惯性聚合 高效追踪和阅读你感兴趣的博客、新闻、科技资讯
阅读原文 在惯性聚合中打开

推荐订阅源

Engineering at Meta
Engineering at Meta
雷峰网
雷峰网
freeCodeCamp Programming Tutorials: Python, JavaScript, Git & More
B
Blog
Y
Y Combinator Blog
WordPress大学
WordPress大学
Microsoft Azure Blog
Microsoft Azure Blog
小众软件
小众软件
G
Google Developers Blog
云风的 BLOG
云风的 BLOG
罗磊的独立博客
博客园 - 三生石上(FineUI控件)
博客园 - 叶小钗
钛媒体:引领未来商业与生活新知
钛媒体:引领未来商业与生活新知
量子位
The Cloudflare Blog
T
The Blog of Author Tim Ferriss
博客园_首页
B
Blog RSS Feed
Hugging Face - Blog
Hugging Face - Blog
IT之家
IT之家
阮一峰的网络日志
阮一峰的网络日志
L
LangChain Blog
宝玉的分享
宝玉的分享

Microsoft Security Blog

Microsoft named a Leader in the 2026 IDC MarketScape for MDR/MXDR for the Enterprise  | Microsoft Security Blog DeadLock ransomware: Breaking down a Rust-based encryptor with decentralized recovery infrastructure | Microsoft Security Blog ​​Microsoft named a Leader in the KuppingerCole Leadership Compass for Cloud Native Application Protection Platforms (CNAPP) | Microsoft Security Blog From open lures to cloaked gates: How a macOS ClickFix campaign learned to hide | Microsoft Security Blog ChainDrop supply chain compromise: Anatomy of a self-propagating worm | Microsoft Security Blog Advance Zero Trust for AI: New tools and guidance to secure AI agents and DevSecOps | Microsoft Security Blog 128 Seconds to disruption: Microsoft Defender stops ransomware at QNET  | Microsoft Security Blog CaptiveCrunch: Midnight Blizzard targets travelers worldwide for malware delivery and credential theft | Microsoft Security Blog ​​​​What’s new in Microsoft Security: July 2026 | Microsoft Security Blog ​​Better security starts with better questions | Microsoft Security Blog Rethinking security for the age of AI - The Official Microsoft Blog Enhancing AI security through global AI red teaming | Microsoft Security Blog Email threat landscape: Q2 2026 trends and insights | Microsoft Security Blog Real world incident response: Microsoft and AXA XL strengthen cyber resilience | Microsoft Security Blog Microsoft at Black Hat USA 2026: Defending trust in the age of AI and supply chain attacks | Microsoft Security Blog ACR Stealer: Two observed intrusion chains amid increased threat activity | Microsoft Security Blog Least privilege for AI agents: Identity, access, and tool binding | Microsoft Security Blog Unpacking the AsyncAPI npm supply chain compromise and import-time payload delivery | Microsoft Security Blog Turning threat intelligence into decisive action with Defender Experts | Microsoft Security Blog Defending SaaS-based applications against ShinyHunters OAuth abuse | Microsoft Security Blog Microsoft Entra ID security updates: Passkeys are the default authentication method in Entra ID | Microsoft Security Blog Securing our future: July 2026 progress report on Microsoft's Secure Future Initiative | Microsoft Security Blog GigaWiper: Anatomy of a destructive backdoor assembled from multiple malware | Microsoft Security Blog Protecting Microsoft at AI speed: How SFI proactively hardens our cloud   | Microsoft Security Blog 5 insights from Frost & Sullivan’s 2025 Frost Radar™ for Cloud Security Posture Management | Microsoft Security Blog Improving security posture across the Microsoft partner ecosystem | Microsoft Security Blog Microsoft named a leader in the Frost Radar for cloud and application runtime security | Microsoft Security Blog Accelerating the quantum-safe timeline | Microsoft Security Blog ​​What’s new in Microsoft Security: June 2026 | Microsoft Security Blog Securing AI agents: When AI tools move from reading to acting | Microsoft Security Blog
Storm-1175 focuses gaze on vulnerable web-facing assets i...
2026-04-06 · via Microsoft Security Blog

