惯性聚合 高效追踪和阅读你感兴趣的博客、新闻、科技资讯
阅读原文 在惯性聚合中打开

推荐订阅源

The GitHub Blog
The GitHub Blog
S
SegmentFault 最新的问题
MyScale Blog
MyScale Blog
有赞技术团队
有赞技术团队
V
Visual Studio Blog
T
The Blog of Author Tim Ferriss
爱范儿
爱范儿
Vercel News
Vercel News
让小产品的独立变现更简单 - ezindie.com
让小产品的独立变现更简单 - ezindie.com
Y
Y Combinator Blog
Blog — PlanetScale
Blog — PlanetScale
D
DataBreaches.Net
美团技术团队
Microsoft Security Blog
Microsoft Security Blog
大猫的无限游戏
大猫的无限游戏
Cyber Security Advisories - MS-ISAC
Cyber Security Advisories - MS-ISAC
酷 壳 – CoolShell
酷 壳 – CoolShell
GbyAI
GbyAI
A
About on SuperTechFans
云风的 BLOG
云风的 BLOG
The Cloudflare Blog
宝玉的分享
宝玉的分享
V
V2EX
Microsoft Azure Blog
Microsoft Azure Blog

DEV Community

Authentication Security Deep Dive: From Brute Force to Salted Hashing (With Java Examples) Why AI Systems Don’t Fail — They Drift Spilling beans for how i learn for exam😁"Reinforcement Learning Cheat Sheet" I Replaced Chrome with Safari for AI Browser Automation. Here's What Broke (and What Finally Worked) How Python Borrows Other People's Work The $40 Architecture: Processing 1 Billion API Requests with 99.99% Uptime Vibe Coding: A Workflow Guide (From Zero to SaaS) Most webhook security guides protect the wrong side. The scary part is delivery. Headless CMS for TanStack Start: Build a Blog with Cosmic EU Age Verification App "Hacked in 2 Minutes" — What Actually Happened Comfy Cloud’s delete function does not actually remove files Running AI Models on GPU Cloud Servers: A Beginner Guide Event-driven media intelligence with AWS Step Functions and Bedrock I scored 500 AI prompts across 8 quality dimensions — here's what broke How to Call Google Gemini API from Next.js (Free Tier, No Backend Needed) The Portal Protocol: Reclaiming Human Connection in the Age of AI How to Fix Your Team's Scattered Knowledge Problem With a Self-Hosted Forum Intro to tc Cloud Functors: A Graph-First Mental Model for the Modern Cloud Designing Multi-Tenant Backends With Both Ownership and Team Access I Built a Neumorphic CSS Library with 77+ Components — Here's What I Learned PostgreSQL Performance Optimization: Why Connection Pooling Is Critical at Scale Cómo construí un SaaS multi-rubro para gestionar expensas en Argentina con FastAPI + Vue 3 🚀 I Built an Ethical Hacking Scanner Tool – Open Source Project I Replaced /usage and /context in Claude Code With a Single Statusline A Pythonic Way to Handle Emails (IMAP/SMTP) with Auto-Discovery and AI-Ready Design I Collected 8.9 Million Polymarket Price Points — Here's What I Found About How Markets Really Move EcoTrack AI — Carbon Footprint Tracker & Dashboard Everyone's Using AI. No One Agrees How. 5 self-hosted ebook managers worth trying in 2026 Building Your First AI Agent with LangChain: From Chatbot to Autonomous Assistant
MCP Server Token Bloat: 55,000 Tokens Wasted Before Your ...
pickuma · 2026-05-17 · via DEV Community

pickuma

You connect three MCP servers to Claude Code on Monday morning. Before you type a single character, the agent has already burned through tokens — sometimes more than 50,000 of them. Tool definitions, schemas, descriptions, and parameter docs get injected into the system prompt every turn. A developer who ran the math measured 55,000 tokens of overhead per session, just from MCP server registration.

