惯性聚合 高效追踪和阅读你感兴趣的博客、新闻、科技资讯
阅读原文 在惯性聚合中打开

推荐订阅源

V
V2EX
J
Java Code Geeks
月光博客
月光博客
博客园_首页
The GitHub Blog
The GitHub Blog
Vercel News
Vercel News
B
Blog RSS Feed
博客园 - 聂微东
宝玉的分享
宝玉的分享
T
Tailwind CSS Blog
Jina AI
Jina AI
S
SegmentFault 最新的问题
B
Blog
钛媒体:引领未来商业与生活新知
钛媒体:引领未来商业与生活新知
有赞技术团队
有赞技术团队
Hugging Face - Blog
Hugging Face - Blog
Google DeepMind News
Google DeepMind News
阮一峰的网络日志
阮一峰的网络日志
The Cloudflare Blog
量子位
Martin Fowler
Martin Fowler
博客园 - Franky
大猫的无限游戏
大猫的无限游戏
博客园 - 叶小钗

DEV Community

Authentication Security Deep Dive: From Brute Force to Salted Hashing (With Java Examples) Why AI Systems Don’t Fail — They Drift Spilling beans for how i learn for exam😁"Reinforcement Learning Cheat Sheet" I Replaced Chrome with Safari for AI Browser Automation. Here's What Broke (and What Finally Worked) How Python Borrows Other People's Work The $40 Architecture: Processing 1 Billion API Requests with 99.99% Uptime Vibe Coding: A Workflow Guide (From Zero to SaaS) Most webhook security guides protect the wrong side. The scary part is delivery. Headless CMS for TanStack Start: Build a Blog with Cosmic EU Age Verification App "Hacked in 2 Minutes" — What Actually Happened Comfy Cloud’s delete function does not actually remove files Running AI Models on GPU Cloud Servers: A Beginner Guide Event-driven media intelligence with AWS Step Functions and Bedrock I scored 500 AI prompts across 8 quality dimensions — here's what broke How to Call Google Gemini API from Next.js (Free Tier, No Backend Needed) The Portal Protocol: Reclaiming Human Connection in the Age of AI How to Fix Your Team's Scattered Knowledge Problem With a Self-Hosted Forum Intro to tc Cloud Functors: A Graph-First Mental Model for the Modern Cloud Designing Multi-Tenant Backends With Both Ownership and Team Access I Built a Neumorphic CSS Library with 77+ Components — Here's What I Learned PostgreSQL Performance Optimization: Why Connection Pooling Is Critical at Scale Cómo construí un SaaS multi-rubro para gestionar expensas en Argentina con FastAPI + Vue 3 🚀 I Built an Ethical Hacking Scanner Tool – Open Source Project I Replaced /usage and /context in Claude Code With a Single Statusline A Pythonic Way to Handle Emails (IMAP/SMTP) with Auto-Discovery and AI-Ready Design I Collected 8.9 Million Polymarket Price Points — Here's What I Found About How Markets Really Move EcoTrack AI — Carbon Footprint Tracker & Dashboard Everyone's Using AI. No One Agrees How. 5 self-hosted ebook managers worth trying in 2026 Building Your First AI Agent with LangChain: From Chatbot to Autonomous Assistant
Why PostgreSQL and ClickHouse Work So Well Together
Mohamed Huss · 2026-05-11 · via DEV Community

A lot of people compare PostgreSQL and ClickHouse like they are competing databases.

They really are not.

In fact, modern data systems often use both together.

And once you understand what each database is optimized for, the reason becomes pretty obvious.


PostgreSQL and ClickHouse Solve Different Problems

The biggest mistake people make is expecting both databases to behave similarly.

They are built for entirely different workloads.

PostgreSQL is primarily an OLTP database.

ClickHouse is primarily an OLAP database.

That single difference changes almost everything about how they think internally.


PostgreSQL Thinks About Transactions First

PostgreSQL is extremely good at handling transactional workloads.

Things like:

  • user data
  • payments
  • inventory
  • banking records
  • order systems
  • application state

These are systems where:

  • consistency matters
  • updates happen frequently
  • rows are modified constantly
  • transactions must be reliable

For example:

UPDATE inventory
SET stock = stock - 1
WHERE product_id = 101;

Enter fullscreen mode Exit fullscreen mode

This kind of workload is where PostgreSQL shines.

