惯性聚合 高效追踪和阅读你感兴趣的博客、新闻、科技资讯
阅读原文 在惯性聚合中打开

推荐订阅源

博客园_首页
Security Archives - TechRepublic
Security Archives - TechRepublic
Application and Cybersecurity Blog
Application and Cybersecurity Blog
cs.CV updates on arXiv.org
cs.CV updates on arXiv.org
C
CERT Recently Published Vulnerability Notes
S
Security @ Cisco Blogs
S
Security Affairs
D
Darknet – Hacking Tools, Hacker News & Cyber Security
L
Lohrmann on Cybersecurity
cs.AI updates on arXiv.org
cs.AI updates on arXiv.org
Hacker News: Ask HN
Hacker News: Ask HN
Forbes - Security
Forbes - Security
H
Heimdal Security Blog
A
Arctic Wolf
NISL@THU
NISL@THU
P
Proofpoint News Feed
W
WeLiveSecurity
S
Schneier on Security
AI
AI
Schneier on Security
Schneier on Security
N
News and Events Feed by Topic
L
LINUX DO - 最新话题
Cisco Talos Blog
Cisco Talos Blog
AWS News Blog
AWS News Blog
Hacker News - Newest:
Hacker News - Newest: "LLM"
Know Your Adversary
Know Your Adversary
Scott Helme
Scott Helme
V
Vulnerabilities – Threatpost
Cyberwarzone
Cyberwarzone
I
Intezer
S
Securelist
Help Net Security
Help Net Security
Microsoft Security Blog
Microsoft Security Blog
量子位
让小产品的独立变现更简单 - ezindie.com
让小产品的独立变现更简单 - ezindie.com
小众软件
小众软件
Last Week in AI
Last Week in AI
Jina AI
Jina AI
OSCHINA 社区最新新闻
OSCHINA 社区最新新闻
WordPress大学
WordPress大学
罗磊的独立博客
月光博客
月光博客
雷峰网
雷峰网
A
About on SuperTechFans
The GitHub Blog
The GitHub Blog
T
The Blog of Author Tim Ferriss
MongoDB | Blog
MongoDB | Blog
大猫的无限游戏
大猫的无限游戏
博客园 - 司徒正美
CTFtime.org: upcoming CTF events
CTFtime.org: upcoming CTF events