The financially motivated cybercriminal actor tracked by Microsoft Threat Intelligence as Storm-1175 operates high-velocity ransomware campaigns that weaponize N-days, targeting vulnerable, web-facing systems during the window between vulnerability disclosure and widespread patch adoption. Following successful exploitation, Storm-1175 rapidly moves from initial access to data exfiltration and deployment of Medusa ransomware, often within a few days and, in some cases, within 24 hours. The threat actor’s high operational tempo and proficiency in identifying exposed perimeter assets have proven successful, with recent intrusions heavily impacting healthcare organizations, as well as those in the education, professional services, and finance sectors in Australia, United Kingdom, and United States.

The pace of Storm-1175’s campaigns is enabled by the threat actor’s consistent use of recently disclosed vulnerabilities to obtain initial access. While the threat actor typically uses N-day vulnerabilities, we have also observed Storm-1175 leveraging zero-day exploits, in some cases a full week before public vulnerability disclosure. The threat actor has also been observed chaining together multiple exploits to enable post-compromise activity. After initial access, Storm-1175 establishes persistence by creating new user accounts, deploys various tools including remote monitoring and management software for lateral movement, conducts credential theft, and tampers with security solutions before deploying ransomware throughout the compromised environment.

In this blog post, we delve into the attack techniques attributed to Storm-1175 over several years. While Storm-1175’s methodology aligns with the tactics, techniques, and procedures (TTPs) of many tracked ransomware actors, analysis of their post-compromise tactics provides essential insights into how organizations can harden and defend against attackers like Storm-1175, informing opportunities to disrupt attackers even if they have gained initial access to a network.

Storm-1175’s rapid attack chain: From initial access to impact

Exploitation of vulnerable web-facing assets

Storm-1175 rapidly weaponizes recently disclosed vulnerabilities to obtain initial access. Since 2023, Microsoft Threat Intelligence has observed exploitation of over 16 vulnerabilities, including:

Storm-1175 rotates exploits quickly during the time between disclosure and patch availability or adoption, taking advantage of the period where many organizations remain unprotected. In some cases, Storm-1175 has weaponized exploits for disclosed vulnerabilities in as little as one day, as was the case for CVE-2025-31324 impacting SAP NetWeaver: the security issue was disclosed on April 24, 2025, and we observed Storm-1175 exploitation soon after on April 25.

Diagram showing timeline of Storm-1175 exploitation, of various vulnerabilities over the years, including date of disclosure and date of weaponization
Figure 1. Timeline of disclosure and exploitation of vulnerabilities used by Storm-1175 in campaigns

In multiple intrusions, Storm-1175 has chained together exploits to enable post-compromise activities like remote code execution (RCE). For example, in July 2023, Storm-1175 exploited two vulnerabilities affecting on-premises Microsoft Exchange Servers, dubbed “OWASSRF” by public researchers: exploitation of CVE‑2022‑41080 provided initial access by exposing Exchange PowerShell via Outlook Web Access (OWA), and Storm-1175 subsequently exploited CVE‑2022‑41082 to achieve remote code execution.

Storm-1175 has also demonstrated a capability for targeting Linux systems as well: in late 2024, Microsoft Threat Intelligence identified the exploitation of vulnerable Oracle WebLogic instances across multiple organizations, though we were unable to identify the exact vulnerability being exploited in these attacks.

Finally, we have also observed the use of at least three zero-day vulnerabilities including, most recently, CVE-2026-23760 in SmarterMail, which was exploited by Storm-1175 the week prior to public disclosure, and CVE-2025-10035 in GoAnywhere Managed File Transfer, also exploited one week before public disclosure. While these more recent attacks demonstrate an evolved development capability or new access to resources like exploit brokers for Storm-1175, it is worth noting that GoAnywhere MFT has previously been targeted by ransomware attackers, and that the SmarterMail vulnerability was reportedly similar to a previously disclosed flaw; these factors may have helped to facilitate subsequent zero-day exploitation activity by Storm-1175, who still primarily leverages N-day vulnerabilities. Regardless, as attackers increasingly become more adept at identifying new vulnerabilities, understanding your digital footprint—such as through the use of public scanning interfaces like Microsoft Defender External Attack Surface Management—is essential to defending against perimeter network attacks.

