惯性聚合 高效追踪和阅读你感兴趣的博客、新闻、科技资讯
阅读原文 在惯性聚合中打开

推荐订阅源

酷 壳 – CoolShell
酷 壳 – CoolShell
H
Hacker News: Front Page
P
Palo Alto Networks Blog
T
ThreatConnect
Apple Machine Learning Research
Apple Machine Learning Research
博客园_首页
T
True Tiger Recordings
P
Privacy & Cybersecurity Law Blog
B
Blog
IT之家
IT之家
Last Week in AI
Last Week in AI
F
Full Disclosure
Hacker News: Ask HN
Hacker News: Ask HN
C
Comments on: Blog
Microsoft Azure Blog
Microsoft Azure Blog
C
Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency CISA
Microsoft Security Blog
Microsoft Security Blog
博客园 - 【当耐特】
N
News and Events Feed by Topic
NISL@THU
NISL@THU
腾讯CDC
雷峰网
雷峰网
Security Latest
Security Latest
李成银的技术随笔
M
Microsoft Research Blog - Microsoft Research
L
LangChain Blog
L
Lohrmann on Cybersecurity
cs.CL updates on arXiv.org
cs.CL updates on arXiv.org
C
Check Point Blog
Y
Y Combinator Blog
Recent Announcements
Recent Announcements
博客园 - Franky
N
News | PayPal Newsroom
V
V2EX
A
About on SuperTechFans
The Register - Security
The Register - Security
月光博客
月光博客
奇客Solidot–传递最新科技情报
奇客Solidot–传递最新科技情报
Google Online Security Blog
Google Online Security Blog
MyScale Blog
MyScale Blog
Cisco Talos Blog
Cisco Talos Blog
Vercel News
Vercel News
WordPress大学
WordPress大学
C
Cyber Attacks, Cyber Crime and Cyber Security
The Hacker News
The Hacker News
IntelliJ IDEA : IntelliJ IDEA – the Leading IDE for Professional Development in Java and Kotlin | The JetBrains Blog
IntelliJ IDEA : IntelliJ IDEA – the Leading IDE for Professional Development in Java and Kotlin | The JetBrains Blog
爱范儿
爱范儿
A
Arctic Wolf
L
LINUX DO - 最新话题
freeCodeCamp Programming Tutorials: Python, JavaScript, Git & More

