惯性聚合 高效追踪和阅读你感兴趣的博客、新闻、科技资讯
阅读原文 在惯性聚合中打开

推荐订阅源

酷 壳 – CoolShell
酷 壳 – CoolShell
H
Hacker News: Front Page
P
Palo Alto Networks Blog
T
ThreatConnect
Apple Machine Learning Research
Apple Machine Learning Research
博客园_首页
T
True Tiger Recordings
P
Privacy & Cybersecurity Law Blog
B
Blog
IT之家
IT之家
Last Week in AI
Last Week in AI
F
Full Disclosure
Hacker News: Ask HN
Hacker News: Ask HN
C
Comments on: Blog
Microsoft Azure Blog
Microsoft Azure Blog
C
Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency CISA
Microsoft Security Blog
Microsoft Security Blog
博客园 - 【当耐特】
N
News and Events Feed by Topic
NISL@THU
NISL@THU
腾讯CDC
雷峰网
雷峰网
Security Latest
Security Latest
李成银的技术随笔
M
Microsoft Research Blog - Microsoft Research
L
LangChain Blog
L
Lohrmann on Cybersecurity
cs.CL updates on arXiv.org
cs.CL updates on arXiv.org
C
Check Point Blog
Y
Y Combinator Blog
Recent Announcements
Recent Announcements
博客园 - Franky
N
News | PayPal Newsroom
V
V2EX
A
About on SuperTechFans
The Register - Security
The Register - Security
月光博客
月光博客
奇客Solidot–传递最新科技情报
奇客Solidot–传递最新科技情报
Google Online Security Blog
Google Online Security Blog
MyScale Blog
MyScale Blog
Cisco Talos Blog
Cisco Talos Blog
Vercel News
Vercel News
WordPress大学
WordPress大学
C
Cyber Attacks, Cyber Crime and Cyber Security
The Hacker News
The Hacker News
IntelliJ IDEA : IntelliJ IDEA – the Leading IDE for Professional Development in Java and Kotlin | The JetBrains Blog
IntelliJ IDEA : IntelliJ IDEA – the Leading IDE for Professional Development in Java and Kotlin | The JetBrains Blog
爱范儿
爱范儿
A
Arctic Wolf
L
LINUX DO - 最新话题
freeCodeCamp Programming Tutorials: Python, JavaScript, Git & More

