惯性聚合 高效追踪和阅读你感兴趣的博客、新闻、科技资讯
阅读原文 在惯性聚合中打开

推荐订阅源

酷 壳 – CoolShell
酷 壳 – CoolShell
H
Hacker News: Front Page
P
Palo Alto Networks Blog
T
ThreatConnect
Apple Machine Learning Research
Apple Machine Learning Research
博客园_首页
T
True Tiger Recordings
P
Privacy & Cybersecurity Law Blog
B
Blog
IT之家
IT之家
Last Week in AI
Last Week in AI
F
Full Disclosure
Hacker News: Ask HN
Hacker News: Ask HN
C
Comments on: Blog
Microsoft Azure Blog
Microsoft Azure Blog
C
Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency CISA
Microsoft Security Blog
Microsoft Security Blog
博客园 - 【当耐特】
N
News and Events Feed by Topic
NISL@THU
NISL@THU
腾讯CDC
雷峰网
雷峰网
Security Latest
Security Latest
李成银的技术随笔
M
Microsoft Research Blog - Microsoft Research
L
LangChain Blog
L
Lohrmann on Cybersecurity
cs.CL updates on arXiv.org
cs.CL updates on arXiv.org
C
Check Point Blog
Y
Y Combinator Blog
Recent Announcements
Recent Announcements
博客园 - Franky
N
News | PayPal Newsroom
V
V2EX
A
About on SuperTechFans
The Register - Security
The Register - Security
月光博客
月光博客
奇客Solidot–传递最新科技情报
奇客Solidot–传递最新科技情报
Google Online Security Blog
Google Online Security Blog
MyScale Blog
MyScale Blog
Cisco Talos Blog
Cisco Talos Blog
Vercel News
Vercel News
WordPress大学
WordPress大学
C
Cyber Attacks, Cyber Crime and Cyber Security
The Hacker News
The Hacker News
IntelliJ IDEA : IntelliJ IDEA – the Leading IDE for Professional Development in Java and Kotlin | The JetBrains Blog
IntelliJ IDEA : IntelliJ IDEA – the Leading IDE for Professional Development in Java and Kotlin | The JetBrains Blog
爱范儿
爱范儿
A
Arctic Wolf
L
LINUX DO - 最新话题
freeCodeCamp Programming Tutorials: Python, JavaScript, Git & More

