惯性聚合 高效追踪和阅读你感兴趣的博客、新闻、科技资讯
阅读原文 在惯性聚合中打开

推荐订阅源

WordPress大学
WordPress大学
Cyberwarzone
Cyberwarzone
The GitHub Blog
The GitHub Blog
云风的 BLOG
云风的 BLOG
P
Proofpoint News Feed
小众软件
小众软件
Recent Announcements
Recent Announcements
博客园 - 三生石上(FineUI控件)
Security Archives - TechRepublic
Security Archives - TechRepublic
W
WeLiveSecurity
Cloudbric
Cloudbric
博客园 - 司徒正美
美团技术团队
N
News and Events Feed by Topic
Exploit-DB.com RSS Feed
Exploit-DB.com RSS Feed
PCI Perspectives
PCI Perspectives
宝玉的分享
宝玉的分享
H
Help Net Security
H
Hackread – Cybersecurity News, Data Breaches, AI and More
Google DeepMind News
Google DeepMind News
Help Net Security
Help Net Security
Last Week in AI
Last Week in AI
S
Schneier on Security
N
News | PayPal Newsroom
B
Blog RSS Feed
L
LINUX DO - 最新话题
T
Troy Hunt's Blog
S
Secure Thoughts
雷峰网
雷峰网
aimingoo的专栏
aimingoo的专栏
L
Lohrmann on Cybersecurity
G
Google Developers Blog
Microsoft Azure Blog
Microsoft Azure Blog
Hacker News - Newest:
Hacker News - Newest: "LLM"
T
Tenable Blog
S
Securelist
L
LangChain Blog
Recent Commits to openclaw:main
Recent Commits to openclaw:main
I
InfoQ
H
Heimdal Security Blog
Cisco Talos Blog
Cisco Talos Blog
F
Full Disclosure
Y
Y Combinator Blog
酷 壳 – CoolShell
酷 壳 – CoolShell
K
Kaspersky official blog
T
Tailwind CSS Blog
奇客Solidot–传递最新科技情报
奇客Solidot–传递最新科技情报
钛媒体:引领未来商业与生活新知
钛媒体:引领未来商业与生活新知
阮一峰的网络日志
阮一峰的网络日志
C
Cisco Blogs