Datadog | The Monitor blog

Reduce CVE noise with OpenVEX assessments in Datadog How we made a SQL query optimization agent 59% more accurate using autoresearch and LLM Observability How to audit and clean up monitors effectively Diagnose slow PostgreSQL queries faster with explain plan correlation Explore Datadog metrics with Natural Language Queries Toto 2.0: Time series forecasting enters the scaling era Simplify micro-frontend observability with Datadog RUM Attribute AI costs across providers with Datadog Cloud Cost Management Diagnose and resolve database performance issues faster with Database Investigator Datadog for Government achieves FedRAMP® High certification Analyze cloud costs with flexible spreadsheets in Datadog Sheets Inside Datadog’s AI Research Lab: Meet two PhD candidates behind Toto Connect triage and investigation in a single workflow with Datadog Cloud SIEM This Month in Datadog - April 2026 Monitor and optimize Supabase query performance with Datadog Database Monitoring Add dynamically updating context to logs with Reference Tables and Observability Pipelines Introducing ARFBench: A time series question-answering benchmark based on real incidents The product signal latency gap slowing your growth Test network paths with TCP, UDP, and ICMP in Datadog Turn developer feedback into operational insight with Datadog Forms and Sheets How to investigate cloud credential compromise with Bits AI Security Analyst Evaluate, optimize, and secure your Google Cloud AI stack with Datadog Bringing observability data hosting to the UK on AWS Identify and fix code issues faster with Datadog’s Azure DevOps Source Code integration Steganography at scale: Embedding share URLs in Datadog widget screenshots Every team should be A/B testing Centralize observability management with Datadog Governance Console Spotting CI/CD misconfigurations before the bots do: Securing GitHub Actions with Datadog IaC Security Route OTel data from AI apps to ClickHouse and Datadog using Observability Pipelines Manage service tracing across hosts with Single Step Instrumentation rules Offline evaluation for AI agents: Best practices Detect runtime threats in Python Lambda functions with Datadog AAP Introducing our open source AI-native SAST Instrument and monitor Boomi integration flows with OpenTelemetry and Datadog Not all index scans are equal: How we cut query latency by over 99% Platform engineering metrics: What to measure and what to ignore Integrate Recorded Future threat intelligence with Datadog Cloud SIEM CI/CD security: threat modeling using a MITRE-style threat matrix CI/CD security: How to secure your GitHub ecosystem Ingress NGINX is EOL: A practical guide for migrating to Kubernetes Gateway API How we built a real-world evaluation platform for autonomous SRE agents at scale Operating agentic AI with Amazon Bedrock AgentCore and Datadog LLM Observability: Lessons from NTT DATA Introducing the Datadog Code Security MCP Capture and analyze custom heatmaps in Session Replay Understand session replays faster with AI summaries and smart chapters Monitor ClickHouse query performance with Datadog Database Monitoring How we designed empathetic alert sounds for on-call engineers Search and act across Datadog to resolve issues faster with Bits Assistant Measure the business impact of every product change with Datadog Experiments Analyzing round trip query latency Configuring JavaScript caches for better performance Introducing Bits AI Dev Agent for Code Security Datadog achieves ISO 42001 certification for responsible AI Monitor Nutanix clusters, hosts, and VMs with Datadog Monitor Juniper Mist in Datadog A new Host Map for modern infrastructure When upserts don't update but still write: Debugging Postgres performance at scale Annotate traces to improve LLM quality with Datadog LLM Observability What's new in Cloud SIEM: AI-powered investigations, enhanced threat intelligence, and scalable security operations Explore Kubernetes with native OpenTelemetry data Monitor Oracle Fusion Cloud Applications with Datadog Announcing the Datadog Terraform provider v4.0.0 Scaling Kubernetes workloads on custom metrics How to design cloud environments for AI-powered threat analysis Monitor Aruba Central in Datadog How we centralize and remediate risks with Datadog Case Management Accelerate incident response with Datadog and ServiceNow Monitor your application and network load balancer logs Understanding Karpenter architecture for Kubernetes autoscaling Tools for collecting metrics and logs from Karpenter Monitor Karpenter with Datadog What your product data is actually saying Key metrics for monitoring Karpenter Securing Datadog's platform in the AI age: The role of observability data Closing the verification loop: Observability-driven harnesses for building with agents When an AI agent came knocking: Catching malicious contributions in Datadog’s open source repos Closing the verification loop, Part 2: Fully autonomous optimization Four ways engineering teams use the Datadog MCP Server to power AI agents Approaching your observability migration with the right mindset Meet the new Bits AI SRE: Deeper reasoning, twice as fast Designing MCP tools for agents: Lessons from building Datadog's MCP server Key learnings from the 2026 State of DevSecOps study Use plain English to query your multi-cloud infrastructure in Resource Catalog Simplifying troubleshooting across the user journey with Datadog Synthetic Monitoring Protect your OCI resources with Datadog Cloud Security This Month in Datadog - February 2026 Fine-tune Toto for turbocharged forecasts Amazon EC2 security: How misconfigured and public AMIs expand your cloud attack surface Enable end-to-end visibility into your Java apps with a single command Measure and improve mobile app startup performance with Datadog RUM Evaluating our AI Guard application to improve quality and control cost Identify untested code across every level of your codebase Make use of guardrail metrics and stop babysitting your releases Monitor Versa Networks SD-WAN performance in Datadog How we reduced the size of our Agent Go binaries by up to 77% Improve performance and reliability with APM Recommendations Remediate transitive vulnerabilities faster with Datadog Software Composition Analysis Generate audit-ready vulnerability and compliance reports with Datadog Sheets Monitor Fortinet FortiManager performance in Datadog Improve test coverage across codebases with Datadog Code Coverage
Monitor your LiteLLM AI proxy with Datadog
2025-08-20 · via Datadog | The Monitor blog
Mahip Deora