That number changes how you should think about MCP. It is not "free middleware." Every server you add competes with your code, your conversation history, and your model's working memory for the same context window.

The 55K Token Tax No One Talks About

When an MCP server connects to Claude Code, Cursor, or any MCP-compatible client, the client serializes every tool the server exposes — name, description, JSON schema for parameters, and often verbose example text — into the model's system prompt. This payload re-enters context on every single turn.

The dev.to author who measured this found that a stack with GitHub, Linear, Slack, Postgres, and a few smaller servers passed 55,000 tokens before any user message. Claude Sonnet 4.6 ships with a 200K context window. That means roughly 27% of your usable context is gone before you ask a question.

On Opus 4.7 with 1M context the percentage shrinks, but the cost does not. Cached input tokens still bill at a fraction of regular input — and on every turn that fraction adds up.

Three concrete impacts:

  • API cost per turn rises. At cached input rates around $0.30 per million tokens, 55K tokens of overhead bills you roughly $0.02 per turn just to remind the model which tools exist. Across a 100-turn session that is $2 of pure tooling tax.
  • Response latency increases. Larger prompts take longer to process. First-token latency on a 60K-token prompt is measurably worse than on a 5K prompt, even with caching.
  • Agent reliability drops. Models given more tools than they need confuse parameters, pick wrong tools, and hallucinate arguments. The "lost in the middle" effect is real for tool selection.

If your agent feels slower or less accurate after you "installed a few useful MCP servers," the cause is almost always context dilution. The model is spending its attention budget reading tool docs instead of your code.

Where the Tokens Actually Go

Run a token accounting on a typical MCP server registration and you find three categories of bloat:

Tool descriptions written for humans. Most MCP servers ship descriptions like "Search for issues using a query string. Supports filters for status, assignee, priority, and project. Returns up to 50 results sorted by relevance. Use this when the user asks about specific issues or wants to find issues matching criteria." That single description is ~200 tokens. Multiply by 30+ tools and you have 6,000 tokens before any schema.

JSON schemas with verbose property docs. Each parameter gets a description field, often duplicated across tools. A Linear MCP server exposing 20 tools with 5 parameters each, where each parameter carries a 30-token description, runs 3,000 tokens before nesting and enum values.

Example text and usage hints. Some servers append example calls like search_issues(query='bug', status='open') to every tool. Helpful for the model, but it triples the cost per tool.

The measurement broke down a real stack: GitHub MCP at ~12K tokens, Linear at ~9K, Slack at ~7K, a custom Postgres server at ~14K, plus filesystem and memory servers around ~5K each. Total: ~55K before the first user prompt.

How to Cut the Bloat

You do not have to disconnect every server. You have to be deliberate about which tools enter context.

Audit what you actually use. Most developers connect a server, use three of its tools regularly, and forget the rest exist. Claude Code's /mcp command lists every tool; check it against your last week of sessions. If you have not called a tool, it should not be loaded.

Use scoped server profiles. Claude Code and Cursor both support per-project MCP config. Your blog repo does not need the Postgres server. Your data pipeline repo does not need the Notion server. Configure per-project rather than globally.

Prefer deferred tool loading where supported. Some clients now support lazy tool registration where only tool names load up front and full schemas fetch on demand. If your client supports it, enable it — token cost can drop 60–80%.

Write tighter tool descriptions if you author MCP servers. A description should tell the model when to use the tool in 1-2 sentences. Schema doc fields should be short noun phrases, not tutorials.

Measure before and after. Use your API provider's token usage logs. Anthropic's console shows cached vs uncached input per request. Set a budget — say, 10K tokens of overhead max — and trim until you hit it.

The deeper lesson: MCP is an abstraction with a token-shaped cost that nobody puts on the invoice. You pay for it in latency, accuracy, and dollars per turn. Treat each MCP connection like a dependency in package.json — useful when needed, dead weight when not.


Originally published at pickuma.com. Subscribe to the RSS or follow @pickuma.bsky.social for new reviews.