惯性聚合 高效追踪和阅读你感兴趣的博客、新闻、科技资讯
阅读原文 在惯性聚合中打开

推荐订阅源

酷 壳 – CoolShell
酷 壳 – CoolShell
H
Hacker News: Front Page
P
Palo Alto Networks Blog
T
ThreatConnect
Apple Machine Learning Research
Apple Machine Learning Research
博客园_首页
T
True Tiger Recordings
P
Privacy & Cybersecurity Law Blog
B
Blog
IT之家
IT之家
Last Week in AI
Last Week in AI
F
Full Disclosure
Hacker News: Ask HN
Hacker News: Ask HN
C
Comments on: Blog
Microsoft Azure Blog
Microsoft Azure Blog
C
Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency CISA
Microsoft Security Blog
Microsoft Security Blog
博客园 - 【当耐特】
N
News and Events Feed by Topic
NISL@THU
NISL@THU
腾讯CDC
雷峰网
雷峰网
Security Latest
Security Latest
李成银的技术随笔
M
Microsoft Research Blog - Microsoft Research
L
LangChain Blog
L
Lohrmann on Cybersecurity
cs.CL updates on arXiv.org
cs.CL updates on arXiv.org
C
Check Point Blog
Y
Y Combinator Blog
Recent Announcements
Recent Announcements
博客园 - Franky
N
News | PayPal Newsroom
V
V2EX
A
About on SuperTechFans
The Register - Security
The Register - Security
月光博客
月光博客
奇客Solidot–传递最新科技情报
奇客Solidot–传递最新科技情报
Google Online Security Blog
Google Online Security Blog
MyScale Blog
MyScale Blog
Cisco Talos Blog
Cisco Talos Blog
Vercel News
Vercel News
WordPress大学
WordPress大学
C
Cyber Attacks, Cyber Crime and Cyber Security
The Hacker News
The Hacker News
IntelliJ IDEA : IntelliJ IDEA – the Leading IDE for Professional Development in Java and Kotlin | The JetBrains Blog
IntelliJ IDEA : IntelliJ IDEA – the Leading IDE for Professional Development in Java and Kotlin | The JetBrains Blog
爱范儿
爱范儿
A
Arctic Wolf
L
LINUX DO - 最新话题
freeCodeCamp Programming Tutorials: Python, JavaScript, Git & More