Mahip Deora

Barry Eom

Barry Eom

Nicole Cybul

Nicole Cybul

As organizations rapidly scale their use of large language models (LLMs), many teams are adopting LiteLLM to simplify access to a diverse set of LLM providers and models. LiteLLM provides a unified interface through both an SDK and proxy to speed up development, centralize control, and optimize LLM-powered workflows. But introducing a proxy layer adds abstraction, making it harder to understand how requests are processed. This challenge is particularly prominent when it comes to understanding model selection, performance, and cost attribution.

To address this, we are pleased to announce Datadog’s Agent integration and SDK with LiteLLM, which enable you to easily monitor, troubleshoot, and optimize your LiteLLM-powered applications.

The LLM Observability SDK provides deep, application-level visibility into how agents and applications interact with LLMs through LiteLLM. The SDK traces every request end-to-end, giving you insights into model and provider performance, token usage, latency, and prompt content. Whether you’re debugging slow agent responses or analyzing model cost tradeoffs, the SDK helps teams rapidly identify issues and optimize behavior.

The Datadog Agent integration monitors the LiteLLM proxy service itself. This integration surfaces high-level metrics about the service’s health including request volumes, error rates, latency distributions, and overall provider costs. These metrics enable platform teams to track performance trends, detect infrastructure issues, and ensure reliability at scale.

Together, these tools provide full-stack observability across your LLM workflows: from the initial application call, through LiteLLM, to the final response from your LLM provider. In this post, we’ll show you how the Datadog LiteLLM integration and SDK help engineering and AI teams gain actionable insights and accelerate troubleshooting across their LLM-powered applications.

Monitor, evaluate, and troubleshoot LiteLLM agents and applications faster with end-to-end tracing

LLM Observability SDKs instrument your applications, tracing every LLM request end-to-end and enriching those traces with metadata such as token usage, model and provider details, and prompt content. Getting started with Datadog’s LiteLLM SDK is simple and requires just a few steps. Users need to enable LLM Observability in their Datadog account, install or upgrade to dd-trace-py version 3.9.0 or later, and activate auto-instrumentation in their Python environment. Full setup instructions are available in the Datadog documentation.

Once enabled, the SDK allows you to easily track how your team or organization uses LLMs across different models, providers, and teams. Datadog automatically traces all LLM requests and enriches them with key metadata such as token counts, estimated cost, and the base URLs of the proxies that handled those requests. By doing so, Datadog allows organizations to analyze and understand which LLMs and providers are used most frequently by specific teams or applications. For instance, you can use contextual fields like user and team aliases to break down usage patterns and ensure fair allocation of resources.

Additionally, Datadog’s SDK with LiteLLM enables you to quickly pinpoint and resolve issues across your LLM stack using rich, end-to-end tracing.

Screenshot of LiteLLM trace in Datadog LLM Observability

From initiation to response, each LiteLLM request is traced as a span that captures the full lifecycle of the interaction. These traces include metadata that enables performance monitoring so teams can identify latency spikes and bottlenecks, whether they stem from LiteLLM’s routing logic, delays from the underlying model provider, or issues with specific endpoints.

Datadog also surfaces errors, retries, and fallback events, making it easier to detect recurring failure patterns and investigate retry logic and timeouts. You can inspect the content and structure of each request and response—including the prompt, user roles, and any parameters—which helps debug issues like unexpected outputs, prompt formatting mistakes, or unusual model behavior. This telemetry data can be correlated across your stack using shared trace and call IDs, along with contextual fields like user or team aliases and cache status.

The traces collected by Datadog LLM observability empower teams to proactively monitor, troubleshoot, and optimize their LLM-powered applications with granularity and speed.

