惯性聚合 高效追踪和阅读你感兴趣的博客、新闻、科技资讯
阅读原文 在惯性聚合中打开

推荐订阅源

V
Vulnerabilities – Threatpost
T
The Blog of Author Tim Ferriss
S
SegmentFault 最新的问题
D
DataBreaches.Net
博客园_首页
罗磊的独立博客
B
Blog
T
Threat Research - Cisco Blogs
C
Cisco Blogs
GbyAI
GbyAI
Engineering at Meta
Engineering at Meta
WordPress大学
WordPress大学
G
GRAHAM CLULEY
H
Help Net Security
酷 壳 – CoolShell
酷 壳 – CoolShell
Cyber Security Advisories - MS-ISAC
Cyber Security Advisories - MS-ISAC
爱范儿
爱范儿
SecWiki News
SecWiki News
T
Threatpost
钛媒体:引领未来商业与生活新知
钛媒体:引领未来商业与生活新知
Schneier on Security
Schneier on Security
T
The Exploit Database - CXSecurity.com
Google Online Security Blog
Google Online Security Blog
T
Tor Project blog
小众软件
小众软件
让小产品的独立变现更简单 - ezindie.com
让小产品的独立变现更简单 - ezindie.com
Y
Y Combinator Blog
H
Hacker News: Front Page
V
V2EX
Security Latest
Security Latest
Cloudbric
Cloudbric
Simon Willison's Weblog
Simon Willison's Weblog
Attack and Defense Labs
Attack and Defense Labs
D
Darknet – Hacking Tools, Hacker News & Cyber Security
P
Proofpoint News Feed
博客园 - 三生石上(FineUI控件)
NISL@THU
NISL@THU
S
Secure Thoughts
Blog — PlanetScale
Blog — PlanetScale
博客园 - 司徒正美
V2EX - 技术
V2EX - 技术
Vercel News
Vercel News
P
Palo Alto Networks Blog
IT之家
IT之家
MyScale Blog
MyScale Blog
有赞技术团队
有赞技术团队
Application and Cybersecurity Blog
Application and Cybersecurity Blog
D
Docker
Google DeepMind News
Google DeepMind News
Webroot Blog
Webroot Blog

