惯性聚合 高效追踪和阅读你感兴趣的博客、新闻、科技资讯
阅读原文 在惯性聚合中打开

推荐订阅源

F
Full Disclosure
Recorded Future
Recorded Future
T
Tenable Blog
S
Securelist
C
CERT Recently Published Vulnerability Notes
T
Threatpost
S
Schneier on Security
A
Arctic Wolf
The Hacker News
The Hacker News
C
CXSECURITY Database RSS Feed - CXSecurity.com
Know Your Adversary
Know Your Adversary
P
Privacy International News Feed
Threat Intelligence Blog | Flashpoint
Threat Intelligence Blog | Flashpoint
The Register - Security
The Register - Security
Cisco Talos Blog
Cisco Talos Blog
AWS News Blog
AWS News Blog
K
Kaspersky official blog
T
True Tiger Recordings
T
Threat Research - Cisco Blogs
V
Vulnerabilities – Threatpost
P
Palo Alto Networks Blog
T
The Exploit Database - CXSecurity.com
小众软件
小众软件
B
Blog
Cyber Security Advisories - MS-ISAC
Cyber Security Advisories - MS-ISAC
Microsoft Azure Blog
Microsoft Azure Blog
Cyberwarzone
Cyberwarzone
C
Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency CISA
T
Tor Project blog
Spread Privacy
Spread Privacy
Malwarebytes
Malwarebytes
P
Proofpoint News Feed
F
Fox-IT International blog
F
Fortinet All Blogs
P
Privacy & Cybersecurity Law Blog
G
GRAHAM CLULEY
量子位
Latest news
Latest news
OSCHINA 社区最新新闻
OSCHINA 社区最新新闻
博客园 - 叶小钗
Project Zero
Project Zero
T
Tailwind CSS Blog
N
Netflix TechBlog - Medium
Martin Fowler
Martin Fowler
IntelliJ IDEA : IntelliJ IDEA – the Leading IDE for Professional Development in Java and Kotlin | The JetBrains Blog
IntelliJ IDEA : IntelliJ IDEA – the Leading IDE for Professional Development in Java and Kotlin | The JetBrains Blog
I
Intezer
博客园_首页
腾讯CDC
H
Hackread – Cybersecurity News, Data Breaches, AI and More
D
Darknet – Hacking Tools, Hacker News & Cyber Security