Hacker News

Introducing Claude Opus 4.7 Qwen Studio The Future of Everything is Lies, I Guess: Where Do We Go From Here? GitHub - SeanFDZ/macmind: Single-layer transformer in HyperTalk for the classic Macintosh Show HN: Agent-cache – Multi-tier LLM/tool/session caching for Valkey and Redis Moving a large-scale metrics pipeline from StatsD to OpenTelemetry / Prometheus GitHub - Nightmare-Eclipse/RedSun: The Red Sun vulnerability repository GitHub - SethPyle376/hiraeth: Local AWS emulator focused on fast integration testing, with SQS support, SQLite-backed state, and a debug-friendly web UI. GitHub - macOS26/Agent: Any AI, replaces Claude Code, Cursor, OpenClaw. Over 18 LLM providers (Claude, OpenAI, Gemini, Ollama, Zai, HF, Qwen) wired into a native Mac app that writes code, builds Xcode projects, bumps versions, manages git, automates Safari, use AppleScript, JS or Accessibility, extend Agent! w/ MCP Servers, run tasks from your iPhone via Messages. YouTube now lets you turn off Shorts I Made a Terminal Pager Burgers | マクドナルド公式 Commands — HackerNews CLI documentation ChatGPT for Excel PiCore - Raspberry Pi Port of Tiny Core Linux Live Nation illegally monopolized ticketing market, jury finds Google Broke Its Promise to Me. Now ICE Has My Data. Founding Engineer at Adaptional | Y Combinator CRISPR takes important step toward silencing Down syndrome’s extra chromosome GitHub - saffron-health/libretto: The AI toolkit for building reliable browser automations US v. Heppner (S.D.N.Y. 2026) no attorney-client privilege for AI chats [pdf] Unexpected €54k billing spike in 13 hours: Firebase browser key without API restrictions used for Gemini requests Retrofitting JIT Compilers into C Interpreters IPv6 – Google The Accursèd Alphabetical Clock Cybersecurity Looks Like Proof of Work Now Fragments: April 14 Cal.com Goes Closed Source: Why AI Security Is Forcing Our Decision | Cal.com - Scheduling Software for Online Bookings Laravel raised money and now injects ads directly into your agent When moving fast, talking is the first thing to break Too much Discussion of the XOR swap trick – Heather Cafe Introduction to Spherical Harmonics for Graphics Programmers The Grand Line Building a Z-Machine in the worst possible language High-Level Rust: Getting 80% of the Benefits with 20% of the Pain GitHub - duguyue100/midnight-captain: Inspired by Midnight Commander, tailored to my taste. How to build a `git diff` driver · Jamie Tanna | Software Engineer Center for Responsible, Decentralized Intelligence at Berkeley The Local Universe’s Expansion Rate Is Clearer Than Ever, but Still Doesn’t Add Up - A new synthesis of astronomical measurements confirms a persistent mismatch that could point to physics beyond current models The air throughout our homes is infused with microplastics. But there are things you can do to breathe less of them The disturbing white paper Red Hat is trying to erase from the internet – OSnews The Future of Everything is Lies, I Guess: Annoyances ‘Abhorrent’: the inside story of the Polymarket gamblers betting millions on war Productive procrastination — Max van IJsselmuiden maps, territory and LMs 447 Terabytes per Square Centimetre at Zero Retention Energy: Non-Volatile Memory at the Atomic Scale on Fluorographane Show HN: Pardonned.com – A searchable database of US Pardons 20 Years on AWS and Never Not My Job The Seasons are Wrong Artemis II crew splashes down near San Diego after historic moon mission We gave an AI a 3 year retail lease in SF and asked it to make a profit | Andon Labs How a dancer with ALS used brainwaves to perform live On filing the corners off my MacBooks Installing every* Firefox extension OpenClaw’s memory is unreliable, and you don’t know when it will break Steve Blank Nowhere Is Safe Chimpanzees in Uganda locked in vicious 'civil war', say researchers watgo - a WebAssembly Toolkit for Go linux/Documentation/process/coding-assistants.rst at master · torvalds/linux GitHub - callumlocke/json-formatter: Makes JSON easy to read. Founding Product Engineer at Bild AI | Y Combinator A compelling title that is cryptic enough to get you to take action on it GitHub - Keychron/Keychron-Keyboards-Hardware-Design: Industrial design files for Keychron keyboards and mice. 100+ models with CAD assets in STEP, DXF, DWG, and PDF. Source-available, with commercial use allowed for original compatible accessories within the license terms. [ANNOUNCE] WireGuardNT v0.11 and WireGuard for Windows v0.6 Released 1D-Chess Helium Is Hard to Replace Cooperative Vectors Introduction | Evolve Keeping a Postgres queue healthy — PlanetScale Our response to the Axios developer tool compromise Do Americans read print books, e-books or audiobooks more? The Zettelkasten Method in Obsidian: A Practical Setup Guide Artemis II Is Competency Porn and We Are Starving For It WeakC4 Flight Viz — Cockpit View A Mexican surveillance giant you’ve never heard of is now watching the U.S. border Surelock: Deadlock-Free Mutexes for Rust RISC-V 101 – what is it and what does it mean for Canonical? | Ubuntu The Problem That Built an Industry How Much Linear Memory Access Is Enough? | Solidean Investigating Split Locks on x86-64 Simplest hash functions Sybilproof reputation mechanisms (2005) [pdf] What is a property? How Complex is my Code? Static code analysis in Kotlin — tools overview Toffoli gates are all you need PGLite evangelism dcmake: a new CMake debugger UI Clojure on Fennel part one: Persistent Data Structures Fragments: April 2 Python Release Python install manager 26.1 The Life and Death of the Book Review - Liberties Introducing Database Traffic Control — PlanetScale Bitcoin miners are losing $19,000 on every BTC produced as difficulty drops 7.8% God sleeps in the minerals Building slogbox Apple Silicon and Virtual Machines: Beating the 2 VM Limit Who was “Not Even Wrong” first? Pokemon Evolution Vs Darwinian Evolution The APL Programming Language Source Code
NAEP Long-Term Trend Assessment Results: Reading and Mathematics
u1hcw9nx · 2026-04-23 · via Hacker News

Scores decline again for 13-year-old students in reading and mathematics

The National Center for Education Statistics (NCES) administered the NAEP long-term trend (LTT) reading and mathematics assessments to 13-year-old students from October to December of the 2022–23 school year. The average scores for 13-year-olds declined 4 points in reading and 9 points in mathematics compared to the previous assessment administered during the 2019–20 school year. Compared to a decade ago, the average scores declined 7 points in reading and 14 points in mathematics.