Datadog | The Monitor blog

How to audit and clean up monitors effectively How we made a SQL query optimization agent 59% more accurate using autoresearch and LLM Observability Reduce CVE noise with OpenVEX assessments in Datadog Diagnose slow PostgreSQL queries faster with explain plan correlation Explore Datadog metrics with Natural Language Queries Attribute AI costs across providers with Datadog Cloud Cost Management Simplify micro-frontend observability with Datadog RUM Toto 2.0: Time series forecasting enters the scaling era Diagnose and resolve database performance issues faster with Database Investigator Datadog for Government achieves FedRAMP® High certification Analyze cloud costs with flexible spreadsheets in Datadog Sheets Inside Datadog’s AI Research Lab: Meet two PhD candidates behind Toto Connect triage and investigation in a single workflow with Datadog Cloud SIEM This Month in Datadog - April 2026 Monitor and optimize Supabase query performance with Datadog Database Monitoring Add dynamically updating context to logs with Reference Tables and Observability Pipelines Introducing ARFBench: A time series question-answering benchmark based on real incidents Test network paths with TCP, UDP, and ICMP in Datadog The product signal latency gap slowing your growth How to investigate cloud credential compromise with Bits AI Security Analyst Evaluate, optimize, and secure your Google Cloud AI stack with Datadog Turn developer feedback into operational insight with Datadog Forms and Sheets Identify and fix code issues faster with Datadog’s Azure DevOps Source Code integration Steganography at scale: Embedding share URLs in Datadog widget screenshots Bringing observability data hosting to the UK on AWS Centralize observability management with Datadog Governance Console Every team should be A/B testing Manage service tracing across hosts with Single Step Instrumentation rules Route OTel data from AI apps to ClickHouse and Datadog using Observability Pipelines Spotting CI/CD misconfigurations before the bots do: Securing GitHub Actions with Datadog IaC Security Detect runtime threats in Python Lambda functions with Datadog AAP Offline evaluation for AI agents: Best practices Introducing our open source AI-native SAST Instrument and monitor Boomi integration flows with OpenTelemetry and Datadog Not all index scans are equal: How we cut query latency by over 99% Platform engineering metrics: What to measure and what to ignore Integrate Recorded Future threat intelligence with Datadog Cloud SIEM CI/CD security: threat modeling using a MITRE-style threat matrix CI/CD security: How to secure your GitHub ecosystem Ingress NGINX is EOL: A practical guide for migrating to Kubernetes Gateway API How we built a real-world evaluation platform for autonomous SRE agents at scale Operating agentic AI with Amazon Bedrock AgentCore and Datadog LLM Observability: Lessons from NTT DATA Introducing the Datadog Code Security MCP Capture and analyze custom heatmaps in Session Replay Understand session replays faster with AI summaries and smart chapters How we designed empathetic alert sounds for on-call engineers Search and act across Datadog to resolve issues faster with Bits Assistant Measure the business impact of every product change with Datadog Experiments Analyzing round trip query latency Configuring JavaScript caches for better performance Introducing Bits AI Dev Agent for Code Security Datadog achieves ISO 42001 certification for responsible AI Monitor Nutanix clusters, hosts, and VMs with Datadog Monitor Juniper Mist in Datadog A new Host Map for modern infrastructure When upserts don't update but still write: Debugging Postgres performance at scale Annotate traces to improve LLM quality with Datadog LLM Observability What's new in Cloud SIEM: AI-powered investigations, enhanced threat intelligence, and scalable security operations Explore Kubernetes with native OpenTelemetry data Monitor Oracle Fusion Cloud Applications with Datadog Announcing the Datadog Terraform provider v4.0.0 Scaling Kubernetes workloads on custom metrics How to design cloud environments for AI-powered threat analysis Monitor Aruba Central in Datadog How we centralize and remediate risks with Datadog Case Management Accelerate incident response with Datadog and ServiceNow Monitor your application and network load balancer logs Understanding Karpenter architecture for Kubernetes autoscaling Tools for collecting metrics and logs from Karpenter Monitor Karpenter with Datadog What your product data is actually saying Key metrics for monitoring Karpenter Securing Datadog's platform in the AI age: The role of observability data Closing the verification loop: Observability-driven harnesses for building with agents Closing the verification loop, Part 2: Fully autonomous optimization When an AI agent came knocking: Catching malicious contributions in Datadog’s open source repos Four ways engineering teams use the Datadog MCP Server to power AI agents Approaching your observability migration with the right mindset Meet the new Bits AI SRE: Deeper reasoning, twice as fast Designing MCP tools for agents: Lessons from building Datadog's MCP server Key learnings from the 2026 State of DevSecOps study Use plain English to query your multi-cloud infrastructure in Resource Catalog Simplifying troubleshooting across the user journey with Datadog Synthetic Monitoring Protect your OCI resources with Datadog Cloud Security This Month in Datadog - February 2026 Fine-tune Toto for turbocharged forecasts Amazon EC2 security: How misconfigured and public AMIs expand your cloud attack surface Enable end-to-end visibility into your Java apps with a single command Measure and improve mobile app startup performance with Datadog RUM Evaluating our AI Guard application to improve quality and control cost Identify untested code across every level of your codebase Make use of guardrail metrics and stop babysitting your releases Monitor Versa Networks SD-WAN performance in Datadog How we reduced the size of our Agent Go binaries by up to 77% Improve performance and reliability with APM Recommendations Remediate transitive vulnerabilities faster with Datadog Software Composition Analysis Generate audit-ready vulnerability and compliance reports with Datadog Sheets Monitor Fortinet FortiManager performance in Datadog Improve test coverage across codebases with Datadog Code Coverage Move fast, don’t break things: Consistent testing standards at scale
Monitor ClickHouse query performance with Datadog Database Monitoring
2026-04-02 · via Datadog | The Monitor blog
Sangeeta Shivaji Rao

Sangeeta Shivaji Rao

Mike Peralta

Mike Peralta

ClickHouse is widely used for large-scale analytics, but once it is running in production, it can be difficult to understand how query activity translates into resource usage. Engineers investigating performance issues often struggle to determine which queries consume the most memory, run most frequently, or cause spikes in load. In practice, engineers are left querying system.query_log, tailing server logs, and piecing together information after an incident. While this can show what queries are running at a given moment, it does not provide a consistent way to compare queries across a cluster. It also does not reveal the overall impact of a query or show what it actually costs once it is finished.

