惯性聚合 高效追踪和阅读你感兴趣的博客、新闻、科技资讯
阅读原文 在惯性聚合中打开

推荐订阅源

IT之家
IT之家
Engineering at Meta
Engineering at Meta
腾讯CDC
宝玉的分享
宝玉的分享
H
Help Net Security
I
InfoQ
博客园 - Franky
The GitHub Blog
The GitHub Blog
奇客Solidot–传递最新科技情报
奇客Solidot–传递最新科技情报
H
Hackread – Cybersecurity News, Data Breaches, AI and More
Microsoft Security Blog
Microsoft Security Blog
M
MIT News - Artificial intelligence
博客园_首页
美团技术团队
Recent Announcements
Recent Announcements
freeCodeCamp Programming Tutorials: Python, JavaScript, Git & More
雷峰网
雷峰网
The Cloudflare Blog
博客园 - 司徒正美
Vercel News
Vercel News
MyScale Blog
MyScale Blog
人人都是产品经理
人人都是产品经理
爱范儿
爱范儿
月光博客
月光博客

DEV Community

Authentication Security Deep Dive: From Brute Force to Salted Hashing (With Java Examples) Why AI Systems Don’t Fail — They Drift Spilling beans for how i learn for exam😁"Reinforcement Learning Cheat Sheet" I Replaced Chrome with Safari for AI Browser Automation. Here's What Broke (and What Finally Worked) How Python Borrows Other People's Work The $40 Architecture: Processing 1 Billion API Requests with 99.99% Uptime Vibe Coding: A Workflow Guide (From Zero to SaaS) Most webhook security guides protect the wrong side. The scary part is delivery. Headless CMS for TanStack Start: Build a Blog with Cosmic EU Age Verification App "Hacked in 2 Minutes" — What Actually Happened Comfy Cloud’s delete function does not actually remove files Running AI Models on GPU Cloud Servers: A Beginner Guide Event-driven media intelligence with AWS Step Functions and Bedrock I scored 500 AI prompts across 8 quality dimensions — here's what broke How to Call Google Gemini API from Next.js (Free Tier, No Backend Needed) The Portal Protocol: Reclaiming Human Connection in the Age of AI How to Fix Your Team's Scattered Knowledge Problem With a Self-Hosted Forum Intro to tc Cloud Functors: A Graph-First Mental Model for the Modern Cloud Designing Multi-Tenant Backends With Both Ownership and Team Access I Built a Neumorphic CSS Library with 77+ Components — Here's What I Learned PostgreSQL Performance Optimization: Why Connection Pooling Is Critical at Scale Cómo construí un SaaS multi-rubro para gestionar expensas en Argentina con FastAPI + Vue 3 🚀 I Built an Ethical Hacking Scanner Tool – Open Source Project I Replaced /usage and /context in Claude Code With a Single Statusline A Pythonic Way to Handle Emails (IMAP/SMTP) with Auto-Discovery and AI-Ready Design I Collected 8.9 Million Polymarket Price Points — Here's What I Found About How Markets Really Move EcoTrack AI — Carbon Footprint Tracker & Dashboard Everyone's Using AI. No One Agrees How. 5 self-hosted ebook managers worth trying in 2026 Building Your First AI Agent with LangChain: From Chatbot to Autonomous Assistant
I measure how fast 42 LLMs actually answer. Here's the ho...
Anton Gulin · 2026-06-16 · via DEV Community
Cover image for I measure how fast 42 LLMs actually answer. Here's the honest method.

Anton Gulin

I test software for a living. So when a vendor calls an AI model "fast," I don't trust the word. I measure it.

Most leaderboards rank how smart a model is. Almost none rank how fast it answers. You pick a model because it scored well, ship it, and then your users sit and wait.

Speed is two different numbers. People mix them up constantly.

The two numbers

Time to first token (TTFT). The wait before the first word appears. You feel this every time a chatbot "thinks" before replying.

Tokens per second (TPS). How fast the model writes once it starts. A token is a chunk of a word.

A model can be great at one and terrible at the other. You need both.

How I measure it

I run an independent tracker called ollamatps.com. It benchmarks 42 Ollama Cloud models. Here is the exact method, because a benchmark you cannot inspect is just a claim.

  • One fixed prompt. Every run asks the model to write a 400-word explanation of HTTP routing. Same prompt, every model, every time.
  • Fixed output cap. max_tokens is capped at 300. It never changes between runs.
  • Every ~10 minutes. Each model is re-tested continuously, not once.
  • TTFT is measured from the moment the request is sent to the first non-empty content chunk. It includes network round-trip and prompt-processing time. That is honest, because it is what you actually wait.
  • TPS is generation throughput only: eval_count / (total_duration - time_to_first_token). The startup wait is removed, so TPS measures pure writing speed.

Same prompt, same cap, same schedule. That is what makes two models comparable.

Building this was a testing job, not a coding job. Retries on failure. A reliability score per model. A circuit breaker for models that keep failing. If you cannot trust the measurement, the number is noise. That part is the same work I do on any test system.

What surprised me

Bigger is not faster.

The fastest model on the board is one of the smallest: a 30B model at over 200 tokens per second. The model literally named "ultra" is dead last, under 8 tokens per second.

And the wait varies wildly. TTFT ranges from about 0.3 seconds to 23 seconds across the 42 models. Same cloud. Roughly 80x difference in how long you wait for the first word.

If you picked your model on a benchmark score alone, you have no idea which of these you are getting.

Why I rebuilt it

The first version tracked fewer models and was less robust. I rebuilt the engine this month (v2) to be multi-provider and to test continuously. The live board updates every 10 minutes.

Watch it run: ollamatps.com


Anton Gulin is the AI QA Architect, the first person to claim this title on LinkedIn. He builds AI-powered test automation systems where AI agents and human engineers collaborate on quality. Former Apple SDET (Apple.com / Apple Card pre-release testing). Find him at anton.qa or on LinkedIn.