Figure Trend in NAEP long-term trend reading and mathematics average scores for 13-year-old students

Display As

Display this data as 'Table' in the menu above for an accessible version of the data represented in this chart.

* Significantly different (p < .05) from 2023.

NOTE: The NAEP long-term trend (LTT) assessment results are reported by the year in which the school year ends. For example, the age 13 assessment was administered during the fall of the 2022–23 school year and results are reported as 2023 LTT at age 13.

This Highlights report compares performance on the NAEP long-term trend reading and mathematics assessments for age 13 students during the 2022–23 school year to previous assessment results, with a focus on results obtained in the 2019–20 school year. Results reflect the performance of a nationally representative sample of 8,700 thirteen-year-olds in each subject. Performance comparisons are based on statistically significant differences between assessment years and between groups. Explore details about the long-term trend assessments and how they differ from main NAEP assessments.

Share this result:

III. Student Learning Experience

Students who took the long-term trend assessments in reading and mathematics during the 2022–23 school year also responded to a survey questionnaire. Students taking the long-term trend reading assessment were asked how often they read for fun on their own time; students taking the long-term trend mathematics assessment were asked which type of mathematics course they were currently taking; and all students were asked about the number of days they had been absent from school in the previous month.

Students’ responses to survey questions provide information with which to compare performance based on their self-reported characteristics and educational experiences. This information may be valuable in helping parents, educators, and policymakers understand what aspects of students’ experiences are related to achievement. Survey questionnaire results, however, do not establish a cause-and-effect relationship between the characteristic or experience and student achievement. NAEP is not designed to identify the causes of performance differences. Numerous factors interact to influence student achievement, including local educational policies and practices, the quality of teachers, and available resources. Such factors may change over time and vary among student groups.

Percentage of students missing 5 or more days of school monthly has doubled since 2020

Students who took the 2023 long-term trend reading and mathematics assessments were asked how many days of school they had missed in the last month. Responses to the survey question for both subjects indicate a decrease in the percentages of 13-year-old students reporting having missed none to 2 days in the past month compared to 2020. Conversely, there were increases in the percentages of 13-year-old students who reported missing 3 or 4 days and students who reported missing 5 or more days in the last month. The percentage of students who reported missing 5 or more days doubled from 5 percent in 2020 to 10 percent in 2023. 

For both reading and mathematics, students with fewer missed school days generally had higher average scores in 2023 than students with more missed school days.

Figure Percentage of 13-year-old students in NAEP long-term trend reading, by number of days student absent from school in a month: 2020 and 2023

Display As

Fourteen percent of students report reading for fun almost every day, lower than previous years

In 2023, fourteen percent of students reported reading for fun almost every day. This percentage was 3 percentage points lower than 2020, and 13 percentage points lower than 2012. Overall, the percentage of 13-year-old students who reported reading for fun almost every day was lower in 2023 than in all previous assessment years. 

The average reading score in 2023 for those students who reported reading for fun on their own almost every day was 275, which was higher than the scores for students who reported other levels of frequency for reading on their own time. See a data table with average score results. 

Figure Trend in percentages of 13-year-old students in NAEP long-term trend reading, by how often they read for fun on their own time

Display As

0

Legend

*Significantly different (p < .05) from 2023.

NOTE: The NAEP long-term trend (LTT) assessment results are reported by the year in which the school year ends. For example, the age 13 assessment was administered during the fall of the 2022–23 school year and results are reported as 2023 LTT at age 13.