LWN.net comments

tcmalloc's weird hack [LWN.net] Fixed? [LWN.net] mpd [LWN.net] Userspace AX.25 [LWN.net] RIP [LWN.net] My two cents... [LWN.net] pipx [LWN.net] Tragedy [LWN.net] A young man destined for glory [LWN.net] And 'less' won't let you search [LWN.net] A great loss [LWN.net] Sad and shocking news [LWN.net] Easy migration from Clementine [LWN.net] Sad coincidence [LWN.net] GNOME is actually usable thanks to Seth et al [LWN.net] Sad news :( [LWN.net] armhf supports preempt_rt [LWN.net] MusicBrainz accurracy [LWN.net] On open source maintainership [LWN.net] Let's stop here [LWN.net] Not a new thing [LWN.net] uv is indeed great pgmoneta Some comments on this on a Postgres blog feed [LWN.net] uv [LWN.net] going to Debian [LWN.net] Upgrading 64-bit-capable systems to 64-bit kernels? [LWN.net] Free Software foundations Maintainers can wait for code review but not for publish review? A reasonably extreme point of view [LWN.net] Maintaining old code Varieties of filesystems and schedulers, so why not for IPC mechanisms too? [LWN.net] AI and documentation [LWN.net] Delegating the work to a subsidiary [LWN.net] Maybe they should provide their reviews to the world [LWN.net] Something can be a bug but not a vulnerability [LWN.net] History is a little backwards ... [LWN.net] A reasonably extreme point of view [LWN.net] Let’s stop here [LWN.net] authd [LWN.net] Suggestion for bug report [LWN.net] Software pain points for long-term equipment [LWN.net] Wrong direction [LWN.net] mjg59 has lost the plot there [LWN.net] Role of German law in this? [LWN.net] Without beer? [LWN.net] Feels soul destroying [LWN.net] No zswap in Debian cloud kernel [LWN.net] No Beer?!? [LWN.net] The other fam [LWN.net] Thank you Andrew [LWN.net] Brave! [LWN.net] I second the cost factor [LWN.net] cassandra [LWN.net] Proprietary tools [LWN.net] familiar [LWN.net] ... is also staging. [LWN.net] Python package managers [LWN.net] Pour one out for AX.25... [LWN.net] tun/tap? [LWN.net] Another article at gnulinux.ch [LWN.net] Transitive checks [LWN.net] Just execute from stdin [LWN.net] Cross-compile Vacation [LWN.net] Concrete steps toward RFC 3550 (new Range types) You can rip with Windows apps too! Have the tempfile issues raised in the release notes been fixed? onlyoffice tried to add stuff in the fine print, and failed Work w/o publication is not science Removing art like offensive fortunes is a mistake. [LWN.net] De-googling (was Wtf) [LWN.net] I liked pdfmark [LWN.net] Juice then tag [LWN.net] why did PREEMPT_LAZY caused more preemptions than PREEMPT_NONE with THP disabled? [LWN.net] x86-64 was first introduced in 2003 [LWN.net] no memory safety? [LWN.net] False positive identification rate [LWN.net] "Defensive" AI use [LWN.net] LTS release? [LWN.net] ironic (ugly, good) [LWN.net] Moving away from LLVM [LWN.net] ironic (ugly, good) [LWN.net] Abandoning vim(1) ASAP [LWN.net] "Picard" naming [LWN.net] circular reasoning is a potential source of unsoundness [LWN.net] Nice to see an update [LWN.net] Writable THPs [LWN.net] Whole network messages [LWN.net] I'll fix my code ... [LWN.net] Can also recommend beets [LWN.net] Jack the CD ripper [LWN.net] How about the bad CDs? [LWN.net] systemd-boot [LWN.net] Significant raise of reports [LWN.net] IMO, it's appropriate [LWN.net] How about the bad CDs? [LWN.net] Update to include Part 4? [LWN.net] Pandoc also is invauable for a cheap-and-dirty retrieval augmented generation. [LWN.net] Whole network messages [LWN.net]
<soapbox> [LWN.net]
mjbommar · 2026-06-16 · via LWN.net comments

That "Assisted-by" guy here :)

For the record, I submitted a patch on 2.6.19 back in December 2006 when the 802.11 softmac stack was young and still broken on my laptop. I think that means I'm technically not a first timer, if anyone is really counting.

That said, your broader point remains. I think we all appreciate the difference between "understanding" something and the ability to recite the call graph with your eyes closed after three beers.

The gap between those two things is real and I don't think most people - myself especially in this context - should pretend to understand the code they submit in the latter sense. That's reserved for the select few whose shoulders we stand on.

But I doubt I'm ruffling too many feathers when I suggest that writing software of any complexity without formal verification (which is often impossible), especially in languages like C, especially when a code base spans many years and many authors and many styles, is practically guaranteed to induce human failure modes.

So I think the real question we ought to be asking, heavily motivated by the impact of LLM's on both the productivity function and the changing nature of offensive security, is how we can help more people like me safely contribute.

Safely can mean a lot of things. Yes, there's the Rust conversation re: memory management. But more broadly, I think it's documentation, testing, processes, and - probably most controversially - a little more convergence of standards, styles, and even, *gasp*, code.

All of these things are tools that transcend the individual maintainer. And in my opinion, much like the smartest, fastest, strongest hominids lost out to the ones who built the best tools and shared that knowledge, we are at a point where competitive dynamics will do the same to us.

P.S.: since I know some of you have asked or wondered about the why, I'll say that rolling up your sleeves and grabbing a shovel feels much better than sitting anxiously and worrying about what happens when frontier models fall into the wrong hands. I still remember when security was about Theo and Linus's latest argument; let's just say, we're not in Kansas anymore.