惯性聚合 高效追踪和阅读你感兴趣的博客、新闻、科技资讯
阅读原文 在惯性聚合中打开

推荐订阅源

I
InfoQ
G
Google Developers Blog
Engineering at Meta
Engineering at Meta
月光博客
月光博客
博客园 - 聂微东
博客园 - Franky
奇客Solidot–传递最新科技情报
奇客Solidot–传递最新科技情报
有赞技术团队
有赞技术团队
A
About on SuperTechFans
Microsoft Azure Blog
Microsoft Azure Blog
Blog — PlanetScale
Blog — PlanetScale
U
Unit 42
T
Tailwind CSS Blog
Cyber Security Advisories - MS-ISAC
Cyber Security Advisories - MS-ISAC
云风的 BLOG
云风的 BLOG
S
SegmentFault 最新的问题
F
Fortinet All Blogs
H
Help Net Security
J
Java Code Geeks
酷 壳 – CoolShell
酷 壳 – CoolShell
博客园 - 叶小钗
L
LangChain Blog
Martin Fowler
Martin Fowler
N
Netflix TechBlog - Medium

OpenAI Developers

API deployment checklist | OpenAI API Sora 2 Prompting Guide Codex Prompting Guide Docs MCP | OpenAI Developers Gpt-image-1.5 Prompting Guide GPT-5.2 Prompting Guide Transcribing User Audio with a Separate Realtime Request Modernizing your Codebase with Codex GitHub - openai/openai-sora-sample-app: Sample app to get started using the Video API with Sora GitHub - openai/openai-apps-sdk-examples: Example apps for the Apps SDK GitHub - openai/openai-chatkit-advanced-samples: Starter app to build with OpenAI ChatKit SDK GitHub - openai/openai-chatkit-starter-app: Starter app to build with OpenAI ChatKit + Agent Builder Rate limits | OpenAI API Web search | OpenAI API Getting started with datasets | OpenAI API Prompt optimizer | OpenAI API Verifying gpt-oss implementations How to run gpt-oss locally with LM Studio Fine-tuning with gpt-oss and Hugging Face Transformers How to run gpt-oss locally with Ollama Function calling | OpenAI API Models | OpenAI API Reasoning best practices | OpenAI API Reasoning models | OpenAI API Background mode | OpenAI API Batch API | OpenAI API Conversation state | OpenAI API File search | OpenAI API Flex processing | OpenAI API MCP and Connectors | OpenAI API
Predicted Outputs | OpenAI API
2025-07-18 · via OpenAI Developers

Predicted Outputs enable you to speed up API responses from Chat Completions when many of the output tokens are known ahead of time. This is most common when you are regenerating a text or code file with minor modifications. You can provide your prediction using the prediction request parameter in Chat Completions.

Predicted Outputs are available today using the latest gpt-4o, gpt-4o-mini, gpt-4.1, gpt-4.1-mini, and gpt-4.1-nano models. Read on to learn how to use Predicted Outputs to reduce latency in your applications.

Predicted Outputs are particularly useful for regenerating text documents and code files with small modifications. Let’s say you want the GPT-4o model to refactor a piece of TypeScript code, and convert the username property of the User class to be email instead:

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
class User {
  firstName: string = "";
  lastName: string = "";
  username: string = "";
}

export default User;

Most of the file will be unchanged, except for line 4 above. If you use the current text of the code file as your prediction, you can regenerate the entire file with lower latency. These time savings add up quickly for larger files.

Below is an example of using the prediction parameter in our SDKs to predict that the final output of the model will be very similar to our original code file, which we use as the prediction text.

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
import OpenAI from "openai";

const code = `
class User {
  firstName: string = "";
  lastName: string = "";
  username: string = "";
}

export default User;
`.trim();

const openai = new OpenAI();

const refactorPrompt = `
Replace the "username" property with an "email" property. Respond only 
with code, and with no markdown formatting.
`;

const completion = await openai.chat.completions.create({
  model: "gpt-4.1",
  messages: [
    {
      role: "user",
      content: refactorPrompt
    },
    {
      role: "user",
      content: code
    }
  ],
  store: true,
  prediction: {
    type: "content",
    content: code
  }
});

// Inspect returned data
console.log(completion);
console.log(completion.choices[0].message.content);

In addition to the refactored code, the model response will contain data that looks something like this:

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
{
  id: 'chatcmpl-xxx',
  object: 'chat.completion',
  created: 1730918466,
  model: 'gpt-4o-2024-08-06',
  choices: [ /* ...actual text response here... */],
  usage: {
    prompt_tokens: 81,
    completion_tokens: 39,
    total_tokens: 120,
    prompt_tokens_details: { cached_tokens: 0, audio_tokens: 0 },
    completion_tokens_details: {
      reasoning_tokens: 0,
      audio_tokens: 0,
      accepted_prediction_tokens: 18,
      rejected_prediction_tokens: 10
    }
  },
  system_fingerprint: 'fp_159d8341cc'
}

Note both the accepted_prediction_tokens and rejected_prediction_tokens in the usage object. In this example, 18 tokens from the prediction were used to speed up the response, while 10 were rejected.

