惯性聚合 高效追踪和阅读你感兴趣的博客、新闻、科技资讯
阅读原文 在惯性聚合中打开

推荐订阅源

Y
Y Combinator Blog
IT之家
IT之家
博客园_首页
量子位
博客园 - 三生石上(FineUI控件)
小众软件
小众软件
博客园 - 聂微东
罗磊的独立博客
酷 壳 – CoolShell
酷 壳 – CoolShell
Hugging Face - Blog
Hugging Face - Blog
V
V2EX
爱范儿
爱范儿
大猫的无限游戏
大猫的无限游戏
宝玉的分享
宝玉的分享
freeCodeCamp Programming Tutorials: Python, JavaScript, Git & More
奇客Solidot–传递最新科技情报
奇客Solidot–传递最新科技情报
雷峰网
雷峰网
OSCHINA 社区最新新闻
OSCHINA 社区最新新闻
Google DeepMind News
Google DeepMind News
Microsoft Azure Blog
Microsoft Azure Blog
有赞技术团队
有赞技术团队
S
SegmentFault 最新的问题
Engineering at Meta
Engineering at Meta
让小产品的独立变现更简单 - ezindie.com
让小产品的独立变现更简单 - ezindie.com

DEV Community

Authentication Security Deep Dive: From Brute Force to Salted Hashing (With Java Examples) Why AI Systems Don’t Fail — They Drift Spilling beans for how i learn for exam😁"Reinforcement Learning Cheat Sheet" I Replaced Chrome with Safari for AI Browser Automation. Here's What Broke (and What Finally Worked) How Python Borrows Other People's Work The $40 Architecture: Processing 1 Billion API Requests with 99.99% Uptime Vibe Coding: A Workflow Guide (From Zero to SaaS) Most webhook security guides protect the wrong side. The scary part is delivery. Headless CMS for TanStack Start: Build a Blog with Cosmic EU Age Verification App "Hacked in 2 Minutes" — What Actually Happened Comfy Cloud’s delete function does not actually remove files Running AI Models on GPU Cloud Servers: A Beginner Guide Event-driven media intelligence with AWS Step Functions and Bedrock I scored 500 AI prompts across 8 quality dimensions — here's what broke How to Call Google Gemini API from Next.js (Free Tier, No Backend Needed) The Portal Protocol: Reclaiming Human Connection in the Age of AI How to Fix Your Team's Scattered Knowledge Problem With a Self-Hosted Forum Intro to tc Cloud Functors: A Graph-First Mental Model for the Modern Cloud Designing Multi-Tenant Backends With Both Ownership and Team Access I Built a Neumorphic CSS Library with 77+ Components — Here's What I Learned PostgreSQL Performance Optimization: Why Connection Pooling Is Critical at Scale Cómo construí un SaaS multi-rubro para gestionar expensas en Argentina con FastAPI + Vue 3 🚀 I Built an Ethical Hacking Scanner Tool – Open Source Project I Replaced /usage and /context in Claude Code With a Single Statusline A Pythonic Way to Handle Emails (IMAP/SMTP) with Auto-Discovery and AI-Ready Design I Collected 8.9 Million Polymarket Price Points — Here's What I Found About How Markets Really Move EcoTrack AI — Carbon Footprint Tracker & Dashboard Everyone's Using AI. No One Agrees How. 5 self-hosted ebook managers worth trying in 2026 Building Your First AI Agent with LangChain: From Chatbot to Autonomous Assistant
The Disk-Pressure Incident That Taught Me to Always Set L...
Noah Makau · 2026-05-22 · via DEV Community

Part 6 of 7 — The Mac Kubernetes Lab: A Production-Mirror Setup from Scratch.

Previously in Part 5: We installed Istio with revision-based upgrades, MetalLB for LoadBalancer IPs, and practised traffic management with Gateways, VirtualServices, and fault injection. The cluster behaves. Now we wire up the last three pieces that turn it from “a working local cluster” into “a real mirror of our production EKS.”


The cluster works. Istio is running. MetalLB is handing out IPs. But it’s still missing three layers that make the production parity actually meaningful:

  • Vault Kubernetes auth — pods authenticate to Vault with their service account tokens, the same way they do in production. No hardcoded secrets, no static credentials.
  • Crossplane with the AWS provider — infrastructure compositions you can develop and test locally before they touch real AWS resources, or any other thought of OpenStack?
  • LimitRanges — default resource requests on every namespace. This one comes from a real incident I want to talk about.

The LimitRange story is the most important of the three, so I’ll tell it properly when we get there. First, the auth layer.


Vault Kubernetes auth.

Vault’s Kubernetes auth method lets pods authenticate by presenting their service account JWT. Vault validates the token against the Kubernetes API server and exchanges it for a Vault token with the appropriate policies attached.

