惯性聚合 高效追踪和阅读你感兴趣的博客、新闻、科技资讯
阅读原文 在惯性聚合中打开

推荐订阅源

Cloudbric
Cloudbric
E
Exploit-DB.com RSS Feed
SecWiki News
SecWiki News
Forbes - Security
Forbes - Security
N
News | PayPal Newsroom
S
Security @ Cisco Blogs
Schneier on Security
Schneier on Security
V
V2EX - 技术
S
Secure Thoughts
W
WeLiveSecurity
Google DeepMind News
Google DeepMind News
C
CERT Recently Published Vulnerability Notes
NISL@THU
NISL@THU
S
Securelist
S
Security Archives - TechRepublic
Know Your Adversary
Know Your Adversary
V
Vulnerabilities – Threatpost
Security Latest
Security Latest
Recent Commits to openclaw:main
Recent Commits to openclaw:main
G
GRAHAM CLULEY
H
Hacker News: Front Page
Microsoft Azure Blog
Microsoft Azure Blog
I
Intezer
Google Online Security Blog
Google Online Security Blog
美团技术团队
阮一峰的网络日志
阮一峰的网络日志
T
The Exploit Database - CXSecurity.com
钛媒体:引领未来商业与生活新知
钛媒体:引领未来商业与生活新知
Webroot Blog
Webroot Blog
Jina AI
Jina AI
Engineering at Meta
Engineering at Meta
P
Proofpoint News Feed
The Cloudflare Blog
I
InfoQ
L
LangChain Blog
U
Unit 42
P
Proofpoint News Feed
S
Schneier on Security
S
Security Affairs
Y
Y Combinator Blog
T
Tenable Blog
N
News and Events Feed by Topic
MyScale Blog
MyScale Blog
量子位
Google DeepMind News
Google DeepMind News
Cyberwarzone
Cyberwarzone
博客园 - 聂微东
D
Darknet – Hacking Tools, Hacker News & Cyber Security
GbyAI
GbyAI
AWS News Blog
AWS News Blog