Covert persistence and lateral movement

During exploitation, Storm-1175 typically creates a web shell or drops a remote access payload to establish their initial hold in the environment. From this point, Microsoft Threat Intelligence has observed Storm-1175 moving from initial access to ransomware deployment in as little as one day, though many of the actor’s attacks have occurred over a period of five to six days.

Diagram showing the Storm-1175 attack chain from Exploitation to Impact
Figure 2. Storm-1175 attack chain

On the initially compromised device, the threat actor often establishes persistence by creating a new user and adding that user to the administrators group:

Screenshot of code for creating new user account and adding as administrator
Figure 3. Storm-1175 creates a new user account and adds it as an administrator

From this account, Storm-1175 begins their reconnaissance and lateral movement activity. Storm-1175 has a rotation of tools to accomplish these subsequent attack stages. Most commonly, we observe the use of living-off-the-land binaries (LOLBins), including PowerShell and PsExec, followed by the use of Cloudflare tunnels (renamed to mimic legitimate binaries like conhost.exe) to move laterally over Remote Desktop Protocol (RDP) and deliver payloads to new devices. If RDP is not allowed in the environment, Storm-1175 has been observed using administrator privileges to modify the Windows Firewall policy to enable Remote Desktop.

Screenshot of code for modifying the firewall and enabling RDP
Figure 4. From an initial foothold after the compromise of a SmarterMail application, Storm-1175 modifies the firewall and enables remote desktop access for lateral movement, writing the results of the command to a TXT file

Storm-1175 has also demonstrated a heavy reliance on remote monitoring and management (RMM) tools during post-compromise activity. Since 2023, Storm-1175 has used multiple RMMs, including:

  • Atera RMM
  • Level RMM
  • N-able
  • DWAgent
  • MeshAgent
  • ConnectWise ScreenConnect
  • AnyDesk
  • SimpleHelp

While often used by enterprise IT teams, these RMM tools have multi-pronged functionality that could also allow adversaries to maintain persistence in a compromised network, create new user accounts, enable an alternative command-and-control (C2) method, deliver additional payloads, or use as an interactive remote desktop session.

In many attacks, Storm-1175 relies on PDQ Deployer, a legitimate software deployment tool that lets system administrators silently install applications, for both lateral movement and payload delivery, including ransomware deployment throughout the network.

Additionally, Storm-1175 has leveraged Impacket for lateral movement. Impacket is a collection of open-source Python classes designed for working with network protocols, and it is popular with adversaries due to ease of use and wide range of capabilities. Microsoft Defender for Endpoint has a dedicated attack surface reduction rule to defend against lateral movement techniques used by Impacket: Block process creations originating from PSExec and WMI commands); protecting lateral movement pathways can also mitigate Impacket.

Credential theft

Impacket is further used to facilitate credential dumping through LSASS; the threat actor also leveraged the commodity credential theft tool Mimikatz in identified intrusions in 2025. Additionally, Storm-1175 has relied on known living-off-the-land techniques for stealing credentials, such as by modifying the registry entry UseLogonCredential to turn on WDigest credential caching, or using Task Manager to dump LSASS credentials; for both of these attack techniques, the threat actor must obtain local administrative privileges to modify these resources. The attack surface reduction rule block credential stealing from LSASS can limit the effectiveness of this type of attack, and—more broadly—limiting the use of local administrator rights by end users. Ensuring that local administrator passwords are not shared through the environment can also reduce the risk of these LSASS dumping techniques.