Datadog | The Monitor blog

Reduce CVE noise with OpenVEX assessments in Datadog How we made a SQL query optimization agent 59% more accurate using autoresearch and LLM Observability How to audit and clean up monitors effectively Diagnose slow PostgreSQL queries faster with explain plan correlation Explore Datadog metrics with Natural Language Queries Toto 2.0: Time series forecasting enters the scaling era Simplify micro-frontend observability with Datadog RUM Attribute AI costs across providers with Datadog Cloud Cost Management Diagnose and resolve database performance issues faster with Database Investigator Datadog for Government achieves FedRAMP® High certification Analyze cloud costs with flexible spreadsheets in Datadog Sheets Inside Datadog’s AI Research Lab: Meet two PhD candidates behind Toto Connect triage and investigation in a single workflow with Datadog Cloud SIEM This Month in Datadog - April 2026 Monitor and optimize Supabase query performance with Datadog Database Monitoring Add dynamically updating context to logs with Reference Tables and Observability Pipelines Introducing ARFBench: A time series question-answering benchmark based on real incidents The product signal latency gap slowing your growth Test network paths with TCP, UDP, and ICMP in Datadog Turn developer feedback into operational insight with Datadog Forms and Sheets How to investigate cloud credential compromise with Bits AI Security Analyst Evaluate, optimize, and secure your Google Cloud AI stack with Datadog Bringing observability data hosting to the UK on AWS Identify and fix code issues faster with Datadog’s Azure DevOps Source Code integration Steganography at scale: Embedding share URLs in Datadog widget screenshots Every team should be A/B testing Centralize observability management with Datadog Governance Console Spotting CI/CD misconfigurations before the bots do: Securing GitHub Actions with Datadog IaC Security Route OTel data from AI apps to ClickHouse and Datadog using Observability Pipelines Manage service tracing across hosts with Single Step Instrumentation rules Offline evaluation for AI agents: Best practices Detect runtime threats in Python Lambda functions with Datadog AAP Introducing our open source AI-native SAST Instrument and monitor Boomi integration flows with OpenTelemetry and Datadog Not all index scans are equal: How we cut query latency by over 99% Platform engineering metrics: What to measure and what to ignore Integrate Recorded Future threat intelligence with Datadog Cloud SIEM CI/CD security: threat modeling using a MITRE-style threat matrix CI/CD security: How to secure your GitHub ecosystem Ingress NGINX is EOL: A practical guide for migrating to Kubernetes Gateway API How we built a real-world evaluation platform for autonomous SRE agents at scale Operating agentic AI with Amazon Bedrock AgentCore and Datadog LLM Observability: Lessons from NTT DATA Introducing the Datadog Code Security MCP Capture and analyze custom heatmaps in Session Replay Understand session replays faster with AI summaries and smart chapters Monitor ClickHouse query performance with Datadog Database Monitoring How we designed empathetic alert sounds for on-call engineers Search and act across Datadog to resolve issues faster with Bits Assistant Measure the business impact of every product change with Datadog Experiments Analyzing round trip query latency Configuring JavaScript caches for better performance Introducing Bits AI Dev Agent for Code Security Datadog achieves ISO 42001 certification for responsible AI Monitor Nutanix clusters, hosts, and VMs with Datadog Monitor Juniper Mist in Datadog A new Host Map for modern infrastructure When upserts don't update but still write: Debugging Postgres performance at scale Annotate traces to improve LLM quality with Datadog LLM Observability What's new in Cloud SIEM: AI-powered investigations, enhanced threat intelligence, and scalable security operations Explore Kubernetes with native OpenTelemetry data Monitor Oracle Fusion Cloud Applications with Datadog Announcing the Datadog Terraform provider v4.0.0 Scaling Kubernetes workloads on custom metrics How to design cloud environments for AI-powered threat analysis Monitor Aruba Central in Datadog How we centralize and remediate risks with Datadog Case Management Accelerate incident response with Datadog and ServiceNow Monitor your application and network load balancer logs Understanding Karpenter architecture for Kubernetes autoscaling Tools for collecting metrics and logs from Karpenter Monitor Karpenter with Datadog What your product data is actually saying Key metrics for monitoring Karpenter Securing Datadog's platform in the AI age: The role of observability data Closing the verification loop: Observability-driven harnesses for building with agents When an AI agent came knocking: Catching malicious contributions in Datadog’s open source repos Closing the verification loop, Part 2: Fully autonomous optimization Four ways engineering teams use the Datadog MCP Server to power AI agents Approaching your observability migration with the right mindset Meet the new Bits AI SRE: Deeper reasoning, twice as fast Designing MCP tools for agents: Lessons from building Datadog's MCP server Key learnings from the 2026 State of DevSecOps study Use plain English to query your multi-cloud infrastructure in Resource Catalog Simplifying troubleshooting across the user journey with Datadog Synthetic Monitoring Protect your OCI resources with Datadog Cloud Security This Month in Datadog - February 2026 Fine-tune Toto for turbocharged forecasts Amazon EC2 security: How misconfigured and public AMIs expand your cloud attack surface Enable end-to-end visibility into your Java apps with a single command Measure and improve mobile app startup performance with Datadog RUM Evaluating our AI Guard application to improve quality and control cost Identify untested code across every level of your codebase Make use of guardrail metrics and stop babysitting your releases Monitor Versa Networks SD-WAN performance in Datadog How we reduced the size of our Agent Go binaries by up to 77% Improve performance and reliability with APM Recommendations Remediate transitive vulnerabilities faster with Datadog Software Composition Analysis Generate audit-ready vulnerability and compliance reports with Datadog Sheets Monitor Fortinet FortiManager performance in Datadog Improve test coverage across codebases with Datadog Code Coverage
What's new for scheduling and resource management in Kubernetes v1.34?
2025-08-25 · via Datadog | The Monitor blog
Nicholas Thomson