Datadog | The Monitor blog

Introducing our open source AI-native SAST Instrument and monitor Boomi integration flows with OpenTelemetry and Datadog Not all index scans are equal: How we cut query latency by over 99% Platform engineering metrics: What to measure and what to ignore Integrate Recorded Future threat intelligence with Datadog Cloud SIEM CI/CD security: threat modeling using a MITRE-style threat matrix CI/CD security: How to secure your GitHub ecosystem Ingress NGINX is EOL: A practical guide for migrating to Kubernetes Gateway API Operating agentic AI with Amazon Bedrock AgentCore and Datadog LLM Observability: Lessons from NTT DATA Introducing the Datadog Code Security MCP Capture and analyze custom heatmaps in Session Replay Understand session replays faster with AI summaries and smart chapters Monitor ClickHouse query performance with Datadog Database Monitoring How we designed empathetic alert sounds for on-call engineers Search and act across Datadog to resolve issues faster with Bits Assistant Measure the business impact of every product change with Datadog Experiments Analyzing round trip query latency Configuring JavaScript caches for better performance Introducing Bits AI Dev Agent for Code Security Datadog achieves ISO 42001 certification for responsible AI Monitor Nutanix clusters, hosts, and VMs with Datadog Monitor Juniper Mist in Datadog A new Host Map for modern infrastructure Annotate traces to improve LLM quality with Datadog LLM Observability What’s new in Cloud SIEM: AI-powered investigations, enhanced threat intelligence, and scalable security operations Explore Kubernetes with native OpenTelemetry data Monitor Oracle Fusion Cloud Applications with Datadog Announcing the Datadog Terraform provider v4.0.0 Scaling Kubernetes workloads on custom metrics How to design cloud environments for AI-powered threat analysis Monitor Aruba Central in Datadog How we centralize and remediate risks with Datadog Case Management Accelerate incident response with Datadog and ServiceNow Monitor your application and network load balancer logs Understanding Karpenter architecture for Kubernetes autoscaling Tools for collecting metrics and logs from Karpenter Monitor Karpenter with Datadog What your product data is actually saying Key metrics for monitoring Karpenter Securing Datadog’s platform in the AI age: The role of observability data Four ways engineering teams use the Datadog MCP Server to power AI agents Approaching your observability migration with the right mindset Meet the new Bits AI SRE: Deeper reasoning, twice as fast Key learnings from the 2026 State of DevSecOps study Use plain English to query your multi-cloud infrastructure in Resource Catalog Simplifying troubleshooting across the user journey with Datadog Synthetic Monitoring Protect your OCI resources with Datadog Cloud Security This Month in Datadog - February 2026 Amazon EC2 security: How misconfigured and public AMIs expand your cloud attack surface Enable end-to-end visibility into your Java apps with a single command Measure and improve mobile app startup performance with Datadog RUM Evaluating our AI Guard application to improve quality and control cost Identify untested code across every level of your codebase Make use of guardrail metrics and stop babysitting your releases Monitor Versa Networks SD-WAN performance in Datadog Improve performance and reliability with APM Recommendations Remediate transitive vulnerabilities faster with Datadog Software Composition Analysis Generate audit-ready vulnerability and compliance reports with Datadog Sheets Monitor Fortinet FortiManager performance in Datadog Improve test coverage across codebases with Datadog Code Coverage Move fast, don’t break things: Consistent testing standards at scale Enrich logs with ServiceNow CMDB context before routing to any SIEM or logging tool Monitor Lustre with Datadog Make faster, better product decisions with Datadog Product Analytics Surface and remediate runtime posture issues with Workload Protection Findings Protect agentic AI applications with Datadog AI Guard How to optimize JavaScript code with CSS Trace Google Pub/Sub workloads in Cloud Run with Datadog Detect human names in logs with ML in Sensitive Data Scanner How we cut our NLQ agent debugging time from hours to minutes with LLM Observability Debug PostgreSQL query latency faster with EXPLAIN ANALYZE in Datadog Database Monitoring Datadog acquires Propolis Unify and correlate frontend and backend data with retention filters Scale compliance across global frameworks with Datadog Cloud Security Monitor Arista VeloCloud SD-WAN performance with Datadog Building reliable dashboard agents with Datadog LLM Observability Simplify log collection and aggregation for MSSPs with Datadog Observability Pipelines Mitigation for Node.js denial-of-service vulnerability affecting Datadog APM Automate flaky test fixes with the Bits AI Dev Agent and Test Optimization How we built an AI SRE agent that investigates like a team of engineers Datadog integrations 2025 recap: Observability for AI, security, and hybrid cloud Design effective executive dashboards with Datadog Implement dbt data quality checks with dbt-expectations Bring faster visibility into AWS Lambda functions with remote instrumentation Troubleshoot faster with the GitLab Source Code integration in Datadog How Cambia Health Solutions saved $30,000 monthly with Cloud Cost Management and the Datadog Resource Catalog Normalize any logs for Cloud SIEM with Datadog's OCSF processor Optimizing Datadog at scale: Cost-efficient observability at Zendesk Detect, diagnose, and resolve network issues easily with CNM Network Health Connect engineering errors to user impact in early-stage products Cilium configuration for Kubernetes operations at scale Designing feedback loops for progressive delivery Ship features faster and safer with Datadog Feature Flags Choosing the right OpenTelemetry Collector distribution Route your monitor alerts with Datadog monitor notification rules Automate Cloud SIEM investigations with Bits AI Security Analyst Cloud threat detection: How to identify risky activity across control and data planes Collecting Kafka performance metrics Monitoring Kafka with Datadog Monitoring Kafka performance metrics
Resilience, DevSecOps, and other key takeaways from RSAC 2021
2021-07-15 · via Datadog | The Monitor blog
Huxley Barbee

Huxley Barbee

Emilio Escobar

Emilio Escobar

For the first time in its 30-year history, the 2021 RSA Conference was a virtual-only event, and not in its usual time during the spring. But, with 20,000 registrants joining for the various sessions, it was a testament to this year’s conference theme of resilience.

One continuing trend we saw from the sessions is the marketplace’s sustained demand for the convergence of operational visibility and security. This demand was clear from discussions on the rise of the chief product security officer (CPSO) and DevSecOps. There still doesn’t seem to be a generally accepted definition of DevSecOps, but everybody is talking about it anyway. Whatever term or title you use, it was clear from the sessions that the drive to shift security left into DevOps release cycles is continuing to grow.

