Every developer has done it.
You hit a README, you see the install command:

curl -fsSL https://example.com/install.sh | sh

And you run it. Maybe you skim the script first. Maybe you don't. But you run it.
I've been doing this for years. And each time, a small voice in the back of my head says: you have no idea what that script actually does. You just piped a stranger's code straight into your shell.

Eventually I got tired of ignoring that voice.

What the pattern actually is

curl | sh is not a bad pattern — it's a fast, convenient pattern with a real trust gap. The script runs with your permissions, in your shell, right now. It can:

• Install something with sudo
• Delete files with rm -rf
• Write to your disk with dd
• Access your SSH keys or .env files
• Set up a cron job or a systemd service that runs again next reboot
• Decode and run a payload with base64 | eval Most install scripts do none of these things maliciously. But many do several of them legitimately — and you wouldn't know which ones until something went wrong. --- ## What I built instead I'm a solo founder based in Ouagadougou, Burkina Faso. I build with heavy AI pairing — I'm not a trained engineer, I work with Claude, review the output, and ship. This tool (peek) was AI-paired and reviewed by me before release. peek is a ~130-line POSIX shell script that sits in front of the pattern:

# Instead of:
curl -fsSL https://example.com/install.sh | sh
# Do:
peek https://example.com/install.sh

Before anything runs, peek:

1. Fetches the script
2. Scans it for risky patterns
3. Prints a risk score and the exact dangerous lines
4. Asks you to confirm — and refuses to auto-run a HIGH-RISK script unless you type RUN You can also pipe into it, or run it in analysis-only mode:

curl -fsSL https://example.com/install.sh | peek     # analyze from a pipe
peek --print ./downloaded.sh                          # never runs, analysis only

What it flags (and what it doesn't)

The patterns peek checks:

• Root escalation — sudo, running as root
• Destructive file ops — rm -rf, find -delete
• Raw disk writes — dd of=/dev/sd, mkfs
• Obfuscated payloads — eval, base64 -d | sh
• Credential access — reads from ~/.ssh, .env, .aws
• Persistence — writes to cron, systemctl enable, init scripts
• Network calls — wget/curl inside the script (downloading more things)
• Generic secret assignments — secret=, password=, token=, key= Each finding has a severity (CRITICAL / HIGH / MEDIUM / INFO). The final score gates the auto-run. --- ## The honest part: it's a heuristic, not a sandbox This is important and I want to say it plainly. peek can be fooled. If a script:
• uses obfuscation peek doesn't recognise yet
• downloads a second-stage payload after running
• does something destructive through a helper binary it installs first ...peek won't catch it. A clean score does not mean a script is safe. It means nothing obvious matched. The real value isn't "this script is safe." The real value is: it makes you stop and look, and it surfaces the lines you'd otherwise skim past. For HIGH-RISK scripts, peek will refuse to auto-run and will page the full script so you can read it yourself. That's the intended workflow: peek narrows your attention to the suspicious parts, then you judge. I considered putting a disclaimer like "always read the full script before running" in the output. Then I realized: peek IS that disclaimer, in executable form. --- ## Yes, I see the irony The pack that contains peek has its own one-liner installer:

curl -fsSL get.limackcorp.online | sh

I see the irony. So: before you use peek to audit anyone else's scripts, read mine first.

peek.sh is ~130 lines of plain POSIX shell, no dependencies, no hidden calls. The repo is at https://github.com/limack0/limack-devtools — read it, then use peek to audit it if you want the recursive experience.

peek is part of a larger pack

I built 11 other tools in the same session, all single-file shell scripts, all targeting the same constraint: things that work when the infrastructure doesn't.
The ones most related to this post:

• secrets-doctor — scans your files for leaked API keys, tokens, private keys. Local-only, nothing uploaded, exits non-zero in CI.
• tunnelforge — exposes a local port via Cloudflare in one command. No ngrok account.
• devbox — sets up a dev machine including an offline mode: prep all installers on a connected machine, deploy on an air-gapped one. Full pack: https://github.com/limack0/limack-devtools --- ## What I'd genuinely want feedback on The pattern list in peek.sh is where I'm least confident. Specifically:
• False negatives — what risky patterns am I missing? (Particularly multi-stage obfuscation, environment hijacking, LD_PRELOAD tricks)
• False positives — the generic secret=... rule is the noisiest. What good scripts would peek flag unfairly?
• The scoring weights — is CRITICAL/HIGH/MEDIUM calibrated right, or should the thresholds shift? PRs very welcome. The whole point of an open-source script is that you can see exactly what it's doing — and improve it. --- All tools in this pack were AI-paired with Claude, reviewed and pushed by me.