Nicholas Thomson

Kubernetes v1.34, which is scheduled for release August 27, 2025, focuses on improved scheduler visibility, deeper life cycle observability, and enhanced resource management. As always, the list of changes and improvements in the official changelog is extensive, and cluster operators may be wondering which changes are most important. If you’re operating a monitoring platform or depend on deep Kubernetes observability, here’s how a number of new features will affect your workflows.

Better scheduling visibility, predictive metrics, and life cycle observability

When scheduling decisions, pod placement, or autoscaling behavior are opaque, incident response slows down and it becomes harder to correlate infrastructure changes with application performance. This lack of visibility also increases the risk of inefficient resource use. As such, cluster operators need to maintain deep visibility into how workloads are scheduled, started, and scaled. Kubernetes v1.34 introduces several features that help teams gain earlier, more accurate signals about pod readiness, container termination, and expected node placement, enabling faster root cause analysis, smarter alerting, and more reliable predictive dashboards.

Asynchronous scheduler API calls — Beta (enabled via SchedulerAsyncAPICalls feature gate)

Kubernetes scheduler performance can degrade due to blocking API calls—such as updating pod status or binding decisions—before proceeding to the next scheduling decision. This creates scheduling bottlenecks and introduces delays that ripple into downstream observability systems.

With this new feature, the scheduler can now perform API interactions asynchronously, increasing throughput and responsiveness. Faster scheduling means that pod state transitions will be reflected more quickly in metrics, logs, and alerts related to pod life cycle events.

NominatedNodeName for pod placement – Alpha

Observability tools typically have limited insight into where unscheduled pods are expected to run, as this information isn’t exposed until the scheduler completes its decision and the pod is actually bound to a node. This lack of visibility makes it difficult to anticipate placement bottlenecks, preemptively allocate resources, or correlate scheduling delays with downstream effects in logs, metrics, or alerts, especially in environments with resource constraints or taints.

With this feature, the scheduler will now set the nominatedNodeName field for more pods—not just those pending preemption—exposing their expected node earlier in the scheduling process. This field indicates which node the scheduler is reserving for the pod, and teams can use this metadata for predictive scheduling dashboards or pre-scheduling alerting logic, as well as enhanced workload tracing and capacity forecasting.

Container stop signals – Alpha (feature-gated)

In Kubernetes, distinguishing between different reasons for container shutdowns—such as graceful exits versus forced terminations—has traditionally been difficult, since the STOPSIGNAL was configured in the container image or runtime and was not visible in the pod spec. This limited both control over shutdown behavior and clarity during incident analysis.

The new container stop signals feature surfaces the termination signal in a pod’s status, making it visible to operators. Making termination intent more explicit will improve life cycle observability, alerting accuracy, and the ability to debug container exits without relying solely on logs. Additionally, this new feature allows developers to configure custom stop signals directly in the pod specification, rather than being constrained to the image defaults, providing greater control over shutdown semantics.

Enhancing observability for extended resources with Dynamic Resource Allocation (DRA)

Increasingly, Kubernetes workloads depend on specialized hardware, like GPUs, FPGAs, and smart NICs. Accordingly, there is a growing need for better visibility into how these extended resources are allocated, consumed, and managed. Dynamic Resource Allocation (DRA) is a Kubernetes framework that lets workloads request specialized hardware like GPUs or FPGAs through standardized, pluggable drivers, rather than vendor-specific plugins or ad hoc APIs. Several new features in Kubernetes v1.34 enhance DRA to improve observability across the entire life cycle, from scheduling to health monitoring.

