惯性聚合 高效追踪和阅读你感兴趣的博客、新闻、科技资讯
阅读原文 在惯性聚合中打开

推荐订阅源

WordPress大学
WordPress大学
酷 壳 – CoolShell
酷 壳 – CoolShell
OSCHINA 社区最新新闻
OSCHINA 社区最新新闻
腾讯CDC
freeCodeCamp Programming Tutorials: Python, JavaScript, Git & More
Jina AI
Jina AI
N
Netflix TechBlog - Medium
有赞技术团队
有赞技术团队
博客园 - 【当耐特】
MongoDB | Blog
MongoDB | Blog
P
Proofpoint News Feed
L
LangChain Blog
aimingoo的专栏
aimingoo的专栏
GbyAI
GbyAI
B
Blog
F
Fortinet All Blogs
T
Tailwind CSS Blog
Cyber Security Advisories - MS-ISAC
Cyber Security Advisories - MS-ISAC
G
Google Developers Blog
A
About on SuperTechFans
C
Check Point Blog
Microsoft Security Blog
Microsoft Security Blog
MyScale Blog
MyScale Blog
B
Blog RSS Feed

Datadog | The Monitor blog

Introducing our open source AI-native SAST Instrument and monitor Boomi integration flows with OpenTelemetry and Datadog Not all index scans are equal: How we cut query latency by over 99% Platform engineering metrics: What to measure and what to ignore Integrate Recorded Future threat intelligence with Datadog Cloud SIEM CI/CD security: threat modeling using a MITRE-style threat matrix CI/CD security: How to secure your GitHub ecosystem Ingress NGINX is EOL: A practical guide for migrating to Kubernetes Gateway API Operating agentic AI with Amazon Bedrock AgentCore and Datadog LLM Observability: Lessons from NTT DATA Introducing the Datadog Code Security MCP Capture and analyze custom heatmaps in Session Replay Understand session replays faster with AI summaries and smart chapters Monitor ClickHouse query performance with Datadog Database Monitoring How we designed empathetic alert sounds for on-call engineers Search and act across Datadog to resolve issues faster with Bits Assistant Measure the business impact of every product change with Datadog Experiments Analyzing round trip query latency Configuring JavaScript caches for better performance Introducing Bits AI Dev Agent for Code Security Datadog achieves ISO 42001 certification for responsible AI Monitor Nutanix clusters, hosts, and VMs with Datadog Monitor Juniper Mist in Datadog A new Host Map for modern infrastructure Annotate traces to improve LLM quality with Datadog LLM Observability What’s new in Cloud SIEM: AI-powered investigations, enhanced threat intelligence, and scalable security operations Explore Kubernetes with native OpenTelemetry data Monitor Oracle Fusion Cloud Applications with Datadog Announcing the Datadog Terraform provider v4.0.0 Scaling Kubernetes workloads on custom metrics How to design cloud environments for AI-powered threat analysis
Track, debug, and roll back changes with Version History ...
2025-10-17 · via Datadog | The Monitor blog

A synthetic test is only useful if you can trust what it’s telling you. When one fails, the reason may not be obvious. Was the application updated? Did the test change? Or both? As more people contribute and refine the same test, it becomes harder to understand what changed or restore a working version. Without clear visibility into those updates, teams can spend more time tracking down the cause of a failure than resolving it.

Datadog’s new Version History for Synthetic Monitoring tests addresses these challenges by giving teams complete visibility into how tests evolve over time. Instead of guessing or relying on incomplete information, you can see every modification, trace failures back to specific changes, and restore earlier versions when needed. This reduces debugging time, improves collaboration across teams, and ensures that the right tests are running in the right environments.

In this post, we’ll show you how Version History for Synthetic Monitoring tests lets you:

Testing with Version History

When a synthetic test fails, teams need to quickly determine whether the problem lies in the application, the test itself, or both. Without this visibility, debugging slows down, collaboration becomes less effective, and rolling back to a stable configuration takes unnecessary effort.

Version History makes Synthetic Monitoring more reliable, allowing teams to ship code with confidence by maintaining reliable coverage throughout the development life cycle.

See how tests change over time

With the new Version History page, you’ll get a 30-day record of every test modification, including who made the change and when it occurred. If your organization has Audit Trail, the period of record extends to 90 days. Instead of chasing down teammates or guessing what changed, you can quickly confirm whether a failing test comes from an application issue or was introduced in a recent edit.

Screenshot showing the version history of a high uptime test.

Restore earlier versions in a single action

When a change causes unexpected failures, teams can roll back to a stable version directly in the UI instead of manually recreating an old configuration. This lets you quickly return to a known working state, reducing downtime and keeping pipelines moving.

Run the right test versions in every environment

Tests don’t have to run identically across development, staging, and production. You can use the Datadog API or CLI to specify which versions run in each environment. This ensures that pull requests, staging, and production pipelines use the right test version, avoiding false alarms and maintaining consistent coverage during rollbacks.

Trace results back to specific versions

With Version History, each test run shows which version was executed in the UI and through the API. This helps correlate failures with changes and helps maintain an auditable record of what was tested alongside each application build.

Test smarter with Version History

Version History for Synthetic Monitoring tests is generally available for all Datadog customers. To get started, you can access it from any test details page in the Synthetic Monitoring and Testing UI. Every change—whether it’s to the request, assertions, or execution settings—is logged, giving your team confidence that test behavior is transparent and auditable.

To learn more, see our documentation on Version History. Or, if you’re not already a Datadog customer, sign up for a 14-day free trial.