惯性聚合 高效追踪和阅读你感兴趣的博客、新闻、科技资讯
阅读原文 在惯性聚合中打开

推荐订阅源

N
News | PayPal Newsroom
P
Proofpoint News Feed
Cyberwarzone
Cyberwarzone
C
Cisco Blogs
SecWiki News
SecWiki News
Know Your Adversary
Know Your Adversary
cs.AI updates on arXiv.org
cs.AI updates on arXiv.org
Vercel News
Vercel News
freeCodeCamp Programming Tutorials: Python, JavaScript, Git & More
罗磊的独立博客
NISL@THU
NISL@THU
WordPress大学
WordPress大学
Hacker News - Newest:
Hacker News - Newest: "LLM"
T
Threat Research - Cisco Blogs
AI
AI
Simon Willison's Weblog
Simon Willison's Weblog
Security Archives - TechRepublic
Security Archives - TechRepublic
有赞技术团队
有赞技术团队
L
LINUX DO - 热门话题
Hacker News: Ask HN
Hacker News: Ask HN
V
V2EX
G
GRAHAM CLULEY
TaoSecurity Blog
TaoSecurity Blog
Hugging Face - Blog
Hugging Face - Blog
D
Darknet – Hacking Tools, Hacker News & Cyber Security
F
Fortinet All Blogs
博客园 - 叶小钗
博客园 - 三生石上(FineUI控件)
云风的 BLOG
云风的 BLOG
Recorded Future
Recorded Future
Latest news
Latest news
The Hacker News
The Hacker News
aimingoo的专栏
aimingoo的专栏
T
Troy Hunt's Blog
S
Schneier on Security
I
Intezer
Google DeepMind News
Google DeepMind News
A
Arctic Wolf
Apple Machine Learning Research
Apple Machine Learning Research
Threat Intelligence Blog | Flashpoint
Threat Intelligence Blog | Flashpoint
T
Threatpost
爱范儿
爱范儿
The Register - Security
The Register - Security
S
SegmentFault 最新的问题
Blog — PlanetScale
Blog — PlanetScale
博客园 - 聂微东
宝玉的分享
宝玉的分享
Recent Commits to openclaw:main
Recent Commits to openclaw:main
美团技术团队
B
Blog RSS Feed

