A funny thing about tagging LLM use. Most of the tags you put on a commit *increase* confidence in the commit as it traverses the development pipeline, indicating that more people have seen and approve of the work. The email address may have some weight on how much. An Assisted-by tag is more likely to *decrease* confidence in the commit. The model may have some weight on how much.

In this way, using the tag voluntarily is disincentivized. Why would you taint a two line commit as assisted, when nobody will ever be able to tell it was automated in discovery, implementation and/or self-review? As long as you write your own commit messages, many stable patches would be untraceable to an LLM because the solutions are obvious, they were just waiting to be discovered.

Now you're taking credit for technique which you may not be able to demonstrate without your fancy tools. Personally I want to be able to do everything with the stock vim that comes with my distro, because I've spent so much time working on remote machines. Others will try to fake it until they make it, and it's not clear what can or should be done about that.