On the production EKS clusters at work, this is how microservices retrieve database credentials, API keys, and TLS certificates: no hard-coded secrets, no secret sprawl, every issuance audit-logged in Vault.

Setting it up locally means I can test the full injection workflow without a VPN, and debug failures on a cluster where the stakes are zero.

Vault Kubernetes auth flow — pod presents service account token, Vault validates, pod receives a Vault token.<br>

Installing the Vault agent injector.

We deploy just the Vault agent injector in the lab cluster. It points to the external Vault VM rather than running its own Vault server:

# 💻 Mac
kubectx lab-cluster

helm repo add hashicorp https://helm.releases.hashicorp.com
helm repo update

# Get the vault VM IP - does not persist across sessions
export VAULT_IP=$(orb run -m vault hostname -I | awk '{print $1}')
echo "VAULT_IP=$VAULT_IP"
helm install vault hashicorp/vault \
  --namespace vault --create-namespace \
  --set "injector.externalVaultAddr=http://$VAULT_IP:8200"

kubectl get pods -n vault
# vault-agent-injector-xxx   1/1   Running   0   30s

Enter fullscreen mode Exit fullscreen mode

Configuring K8s auth on Vault.

Run this on the vault VM, pointing Vault at the lab cluster’s API server:

# 🖥️ VM: vault

# Re-export - always required, doesn't persist across sessions
export VAULT_ADDR='http://127.0.0.1:8200'
export VAULT_ROOT_TOKEN=$(grep 'Initial Root Token' ~/vault-init.txt | awk '{print $NF}')

# If Vault is sealed after a reboot:
# vault operator unseal $(grep 'Unseal Key 1' ~/vault-init.txt | awk '{print $NF}')
vault login $VAULT_ROOT_TOKEN

# Get CP_IP from the Mac terminal: orb run -m cp01 hostname -I | awk '{print $1}'
export CP_IP=<cp01-ip>

# Regenerate the CA cert if /tmp was cleared after reboot
vault read -field=certificate pki_k8s/issuer/default > /tmp/lab-ca.crt

# Enable Kubernetes auth (safe to re-run - ignores "already enabled")
vault auth enable -path=lab-k8s kubernetes 2>/dev/null || echo "already enabled"

# Configure - point Vault at the lab cluster API server
vault write auth/lab-k8s/config \
  kubernetes_host="https://$CP_IP:6443" \
  kubernetes_ca_cert=@/tmp/lab-ca.crt

vault read auth/lab-k8s/config

Enter fullscreen mode Exit fullscreen mode

Testing K8s auth.

Create a simple role and test it from a pod:

# 🖥️ VM: vault

# Create a policy
vault policy write read-secrets - <<EOF
path "secret/data/myapp/*" {
  capabilities = ["read"]
}
EOF
# Create a K8s auth role
vault write auth/lab-k8s/role/myapp \
  bound_service_account_names=myapp \
  bound_service_account_namespaces=default \
  policies=read-secrets \
  ttl=1h

# Write a test secret
vault secrets enable -path=secret kv-v2 2>/dev/null || true
vault kv put secret/myapp/config db_password="supersecret"

Enter fullscreen mode Exit fullscreen mode

# 💻 Mac — deploy a pod with Vault annotations
kubectl apply -f - <<EOF
apiVersion: v1
kind: ServiceAccount
metadata:
  name: myapp
  namespace: default
---
apiVersion: v1
kind: Pod
metadata:
  name: vault-test
  namespace: default
  annotations:
    vault.hashicorp.com/agent-inject: "true"
    vault.hashicorp.com/role: "myapp"
    vault.hashicorp.com/agent-inject-secret-config: "secret/data/myapp/config"
spec:
  serviceAccountName: myapp
  containers:
  - name: app
    image: busybox
    command: ["sleep", "3600"]
EOF

# Check the secret was injected
kubectl exec vault-test -c app -- cat /vault/secrets/config
# db_password: supersecret

Enter fullscreen mode Exit fullscreen mode

If that last line returns the password, the whole chain works: service account JWT → Vault validation → Vault token → secret retrieval → file injection. Every link of the chain is what a real production app does.


Crossplane.

Crossplane turns a Kubernetes cluster into a universal control plane for cloud infrastructure. Instead of Terraform modules or CloudFormation stacks, you define infrastructure as Kubernetes custom resources, and Crossplane reconciles them continuously.
I use it at work to provision AWS resources (EKS node groups, RDS, S3 buckets, IAM roles) and VMware Cloud Director resources through a custom provider. The lab version mirrors the AWS side of that.
Crossplane composites — an XR triggers a Composition that creates multiple Managed Resources across cloud providers.