We have also observed that after gaining administrator credentials, Storm-1175 has used a script to recover passwords from Veeam backup software, which is used to connect to remote hosts, therefore enabling ransomware deployment to additional connected systems.

With sufficient privileges, Storm-1175 can then use tools like PsExec to pivot to a Domain Controller, where they have accessed the NTDS.dit dump, a copy of the Active Directory database which contains user data and passwords that can be cracked offline. This privileged position has also granted Storm-1175 access to the security account manager (SAM), which provides detailed configuration and security settings, enabling an attacker to understand and manipulate the system environment on a much wider scale.

Security tampering for ransomware delivery

Storm-1175 modifies the Microsoft Defender Antivirus settings stored in the registry to tamper with the antivirus software and prevent it from blocking ransomware payloads; in order to accomplish this, an attacker must have access to highly privileged accounts that can modify the registry directly. For this reason, prioritizing alerts related to credential theft activity, which typically indicate an active attacker in the environment, is essential to responding to ransomware signals and preventing attackers from gaining privileged account access.

Storm-1175 has also used encoded PowerShell commands to add the C:\ drive to the antivirus exclusion path, preventing the security solution from scanning the drive and allowing payloads to run without any alerts. Defenders can harden against these tampering techniques by combining tamper protection with the DisableLocalAdminMerge setting, which prevents attackers from using local administrator privileges to set antivirus exclusions.

Data exfiltration and ransomware deployment

Like other ransomware as a service (RaaS) offerings, Medusa offers a leak site to facilitate double extortion operations for its affiliates: attackers not only encrypt data, but steal the data and hold it for ransom, threatening to leak the files publicly if a ransom is not paid. To that aim, Storm-1175 often uses Bandizip to collect files and Rclone for data exfiltration. Data synchronization tools like Rclone allow threat actors to easily transfer large volumes of data to a remote attacker-owned cloud resource. These tools also provide data synchronization capabilities, moving newly created or updated files to cloud resources in real-time to enable continuous exfiltration throughout all stages of the attack without needing attacker interaction.

Finally, having gained sufficient access throughout the network, Storm-1175 frequently leverages PDQ Deployer to launch a script (RunFileCopy.cmd) and deliver Medusa ransomware payloads. In some cases, Storm-1175 has alternatively used highly privileged access to create a Group Policy update to broadly deploy ransomware.

Mitigation and protection guidance

To defend against Storm-1175 TTPs and similar activity, Microsoft recommends the following mitigation measures:

Microsoft Defender detections

Microsoft Defender customers can refer to the list of applicable detections below. Microsoft Defender coordinates detection, prevention, investigation, and response across endpoints, identities, email, apps to provide integrated protection against attacks like the threat discussed in this blog.

Tactic Observed activity Microsoft Defender coverage 
Initial AccessStorm-1175 exploits vulnerable web-facing applicationsMicrosoft Defender for Endpoint
– Ransomware-linked threat actor detected
– Possible Beyond Trust software vulnerability exploitation
– Possible exploitation of GoAnywhere MFT vulnerability
– Possible SAP NetWeaver vulnerability exploitation Possible exploitation of JetBrains TeamCity vulnerability
– Suspicious command execution via ScreenConnect
– Suspicious service launched
Persistence and privilege escalationStorm-1175 creates new user accounts under administrative groups using the net commandMicrosoft Defender for Endpoint
– User account created under suspicious circumstances
– New local admin added using Net commands
– New group added suspiciously
– Suspicious account creation
– Suspicious Windows account manipulation
– Anomalous account lookups
Credential theftStorm-1175 dumps credentials from LSASS, or uses a privileged position from the Domain Controller to access NTDS.dit and SAM hiveMicrosoft Defender Antivirus
– Behavior:Win32/SAMDumpz

Microsoft Defender for Endpoint
– Exposed credentials at risk of compromise
– Compromised account credentials
– Process memory dump