Datadog Database Monitoring for ClickHouse, available in Preview, provides a unified view of query performance across both ClickHouse Cloud and self-hosted deployments. It collects aggregated query metrics, captures completed query samples, and surfaces real-time query activity so that teams can identify inefficient queries, investigate incidents, and optimize workloads.

In this post, we’ll cover how Database Monitoring for ClickHouse helps you:

Find your most expensive queries

Understanding query performance at scale requires more than reviewing individual slow queries. Engineers need to compare patterns across the cluster, including how often queries run, how long they take, and how much data they process. Without this context, teams might focus on outliers and miss the queries that drive most resource usage, such as queries that run thousands of times per hour.

Database Monitoring collects aggregated metrics for each normalized query pattern in your ClickHouse environment. This helps engineers evaluate queries by overall impact, not just latency. For example, a moderately slow query that runs frequently can have a greater effect than a single long-running query.

These metrics include execution count within a collection window, total and average duration, memory usage, and I/O activity such as rows and bytes read or written. They also include result set size, which helps teams understand how much data queries return to clients. With this data, teams can identify which query patterns drive the highest cost and prioritize optimization work.

Database Monitoring for ClickHouse brings all this together in one place, as shown in the preceding screen capture. The ClickHouse instance page gives you two complementary views for identifying expensive queries. The stacked bar chart breaks down sessions over time by query pattern. You can scan for spikes in load and hover over individual bars to see which query patterns were active at that moment, making it easy to correlate load spikes with specific queries.

Below the chart, the Queries table ranks query patterns by their current impact. Together, these views let you move beyond “which query is slowest” to “which query costs the most overall,” whether that’s a high-frequency moderate query or a low-frequency heavy one. The Query Metrics view lets you rank queries by the metric that actually matters: the total impact on the system. This way, you can optimize the right queries first, not just the most frequent or the slowest ones.

Reconstruct what happened during an incident

When performance issues occur, aggregated metrics are not enough. Engineers also need to understand the resource profile of each query execution—specifically, how individual queries performed at a specific point in time. To construct this profile, teams might resort to querying system.query_log across each node in the cluster, filtering through large volumes of entries, and correlating timestamps. On busy clusters, retention settings may even remove the data needed to perform a full investigation.

Database Monitoring captures completed query samples for each execution and stores them independently of ClickHouse logs. Teams can view these samples across multiple instances and clusters in a single place, which makes it easier to investigate issues that span distributed environments.

Each query sample includes detailed execution context, including query text (with sensitive values hidden), execution duration, memory usage, and data read and written. It also includes result set size and metadata such as user, database, tables accessed, and query type. All this context gives teams a clear picture of how queries interact with the entire system.

A completed query sample showing execution duration, memory usage, and event attributes.

With this data, engineers can also reconstruct incidents after they occur. They can identify which queries caused spikes in memory usage, determine whether workload changes contributed to degraded performance, and trace issues to specific users or services. Because Datadog retains this data, teams are not limited by ClickHouse log retention settings.

Get started with ClickHouse Database Monitoring

Database Monitoring for ClickHouse gives engineers a full, unified view of query performance, helping teams reduce costs, improve performance, and respond more effectively to incidents. Teams can view aggregated query metrics, completed query samples, and active queries in real time across all ClickHouse deployments in one place, alongside the rest of their Datadog observability data.

Database Monitoring for ClickHouse is available in Preview for both ClickHouse Cloud and self-hosted deployments. For setup details, see the ClickHouse Database Monitoring documentation or request access on the Preview page.

If you’re new to Datadog, sign up for a 14-day free trial.