Datadog | The Monitor blog

Introducing our open source AI-native SAST Instrument and monitor Boomi integration flows with OpenTelemetry and Datadog Not all index scans are equal: How we cut query latency by over 99% Platform engineering metrics: What to measure and what to ignore Integrate Recorded Future threat intelligence with Datadog Cloud SIEM CI/CD security: threat modeling using a MITRE-style threat matrix CI/CD security: How to secure your GitHub ecosystem Ingress NGINX is EOL: A practical guide for migrating to Kubernetes Gateway API Operating agentic AI with Amazon Bedrock AgentCore and Datadog LLM Observability: Lessons from NTT DATA Introducing the Datadog Code Security MCP Capture and analyze custom heatmaps in Session Replay Understand session replays faster with AI summaries and smart chapters Monitor ClickHouse query performance with Datadog Database Monitoring How we designed empathetic alert sounds for on-call engineers Search and act across Datadog to resolve issues faster with Bits Assistant Measure the business impact of every product change with Datadog Experiments Analyzing round trip query latency Configuring JavaScript caches for better performance Introducing Bits AI Dev Agent for Code Security Datadog achieves ISO 42001 certification for responsible AI Monitor Nutanix clusters, hosts, and VMs with Datadog Monitor Juniper Mist in Datadog A new Host Map for modern infrastructure Annotate traces to improve LLM quality with Datadog LLM Observability What’s new in Cloud SIEM: AI-powered investigations, enhanced threat intelligence, and scalable security operations Explore Kubernetes with native OpenTelemetry data Monitor Oracle Fusion Cloud Applications with Datadog Announcing the Datadog Terraform provider v4.0.0 Scaling Kubernetes workloads on custom metrics How to design cloud environments for AI-powered threat analysis Monitor Aruba Central in Datadog How we centralize and remediate risks with Datadog Case Management Accelerate incident response with Datadog and ServiceNow Monitor your application and network load balancer logs Understanding Karpenter architecture for Kubernetes autoscaling Tools for collecting metrics and logs from Karpenter Monitor Karpenter with Datadog What your product data is actually saying Key metrics for monitoring Karpenter Securing Datadog’s platform in the AI age: The role of observability data Four ways engineering teams use the Datadog MCP Server to power AI agents Approaching your observability migration with the right mindset Meet the new Bits AI SRE: Deeper reasoning, twice as fast Key learnings from the 2026 State of DevSecOps study Use plain English to query your multi-cloud infrastructure in Resource Catalog Simplifying troubleshooting across the user journey with Datadog Synthetic Monitoring Protect your OCI resources with Datadog Cloud Security This Month in Datadog - February 2026 Amazon EC2 security: How misconfigured and public AMIs expand your cloud attack surface Enable end-to-end visibility into your Java apps with a single command Measure and improve mobile app startup performance with Datadog RUM Evaluating our AI Guard application to improve quality and control cost Identify untested code across every level of your codebase Make use of guardrail metrics and stop babysitting your releases Monitor Versa Networks SD-WAN performance in Datadog Improve performance and reliability with APM Recommendations Remediate transitive vulnerabilities faster with Datadog Software Composition Analysis Generate audit-ready vulnerability and compliance reports with Datadog Sheets Monitor Fortinet FortiManager performance in Datadog Improve test coverage across codebases with Datadog Code Coverage Move fast, don’t break things: Consistent testing standards at scale Enrich logs with ServiceNow CMDB context before routing to any SIEM or logging tool Monitor Lustre with Datadog Make faster, better product decisions with Datadog Product Analytics Surface and remediate runtime posture issues with Workload Protection Findings Protect agentic AI applications with Datadog AI Guard How to optimize JavaScript code with CSS Trace Google Pub/Sub workloads in Cloud Run with Datadog Detect human names in logs with ML in Sensitive Data Scanner How we cut our NLQ agent debugging time from hours to minutes with LLM Observability Debug PostgreSQL query latency faster with EXPLAIN ANALYZE in Datadog Database Monitoring Datadog acquires Propolis Unify and correlate frontend and backend data with retention filters Scale compliance across global frameworks with Datadog Cloud Security Monitor Arista VeloCloud SD-WAN performance with Datadog Building reliable dashboard agents with Datadog LLM Observability Simplify log collection and aggregation for MSSPs with Datadog Observability Pipelines Mitigation for Node.js denial-of-service vulnerability affecting Datadog APM Automate flaky test fixes with the Bits AI Dev Agent and Test Optimization How we built an AI SRE agent that investigates like a team of engineers Datadog integrations 2025 recap: Observability for AI, security, and hybrid cloud Design effective executive dashboards with Datadog Implement dbt data quality checks with dbt-expectations Bring faster visibility into AWS Lambda functions with remote instrumentation Troubleshoot faster with the GitLab Source Code integration in Datadog How Cambia Health Solutions saved $30,000 monthly with Cloud Cost Management and the Datadog Resource Catalog Normalize any logs for Cloud SIEM with Datadog's OCSF processor Optimizing Datadog at scale: Cost-efficient observability at Zendesk Detect, diagnose, and resolve network issues easily with CNM Network Health Connect engineering errors to user impact in early-stage products Cilium configuration for Kubernetes operations at scale Designing feedback loops for progressive delivery Ship features faster and safer with Datadog Feature Flags Choosing the right OpenTelemetry Collector distribution Route your monitor alerts with Datadog monitor notification rules Automate Cloud SIEM investigations with Bits AI Security Analyst Cloud threat detection: How to identify risky activity across control and data planes Collecting Kafka performance metrics Monitoring Kafka with Datadog Monitoring Kafka performance metrics
Turn developer feedback into operational insight with Datadog Forms and Sheets | Datadog
Reva Ranka · 2026-04-22 · via Datadog | The Monitor blog

Engineering organizations rely heavily on developer feedback to improve internal platforms, tooling, and processes. However, that feedback is often scattered across disconnected systems such as external forms, spreadsheets, chat threads, and documentation tools. Because these systems are separate from operational data, teams struggle to correlate developer sentiment with measurable performance or reliability outcomes. This disconnect makes it difficult to prioritize improvements or identify systemic issues early.

To help solve these challenges, you can use Datadog Forms and Datadog Sheets in the same environment where your teams already operate. Forms enables you to create structured surveys and view feedback directly within Datadog, and Sheets helps you analyze responses alongside telemetry data and contextual metadata by using a familiar spreadsheet interface. By combining these capabilities, you can move from fragmented feedback to clear insight that you can act on.

In this post, we’ll explain how you can use Forms and Sheets together to:

  • Collect structured feedback directly within Datadog

  • Review and act on feedback as you receive it

  • Analyze responses over time and enrich them with useful metadata

  • Aggregate data and identify trends

Collect structured feedback directly within Datadog

Feedback collection is most effective when it fits naturally into your team’s existing workflows. With Datadog Forms, you can gather input without relying on external tools that separate your data and processes. You can solicit feedback as part of a postmortem, after specific events (like incident resolution or deployment), or on a scheduled basis.