You want:

  • ACID guarantees
  • reliable transactions
  • row-level updates
  • strong consistency

PostgreSQL is designed around exactly that.


ClickHouse Thinks About Analytics First

ClickHouse approaches data very differently.

Instead of optimizing for frequent row updates, it optimizes for analytical queries across massive datasets.

Things like:

  • metrics
  • observability
  • logs
  • event streams
  • analytical dashboards
  • time-series workloads

For example:

SELECT
    service_name,
    avg(response_time_ms)
FROM metrics
WHERE timestamp >= now() - INTERVAL 1 HOUR
GROUP BY service_name;

Enter fullscreen mode Exit fullscreen mode

This is a completely different style of workload.

Instead of:

  • modifying small numbers of rows

ClickHouse is optimized for:

  • scanning huge amounts of data efficiently
  • aggregating billions of records
  • compressing analytical datasets
  • fast columnar reads

PostgreSQL Stores the Business. ClickHouse Explains It.

This is honestly the simplest way I think about it now.

PostgreSQL usually stores:

  • current application state
  • transactional business data
  • operational records

ClickHouse usually stores:

  • analytical history
  • events
  • metrics
  • large-scale queryable telemetry

One powers the application.

The other explains what the application is doing.


Why They Commonly Exist Together

This is where things get interesting.

In many modern architectures, PostgreSQL becomes the operational source of truth.

Then data flows into ClickHouse for analytics.

Something like this:

Application
    ↓
PostgreSQL
    ↓
CDC / Airbyte / Kafka
    ↓
ClickHouse
    ↓
Dashboards / Analytics / Observability

Enter fullscreen mode Exit fullscreen mode

This pattern is far more common than many people realize.

Because each database is doing what it is best at.


Why Not Just Use PostgreSQL for Analytics?

PostgreSQL can do analytical queries.

But analytical workloads behave very differently from transactional workloads.

For example:

  • scanning billions of rows
  • large aggregations
  • observability queries
  • real-time analytics
  • historical trend analysis

These workloads stress databases differently.

ClickHouse is optimized around:

  • columnar storage
  • vectorized execution
  • aggressive compression
  • analytical query execution

That is why queries over huge datasets often feel dramatically faster in ClickHouse.


Why Not Just Use ClickHouse for Everything?

This is another common misunderstanding.

ClickHouse is incredible for analytics.

But transactional systems require things like:

  • frequent updates
  • transactional consistency
  • row-level modifications
  • operational application state

That is not the primary design goal of ClickHouse.

You generally do not want your:

  • user authentication system
  • banking transactions
  • inventory updates
  • operational business logic

to depend entirely on analytical database behavior.


The Interesting Part Is the Separation of Responsibilities

What I personally find interesting is how these systems complement each other instead of replacing each other.

PostgreSQL handles:

  • operational correctness

ClickHouse handles:

  • analytical scale

That separation creates much cleaner architectures.

Instead of forcing one database to solve every problem, each system handles the workload it was designed for.


CDC Is What Connects Them

One thing that makes this architecture powerful is CDC (Change Data Capture).

Instead of manually exporting data repeatedly, systems can stream changes from PostgreSQL into ClickHouse continuously.

Tools like:

  • Debezium
  • Airbyte
  • Kafka pipelines

make this pattern extremely practical now.

The operational system continues running normally while analytical systems receive data almost in real time.


They Even Think Differently Internally

The differences go deeper than just "transactions vs analytics".

PostgreSQL thinks heavily about:

  • rows
  • transactional consistency
  • updates
  • locking
  • relational integrity

ClickHouse thinks heavily about:

  • columns
  • compression
  • merges
  • partitions
  • analytical scans
  • aggregation efficiency

Even their storage engines reflect completely different priorities.


This Is Why Modern Data Stacks Often Use Both

Once you stop viewing databases as competitors and instead view them as workload-specific systems, the architecture starts making much more sense.

PostgreSQL handles the operational side.

ClickHouse handles the analytical side.

Together, they create systems that can:

  • process transactions reliably
  • scale analytical workloads efficiently
  • support observability
  • power dashboards
  • retain huge historical datasets

without forcing a single database to do everything.


Final Thought

The more I learn about databases, the more I realize that most modern architectures are really about separation of responsibilities.

PostgreSQL and ClickHouse work well together because they optimize for fundamentally different problems.

One is built to preserve business state reliably.

The other is built to analyze massive amounts of history efficiently.

And when combined properly, they complement each other extremely well.