Persistence, lateral movementStorm-1175 uses RMM tools for persistence, payload delivery, and lateral movementMicrosoft Defender for Endpoint
– Suspicious Atera activity
– File dropped and launched from remote location
ExecutionStorm-1175 delivers tools such as PsExec or leverages LOLbins like PowerShell to carry out post-compromise activityMicrosoft Defender Antivirus
– Behavior:Win32/PsexecRemote

Microsoft Defender for Endpoint
– Hands-on-keyboard attack involving multiple devices
– Remote access software
– Suspicious PowerShell command line
– Suspicious PowerShell download or encoded command execution
– Ransomware-linked threat actor detected

ExfiltrationStorm-1175 uses the synch tool Rclone to steal documentsMicrosoft Defender for Endpoint
– Potential human-operated malicious activity
– Renaming of legitimate tools for possible data exfiltration
– Possible data exfiltration
– Hidden dual-use tool launch attempt
Defense evasionStorm-1175 disables Windows DefenderMicrosoft Defender for Endpoint
– Defender detection bypass
– Attempt to turn off Microsoft Defender Antivirus protection
ImpactStorm-1175 deploys Medusa ransomwareMicrosoft Defender Antivirus
– Ransom:Win32/Medusa

Microsoft Defender for Endpoint
– Possible ransomware activity based on a known malicious extension
– Possible compromised user account delivering ransomware-related files
– Potentially compromised assets exhibiting ransomware-like behavior
– Ransomware behavior detected in the file system
– File dropped and launched from remote location

Microsoft Security Copilot

Microsoft Security Copilot is embedded in Microsoft Defender and provides security teams with AI-powered capabilities to summarize incidents, analyze files and scripts, summarize identities, use guided responses, and generate device summaries, hunting queries, and incident reports.

Customers can also deploy AI agents, including the following Microsoft Security Copilot agents, to perform security tasks efficiently:

Security Copilot is also available as a standalone experience where customers can perform specific security-related tasks, such as incident investigation, user analysis, and vulnerability impact assessment. In addition, Security Copilot offers developer scenarios that allow customers to build, test, publish, and integrate AI agents and plugins to meet unique security needs.

Threat intelligence reports

Microsoft Defender XDR customers can use the following threat analytics reports in the Defender portal (requires license for at least one Defender XDR product) to get the most up-to-date information about the threat actor, malicious activity, and techniques discussed in this blog. These reports provide the intelligence, protection information, and recommended actions to prevent, mitigate, or respond to associated threats found in customer environments.

Indicators of compromise

The following indicators are gathered from identified Storm-1175 attacks during 2026.

IndicatorTypeDescriptionFirst seenLast seen
0cefeb6210b7103fd32b996beff518c9b6e1691a97bb1cda7f5fb57905c4be96SHA-256Gaze.exe (Medusa Ransomware)2026-03-012026-03-01
9632d7e4a87ec12fdd05ed3532f7564526016b78972b2cd49a610354d672523c *Note that we have seen this hash in ransomware intrusions by other threat actors since 2024 as wellSHA-256lsp.exe (Rclone)2024-04-01  2026-02-18
e57ba1a4e323094ca9d747bfb3304bd12f3ea3be5e2ee785a3e656c3ab1e8086SHA-256main.exe (SimpleHelp)2026-01-152026-01-15
5ba7de7d5115789b952d9b1c6cff440c9128f438de933ff9044a68fff8496d19SHA-256moon.exe (SimpleHelp)2025-09-152025-09-22
185.135.86[.]149IPSimpleHelp C22024-02-232026-03-15
134.195.91[.]224IPSimpleHelp C22024-02-232026-02-26
85.155.186[.]121IPSimpleHelp C22024-02-232026-02-12

References

Learn more

For the latest security research from the Microsoft Threat Intelligence community, check out the Microsoft Threat Intelligence Blog.

To get notified about new publications and to join discussions on social media, follow us on LinkedIn, X (formerly Twitter), and Bluesky.

To hear stories and insights from the Microsoft Threat Intelligence community about the ever-evolving threat landscape, listen to the Microsoft Threat Intelligence podcast.