惯性聚合 高效追踪和阅读你感兴趣的博客、新闻、科技资讯
阅读原文 在惯性聚合中打开

推荐订阅源

美团技术团队
B
Blog RSS Feed
博客园_首页
奇客Solidot–传递最新科技情报
奇客Solidot–传递最新科技情报
钛媒体:引领未来商业与生活新知
钛媒体:引领未来商业与生活新知
Google DeepMind News
Google DeepMind News
D
Docker
Blog — PlanetScale
Blog — PlanetScale
M
MIT News - Artificial intelligence
C
Check Point Blog
The Cloudflare Blog
T
Tailwind CSS Blog
大猫的无限游戏
大猫的无限游戏
量子位
The GitHub Blog
The GitHub Blog
Microsoft Azure Blog
Microsoft Azure Blog
I
InfoQ
T
The Blog of Author Tim Ferriss
博客园 - 【当耐特】
Vercel News
Vercel News
P
Proofpoint News Feed
Hugging Face - Blog
Hugging Face - Blog
V
V2EX
博客园 - 司徒正美

DEV Community

Authentication Security Deep Dive: From Brute Force to Salted Hashing (With Java Examples) Why AI Systems Don’t Fail — They Drift Spilling beans for how i learn for exam😁"Reinforcement Learning Cheat Sheet" I Replaced Chrome with Safari for AI Browser Automation. Here's What Broke (and What Finally Worked) How Python Borrows Other People's Work The $40 Architecture: Processing 1 Billion API Requests with 99.99% Uptime Vibe Coding: A Workflow Guide (From Zero to SaaS) Most webhook security guides protect the wrong side. The scary part is delivery. Headless CMS for TanStack Start: Build a Blog with Cosmic EU Age Verification App "Hacked in 2 Minutes" — What Actually Happened Comfy Cloud’s delete function does not actually remove files Running AI Models on GPU Cloud Servers: A Beginner Guide Event-driven media intelligence with AWS Step Functions and Bedrock I scored 500 AI prompts across 8 quality dimensions — here's what broke How to Call Google Gemini API from Next.js (Free Tier, No Backend Needed) The Portal Protocol: Reclaiming Human Connection in the Age of AI How to Fix Your Team's Scattered Knowledge Problem With a Self-Hosted Forum Intro to tc Cloud Functors: A Graph-First Mental Model for the Modern Cloud Designing Multi-Tenant Backends With Both Ownership and Team Access I Built a Neumorphic CSS Library with 77+ Components — Here's What I Learned PostgreSQL Performance Optimization: Why Connection Pooling Is Critical at Scale Cómo construí un SaaS multi-rubro para gestionar expensas en Argentina con FastAPI + Vue 3 🚀 I Built an Ethical Hacking Scanner Tool – Open Source Project I Replaced /usage and /context in Claude Code With a Single Statusline A Pythonic Way to Handle Emails (IMAP/SMTP) with Auto-Discovery and AI-Ready Design I Collected 8.9 Million Polymarket Price Points — Here's What I Found About How Markets Really Move EcoTrack AI — Carbon Footprint Tracker & Dashboard Everyone's Using AI. No One Agrees How. 5 self-hosted ebook managers worth trying in 2026 Building Your First AI Agent with LangChain: From Chatbot to Autonomous Assistant
How I Built an API That Cuts LLM Token Costs by 11-22%
Diallo West · 2026-05-08 · via DEV Community

I've been building AI-powered tools for the past year, and one thing kept bugging me: I was wasting money on tokens.

Not because my prompts were bad — but because they were verbose. Every prompt I wrote had filler words, redundant phrases, and unnecessary politeness that inflated my token counts without improving the output.

So I built Fortress Token Optimizer — an API that compresses prompts before they reach the LLM. Same meaning, fewer tokens, lower cost.

The Problem

Look at a typical prompt:

Could you please help me analyze this sales data and provide detailed
insights and recommendations for improvement?

Enter fullscreen mode Exit fullscreen mode

18 tokens. But the LLM doesn't need "Could you please help me" — that's 5 tokens of politeness that doesn't change the output.

After optimization:

Analyze this sales data and provide detailed insights and
recommendations for improvement?

Enter fullscreen mode Exit fullscreen mode

14 tokens. 22% saved. The model produces the same quality response.

Real Benchmarks

I tested across 5 prompt styles (casual chatty, business, technical):

Prompt Type Before After Savings
Casual chatty (cover letter request) 75 tokens 58 tokens 23%
Technical (debugging help) 100 tokens 92 tokens 8%
Learning request (ML resources) 90 tokens 81 tokens 10%
Business analysis 77 tokens 74 tokens 4%
Project planning 69 tokens 61 tokens 12%
Average 82 tokens 73 tokens 11%

The pattern: the chattier the prompt, the more savings. Casual prompts with filler like "basically", "I was wondering if", "um", "please help me" see 15-23% savings. Technical prompts that are already dense save less.

How It Works

Four optimization passes, server-side:

  1. Phrase compression — removes filler ("Could you please help me" → removed)
  2. Deduplication — "analyze the data and provide analysis" → "analyze the data"
  3. Meta-removal — strips instructions-about-instructions
  4. Sentence optimization — tightens phrasing without changing meaning

It's not a regex. The optimizer understands prompt structure — it won't strip a code block or remove meaningful qualifiers.

Usage

Three lines in Python or JavaScript:

pip install fortress-optimizer

Enter fullscreen mode Exit fullscreen mode

from fortress_optimizer import FortressClient

client = FortressClient(api_key="fk_your_key")
result = client.optimize("Could you please help me analyze this data")

print(result["optimization"]["optimized_prompt"])
# → "Analyze this data"
print(f"{result['tokens']['savings_percentage']}% saved")
# → "22% saved"

Enter fullscreen mode Exit fullscreen mode

npm install fortress-optimizer

Enter fullscreen mode Exit fullscreen mode

const { FortressClient } = require('fortress-optimizer');
const client = new FortressClient(process.env.FORTRESS_API_KEY);
const result = await client.optimize('Your prompt here');

Enter fullscreen mode Exit fullscreen mode

Also available as a VS Code extension that runs in the background.

What Does This Save At Scale?

At 500 prompts/day with balanced optimization (~11% savings):

Model Monthly Savings Annual Savings
GPT-4 ($0.03/1K) $4.05 $48.60
Claude Opus ($0.015/1K) $2.03 $24.30
GPT-4o ($0.005/1K) $0.68 $8.10

For a team of 10 engineers at 500 prompts/day each, that's $486/year on GPT-4 — and it compounds as models get more expensive or usage grows.

The savings are modest for individual developers, but they add up for teams running batch processing, RAG pipelines, or high-volume applications.

Three Optimization Levels

Level Savings Use Case
Conservative ~5% Production prompts, minimal changes
Balanced ~11-15% General use (default)
Aggressive ~15-22% Batch processing, cost-sensitive

Free to Try

50,000 tokens/month free, no credit card. Get a key and try it on your existing prompts.

I'd love feedback — especially if you're running high-volume LLM workloads where token costs are a real line item.

Links: