惯性聚合 高效追踪和阅读你感兴趣的博客、新闻、科技资讯
阅读原文 在惯性聚合中打开

推荐订阅源

aimingoo的专栏
aimingoo的专栏
G
Google Developers Blog
B
Blog RSS Feed
A
About on SuperTechFans
奇客Solidot–传递最新科技情报
奇客Solidot–传递最新科技情报
V
V2EX
Stack Overflow Blog
Stack Overflow Blog
C
Check Point Blog
H
Hackread – Cybersecurity News, Data Breaches, AI and More
Engineering at Meta
Engineering at Meta
Cyber Security Advisories - MS-ISAC
Cyber Security Advisories - MS-ISAC
博客园 - 司徒正美
D
Docker
F
Fortinet All Blogs
Hugging Face - Blog
Hugging Face - Blog
Last Week in AI
Last Week in AI
H
Help Net Security
WordPress大学
WordPress大学
MyScale Blog
MyScale Blog
博客园 - Franky
人人都是产品经理
人人都是产品经理
钛媒体:引领未来商业与生活新知
钛媒体:引领未来商业与生活新知
Blog — PlanetScale
Blog — PlanetScale
L
LangChain Blog

DEV Community

Authentication Security Deep Dive: From Brute Force to Salted Hashing (With Java Examples) Why AI Systems Don’t Fail — They Drift Spilling beans for how i learn for exam😁"Reinforcement Learning Cheat Sheet" I Replaced Chrome with Safari for AI Browser Automation. Here's What Broke (and What Finally Worked) How Python Borrows Other People's Work The $40 Architecture: Processing 1 Billion API Requests with 99.99% Uptime Vibe Coding: A Workflow Guide (From Zero to SaaS) Most webhook security guides protect the wrong side. The scary part is delivery. Headless CMS for TanStack Start: Build a Blog with Cosmic EU Age Verification App "Hacked in 2 Minutes" — What Actually Happened Comfy Cloud’s delete function does not actually remove files Running AI Models on GPU Cloud Servers: A Beginner Guide Event-driven media intelligence with AWS Step Functions and Bedrock I scored 500 AI prompts across 8 quality dimensions — here's what broke How to Call Google Gemini API from Next.js (Free Tier, No Backend Needed) The Portal Protocol: Reclaiming Human Connection in the Age of AI How to Fix Your Team's Scattered Knowledge Problem With a Self-Hosted Forum Intro to tc Cloud Functors: A Graph-First Mental Model for the Modern Cloud Designing Multi-Tenant Backends With Both Ownership and Team Access I Built a Neumorphic CSS Library with 77+ Components — Here's What I Learned PostgreSQL Performance Optimization: Why Connection Pooling Is Critical at Scale Cómo construí un SaaS multi-rubro para gestionar expensas en Argentina con FastAPI + Vue 3 🚀 I Built an Ethical Hacking Scanner Tool – Open Source Project I Replaced /usage and /context in Claude Code With a Single Statusline A Pythonic Way to Handle Emails (IMAP/SMTP) with Auto-Discovery and AI-Ready Design I Collected 8.9 Million Polymarket Price Points — Here's What I Found About How Markets Really Move EcoTrack AI — Carbon Footprint Tracker & Dashboard Everyone's Using AI. No One Agrees How. 5 self-hosted ebook managers worth trying in 2026 Building Your First AI Agent with LangChain: From Chatbot to Autonomous Assistant
I Found 54 Reliability Issues in My 14-Agent AI System — ...
suraj kumar · 2026-05-31 · via DEV Community

suraj kumar

Every testing tool for AI agents tests individual agents. But production failures don't happen inside agents — they happen between them.

I learned this the hard way.

The Problem Nobody Is Solving

I built a 14-agent document processing system using CrewAI. Each agent worked perfectly in isolation. In production, the system failed constantly — and I couldn't figure out why.

The problem wasn't any single agent. It was the interactions:

  • One agent failing silently took down 12 others
  • Agents were sharing sensitive data across boundaries they shouldn't cross
  • Three agents formed a communication clique that bypassed the orchestrator
  • Every agent depended on one central orchestrator with zero fallback

No existing tool could find these issues. Arize, Langfuse, Braintrust — they all monitor individual agents. None of them test the graph of agent interactions.

So I built one.

What I Built: swarm-test

swarm-test builds a NetworkX interaction graph of your multi-agent system and runs 6 chaos engineering tests against it:

  1. Cascade Failure — which agents bring down the whole system if they fail
  2. Context Leakage — sensitive data (API keys, PII, credentials) crossing agent boundaries
  3. Intent Drift — agents acting outside their role or being manipulated
  4. Collusion Detection — agents communicating outside the orchestrator's oversight
  5. Blast Radius — single points of failure and critical dependency paths
  6. Timeout Resilience — agents with no fallback if upstream is slow

3-line API:

from swarm_test import SwarmProbe

probe = SwarmProbe(crew)
report = probe.run_all()
report.print_summary()

What It Found On My Real System

I ran swarm-test on my 14-agent system. The results were brutal:

54 total findings:

  • 15 CRITICAL (14 cascade failures + 1 SPOF)
  • 13 HIGH (9 timeout vulnerabilities + 4 collusion cliques)
  • 26 MEDIUM (13 intent drift + 13 missing timeout handling)

The worst agent: OrchestratorAgent scored 4 out of 100. It's a single point of failure with 92% blast radius — if it fails, 12 of 14 agents go down. And it had zero timeout handling.

The scariest finding: EvolutionAgent has 100% blast radius. If it fails, every other agent in the system is affected.

Three agents (OrchestratorAgent, FileOptimizerAgent, PrintOptimizerAgent) formed a collusion clique — communicating directly with each other and bypassing orchestrator oversight.

None of this was visible from testing individual agents. It only appeared when I tested the interaction graph.

I Shipped 7 Features in 7 Days

After launching, I shipped one feature every day:

Day Feature Impact
0 Launch — 5 chaos tests, GitHub + PyPI First multi-agent testing tool on PyPI
1 Timeout resilience test Found 22 new issues in my system
2 JSON export Another developer integrated it into his runtime gate within hours
3 LangGraph adapter Now supports CrewAI + LangGraph
4 Sensitive data detection (23 patterns) Catches AWS keys, JWT tokens, credit cards crossing agent boundaries
5 Per-agent health scores (0-100) Know exactly which agent to fix first
6 Before/after comparison Measure if your refactor actually improved reliability
7 ASCII agent graph See your agent topology right in the terminal

94 tests passing. Two frameworks supported. And growing.

The First Integration

Within 48 hours of launch, another developer built an integration. He has a runtime action-gate that blocks dangerous agent actions before execution. He connected swarm-test's findings as "priors" — so when swarm-test flags an edge as high-risk, his gate becomes more cautious on that edge.

The result: the same run_sql action went from "CONFIRM" (risk 62) to "HUMAN_REQUIRED" (risk 78) when swarm-test's cascade finding was attached.

Structural testing (swarm-test) + runtime enforcement (his gate) = the full reliability stack for multi-agent systems.

Why This Matters Now

According to recent industry research:

  • 88% of organizations report AI agent security incidents
  • Only 14.4% of agents go live with full security approval
  • OWASP classified cascade failures as ASI08 — a top AI security risk

Multi-agent systems are going to production faster than anyone can secure them. The tools exist for single-agent monitoring. Nothing existed for multi-agent interaction testing — until now.

Try It

pip install swarm-test

from swarm_test import SwarmProbe

# Works with CrewAI
probe = SwarmProbe(your_crew)
report = probe.run_all()
report.print_summary()
report.to_html("report.html")  # Interactive D3 graph
report.to_json("report.json")  # Machine-readable for CI/CD

GitHub: github.com/surajkumar811/swarm-test

Open source. MIT licensed. Solo founder building in public.

What reliability tests would YOU want for your multi-agent systems? Drop a comment — I'm shipping features based on real feedback.
Uploading image