RapidFort Blog

RapidFort Test Blog Blog 4 Test Test Blog 3 Test 2 Mythos Vulnerability Assessment: Eliminate Real Risk, Not Just CVEs Securing Modern AI Workloads for National Security RBOM vs SBOM: The Critical Difference Between Software Inventory and Runtime Reality The Remediation Gap: When AI-Powered Discovery Outpaces Human Defense You Only Control 15% of Your Software. Here's How to Secure the Rest. Free ATO Readiness Cohort: Shorten Your Path to Federal Market US Cyber Strategy & Software Supply Chain Security EU CRA for Containers & Kubernetes: Scope, Deadlines & Steps PyPI, npm, and the New Frontline of Software Supply Chain Attacks GitHub Actions Security Audit: CI/CD Risk & Shell Injection What Is RBOM™? Runtime Bill of Materials vs SBOM Explained EU Cyber Resilience Act & Open Source Risk RapidFort Raises $42M Series A for Software Supply Chain Security Fintech Container Security 2026: SASM & RBOM™ RF Analyzer: Precision Container CVE Intelligence Kimia: Secure Kaniko Alternative for Kubernetes Builds AI-Powered Cyberattacks: How Defenders Must Adapt RapidFort Pioneered DoD Container Hardening | Industry Standard Turn Scanner Output into Verified CVE Elimination RapidFort's Giant Washing Machine: Cleaning Open Source at Scale Why SBOMs Fail: RBOM™ & Near-Zero CVE Images Fix the Gap Defeat NPM Supply Chain Worms: Near-Zero CVE Defense Bitnami & Chainguard Alternatives: Free Near-Zero CVE Images Runtime Profiling: Eliminate up to 99.9% of Container CVEs Flow Defending: AI-Speed Container Hardening & Runtime Visibility AI in Software Supply Chain Security: Defense vs Attackers SBOM vs RBOM™: Why Runtime Bill of Materials Wins AI-Powered Container Stack: Built, Hardened & Defended AI-Generated Code Vulnerabilities: Runtime Defense for Containers Container Vulnerability Management Reimagined | RBOM™ 35,000+ Near-Zero CVE Images: FIPS, STIG & AI-Era Standard RBOM™ Runtime Intelligence: Cut CVE Noise & Improve Accuracy EU Vulnerability Database (EUVD): Impact on CVE Management Critical Infrastructure Cyber Resilience: Near-Zero CVE DoD Software Procurement: SWIFT, cATO & Container Security Stop Fixing CVEs One by One: Eliminate up to 99.9% Before Production Break the Patch-and-Pray Cycle: Proactive CVE Management Beyond FedRAMP Checklists: Continuous CVE Elimination Why RapidFort Outperforms the Competition: The Future of Secure Containers FedRAMP Fast-Track: Near-Zero CVE Images & Zero Patching Hidden Costs of Manual CVE Elimination | Automate with RapidFort PCI DSS, SOC 2, FedRAMP & HIPAA Compliance via CVE Elimination Emerging Cyber Threats 2024: Protect Containers with RapidFort Container Supply Chain Security: From Source to Deployment Build a Robust Security Stack with RapidFort's SASM Platform Securing Containerized Environments: Best Practices Identify & Eliminate Common App Vulnerabilities in 3 Steps Near-Zero CVE Blueprint: Securing Your Software Supply Chain Eliminate up to 99.9% of Container CVEs in 3 Steps | No Code Changes DoD Innovation: SpaceWERX, AFWERX & Defense Tech Firsthand Developer Security Training Do's & Don'ts Top 5 Software Security Myths Debunked AI-Generated Code Security Risks: CEO Insights Using AI in Software Development: Security Tips & Considerations RapidFort Wins Intellyx Digital Innovator Award | Runtime Security 3 Tips to Conquer CVE Alert Fatigue Mature DevSecOps Teams: Key Traits & Security Best Practices Software Security Budgeting 2024: Eliminate CVEs by up to 99.9% & Measure ROI RapidFort 2023 Year in Review: Milestones & Container Security Wins OSS Vulnerability Scanning & Container Hardening RapidFort Joins Microsoft Pegasus Program | Container Security Runtime Container Protection: 90% Attack Surface Reduction Black Hat USA 2023: AI, CISO Trends & Cybersecurity Insights SOC 2 Type 2 Compliance for Container Security RapidFort Achieves SOC 2 Type 2 | Enterprise Security Validated Common Container Security Risks & How to Fix Them 6 Steps to Securing Your Software Supply Chain Harden Containers with Coverage Scripts & RBOM™ Profiling Container Vulnerability Management Best Practices Minimize Software Attack Surface | RBOM™-Powered SASM Docker Container Security Best Practices 2023 | Harden & Scan What Is Container Hardening? Reduce CVEs & Meet Compliance | Guide Securing Popular Docker Containers: Up to 80% Attack Surface Cut How RapidFort Secures Its Own Containers | Dogfooding DevSecOps Why Container Security Tools Fail: Scan vs Eliminate Hidden OSS Trade-Offs: Container Bloat, CVEs & Security Debt OSS Patch Management: Eliminate Container Bloat & CVEs OpenSSL Vulnerability: Scan, Harden & Reduce Risk in Containers Harden Hundreds of Containers Today for Free Customs Bridge Automates CVE Elimination with RapidFort SAST vs DAST vs IAST: Limitations for Container OSS Security Delete 78% of Your Redis Container - It Still Works 100% Free Tool: Copy AMIs to AWS GovCloud Fast | Open-Source Script Stop Chasing CVEs: Smarter Container Test Cycles Why CVSS Severity Alone Fails: Use Exploit Probability The Limits of Shift Left: How Software Optimization Fills the Gap Software Supply Chain Security with SCA Scanning What Is Software Supply Chain Risk? Causes & How to Mitigate It Reduce Container Bloat: Remove Unused Components & Cut CVEs What Is Software Optimization? RBOM™ vs SBOM Explained Log4j Response: Harden Containers Now Before the Next Patch
Top 3 Software Security Trends 2024: AI, Compliance & SASM
Rajeev Thakur · 2024-03-20 · via RapidFort Blog

Software security is always evolving, with emerging technology and trends reshaping the ways in which we safeguard our applications. Whether it's the numerous vulnerabilities ushered in by AI-generated code or increasing compliance overhead, security threats and challenges are sure to reach unprecedented heights in the new year. 