Handle extended resource requests via DRA driver – Alpha

Kubernetes provides the DRA framework as a pluggable mechanism for managing complex hardware resources, using ResourceClaim and ResourceSlice objects. However, extended resources such as GPUs, FPGAs, or smart NICs were previously handled outside of DRA, often through custom device plugins or ad hoc annotations. This created fragmentation, making it harder to consistently track resource usage, enforce policies, and support multi-tenant or heterogeneous hardware environments.

This feature extends DRA to cover extended resources, enabling them to be allocated and tracked through standardized DRA drivers rather than one-off integrations. Workloads requesting DRA-managed resources can now be tracked with fine-grained metadata, such as specific device classes, allocation counts, and driver-backed ResourceSlice references, making it easier to report resource allocations and usage per workload. For instance, instead of tracking nvidia.com/gpu and intel.com/fpga through separate mechanisms, both can now be managed and monitored through their respective DRA drivers with consistent metadata and allocation patterns. This enhancement improves visibility, auditability, and allocation efficiency across heterogeneous clusters, providing a much clearer understanding of who’s using which hardware and how.

Device binding conditions – Alpha (DRADeviceBindingConditions and DRAResourceClaimDeviceStatus feature gates required)

When a pod requests extended resources, the scheduler first evaluates those requirements through the DRA framework and then assigns the pod to a node. Once scheduled, the kubelet on that node calls the appropriate DRA driver to prepare the hardware, and the driver allocates the actual device. Because this allocation process can take time, users have traditionally had no clear way to know whether the device was ready; the only options were digging into logs or inspecting node internals.

This enhancement adds device binding conditions, allowing the kubelet to update pod.status.conditions with the binding state reported by the DRA driver. By surfacing readiness information directly in the pod status, users can easily see whether device preparation is in progress, complete, or failed. This improves observability, enables proactive alerting on delayed or failed bindings, and makes diagnosing hardware-related startup issues far more straightforward.

Consumable capacity for devices – Alpha

Before this feature, Kubernetes handled extended resources as opaque, non-overcommittable integer counts. If a device advertised three units and a pod requested one, the scheduler could allocate two more pods that each requested one. But from Kubernetes’ perspective, a device was either allocatable or not—it couldn’t represent “this device has X capacity left.” This meant that workloads that only needed a fraction of a device couldn’t express this natively, and that Kubernetes had no notion of whether a device was saturated, underutilized, or had headroom remaining. Vendors tried to work around this by carving devices into artificial resource types (for example, NVIDIA exposing nvidia.com/mig-1g.5gb, …2g.10gb, etc.), but this fragmented reporting and forced operators to rely on vendor-specific plugins and metrics.

This feature addresses this by introducing consumable capacity for DRA, allowing device plugins to directly expose how much capacity remains on a device. This enables operators to gain visibility into metrics like saturation, headroom, and overcommitment risk, allowing SREs and platform engineers to reason about utilization across heterogeneous hardware and tune scheduling policies with greater accuracy.

Add resource health status to PodStatus – Beta

When a pod using specialized hardware crashes or misbehaves, it’s often unclear whether the issue lies with the device, the application, or the node. This can leave cluster operators to engage in considerable guesswork, leading to delayed incident resolution.

This new field in PodStatus lets DRA and device plugins report device health directly in the pod’s status. Teams can now detect hardware issues at the pod level without sifting through logs, enabling faster alerting, diagnosis, and automated remediation when faulty devices impact workload stability.

Get the most out of Kubernetes v1.34

For cluster operators, it’s important to keep an eye on each new Kubernetes version release for updates that will enable teams to scale up faster and more efficiently. Kubernetes 1.34 brings a wave of observability-aligned enhancements, from deeper scheduling visibility to improved DRA observability. These features unlock faster insights into system health and performance and better coverage of modern workloads.

Explore the benefits of using Datadog for Kubernetes observability in our dedicated blog post, or check out our docs to learn more. If you’re new to Datadog and would like to monitor the health and performance of your Kubernetes clusters, sign up for a free trial to get started.