Note that any rejected tokens are still billed like other completion tokens generated by the API, so Predicted Outputs can introduce higher costs for your requests.

The latency gains of Predicted Outputs are even greater when you use streaming for API responses. Here is an example of the same code refactoring use case, but using streaming in the OpenAI SDKs instead.

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
import OpenAI from "openai";

const code = `
class User {
  firstName: string = "";
  lastName: string = "";
  username: string = "";
}

export default User;
`.trim();

const openai = new OpenAI();

const refactorPrompt = `
Replace the "username" property with an "email" property. Respond only 
with code, and with no markdown formatting.
`;

const completion = await openai.chat.completions.create({
  model: "gpt-4.1",
  messages: [
    {
      role: "user",
      content: refactorPrompt
    },
    {
      role: "user",
      content: code
    }
  ],
  store: true,
  prediction: {
    type: "content",
    content: code
  },
  stream: true
});

// Inspect returned data
for await (const chunk of stream) {
  process.stdout.write(chunk.choices[0]?.delta?.content || "");
}

Position of predicted text in response

When providing prediction text, your prediction can appear anywhere within the generated response, and still provide latency reduction for the response. Let’s say your predicted text is the simple Hono server shown below:

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
import { serveStatic } from "@hono/node-server/serve-static";
import { serve } from "@hono/node-server";
import { Hono } from "hono";

const app = new Hono();

app.get("/api", (c) => {
  return c.text("Hello Hono!");
});

// You will need to build the client code first `pnpm run ui:build`
app.use(
  "/*",
  serveStatic({
    rewriteRequestPath: (path) => `./dist${path}`,
  })
);

const port = 3000;
console.log(`Server is running on port ${port}`);

serve({
  fetch: app.fetch,
  port,
});

You could prompt the model to regenerate the file with a prompt like:

Add a get route to this application that responds with
the text "hello world". Generate the entire application
file again with this route added, and with no other
markdown formatting.

The response to the prompt might look something like this:

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
import { serveStatic } from "@hono/node-server/serve-static";
import { serve } from "@hono/node-server";
import { Hono } from "hono";

const app = new Hono();

app.get("/api", (c) => {
  return c.text("Hello Hono!");
});

app.get("/hello", (c) => {
  return c.text("hello world");
});

// You will need to build the client code first `pnpm run ui:build`
app.use(
  "/*",
  serveStatic({
    rewriteRequestPath: (path) => `./dist${path}`,
  })
);

const port = 3000;
console.log(`Server is running on port ${port}`);

serve({
  fetch: app.fetch,
  port,
});

You would still see accepted prediction tokens in the response, even though the prediction text appeared both before and after the new content added to the response:

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
{
  id: 'chatcmpl-xxx',
  object: 'chat.completion',
  created: 1731014771,
  model: 'gpt-4o-2024-08-06',
  choices: [ /* completion here... */],
  usage: {
    prompt_tokens: 203,
    completion_tokens: 159,
    total_tokens: 362,
    prompt_tokens_details: { cached_tokens: 0, audio_tokens: 0 },
    completion_tokens_details: {
      reasoning_tokens: 0,
      audio_tokens: 0,
      accepted_prediction_tokens: 60,
      rejected_prediction_tokens: 0
    }
  },
  system_fingerprint: 'fp_9ee9e968ea'
}

This time, there were no rejected prediction tokens, because the entire content of the file we predicted was used in the final response. Nice! 🔥

When using Predicted Outputs, you should consider the following factors and limitations.

  • Predicted Outputs are only supported with the GPT-4o, GPT-4o-mini, GPT-4.1, GPT-4.1-mini, and GPT-4.1-nano series of models.
  • When providing a prediction, any tokens provided that are not part of the final completion are still charged at completion token rates. See the rejected_prediction_tokens property of the usage object to see how many tokens are not used in the final response.
  • The following API parameters are not supported when using Predicted Outputs:
    • n: values higher than 1 are not supported
    • logprobs: not supported
    • presence_penalty: values greater than 0 are not supported
    • frequency_penalty: values greater than 0 are not supported
    • audio: Predicted Outputs are not compatible with audio inputs and outputs
    • modalities: Only text modalities are supported
    • max_completion_tokens: not supported
    • tools: Function calling is not currently supported with Predicted Outputs