Compared to their lower-performing peers, larger percentage of higher-performing students report more frequently reading for fun

Fifty-one percent of 13-year-old students scoring at or above the 75th percentile in 2023 reported that they read for fun on their own time at least once a week, whereas 28 percent of 13-year-old students scoring below the 25th percentile reported doing so. The percentage of students who reported reading for fun on their own time once or twice a month was also larger for students at or above the 75th percentile. Conversely, the percentages of students who reported reading less frequently—a few times a year or never or hardly ever—were larger for students performing below the 25th percentile.

Figure Percentage of 13-year-old students in NAEP long-term trend reading, by selected percentiles and by how often they read for fun on their own time: 2023

How often do you read for fun on your own time?

Proportion of

lower-performing students (below 25th percentile)

Proportion of

higher-performing students (at or above 75th percentile)

At least once a week28%*51%
Once or twice a month13%*18%
A few times a year16%*13%
Never or hardly ever42%*17%

* Significantly different (p < .05) from students performing at or above the 75th percentile.

NOTE: The NAEP long-term trend (LTT) assessment results are reported by the year in which the school year ends. For example, the age 13 assessment was administered during the fall of the 2022–23 school year and results are reported as 2023 LTT at age 13.

Smaller percentage of students report taking algebra compared to a decade ago, but no change from 2020

Students were asked, "What kind of mathematics are you taking this year?" and were given five response options: I am not taking mathematics this year; regular mathematics; pre-algebra; algebra; and other. Compared to 2020, there were no significant changes in the percentages of students by type of mathematics taken during the 2022–23 school year.

Compared to 2012, however, the percentage of 13-year-old students in 2023 who reported they were taking regular mathematics increased from 28 to 42 percent, while the percentage of students taking pre-algebra decreased from 29 to 22 percent, and the percentage of students taking algebra dropped from 34 to 24 percent. 

Average scores were lower in 2023 for all types of mathematics courses presented compared to 2020. See a data table with average score results.

Figure Trend in percentages of 13-year-old students in NAEP long-term trend mathematics, by type of mathematics taken during the school year

Display As

0

Legend

*Significantly different (p < .05) from 2023.

NOTE: The NAEP long-term trend (LTT) assessment results are reported by the year in which the school year ends. For example, the age 13 assessment was administered during the fall of the 2022–23 school year and results are reported as 2023 LTT at age 13.

Compared to their lower-performing peers, larger percentage of higher-performing 13-year-old students report taking algebra 

Forty-four percent of 13-year-old students scoring at or above the 75th percentile in 2023 reported that they were taking algebra during the 2022–23 school year, whereas 10 percent of students scoring below the 25th percentile reported doing so. There was no significant difference between the percentages of lower- and higher-performing 13-year-old students who reported currently taking pre-algebra. The percentage of students who reported taking regular mathematics was higher for students performing below the 25th percentile: Fifty-two percent of lower performers reported taking regular mathematics compared to 23 percent of higher-performing students who reported doing so.

Figure Percentage of 13-year-old students in NAEP long-term trend mathematics, by selected percentiles and by type of mathematics taken during the school year: 2023

What kind of mathematics are you taking this year?

Proportion of

lower-performing students (below 25th percentile)

Proportion of

higher-performing students (at or above 75th percentile)

Not taking mathematics8%*#
Regular mathematics52%*23%
Pre-algebra17%21%
Algebra10%*44%
Other12%12%

# Rounds to zero.

* Significantly different (p < .05) from students performing at or above the 75th percentile.

NOTE: The NAEP long-term trend (LTT) assessment results are reported by the year in which the school year ends. For example, the age 13 assessment was administered during the fall of the 2022–23 school year and results are reported as 2023 LTT at age 13.

Share this result:

IV. Explore More Long-Term Trend Data

Generate custom tables for age 13 students in NAEP long-term trend reading and mathematics across all assessment years.

Mathematics

Average Score and Percentages

All students

Share this result:

V. More About the Age 13 Assessment Content and Sample

Since the 1970s, the NAEP long-term trend assessments have been administered to monitor the academic performance of students across three age levels (9-, 13-, and 17-year-old students). This report mainly focuses on the comparison of age 13 students (typically in grade 8) between 2020 and 2023. A report card summarizing results for 9- and 13-year-old students across all administrations back to the 1970s is forthcoming.