For example, let’s say that you’re creating a quarterly developer experience survey to understand how engineers rate internal tooling, deployment workflows, and overall satisfaction. Using Forms, you can build surveys with a range of field types, including dynamic dropdowns, rating scales, prioritization lists, calendar pickers, and image uploads. You can also apply validation rules that enforce email address formats or restrict invalid characters to help ensure that responses are structured and consistent.

Example of a Datadog Forms survey that collects structured feedback from developers.

When your form is ready, you can distribute it internally by sharing a link in the Datadog Internal Developer Portal or in your internal documentation or chat tools. You can also add forms directly to dashboards, so engineers can submit feedback without leaving the tools they’re already using. Another option is to use Datadog Workflow Automation to distribute forms and issue automated reminders to respond. Additionally, you can share forms externally with users who don’t have a Datadog account, whether they’re inside or outside your organization.

Forms supports anonymous responses so that engineers can share candid input about tooling or processes without attribution concerns. You can also configure a form to close automatically on a set date, keeping your dataset clean for time-bounded surveys like quarterly reviews.

Review and act on feedback as you receive it

When feedback starts coming in, you can use Forms to review responses and manage access directly within the platform. You maintain full role-based access control (RBAC) over who can access the responses. Because the form lives within Datadog, responses are captured as data that you can filter and query instead of as isolated documents or attachments. This approach makes it easier for you to revisit and analyze the feedback later. You can also use form submissions to trigger automated workflows, such as creating cases or notifying teams, so that you can act on feedback as soon as it’s submitted.

Responses come with AI-generated summaries and built-in visualizations, such as counts for categorical fields and averages for rating scales, to help you quickly understand developer sentiment. These insights help you spot patterns and outliers without having to do manual analysis.

A built-in view of a pie chart in Datadog Forms that shows developer responses to a question about their workflow.

For deeper evaluation, the Insights tab automatically synthesizes responses into an AI-generated overview that includes sentiment by role, key themes, notable quotes, correlations, and prioritized takeaways. You can present these findings directly as slides or download them locally to share results without rebuilding anything in a separate tool.

An Insights Overview page that shows total responses by role over time.

The value of the feedback that you collect increases when you can analyze it in context. Datadog Sheets enables you to work with form responses as structured data that can be queried, transformed, and enriched alongside other Datadog data sources.

You can open form responses directly in Sheets, where they become part of a dynamic dataset. From there, you can create calculated columns to derive new metrics, such as an overall satisfaction score based on multiple survey questions. This approach helps you standardize how you measure developer experience across teams and time periods.

With Sheets, you can also enrich your data with additional metadata by using lookups. For example, you can associate responses with team ownership, service boundaries, or developer roles. This added context makes it possible to segment feedback in meaningful ways, such as comparing satisfaction across teams or identifying whether specific services correlate with lower developer experience scores.

A menu in Datadog Sheets for the configuration of a new lookup for the developer experience survey.

Because the data remains live within Datadog, your analysis stays up to date without manual exports or periodic refreshes. You can continuously monitor feedback trends as new responses are submitted, rather than relying on static snapshots.

As your dataset grows, it becomes important to summarize and visualize feedback in a way that reveals patterns. Datadog Sheets provides tools such as pivot tables and charts to help you aggregate responses and identify trends across dimensions like team, time period, and tooling area.

Using pivot tables, you can group responses by attributes such as role and calculate metrics like average satisfaction scores or response counts. With this information, you can compare how different parts of your organization experience internal tools and processes. You can also analyze how these metrics change over time by introducing date-based groupings or rolling windows.

To make these insights more accessible, you can add visualizations such as top lists or pie charts directly within Sheets. These visuals help you quickly communicate trends, such as improvements after a tooling change or regressions that result from a new deployment process. By combining tabular analysis with visual summaries, you can more effectively interpret feedback and share findings across your organization.

A Datadog Sheets pivot table, accompanied by a list that summarizes overall rating by role and a pie chart that summarizes overall rating by quarter.

Start converting feedback into actionable insight with Datadog

Datadog Forms and Datadog Sheets provide a structured way to collect developer feedback and analyze it over time. By embedding feedback workflows directly within Datadog and enabling spreadsheet-style analysis in the same platform, you can transform scattered input into actionable operational insight. To learn more, check out the Forms documentation and the Sheets documentation.

If you’re new to Datadog, you can sign up for a 14-day free trial to get started with Forms and Sheets.