Installation:

# 💻 Mac
helm repo add crossplane-stable https://charts.crossplane.io/stable
helm repo update

# Composition Functions are enabled by default in recent versions.
# The --enable-composition-functions flag was removed.
helm install crossplane crossplane-stable/crossplane \
  --namespace crossplane-system --create-namespace

kubectl get pods -n crossplane-system -w
# NAME                                       READY   STATUS    AGE
# crossplane-xxx                             1/1     Running   60s
# crossplane-rbac-manager-xxx               1/1     Running   60s

Enter fullscreen mode Exit fullscreen mode

Installing the AWS provider

💻 Mac

kubectl apply -f - <<EOF
apiVersion: pkg.crossplane.io/v1
kind: Provider
metadata:
name: provider-aws-ec2
spec:
package: xpkg.upbound.io/upbound/provider-aws-ec2:latest
EOF

kubectl get pkg

NAME INSTALLED HEALTHY PACKAGE AGE

provider-aws-ec2 True True xpkg.upbound.io/upbound/provider-... 60s

A minimal composition:

A bare-minimum ProviderConfig enough to verify the install is working:

# 💻 Mac
kubectl apply -f - <<EOF
apiVersion: aws.upbound.io/v1beta1
kind: ProviderConfig
metadata:
  name: default
spec:
  credentials:
    source: Secret
    secretRef:
      namespace: crossplane-system
      name: aws-creds
      key: creds
EOF

Enter fullscreen mode Exit fullscreen mode

In a real setup, you create a IRSA ( IAM Role for Service Account) to authenticate and give the provider permission to create and monitor resources. For local validation, the provider installs, and the compositions can be validated structurally without ever calling AWS.

The LimitRange story.

This is the one that came from a real incident at work.

We had repeated disk-pressure events in our production EKS cluster. Pods with no resource requests had crept into a few namespaces — someone deployed a YAML that omitted resources: entirely, and nobody caught it in review. The Kubernetes scheduler had no signal about their consumption, so nodes ended up overcommitted. Then ephemeral storage filled up, eviction kicked in, and a couple of unrelated pods went down with it. Total downtime measured in tens of minutes. Cause-and-effect chain that took a while to untangle.

The fix is one of the most boring features in Kubernetes: LimitRanges. They set default resource requests and limits at the namespace level. Any container that doesn’t specify its own requests gets the defaults applied automatically by the admission controller. The scheduler always has a signal. Overcommit becomes a deliberate choice, not an accident.

# 💻 Mac
kubectl apply -f - <<EOF
apiVersion: v1
kind: LimitRange
metadata:
  name: default-limits
  namespace: default
spec:
  limits:
  - default:
      memory: 512Mi
      cpu: 500m
    defaultRequest:
      memory: 128Mi
      cpu: 100m
    max:
      ephemeral-storage: 2Gi
    type: Container
EOF

Enter fullscreen mode Exit fullscreen mode

Apply this to every namespace that hosts workloads. In production, I now apply it as a post-provisioning step on every new namespace:

# 💻 Mac — apply to multiple namespaces
for ns in default vault crossplane-system istio-system; do
  kubectl apply -f limitrange.yaml -n $ns
done

Enter fullscreen mode Exit fullscreen mode

The ephemeral-storage max is the part that specifically addresses the disk-pressure failure mode — it bounds how much scratch space a container can consume, which is what spirals when ephemeral storage runs unbounded.

Verifying the complete EKS mirror.

Let’s confirm the whole stack is up:

# 💻 Mac
kubectl get nodes -o wide
# NAME       STATUS   ROLES           VERSION
# cp01       Ready    control-plane   v1.34.x
# worker01   Ready    <none>          v1.34.x
# worker02   Ready    <none>          v1.34.x

kubectl get pods -A
# Cilium/Calico, CoreDNS, istiod-1-26, MetalLB, Crossplane, Vault injector - all Running

Enter fullscreen mode Exit fullscreen mode

Full EKS mirror stack running — all components healthy.<br>


Local vs production — what’s the same and what differs:

Local vs production — what’s the same and what differs:
The only meaningful differences are the CNI (because of OrbStack’s VM capabilities, as we covered in Part 4) and the LoadBalancer implementation. Everything else is identical in configuration. The mental model from this lab transfers directly to the production cluster, and vice versa.


In the final article: How to stop and start the lab without losing state, the CKS exam scenarios this cluster was purpose-built for, and the shell aliases that make the whole thing pleasant to live with.

← Part 5: How I Practise Istio Upgrades Locally Before Touching Production EKS | Part 7: The Day 2 Reality of Running a Kubernetes Lab on Your Mac: Stop/Start, CKS Scenarios, and What I Learned Building It


I’m Noah Makau, a DevSecOps engineer based in Nairobi. I run a small DevOps consultancy and hold CKA, CKAD, and the AWS Solutions Architect Professional certifications , currently preparing for CKS. I write about Kubernetes, Vault, Crossplane, and the day-to-day of running platforms that actually have to stay up.
originally published at blog.arkilasystems.com