Datadog | The Monitor blog

Reduce CVE noise with OpenVEX assessments in Datadog How we made a SQL query optimization agent 59% more accurate using autoresearch and LLM Observability How to audit and clean up monitors effectively Diagnose slow PostgreSQL queries faster with explain plan correlation Explore Datadog metrics with Natural Language Queries Toto 2.0: Time series forecasting enters the scaling era Simplify micro-frontend observability with Datadog RUM Attribute AI costs across providers with Datadog Cloud Cost Management Diagnose and resolve database performance issues faster with Database Investigator Datadog for Government achieves FedRAMP® High certification Analyze cloud costs with flexible spreadsheets in Datadog Sheets Inside Datadog’s AI Research Lab: Meet two PhD candidates behind Toto Connect triage and investigation in a single workflow with Datadog Cloud SIEM This Month in Datadog - April 2026 Monitor and optimize Supabase query performance with Datadog Database Monitoring Add dynamically updating context to logs with Reference Tables and Observability Pipelines Introducing ARFBench: A time series question-answering benchmark based on real incidents The product signal latency gap slowing your growth Test network paths with TCP, UDP, and ICMP in Datadog Turn developer feedback into operational insight with Datadog Forms and Sheets How to investigate cloud credential compromise with Bits AI Security Analyst Evaluate, optimize, and secure your Google Cloud AI stack with Datadog Bringing observability data hosting to the UK on AWS Identify and fix code issues faster with Datadog’s Azure DevOps Source Code integration Steganography at scale: Embedding share URLs in Datadog widget screenshots Every team should be A/B testing Centralize observability management with Datadog Governance Console Spotting CI/CD misconfigurations before the bots do: Securing GitHub Actions with Datadog IaC Security Route OTel data from AI apps to ClickHouse and Datadog using Observability Pipelines Manage service tracing across hosts with Single Step Instrumentation rules Offline evaluation for AI agents: Best practices Detect runtime threats in Python Lambda functions with Datadog AAP Introducing our open source AI-native SAST Instrument and monitor Boomi integration flows with OpenTelemetry and Datadog Not all index scans are equal: How we cut query latency by over 99% Platform engineering metrics: What to measure and what to ignore Integrate Recorded Future threat intelligence with Datadog Cloud SIEM CI/CD security: threat modeling using a MITRE-style threat matrix CI/CD security: How to secure your GitHub ecosystem Ingress NGINX is EOL: A practical guide for migrating to Kubernetes Gateway API How we built a real-world evaluation platform for autonomous SRE agents at scale Operating agentic AI with Amazon Bedrock AgentCore and Datadog LLM Observability: Lessons from NTT DATA Introducing the Datadog Code Security MCP Capture and analyze custom heatmaps in Session Replay Understand session replays faster with AI summaries and smart chapters Monitor ClickHouse query performance with Datadog Database Monitoring How we designed empathetic alert sounds for on-call engineers Search and act across Datadog to resolve issues faster with Bits Assistant Measure the business impact of every product change with Datadog Experiments Analyzing round trip query latency Configuring JavaScript caches for better performance Introducing Bits AI Dev Agent for Code Security Datadog achieves ISO 42001 certification for responsible AI Monitor Nutanix clusters, hosts, and VMs with Datadog Monitor Juniper Mist in Datadog A new Host Map for modern infrastructure When upserts don't update but still write: Debugging Postgres performance at scale Annotate traces to improve LLM quality with Datadog LLM Observability What's new in Cloud SIEM: AI-powered investigations, enhanced threat intelligence, and scalable security operations Explore Kubernetes with native OpenTelemetry data Monitor Oracle Fusion Cloud Applications with Datadog Announcing the Datadog Terraform provider v4.0.0 Scaling Kubernetes workloads on custom metrics How to design cloud environments for AI-powered threat analysis Monitor Aruba Central in Datadog How we centralize and remediate risks with Datadog Case Management Accelerate incident response with Datadog and ServiceNow Monitor your application and network load balancer logs Understanding Karpenter architecture for Kubernetes autoscaling Tools for collecting metrics and logs from Karpenter Monitor Karpenter with Datadog What your product data is actually saying Key metrics for monitoring Karpenter Securing Datadog's platform in the AI age: The role of observability data Closing the verification loop: Observability-driven harnesses for building with agents When an AI agent came knocking: Catching malicious contributions in Datadog’s open source repos Closing the verification loop, Part 2: Fully autonomous optimization Four ways engineering teams use the Datadog MCP Server to power AI agents Approaching your observability migration with the right mindset Meet the new Bits AI SRE: Deeper reasoning, twice as fast Designing MCP tools for agents: Lessons from building Datadog's MCP server Key learnings from the 2026 State of DevSecOps study Use plain English to query your multi-cloud infrastructure in Resource Catalog Simplifying troubleshooting across the user journey with Datadog Synthetic Monitoring Protect your OCI resources with Datadog Cloud Security This Month in Datadog - February 2026 Fine-tune Toto for turbocharged forecasts Amazon EC2 security: How misconfigured and public AMIs expand your cloud attack surface Enable end-to-end visibility into your Java apps with a single command Measure and improve mobile app startup performance with Datadog RUM Evaluating our AI Guard application to improve quality and control cost Identify untested code across every level of your codebase Make use of guardrail metrics and stop babysitting your releases Monitor Versa Networks SD-WAN performance in Datadog How we reduced the size of our Agent Go binaries by up to 77% Improve performance and reliability with APM Recommendations Remediate transitive vulnerabilities faster with Datadog Software Composition Analysis Generate audit-ready vulnerability and compliance reports with Datadog Sheets Monitor Fortinet FortiManager performance in Datadog Improve test coverage across codebases with Datadog Code Coverage
Monitor Claude usage and cost data with Datadog Cloud Cost Management
2025-08-18 · via Datadog | The Monitor blog
Patrick Krieger

Patrick Krieger

David Pointeau

David Pointeau

Bo Huang

Bo Huang

Managing the cost of foundation models is a critical challenge as AI adoption surges, particularly for teams using powerful models like Anthropic’s Claude Opus and Claude Sonnet. Growing teams generate larger prompt volumes and escalating model complexity, making it difficult to have clear visibility, accountability, and control of cloud AI spending. Cost data typically lives in financial tooling that’s disconnected from application and infrastructure workflows, which acts as a further barrier for engineers to correlate spend allocation, investigations, and real-time optimizations.

Our native integration with Anthropic and LLM Observability lets you monitor, troubleshoot, and secure your Anthropic LLM applications. Now, Datadog Cloud Cost Management (CCM) integrates with the Anthropic Usage and Cost Admin API, which is releasing in tandem with our integration, enabling you to ingest Claude usage and cost data directly into your existing dashboards, reports, and monitors. With CCM, organizations can understand the total cost of their services—including cloud, SaaS, and now Claude—so they can allocate every dollar, empower engineers to manage spend, and optimize usage with confidence.

In this post, we’ll show you how to:

Break down Claude usage and cost by model, workspace, and team

Tracking usage becomes difficult when teams increasingly integrate LLMs into their systems, as raw data is often inconsistent, complex, and lacks a unified schema. This fragmented data limits analysis, inhibits cost governance, and weakens automated monitors or reports.