As 2023 wraps and 2024 kicks off, I find myself reflecting on the current software security landscape and the trajectory it’s primed to take in the coming months. Specifically, I believe that the responsible use of artificial intelligence (AI) in code development, streamlining code in critical infrastructure and escalating compliance challenges will play a large role in 2024 and beyond.

1. The advent of AI-enabled code development

It’s no secret that the emergence of AI will usher in unparalleled opportunities for developers to accelerate code volume and velocity - the ability to automate coding tasks, accelerate development timelines and reduce human error will allow software engineers to streamline their processes and innovate at unprecedented rates. In fact, a recent survey found that 41% of all code in modern development practices is already AI-generated, and 92% of programmers use AI tools to support their development - a figure that is poised to climb in 2024.

With that said, we must also be mindful of the potential risks posed by AI-generated code, much of which will likely be of lower quality and more bloated. Security teams are barely keeping pace as is - they have become the bottleneck in many organizations, and yet increased developer velocity is going to put them under even more pressure. The volume of scans, range of vulnerabilities that need to be addressed and number of patches that need to be applied will all increase.

Adopting best practices for code review and validation will be critical to ensuring the security and integrity of AI-generated code. With security teams already stretched thin, a proactive approach is essential. Integrating security as a foundational element to DevOps processes will help streamline vulnerability management, allowing security teams to reduce their software risk meaningfully and efficiently. Whether implementing employee training or emphasizing rigorous code reviews and validation processes, it’s important that developers proactively support their security teams wherever possible.

2. Paring down code used to support critical infrastructure

The wide range of vulnerabilities stemming from AI development tools will not only affect private businesses, but critical infrastructure as well. Currently, the federal government, specifically the Defense Industrial Base (DIB), is struggling to keep up with vulnerability management. The DIB consists of 300,000 contractors that provide services and technologies to the Department of Defense, yet only 19% have any vulnerability management solutions in place. In 2024, security teams will need to automate tooling, such as vulnerability scanners, that segregate vulnerabilities in the execution path from the rest to reduce the range of issues that they need to address. 

But condensed code is not without its trade-offs. While leaner code can improve system performance, minimize the attack surface, and is easier to maintain, debug and update, it can also compromise readability and may lead to functionality loss or limited flexibility down the line. It’s essential to strike a balance between code-size reduction and maintaining the software’s reliability and security. Conducting risk assessments and continuous monitoring, especially for the most critical portions of infrastructure, embedding security throughout the software development lifecycle (SDLC) and ensuring regulatory requirements are great ways to maintain security in pared-down infrastructure. 

3. Increasing compliance overhead

Speaking of regulatory requirements...

No matter what year it is, compliance requirements continue to evolve and present a wealth of challenges to organizations. In 2023, compliance ends seen in the DoD began to permeate across federal and private industry. This means that the amount of busy work, like compliance type tick-box efforts, required by already overburdened security teams, will continue to increase in 2024. This will likely spur the purchasing of automated security tools to meet these requirements and better manage security team workloads.

Unfortunately, compliance tends to favor adherence to rules while innovation seeks experimentation, often resulting in a clash between the two. Implementing measures, like proactively integrating compliance into new projects, encouraging collaboration between security and development teams, creating a risk-based approach to prioritize critical standards and implementing automated tools to streamline compliance processes will help strike a balance between achieving regulatory requirements and fostering innovation.

Pro tip: ring in the new year with RapidFort 

We know that navigating new and emerging security threats can be overwhelming. You may be thinking that you’ll need to invest in multiple platforms or solutions to reduce your software attack surface, but not with RapidFort. 

The RapidFort platform is the first solution on the market that offers build time CI/CD tools and runtime Kubernetes features that work in unison, helping your organization reduce its attack surface throughout the SDLC and facilitating efficient cooperation between security and development teams. Not to mention, the ability to automatically scan containers and remove unnecessary software components can eliminate software vulnerabilities by up to 99.9%. 

The result? More secure, cost-efficient containers and a significant decrease in vulnerabilities, lightening the load on security teams and streamlining DevSecOps processes.

Ready to ring in the new year with RapidFort? Book a demo with our team today.