Datadog | The Monitor blog

Introducing this year’s new Datadog Ambassadors and the new Datadog Champions program Measure the real impact of AI coding tools on software delivery with Datadog AI Impact How to measure developer experience (DevEx) in the AI era Improve API authentication detection with Datadog Securing AI agents: Why guardrail placement is a key design decision Project and manage cloud spend with Datadog budget forecasting How to audit and clean up monitors effectively How we made a SQL query optimization agent 59% more accurate using autoresearch and LLM Observability Reduce CVE noise with OpenVEX assessments in Datadog Diagnose slow PostgreSQL queries faster with explain plan correlation Explore Datadog metrics with Natural Language Queries Attribute AI costs across providers with Datadog Cloud Cost Management Simplify micro-frontend observability with Datadog RUM Toto 2.0: Time series forecasting enters the scaling era Diagnose and resolve database performance issues faster with Database Investigator Datadog for Government achieves FedRAMP® High certification Analyze cloud costs with flexible spreadsheets in Datadog Sheets Inside Datadog’s AI Research Lab: Meet two PhD candidates behind Toto Connect triage and investigation in a single workflow with Datadog Cloud SIEM Monitor and optimize Supabase query performance with Datadog Database Monitoring This Month in Datadog - April 2026 Add dynamically updating context to logs with Reference Tables and Observability Pipelines Introducing ARFBench: A time series question-answering benchmark based on real incidents Test network paths with TCP, UDP, and ICMP in Datadog The product signal latency gap slowing your growth How to investigate cloud credential compromise with Bits AI Security Analyst Evaluate, optimize, and secure your Google Cloud AI stack with Datadog Bringing observability data hosting to the UK on AWS Identify and fix code issues faster with Datadog’s Azure DevOps Source Code integration Steganography at scale: Embedding share URLs in Datadog widget screenshots Every team should be A/B testing Centralize observability management with Datadog Governance Console Spotting CI/CD misconfigurations before the bots do: Securing GitHub Actions with Datadog IaC Security Route OTel data from AI apps to ClickHouse and Datadog using Observability Pipelines Manage service tracing across hosts with Single Step Instrumentation rules Offline evaluation for AI agents: Best practices Detect runtime threats in Python Lambda functions with Datadog AAP Introducing our open source AI-native SAST Instrument and monitor Boomi integration flows with OpenTelemetry and Datadog Not all index scans are equal: How we cut query latency by over 99% Platform engineering metrics: What to measure and what to ignore Integrate Recorded Future threat intelligence with Datadog Cloud SIEM CI/CD security: threat modeling using a MITRE-style threat matrix CI/CD security: How to secure your GitHub ecosystem Ingress NGINX is EOL: A practical guide for migrating to Kubernetes Gateway API How we built a real-world evaluation platform for autonomous SRE agents at scale Operating agentic AI with Amazon Bedrock AgentCore and Datadog LLM Observability: Lessons from NTT DATA Introducing the Datadog Code Security MCP Capture and analyze custom heatmaps in Session Replay Understand session replays faster with AI summaries and smart chapters Monitor ClickHouse query performance with Datadog Database Monitoring How we designed empathetic alert sounds for on-call engineers Search and act across Datadog to resolve issues faster with Bits Assistant Measure the business impact of every product change with Datadog Experiments Analyzing round trip query latency Configuring JavaScript caches for better performance Introducing Bits AI Dev Agent for Code Security Datadog achieves ISO 42001 certification for responsible AI Monitor Nutanix clusters, hosts, and VMs with Datadog Monitor Juniper Mist in Datadog A new Host Map for modern infrastructure When upserts don't update but still write: Debugging Postgres performance at scale Annotate traces to improve LLM quality with Datadog LLM Observability What's new in Cloud SIEM: AI-powered investigations, enhanced threat intelligence, and scalable security operations Explore Kubernetes with native OpenTelemetry data Monitor Oracle Fusion Cloud Applications with Datadog Announcing the Datadog Terraform provider v4.0.0 Scaling Kubernetes workloads on custom metrics How to design cloud environments for AI-powered threat analysis Monitor Aruba Central in Datadog How we centralize and remediate risks with Datadog Case Management Accelerate incident response with Datadog and ServiceNow Monitor your application and network load balancer logs Understanding Karpenter architecture for Kubernetes autoscaling Tools for collecting metrics and logs from Karpenter Monitor Karpenter with Datadog What your product data is actually saying Key metrics for monitoring Karpenter Securing Datadog's platform in the AI age: The role of observability data Closing the verification loop, Part 2: Fully autonomous optimization Closing the verification loop: Observability-driven harnesses for building with agents When an AI agent came knocking: Catching malicious contributions in Datadog’s open source repos Four ways engineering teams use the Datadog MCP Server to power AI agents Approaching your observability migration with the right mindset Meet the new Bits AI SRE: Deeper reasoning, twice as fast Designing MCP tools for agents: Lessons from building Datadog's MCP server Key learnings from the 2026 State of DevSecOps study Use plain English to query your multi-cloud infrastructure in Resource Catalog Simplifying troubleshooting across the user journey with Datadog Synthetic Monitoring Protect your OCI resources with Datadog Cloud Security This Month in Datadog - February 2026 Fine-tune Toto for turbocharged forecasts Amazon EC2 security: How misconfigured and public AMIs expand your cloud attack surface Enable end-to-end visibility into your Java apps with a single command Measure and improve mobile app startup performance with Datadog RUM Evaluating our AI Guard application to improve quality and control cost Identify untested code across every level of your codebase Make use of guardrail metrics and stop babysitting your releases Monitor Versa Networks SD-WAN performance in Datadog How we reduced the size of our Agent Go binaries by up to 77%
Turn developer feedback into operational insight with Datadog Forms and Sheets
2026-04-22 · via Datadog | The Monitor blog

Engineering organizations rely heavily on developer feedback to improve internal platforms, tooling, and processes. However, that feedback is often scattered across disconnected systems such as external forms, spreadsheets, chat threads, and documentation tools. Because these systems are separate from operational data, teams struggle to correlate developer sentiment with measurable performance or reliability outcomes. This disconnect makes it difficult to prioritize improvements or identify systemic issues early.

To help solve these challenges, you can use Datadog Forms and Datadog Sheets in the same environment where your teams already operate. Forms enables you to create structured surveys and view feedback directly within Datadog, and Sheets helps you analyze responses alongside telemetry data and contextual metadata by using a familiar spreadsheet interface. By combining these capabilities, you can move from fragmented feedback to clear insight that you can act on.

In this post, we’ll explain how you can use Forms and Sheets together to:

Collect structured feedback directly within Datadog

Feedback collection is most effective when it fits naturally into your team’s existing workflows. With Datadog Forms, you can gather input without relying on external tools that separate your data and processes. You can solicit feedback as part of a postmortem, after specific events (like incident resolution or deployment), or on a scheduled basis.

