惯性聚合 高效追踪和阅读你感兴趣的博客、新闻、科技资讯
阅读原文 在惯性聚合中打开

推荐订阅源

F
Full Disclosure
Recorded Future
Recorded Future
T
Tenable Blog
S
Securelist
C
CERT Recently Published Vulnerability Notes
T
Threatpost
S
Schneier on Security
A
Arctic Wolf
The Hacker News
The Hacker News
C
CXSECURITY Database RSS Feed - CXSecurity.com
Know Your Adversary
Know Your Adversary
P
Privacy International News Feed
Threat Intelligence Blog | Flashpoint
Threat Intelligence Blog | Flashpoint
The Register - Security
The Register - Security
Cisco Talos Blog
Cisco Talos Blog
AWS News Blog
AWS News Blog
K
Kaspersky official blog
T
True Tiger Recordings
T
Threat Research - Cisco Blogs
V
Vulnerabilities – Threatpost
P
Palo Alto Networks Blog
T
The Exploit Database - CXSecurity.com
小众软件
小众软件
B
Blog
Cyber Security Advisories - MS-ISAC
Cyber Security Advisories - MS-ISAC
Microsoft Azure Blog
Microsoft Azure Blog
Cyberwarzone
Cyberwarzone
C
Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency CISA
T
Tor Project blog
Spread Privacy
Spread Privacy
Malwarebytes
Malwarebytes
P
Proofpoint News Feed
F
Fox-IT International blog
F
Fortinet All Blogs
P
Privacy & Cybersecurity Law Blog
G
GRAHAM CLULEY
量子位
Latest news
Latest news
OSCHINA 社区最新新闻
OSCHINA 社区最新新闻
博客园 - 叶小钗
Project Zero
Project Zero
T
Tailwind CSS Blog
N
Netflix TechBlog - Medium
Martin Fowler
Martin Fowler
IntelliJ IDEA : IntelliJ IDEA – the Leading IDE for Professional Development in Java and Kotlin | The JetBrains Blog
IntelliJ IDEA : IntelliJ IDEA – the Leading IDE for Professional Development in Java and Kotlin | The JetBrains Blog
I
Intezer
博客园_首页
腾讯CDC
H
Hackread – Cybersecurity News, Data Breaches, AI and More
D
Darknet – Hacking Tools, Hacker News & Cyber Security

LWN.net comments

Surprising What if you just use AI to explore? Nonsense [LWN.net] Nonsense [LWN.net] Revealing [LWN.net] Power trip? [LWN.net] Categorically no. [LWN.net] Editing session recording as a throttling mechanism [LWN.net] Nonsense [LWN.net] Nonsense [LWN.net] Surprising [LWN.net] Surprising [LWN.net] This is bananas. [LWN.net] Nonsense [LWN.net] This isn't just anti-ai, it's also anti-gui [LWN.net] Revealing [LWN.net] Nonsense [LWN.net] Just 12 vulnerabilities? [LWN.net] Nonsense [LWN.net] Editing session recording as a throttling mechanism [LWN.net] Privacy [LWN.net] Surprising [LWN.net] Speedruns do require this [LWN.net] Nonsense [LWN.net] Loss of words Nonsense [LWN.net] This isn't just anti-ai, it's also anti-gui [LWN.net] This seems unwieldy [LWN.net] Proprietary vs open source models [LWN.net] This seems unwieldy [LWN.net] Revealing [LWN.net] Surprising [LWN.net] Just 12 vulnerabilities? [LWN.net] Just 12 vulnerabilities? [LWN.net] Revealing [LWN.net] Revealing [LWN.net] Just 12 vulnerabilities? [LWN.net] Revealing [LWN.net] Proprietary vs open source models [LWN.net] Proprietary vs open source models [LWN.net] Revealing [LWN.net] Generate assembly language directly with -S [LWN.net] Proprietary vs open source models [LWN.net] Proprietary vs open source models [LWN.net] Deriving Documentation and Specifications [LWN.net] Proprietary vs open source models [LWN.net] Proprietary vs open source models [LWN.net] Proprietary vs open source models [LWN.net] Proprietary vs open source models [LWN.net] Good, bad and probabilistic [LWN.net] Proprietary vs open source models [LWN.net] Proprietary vs open source models [LWN.net] Proprietary vs open source models [LWN.net] Proprietary vs open source models [LWN.net] Proprietary vs open source models [LWN.net] Proprietary vs open source models [LWN.net] Proprietary vs open source models [LWN.net] Proprietary vs open source models [LWN.net] Surprising [LWN.net] "Tokens per second" may not be the measure you think it is. [LWN.net] Surprising [LWN.net] Surprising [LWN.net] Surprising [LWN.net] Fundriser there [LWN.net] With hindsight, it was a code smell anyway [LWN.net] Shift in public's attitude [LWN.net] Thought I was the only one [LWN.net] Generate assembly language directly with -S [LWN.net] Opposite of -stable maintainers requests? [LWN.net] Thought I was the only one [LWN.net] Thought I was the only one [LWN.net] Thought I was the only one [LWN.net] Opposite of -stable maintainers requests? [LWN.net] Browser [LWN.net] Browser [LWN.net] Data structures and overhead [LWN.net] With him on this one [LWN.net] With hindsight, it was a code smell anyway [LWN.net] With hindsight, it was a code smell anyway [LWN.net] Be careful what you wish for [LWN.net] Be careful what you wish for [LWN.net] Red Hat are what they are... [LWN.net] Browser [LWN.net] schism status [LWN.net] With hindsight, it was a code smell anyway [LWN.net] Be careful what you wish for [LWN.net] schism status [LWN.net] Bluetooth fixed on my Yogabook [LWN.net] Megapatch [LWN.net] With hindsight, it was a code smell anyway [LWN.net] About isolation and memory errors [LWN.net] With hindsight, it was a code smell anyway [LWN.net] Be careful what you wish for [LWN.net] Browser [LWN.net] Complete opposite [LWN.net] A hurdle for the attacker? [LWN.net] important thing With hindsight, it was a code smell anyway [LWN.net] Intel bug workaround Browser
Surprising [LWN.net]
SLi · 2026-05-27 · via LWN.net comments

Surprising

Posted May 27, 2026 10:45 UTC (Wed) by SLi (subscriber, #53131)
In reply to: Surprising by Wol
Parent article: Comprehensive Response to Bambu's AGPLv3 Violations (Software Freedom Conservancy)
to post comments

Surprising

Posted May 27, 2026 11:15 UTC (Wed) by farnz (subscriber, #17727) [Link]

The additional restriction Bambu Labs appear to be trying to impose is that you cannot publish modified code that, in Bambu's sole opinion, makes it harder for them to control the use of their services, if that code is in any way derived from their AGPLv3 code releases.

They're doing this because it's impossible to distinguish an authorized client from an unauthorized one based solely on observing client behaviour - the overlap between "modified client, using our services in a way we dislike" and "unmodified client, using our services in a way we're content with" is huge, and if they blocked users for misuse of the cloud service in a way that caused them issues, they'd block a large number of customers using the Bambu Labs build of their official application.

So, they're attempting to say that it's not permissible to take the Bambu Labs AGPLv3 source code, and modify it in a way that doesn't also ensure that the client authorization code is modified, nor is it permissible to take the AGPLv3 client authorization code and integrate it with another project - you must not create derivative works of the AGPLv3 code where Bambu Labs deems it an unacceptable modification.