41:30Z


Why Not Just Use git log on the Server?

You could SSH in and run git log -1 — but that requires SSH access from CI (blocked for us), a separate monitoring job, or manual checks. The version.txt approach works over plain HTTPS with no
credentials, from anywhere, including your browser.

It also separates concerns: GitHub Actions verifies the outcome, not the process. Even if the internals of deploy.sh change, the verification contract stays the same "does the server report the right SHA?"


Summary

┌──────────────────────────────────────────────────┬───────────────────────────────────────┐
│                     Problem                      │                  Fix                  │
├──────────────────────────────────────────────────┼───────────────────────────────────────┤
│ No signal when deploy is locked                  │ deploy.php returns HTTP 423           │
├──────────────────────────────────────────────────┼───────────────────────────────────────┤
│ No proof of what commit landed                   │ deploy.sh writes public/version.txt   │
├──────────────────────────────────────────────────┼───────────────────────────────────────┤
│ GitHub shows success without server confirmation │ GitHub Actions polls and verifies SHA │
└──────────────────────────────────────────────────┴───────────────────────────────────────┘

Three small changes. Zero new dependencies. Works with any stack that can serve a static file over HTTP.