惯性聚合 高效追踪和阅读你感兴趣的博客、新闻、科技资讯
阅读原文 在惯性聚合中打开

推荐订阅源

J
Java Code Geeks
Last Week in AI
Last Week in AI
T
Tailwind CSS Blog
WordPress大学
WordPress大学
B
Blog RSS Feed
T
The Blog of Author Tim Ferriss
F
Fortinet All Blogs
aimingoo的专栏
aimingoo的专栏
MongoDB | Blog
MongoDB | Blog
博客园 - Franky
C
Check Point Blog
P
Proofpoint News Feed
H
Help Net Security
月光博客
月光博客
博客园_首页
Stack Overflow Blog
Stack Overflow Blog
博客园 - 三生石上(FineUI控件)
Martin Fowler
Martin Fowler
Recent Announcements
Recent Announcements
人人都是产品经理
人人都是产品经理
U
Unit 42
美团技术团队
I
InfoQ
A
About on SuperTechFans

LWN.net comments

tcmalloc's weird hack [LWN.net] Fixed? [LWN.net] mpd [LWN.net] Userspace AX.25 [LWN.net] RIP [LWN.net] My two cents... [LWN.net] pipx [LWN.net] Tragedy [LWN.net] A young man destined for glory [LWN.net] And 'less' won't let you search [LWN.net] A great loss [LWN.net] Sad and shocking news [LWN.net] Easy migration from Clementine [LWN.net] Sad coincidence [LWN.net] GNOME is actually usable thanks to Seth et al [LWN.net] Sad news :( [LWN.net] armhf supports preempt_rt [LWN.net] MusicBrainz accurracy [LWN.net] On open source maintainership [LWN.net] Let's stop here [LWN.net] Not a new thing [LWN.net] uv is indeed great pgmoneta Some comments on this on a Postgres blog feed [LWN.net] uv [LWN.net] going to Debian [LWN.net] Upgrading 64-bit-capable systems to 64-bit kernels? [LWN.net] Free Software foundations Maintainers can wait for code review but not for publish review? A reasonably extreme point of view [LWN.net]
Detecting AI obfuscated porting [LWN.net]
khim · 2026-06-02 · via LWN.net comments

Detecting AI obfuscated porting

Posted Jun 2, 2026 9:43 UTC (Tue) by khim (subscriber, #9252)
In reply to: Detecting AI obfuscated porting by sethkush
Parent article: Ombredanne: An AI agent ported our codebase from Python to Rust

That's why I like neurodetector. Try to feed it any of your own works and find something that it would mark as AI!

It's more-or-less impossible to do with any text of substantial size! Yes, it's matter of tuning, but it's heavily tuned to bias into “this is probably human” direction. I have never seen an actual human scoring more than few percents of “maybe AI” there (but yes, advanced models can get up to 50% of “human” marks as a result).