Monitor LiteLLM performance, usage, and cost in real time

Datadog Agent integrations (like the LiteLLM integration) connect directly to your infrastructure via the Datadog Agent and capture data about the performance of a service and its underlying components. Enabling the LiteLLM native integration is simple. First, ensure the Datadog Agent, with the latest version, is installed on the same host as the LiteLLM instance, and then configure the LiteLLM integration on the Agent.

Once the integration is enabled, data about your LiteLLM instances starts to flow in, including request volume, latency percentiles, error and fallback rates, token usage, and estimated cost. No code changes are needed, the Datadog Agent starts capturing this data out of the box.

These metrics provide real-time visibility into how your LiteLLM instance is handling traffic. Request and response counts help track usage trends, while latency metrics like p95 surface performance issues early, such as slowdowns tied to specific providers or routes. Error and fallback rates highlight instability or misrouted requests, helping teams catch issues before they impact user experience. The integration also captures metrics from internal LiteLLM components, such as Redis and PostgreSQL, highlighting potential performance bottlenecks within the instance itself.

Additionally, you can track token usage and estimate costs for each request, supporting internal chargebacks and budgeting. For example, if your organization uses multiple providers like OpenAI and Anthropic, you can compare usage across teams or applications to ensure consistent cost management. You may discover that a specific service is disproportionately relying on high-cost models for low-priority tasks, an insight you can use to shift those requests to more cost-effective alternatives or enforce token limits.

All telemetry is tagged with key metadata, like team, model, and host, so teams can easily compare performance and cost across applications, environments, or use cases. Whether you’re troubleshooting latency or managing LLM spend, this integration gives you the data you need to operate LiteLLM with confidence. This granular visibility empowers you to make data-driven decisions about host sizing, model selection, provider usage, and resource allocation across your LLM-powered workflows.

Screenshot of LiteLLM trace in Datadog LLM Observability

End-to-end visibility of your LiteLLM Service

While the native LiteLLM integration gives you immediate visibility into how your proxy is performing, surfacing metrics like request volume, latency, token usage, and cost, the LiteLLM SDK extends that visibility deeper into your applications and agents. When used together, the SDK and integration provide full end-to-end observability of your LLM stack, from the initial application call all the way through the LiteLLM instance to the final model response.

This unified view allows teams to pinpoint exactly where latency or failures are introduced, whether they’re due to prompt generation logic in the application, fallback behavior in LiteLLM, or delays from the underlying LLM provider. Metrics from the native integration show performance trends at the infrastructure level, while spans from the SDK reveal the functional flow of requests, including retries, cache usage, and provider selection decisions.

This level of correlation is especially powerful for debugging and optimization. For instance, when a monitor detects a spike in p95 latency on a specific route, you can pivot directly into traces that reveal which teams, user paths, or model configurations were involved. Similarly, if a certain prompt path starts incurring high token costs, you can trace it back to the originating service or user workflow and take action, whether that’s optimizing prompt length, adjusting routing logic, or changing models.

Together, the SDK and integration give you complete insight into both how LLM requests are handled and why they behave the way they do. This holistic observability empowers engineering and AI teams to move faster, troubleshoot smarter, and make data-driven decisions about performance, reliability, and cost.

Start observing LiteLLM-powered AI agents and applications today

As LLM-powered applications become more central to business operations, having unified, actionable observability is critical. With Datadog’s native LiteLLM integration and SDK, you can confidently monitor, troubleshoot, and optimize every LLM request no matter how complex your stack.

Configure the LiteLLM integration today to start tracking performance metrics for your LiteLLM instances, and instrument LiteLLM with Datadog with Datadog to unlock end-to-end visibility for your AI-driven applications. For more information, check out the dd-trace-py v3.9.0 release notes and our LLM Observability documentation.

If you are an existing Datadog customer, you can start monitoring your serverless application today. Otherwise, sign up for a 14-day free trial.