For example, let’s say that you’re creating a quarterly developer experience survey to understand how engineers rate internal tooling, deployment workflows, and overall satisfaction. Using Forms, you can build surveys with a range of field types, including dynamic dropdowns, rating scales, prioritization lists, calendar pickers, and image uploads. You can also apply validation rules that enforce email address formats or restrict invalid characters to help ensure that responses are structured and consistent.

Example of a Datadog Forms survey that collects structured feedback from developers.

When your form is ready, you can distribute it internally by sharing a link in the Datadog Internal Developer Portal or in your internal documentation or chat tools. You can also add forms directly to dashboards, so engineers can submit feedback without leaving the tools they’re already using. Another option is to use Datadog Workflow Automation to distribute forms and issue automated reminders to respond. Additionally, you can share forms externally with users who don’t have a Datadog account, whether they’re inside or outside your organization.

Forms supports anonymous responses so that engineers can share candid input about tooling or processes without attribution concerns. You can also configure a form to close automatically on a set date, keeping your dataset clean for time-bounded surveys like quarterly reviews.

Review and act on feedback as you receive it

When feedback starts coming in, you can use Forms to review responses and manage access directly within the platform. You maintain full role-based access control (RBAC) over who can access the responses. Because the form lives within Datadog, responses are captured as data that you can filter and query instead of as isolated documents or attachments. This approach makes it easier for you to revisit and analyze the feedback later. You can also use form submissions to trigger automated workflows, such as creating cases or notifying teams, so that you can act on feedback as soon as it’s submitted.

Responses come with AI-generated summaries and built-in visualizations, such as counts for categorical fields and averages for rating scales, to help you quickly understand developer sentiment. These insights help you spot patterns and outliers without having to do manual analysis.

A built-in view of a pie chart in Datadog Forms that shows developer responses to a question about their workflow.

For deeper evaluation, the Insights tab automatically synthesizes responses into an AI-generated overview that includes sentiment by role, key themes, notable quotes, correlations, and prioritized takeaways. You can present these findings directly as slides or download them locally to share results without rebuilding anything in a separate tool.

An Insights Overview page that shows total responses by role over time.

The value of the feedback that you collect increases when you can analyze it in context. Datadog Sheets enables you to work with form responses as structured data that can be queried, transformed, and enriched alongside other Datadog data sources.

You can open form responses directly in Sheets, where they become part of a dynamic dataset. From there, you can create calculated columns to derive new metrics, such as an overall satisfaction score based on multiple survey questions. This approach helps you standardize how you measure developer experience across teams and time periods.

With Sheets, you can also enrich your data with additional metadata by using lookups. For example, you can associate responses with team ownership, service boundaries, or developer roles. This added context makes it possible to segment feedback in meaningful ways, such as comparing satisfaction across teams or identifying whether specific services correlate with lower developer experience scores.

A menu in Datadog Sheets for the configuration of a new lookup for the developer experience survey.

Because the data remains live within Datadog, your analysis stays up to date without manual exports or periodic refreshes. You can continuously monitor feedback trends as new responses are submitted, rather than relying on static snapshots.

As your dataset grows, it becomes important to summarize and visualize feedback in a way that reveals patterns. Datadog Sheets provides tools such as pivot tables and charts to help you aggregate responses and identify trends across dimensions like team, time period, and tooling area.

Using pivot tables, you can group responses by attributes such as role and calculate metrics like average satisfaction scores or response counts. With this information, you can compare how different parts of your organization experience internal tools and processes. You can also analyze how these metrics change over time by introducing date-based groupings or rolling windows.

To make these insights more accessible, you can add visualizations such as top lists or pie charts directly within Sheets. These visuals help you quickly communicate trends, such as improvements after a tooling change or regressions that result from a new deployment process. By combining tabular analysis with visual summaries, you can more effectively interpret feedback and share findings across your organization.

A Datadog Sheets pivot table, accompanied by a list that summarizes overall rating by role and a pie chart that summarizes overall rating by quarter.

Start converting feedback into actionable insight with Datadog

Datadog Forms and Datadog Sheets provide a structured way to collect developer feedback and analyze it over time. By embedding feedback workflows directly within Datadog and enabling spreadsheet-style analysis in the same platform, you can transform scattered input into actionable operational insight. To learn more, check out the Forms documentation and the Sheets documentation.

If you’re new to Datadog, you can sign up for a 14-day free trial to get started with Forms and Sheets.