In Datadog, Claude usage and cost data is normalized using the FinOps Foundation’s FOCUS format and becomes immediately available in CCM dashboards, reports, and monitors. This lets you answer key questions: Which models or workspaces are generating the most cost? Are workloads using the right service tier (Standard, Batch, or Priority)? Are teams effectively using caching or ephemeral sessions? What’s the cost breakdown between Claude Opus and Claude Sonnet?

Monitor for unexpected Anthropic token, cost, and usage spikes.

The integration surfaces granular usage data grouped by model, workspace, API key, and service tier. This includes:

  • Input and output token counts per model (e.g., Claude Opus 4, Claude Sonnet 3.5)
  • Service tier usage (Standard, Priority, Batch)
  • Cache hit rates (ephemeral tokens, cache reads)
  • Code execution and web search activity

This data is available out of the box in a prebuilt Anthropic dashboard, providing a daily view into usage and cost across your organization.

Monitor for unexpected Anthropic token spikes.

For instance, let’s say you’re interested in the token usage of a workspace so you can find ways to cut down on unnecessary spend. The Anthropic Usage and Costs dashboard highlights token usage over time, top token consumers by model, and specific token usage metrics to help you pinpoint the model, workspace, or service that could be optimized. By identifying peak usage periods and patterns, you can potentially implement request queuing during high-demand times, helping you to cut down on unnecessary costs. Going a step further, you can also set alerts on specific workspaces or models that you know experience increased usage during different hours.

With built-in support for FOCUS, CCM also automatically maps Claude costs to your organization’s tagging structure and service ownership. This allows you to group spend by workspace, API key, or team and allocate cost across multiple LLMs and service tiers. Further, you can attribute usage to specific services or products and incorporate AI usage into your unit economics.

View costs directly in the dashboard.
View costs directly in the dashboard.

The CCM Explorer gives teams a summary of Claude costs by model, workspace, service, and other important tags. This view also includes the change in costs—both monetary and by percentage—over a period of time, helping you quickly scan the models or workspaces that have the largest recent cost changes.

View costs by model and workspace.

Clicking into a specific summary, you get a more detailed look into the top cost changes of a particular model over time. You can also see the associated teams and tags of the model or workspace, letting you know who owns the service if you have any questions or concerns. From here, you can pivot to a notebook to investigate any anomalous cost changes further or set up a monitor to proactively alert on similar changes for the future.

Create a cost monitor or other alert for a particular model.

By aligning usage with ownership, you can establish accountability across engineering, FinOps, and finance teams.

Monitor and alert on cost anomalies

Once Claude data is flowing into Datadog, you can immediately set alerts for cost and usage data with prebuilt monitor templates. These include alerting on abnormally low cache hit ratio, abnormally high token usage, and when token usage is approaching the rate limit. You can also create custom monitors and alerts to track usage patterns and detect anomalies. This can include sudden increases in token volume, unexpected spend spikes from specific workspaces, and decreases in cache efficiency, along with changes in service tier usage (e.g., a shift to the Priority tier).

Explore a cost change summary for a particular model.

You can also define unit economics like cost per end user, per token, or per inference and use these to forecast, budget, and govern AI spend more effectively.

Understand Claude usage alongside total service cost

Claude usage is just one part of the cost equation for your broader systems. With Datadog CCM, you can correlate dashboards and monitors for Claude spend with infrastructure metrics, application telemetry data, and other cloud service costs, all from the same platform.

This makes it easier to investigate cost anomalies alongside performance issues, identify inefficient deployments or misrouted workloads, and understand how LLM usage contributes to overall service cost. By bringing Claude data into the same observability workflows you already use, you can make informed decisions faster and optimize your AI investments with confidence.

For example, let’s say an APM monitor triggers an alert for increased latency for a particular model, and traces show a delay from a Claude SDK call. You also notice on your Claude Usage and Costs dashboard that spend has spiked within the same time period along with logs showing increased prompt sizes. By correlating your APM traces and Claude cost data, you can roll back recent changes that caused the spike in latency and cost.

Monitor Claude usage with Datadog CCM

With Claude cost and usage data available in Datadog, teams can track AI spend as part of their everyday workflows without switching tools or waiting on monthly reports. You can investigate spikes, allocate spend accurately, and make informed decisions about how to optimize LLM usage across your organization.

To get started, navigate to the Anthropic integration tile in the Datadog app, add your account name, and create an API token. Once configured, Datadog will automatically ingest detailed Claude usage and cost data via the Anthropic Usage and Cost Admin API. For more information, visit the Anthropic integration tile in the Datadog app or check out the CCM documentation. If you’re new to Datadog, you can start a 14-day free trial.