惯性聚合 高效追踪和阅读你感兴趣的博客、新闻、科技资讯
阅读原文 在惯性聚合中打开

推荐订阅源

博客园_首页
N
Netflix TechBlog - Medium
V
Visual Studio Blog
博客园 - Franky
小众软件
小众软件
奇客Solidot–传递最新科技情报
奇客Solidot–传递最新科技情报
Apple Machine Learning Research
Apple Machine Learning Research
博客园 - 三生石上(FineUI控件)
钛媒体:引领未来商业与生活新知
钛媒体:引领未来商业与生活新知
让小产品的独立变现更简单 - ezindie.com
让小产品的独立变现更简单 - ezindie.com
宝玉的分享
宝玉的分享
量子位
大猫的无限游戏
大猫的无限游戏
人人都是产品经理
人人都是产品经理
V
V2EX
The Cloudflare Blog
月光博客
月光博客
Last Week in AI
Last Week in AI
雷峰网
雷峰网
WordPress大学
WordPress大学
博客园 - 【当耐特】
博客园 - 聂微东
IT之家
IT之家
OSCHINA 社区最新新闻
OSCHINA 社区最新新闻

CI on CoreDNS: DNS and Service Discovery

暂无文章

CoreDNS Performance Testing
miek · 2017-08-09 · via CI on CoreDNS: DNS and Service Discovery

As CoreDNS is an inception level project under the CNCF which means we have access to the physical cloud infrastructure of Packet, a bare metal(!) cloud provider. Physical machines imply performance and also because you get an entire machine you can use them for performance metrics.

For CoreDNS we have a few Benchmark tests (from the Go standard library) that haven’t seen much use. Typically you run these before your change and then after your and then use a tool like benchcmp to compare the results and impress your PR’s reviewers. This is all pretty manual, a more automated (and visual!) way would be welcome.

Our new Packet machines to the rescue. We’ve setup the following work flow:

GitHub > webhook > mbench > prometheus > grafana

I.e. we configured a webhook that gets triggered on a pull request and then via some Caddy proxy trigger gets delivered to webhook. Webhook then kicks of a shell script, that pulls down CoreDNS’ repo and the correct pull request. ^[Yes, this script parses the JSON with grep, ultimately that was the only way to make it reliably work.]

This benchmark script does nothing more than run the bench mark tests: go test -run='' -bench=. -benchmem ./... 2>/dev/null).

The output from these tests, i.e:

BenchmarkRequestDo-8   1000000000	 2.11 ns/op	  0 B/op    0 allocs/op

… is written into the named pipe which is then picked up by mbench and converted into Prometheus metrics:

2017/06/25 09:21:51 [INFO] Parsed line: {branch="pr-753",cpu="8",subsystem="coredns"}requestdo_coredns: 1000000000 2.110000 0 0

The latest known branches are found by using a “recording rule” that uses an extra metrics that mbench exports: _start_time_seconds: So we only see the active branches from the last n branches:

benchmark_coredns_branches_topk10 = topk(10, benchmark_coredns_cacheresponse_start_time_seconds{branch != "master"})

There is also cron.hourly that tests master on a continuous basis, which we display separately in Grafana.

Grafana

In Grafana, for each defined benchmark, we’ve setup a templated dashboard: benchmark_coredns_[[benchmark]]_run_gauge{branch=~"$branch"}:

Branch and benchmark selectors in Grafana.

So we can easily select that branch and compare it with whatever other branch.

Thus in the end leading to a dashboard where you can easily compare your performance against the master branch: https://snapshot.raintank.io/dashboard/snapshot/0er0u40KAZ1YM4dl0KgDUkeD3KhzZqFj

Benchmark dashboard.

The end result of all this is that if someone adds an optimization it will be immediately visible in the stats. Any new pull request shows up automatically and any new benchmark function will also be automatically discovered.