The challenges of unifying security and DevOps

Good software development practices, such as modularization (e.g., microservices in many cases), can indirectly benefit security. However, when it comes to promoting collaboration between security and DevOps, the majority of discussion at the RSA Conference sessions revolved around two key points. The first is promoting shared visibility and tooling between the two groups, down to the hands-on-keyboard level. The second is helping each function understand the other. But, in spite of the market demand and industry trend, other sessions indicated that the divide between DevOps and security mindsets still seems as wide as ever.

One gripe that security often has with DevOps is the use of automation and infrastructure-as-code, which can quickly replicate misconfigurations that create attack surfaces at scale. An overarching definition of attack surface management (ASM) that we heard was that it is the continuous discovery, inventory, classification, prioritization, and security monitoring of external digital assets that contain, transmit, or process sensitive data. When it comes to the cloud and thinking of security as operating from within—that is, providing security with unified visibility and internal access across the operating environment—this essentially means Cloud Security Misconfigurations. “Operating from within” is key, as it often implies security working hand-in-hand with DevOps.

Security visibility needs to be at cloud scale

A number of speakers quoted statistics that more than half of cloud breaches are a result of misconfigurations. It would not surprise us if those numbers are accurate. With current offensive security tools, it is possible to scan the entire internet for known exploits in under an hour, making exploitation of a misconfiguration all but a certainty. What does surprise us, however, is how preventable these misconfigurations are. Organizations are not just unlocking their doors but throwing them wide open.

You can’t protect what you don’t know about; up-to-date and comprehensive asset management is a prerequisite for ASM. Beyond that, the next challenge is twofold. One is being able to aggregate findings about your security posture across multiple environments (especially multiple clouds) into meaningful groups. Two is avoiding the alert fatigue that arises from continuous configuration scans, especially when it comes to cloud scale.

Defense in depth is paramount

Another common thread that this year’s RSA Conference’s sessions on ASM brought to the foreground is the focus on defending against the infiltration phase of an attack. Notably, one session discussed the dichotomy between the industry’s emphasis on infiltration versus lateral movement and exfiltration. That is, the security industry tends to prioritize safeguarding against attackers’ initial efforts to gain access to your system rather than what to do once they’re already in. A lot of offensive technology and innovation is focused on scanners, phishing support, and the like. There is far less “off-the-shelf” security tooling for detecting the execution of movement across networks or privilege escalation beyond standard operating system utilities. And the sophistication of what is available can be minimal; you can get commercial support on Metasploit, but for a rootkit your support option is GitHub.

Tooling is created to meet demand, and it would appear that offensive actors tend not to need this post-infiltration tooling as frequently. Perhaps this is a reflection of the slow pace and difficulty teams have in adopting a Zero-Trust security policy throughout their environments. Regardless, it is beneficial for defenders to leverage detection controls within the perimeter of their environments, where attackers may not have as many capabilities for evading detection or obfuscation. The concept of defense in depth—implementing security at multiple layers of your environment—remains relevant.

Ultimately, each topic we touched on—breaking down divisions between DevOps and security, reducing attack surfaces, and maintaining defense in depth—all tie back to this year’s theme for the conference, resilience. A company that does not silo security and technology innovation has increased resilience and is able to proactively mitigate risks and respond to the unknown. Likewise, ASM is a preventative measure while defense in depth mitigates post-infiltration risk exposure. Both of these enhance an organization’s resilience.

Unified, full-stack cloud security with Datadog

One way to support resilience is through Datadog Security, which provides full-stack security for virtualized production environments and promotes collaboration between DevOps and security teams toward shared goals. The platform includes Datadog Cloud Security Misconfigurations, which supports ASM for the cloud but from an internal perspective through continuous configuration audits across cloud accounts, hosts, and containers. Out-of-the-box executive reporting provides summaries that minimize alert fatigue while at the same time delivering posture snapshots, not just for right now but also points in the past.

Datadog Security also provides Workload Protection, which gives you real-time eBPF-powered threat detection across your hosts and containers to identify suspicious activity that may be indicative of post-infiltration motions. Along with Datadog Cloud SIEM, which provides real-time threat detection across operational and security logs, Datadog Security provides unified visibility across your environment to counter the latest trends we’ve seen at the RSA Conference.